[1. Call to Order] [00:00:12] >>> WELCOME, EVERYBODY. WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING TO ORDER, CITY OF PARKLAND. TODAY IS TUESDAY, JUNE 24TH, AT 6:00 P.M. EVERYBODY PLEASE RISE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. >> THANK YOU. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. [4. Approval of Minutes ] >> THANK YOU. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MAY 8TH, 2025 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES? >> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> SECOND. >> SECOND, OKAY. JOEL, MOTION. [5. Comments from the Public on Non-Agenda Items ] >> ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. >> THANK YOU. >> AT THIS TIME I'M GOING TO OPEN THE MEETING TO ANYBODY THAT IS HERE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON ANY NON- AGENDA ITEM. SEEING NONE, CLOSED TO THE -- OH, I APOLOGIZE. STEP UP, IF YOU WOULD. AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. >> IS THIS THING WORKING? >> YES, IT IS. 6761 NORTHWEST 117TH AVENUE IN PARKLAND. >> WHAT IS YOUR TOPIC, WHETHER OR NOT YOU'RE INQUIRING WHETHER OR NOT IT'S A PUBLIC AGENDA ITEM THIS EVENING? >> IT HAS TO DO WITH THE REZONING OF THE GOLF COURSE BEHIND MY HOUSE. >> WE'LL BE VISITING ON THAT TONIGHT. >> I'LL WAIT UNTIL THAT TIME. >> PERFECT. >> VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. >> FOR YOUR RECORD, ADVERTISEMENT WENT OUT TO ALL THE RESIDENTS NEARBY. >> ANY OTHER INPUT FROM ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC? [6. Comments by the Chair] SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE IT TO THE PUBLIC. [7. Approval of the Agenda ] MY COMMENTS ARE JUST TO WELCOME EVERYBODY THIS EVENING. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY CHANGES TO THIS EVENING'S AGENDA? >> THERE ARE NONE, MR. CHAIR. >> THANK YOU. SO SINCE THERE ARE NONE, WE DON'T HAVE TO MAKE ANY MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA, IS THAT ACCURATE? OKAY, YOU CAN'T MAKE A MOTION, BUT I'LL LOOK FOR ONE TO BE MADE ON BEHALF OF YOU. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. >> IS THERE A SECOND? [8.A. Resolution 2025-045: Parkland Royale Phase II Sales Center, Models and Temporary Signage ] >> SECOND. >> SECOND BY JORDANA. >> ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. >> I'M GOING TO OPEN UP ITEM NUMBER 8 AND READ INTO THE RECORD ITEM A, RESOLUTION 2025 PARKLAND ROYALE, CENTER AND TEMPORARY SIGNAGE. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA, APPROVING A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AND COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A SALES CENTER AND ASSOCIATED MODEL ROW, INCLUDING APPROVAL OF ALL MODEL HOMES DESIGN OPTIONS AND TEMPORARY SIGNAGE AND REVISIONS TO THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, STREET NAMES AND INTERIOR LOT LINES FOR LOTS NUMBER 29, 60, 135 AND 147 TO MEET MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS AND APPROVING THE VACATION OF RESTRICTED PLAT DEDICATION LANGUAGE SPECIFIC TO LOTS 29, 60, 135 AND 147 TO ALLOW FOR THE INCREASE IN LOT SIZE FOR SUCH LOTS TO MEET MINIMUM SITE PLAN STANDARDS FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE PARKLAND ROYALE PHASE II COMMUNITY WEST OF BISHOP PIT ROAD AS PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, ALSO KNOWN AS SPA-24- 003, AND 2025-20AB, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. I'LL TRY TO BE MORE CONCISE IN OUR TITLES GOING FORWARD SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO USE AS MUCH LUNG POWER THERE. MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, KATELYN FORBES WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I'LL GIVE A BRIEF INTRODUCTION REGARDING THE PROJECT AND APPLICATIONS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TONIGHT AND THEN THE APPLICANT IS HERE WITH A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION TO SHARE GRAPHICS AND GIVE ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND. JUST SO YOU ALL KNOW, WE DO HAVE BRIAN HERBERT WITH US TONIGHT, AS WELL AS OUR CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARBORIST IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM. THEY'LL BE AVAILABLE AS WELL. SO THE PRIMARY APPLICATIONS [00:05:02] BEFORE YOU TONIGHT REALLY TO THE PARKLAND ROYALE PHASE II PROJECT, IF YOU REMEMBER SEVERAL YEARS BACK NOW, THE CITY APPROVED THE SITE PLAN OUT IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE CITY. SO THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN MOVING FORWARD TO SUBMIT THE APPLICATIONS THAT ARE NECESSARY TO ACTUALLY START THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. SO TONIGHT BEFORE YOU ARE A MIXTURE OF APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING A SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD APPLICATIONS AND THAT WILL ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THEIR TEMPORARY SALES CENTER AND THEIR TEMPORARY SIGNAGE, AS WELL AS THE MODEL ROW, WHICH DOES INCLUDE FOUR MODEL HOMES THAT WILL BE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE TEMPORARY SALES CENTER. THE AGENDA PACKET ALSO INCLUDES APPROVAL OF ALL OF THE MODEL HOME DESIGN OPTIONS FOR BOTH THE 53 AND 63 FOOT LOTS. YOU'LL SEE IN THE BIG BOOKS IN THE BACKUP WITH ALL THE PRETTY PICTURES THERE, THERE'S FOUR MODELS FOR EACH. THE 53 AND THE 63 FOOT MODELS, EACH OF THOSE HAVE FOUR DIFFERENT ELEVATION OPTIONS, AND THAT'S TO TRY TO MEET THE CITY'S ANTI- MONOTONY STANDARDS. ALSO INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION ARE SOME SITE- WIDE CLEANUP OPTIONS, SITE- WIDE CLEANUP THAT HAD TO TAKE PLACE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE PENDING LANDSCAPE COMMENTS, SO THEY WORKED WITH PATTY ON CHANGING SOME OF THE MATERIALS AND ADDRESSING SOME OF THE PENDING COMMENTS THAT WERE STILL OUTSTANDING FROM JILL KOE WEEKEND AT . THE LAST ITEM IS THE RESTRICTIVE PLAT LANGUAGE AND ALL THIS DOES IS VACATE THE LANGUAGE ON THE PLAT. IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH PLATS, YOU MIGHT SEE A LOT OF LANGUAGE ON THE FRONT FACE AND THERE'S DEDICATION LANGUAGE USUALLY THERE THAT SAYS WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH THE DIFFERENT TRACTS, HOW MUCH YOU CAN BUILD ON THE OVERALL PLAT, ESSENTIALLY UPON REVIEW WHEN THEY STARTED SUBMITTING THE APPLICATIONS THAT ARE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT THERE WERE FOUR LOTS THAT WERE SLIGHTLY DEFICIENT IN THEIR TOTAL LOT AREA, WHEN THEY STARTED TO ROUND OUT THE CORNER CLIPS OF THOSE LOTS. SO THOSE FOUR LOTS WERE DEFICIENT ANYWHERE FROM ONE SQUARE FOOT TO ABOUT 32 SQUARE FEET, SO THEY FORTUNATELY WERE ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE TRACTS, SO THEY'RE THROUGH THE PROCESS, THE VACATION PROCESS, THEY'LL BE TAKING ANYWHERE FROM ONE SQUARE FOOT TO 32 SQUARE FEET FROM THE ADJACENT TRACTS AND ADDING THEM TO MAKE SURE THE LOT SIZES MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARDS THAT WERE APPROVED. THERE IS NO MINIMUM OPEN SPACE CRITERIA, PER SE, FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT, SO THERE'S NO CONCERNS FROM COMPLIANCE FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE. IT'S REALLY A CLEANUP ITEM THAT WE ASK THEM TO ADDRESS AT THIS POINT. I'LL TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT TO GIVE YOU THEIR PRESENTATION. >> VERY GOOD, THANK YOU. WELCOME. >> GOOD EVENING. 200 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD, FORT LAUDERDALE, ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. AND WE HAVE SOME SLIDES TO SHOW. I KNOW YOU KNOW THE SITE BUT I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO START OUT WITH THAT. KEEP IN MIND THAT ALL OF THE PREVIOUS APPROVALS FOR THIS PROPERTY WERE DONE FOR THE APPLICANT AT THAT TIME, BRIAN TUTTLE. MY CLIENT CLOSED ON THIS PROPERTY LAST YEAR, THE SITE WAS APPROVED, IT WAS RECORDED. OUR JOB IS NOW TO DEAL WITH SPECIFIC LOCATIONS WITHIN THE PROPERTY. IN FACT, IF YOU GO OUT THERE TODAY YOU'LL SEE THEY'VE ALREADY BEEN BUILDING THE ROADS AND EVERYTHING BECAUSE ALL OF THAT WAS APPROVED. WHAT WE HAVE TO DO NOW IS THE SALES CENTER, THE CLUBHOUSE, THE ENTRY FEATURE, THE MODEL ROW AND THE MODELS. NOW, TONIGHT ON THE AGENDA IS THE SALES CENTER, THE MODEL ROW AND THE MODELS. THE ENTRY FEATURE AND CLUBHOUSE ARE STILL UNDER REVIEW AT DRC AND WILL BE HERE AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING ONCE WE FINISH WITH THE DRC PROCESS. WE HAVE THESE ITEMS FOR TONIGHT. SO, AGAIN, THE PROPERTY WAS A THREE-UNIT PER ACRE LAND USE, WITH THE 77 PLUS ACRES GROSS. IT COULD HAVE GENERATED 230 HOMES, IT'S 205 HOMES. THAT'S WHAT THE SITE PLAN WAS APPROVED FOR IN 2021 AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING, COMPLYING WITH THAT APPROVED SITE PLAN. SO THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, AND YOU SEE IN THE DIFFERENT SHADING WHERE THE 63 BY 130 FOOT LOTS ARE AND WHERE THE 53 BY 120 FOOT LOTS ARE. AGAIN, IF YOU WERE TO GO OUT TODAY, YOU WOULD SEE THE ROADS SHOWN HERE ARE ALMOST FINISHED, THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORK IS DONE. AGAIN, NOT BUILDING ANY HOUSES YET BECAUSE WE STILL HAVE TO GET THEM APPROVED THROUGH THE PROCESS WE'RE WORKING ON TONIGHT. SO AS WAS MENTIONED EARLIER, FOUR MODELS AND FOUR OPTIONS FOR EACH MODEL FOR THE 53 FOOT, AND FOUR MODELS AND FOUR OPTIONS EACH FOR THE 63 FOOT, SO 32 TOTAL ELEVATIONS BETWEEN ALL [00:10:06] OF THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF LOTS. THE SALE MODEL ROW IS FOUR LOTS AS MENTIONED, THE SALES TRAILER WILL SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN. AND ALSO THE ISSUE WITH THOSE LOTS THAT MRS. FORBES WAS TALKING ABOUT EARLIER. THESE ARE THE ARCHITECTURAL MODELS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AND WANT ME TO STOP OR GO BACK, JUST LET ME KNOW AND I'LL DO IT. SO THIS IS THE FIRST ONE OF THE FOUR, THE DELLA. YOU SEE ALL THE NAMES, YOU SEE THE PICTURE THERE. AND THEN THE SQUARE FOOTAGES. WHEN WE GET TO THE ACTUAL MODELS, YOU'LL SEE IN FRONT OF EACH MODEL THERE WILL BE A LITTLE SIGN THAT WILL SAY THE NAME OF THE MODEL, THE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS, THE NUMBER OF BATHROOMS AND THE NUMBER OF SQUARE FEET. WE'LL SHOW YOU THAT MOMENTARILY. SO THESE ARE THE 53S AND YOU NOTICE IN THE UPPER RIGHT WE HAVE AN X OVER THAT ONE MODEL. AND THE REASON FOR THAT, AS PART OF OUR REVIEW, BRIAN HERBERT HERE TONIGHT, WHO DOES YOUR ARCHITECTURAL AND APPEARANCE REVIEWS, SAID THAT COLOR SCHEME DOESN'T LOOK VERY GOOD, WE WOULD LIKE YOU TO CHANGE IT OUT. WE'LL SHOW YOU LATER WHAT WE PUT IN SUBSTITUTE. THAT'S WHY WE PUT THE BIG X, SO YOU'LL KNOW THAT WAS THE ONE WE GOT RID OF. THIS IS JUST SHOWING YOU DIFFERENT MODELS, DIFFERENT COLOR SCHEMES, DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS. AND, OF COURSE, IN YOUR ANTI- MONOTONY ORDINANCE IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE HAVE ALL THESE SO YOU DON'T HAVE HOMES THAT LOOK TOO MUCH ALIKE RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER OR RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM EACH OTHER. SO THIS IS THE FIRST 53 MODEL. REMEMBER, THE 53 IS REFERRING TO THE LOT WIDTH. THE HOUSE HAS TO ASIDE BY THE SUT BACKS. THIS IS THE DELLA MODEL WITH DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS AND WE PICKED ONE OF THE COLOR PACKAGES FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS. YOU SEE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, THE BEDROOM, BATH AND GARAGE SITUATION. WHEN YOU SEE BONUS ROOM, THAT'S LIKE A DEN. OKAY, AND THEN THIS IS THE NILE, ANOTHER ONE OF THE 53 FOOT MODELS. YOU SEE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. SO WE KNOW THAT A BONUS ROOM IS A DEN. I ASKED WHAT'S A NEXT GEN ROOM, THAT'S LIKE A MOTHER-IN- LAW OR THE KID WHO CAME BACK FROM COLLEGE, SO MAYBE WE COULD CALL IT THE PREVIOUS OR NEXT GEN ROOM. I GUESS THAT WASN'T VERY FUNNY. THE NEXT ONE, YOU SEE THE SQUARE FOOTAGES AND THE BEDROOM, BATH AND GARAGE CONFIGURATION THERE AS WELL. AND THEN THE LAST OF THE -- >> EXCUSE ME, DENNIS. BACK UP ONE. THE WHAT AND WHAT? >> THIS ONE OR THE PREVIOUS ONE? >> THIS ONE, YOU SAID THE BED AND BATH OPTION? WHAT WAS THE LAST SENTENCE YOU SAID? NOT IMPORTANT. >> THE ONE BEFORE? >> BEDROOM AND -- I UNDERSTAND, I'VE GOT IT NOW. YOU HAD STATED THE BEDROOM AND BATH -- >> I TOLD THE BAD JOKE. >> YOU WERE REFERENCING THE QUANTITIES OF BEDROOMS AND BATHS. >> YEAH, BATHROOMS ARE NOT OPTIONAL. SO THEN THERE'S THE SOMERSET, THE LAST OF THE 53S, AGAIN SHOWING YOU THE FOUR ELEVATIONS WITH THE DIFFERENT COLOR PACKAGE FOR EACH. SO THEN THESE ARE THE COLOR PACKAGES AND MATERIALS PACKAGES. YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN THESE BEFORE WHEN YOU'VE DONE CAB WHERE WE SHOW THE BASE COLOR, THE TRIM COLORS, THE WINDOWS, THE MULLIONS AROUND THE WINDOWS. 4 WAS THE SCHEME THAT BRIAN ASKED US TO CHANGE AND WE DID. BY THE WAY, WE'LL POINT OUT MOMENTARILY ON YOUR BACKUP, YOU'LL SEE THERE WERE SOME ITEMS THAT BRIAN HERBERT WANTED US TO CHANGE. WE'RE GOING TO SHOW YOU WE CHANGED EVERY ONE OF THEM AND HE'S REVIEWED THE CHANGES BECAUSE WE WANTED TO BE READY WITH EVERYTHING FOR TONIGHT. SO THE OTHER THING WE DO WITH CAB IS WE HAVE TYPICAL LANDSCAPING PACKAGES FOR EACH MODEL AND EACH ELEVATION TYPE. SO I'M JUST GOING TO SHOW YOU FROM ONE OF THE MODELS HOW IT WORKS, BECAUSE I COULD DO 20 OF THESE AND IT WOULD TAKE ALL NIGHT. WE JUST TOOK THE DELLA AND IF YOU HAVE ELEVATION NUMBER ONE ON THE LEFT OR ELEVATION NUMBER TWO, AND YOU THINK, WELL, WHY IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DIFFERENT WHEN THE HOUSE IS BASICALLY THE SAME? BECAUSE PART OF YOUR ANTI- MONOTONY ORDINANCE IS NOT JUST THE ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING, BUT IT'S ALSO THE LANDSCAPE PACKAGE THAT GOES IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE, BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT EVERY HOUSE TO HAVE THE SAME LANDSCAPE PACKAGE, YOU WANT IT TO BE VARIED. ANYWAY, THIS IS THE DELLA MODEL ELEVATIONS ONE AND TWO AND THEN THE ONE FOR THREE AND FOUR. THEY EACH HAVE DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS AND DIFFERENT LANDSCAPE PACKAGES AND THAT'S THE SAME THING THAT'S TRUE FOR EVERY ONE OF THE MODELS THAT WE BUILD. BUT I'M NOT GOING TO SHOW THEM ALL. BUT IF YOU WANT TO LOOK AT ANY ONE OF THEM, WE'VE GOT A FULL SET OF PLANS HERE. THEN THESE ARE THE 63 FOOT WIDE [00:15:01] MODELS AND THEN, AGAIN, COLOR SCHEME NUMBER FOUR IS THE ONE THAT WE'VE ELIMINATED AND WE'LL SHOW YOU MOMENTARILY THE ONE WE PUT IN ITS PLACE. SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AT EACH OF THE FOUR 63 MODELS. THIS IS THE CRIMSON, AND, AGAIN, YOU SEE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. WHEN IT SAYS LIVEABLE AREA, THAT MEANS AIR- CONDITIONED SPACE. THE GARAGE IS IN ADDITION TO THAT. THE BEDROOM, THE BATH AND THE GARAGE. AND YOU NOTICE THAT THIS IS A SINGLE STORY MODEL. THEN THIS IS THE NIAGARA, SAME SETUP. THE AIR- CONDITIONED SPACE, THE BEDROOM, BATH, GARAGE, AND YOU SEE THE FOUR ELEVATIONS. THE RUBY. AND I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THE ONES WHERE WE'RE GOING TO SHOW YOU AN ARCHITECTURAL MODIFICATION WE MADE ON ONE OF THE MODELS AT THE REQUEST OF MR. HERBERT, AND HE WAS RIGHT, AND WE ACKNOWLEDGED IT AND CHANGED IT. THEN THIS IS THE LAST ONE, THE SILVERSTONE, THE LAST ONE THIS IS THE COLOR CHART THAT GOES WITH THE 63S. AGAIN, YOU SEE THE COLOR SCHEME NUMBER FOUR HAS THE X OVER IT. AND, AGAIN, IT WASN'T EVERYTHNG ABOUT COLOR SCHEME NUMBER FOUR THAT WAS PROBLEMATIC, IT WAS JUST THE FIRST FOUR COLORS. THE WINDOWS AND ALL THAT WERE OKAY. AND THEN, AGAIN, THE TYPICAL LOT LANDSCAPE ON THE 63S, HERE IS THE CRIMSON ELEVATIONS ONE AND TWO AND THE CRIMSON ELEVATIONS THREE AND FOUR. THESE ARE THE COMMENTS FROM THE CITY'S DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, FROM BRIAN HERBERT, AND WE SEE EACH OF THE COMMENTS AND THEN WE SAY WHAT WE DID. FOR EXAMPLE, ON THE PAVERS, WE HAD A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT PAVER PATTERNS AND COLORS, AND THERE WAS A SUGGESTION THAT WE CHANGE THEM AND MATCH THEM WITH WHAT WE'RE DOING ON THE CLUBHOUSE, SO THAT'S WHAT WE DID. WE CHANGED THE PAVERS WHERE THEY WERE PROBLEMATIC TO BE THE SAME COLORS AND MATERIALS WE'RE USING AT THE CLUBHOUSE. WE HAD SOME DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN RENDERINGS AND BLACK AND WHITE LINE DRAWINGS. ALL THOSE WERE FIXED. WE REVISED THE BALCONY FEATURE TO HANDLE THIS DRAINAGE BETTER. WE CHANGED THE COLORS THAT YOU SEE IN NUMBER FOUR. ASSESSABLE BEIGE AND ES THEHIC WHITE. BRIAN HAS SINCE SENT AN EMAIL ACKNOWLEDGING THAT WE'VE MADE ALL THE CHANGES AND HE'S GOOD NOW. AND I SEE HIM NODDING HIS HEAD, SO HOPEFULLY THAT WORKS. SO, AGAIN, YOU SEE IN THE UPPER RIGHT, THIS IS WHAT WE REPLACED THE PRIOR COLOR PACKAGE NUMBER FOUR. YOU SEE IT'S LESS KIND OF TAN OR -- I DON'T KNOW WHAT COLOR YOU WOULD CALL IT, BUT YOU SEE WE CHANGED IT, AND THE ARCHITECT SAID THIS IS BETTER. THE SAME THING ON THE 63S WHERE WE TOOK OUT COLOR SCHEME NUMBER FOUR AND PUT IN THE NEW COLOR SCHEME. AND THEN THESE ARE JUST SOME RENDERINGS. SO YOU SEE ON THE LEFT IS THE OLD COLOR SCHEME, ON THE RIGHT IS THE NEW ONE. WE JUST PICKED ONE OF THE MODELS. IT COULD HAVE BEEN ANY OF THEM BUT YOU SEE THE COLOR CHANGE FROM THE OLD NUMBER FOUR TO THE NEW NUMBER FOUR. ON THE LEFT WE KIND OF HAD EXTRA BRACKETS THAT WEREN'T SPACED THE SAME AS THEY WERE EVERYWHERE ELSE. SO WE TOOK OUT THE EXTRA ONES SO THE SPACING WAS CONSISTENT ACROSS. AND YOU CAN KIND OF SEE WHERE THE TWO RED CIRCLES ARE HOW WE DID THAT. AND THEN, AGAIN, YOU JUST SAW THE NEW COLOR SCHEME ON THE ONE BUILDING, BUT HERE IS THE NEW COLOR CHART SHOWING THE REVISED COLOR SCHEME NUMBER FOUR. AND THAT WOULD APPLY TO BOTH THE 53S AND 63S, THE NEW CHART. AND THEN THE MODEL ROW, SO WE HAVE ON LOT 94 IS GOING TO BEBE THE PARKING LOT FOR THE SALES CENTER, ON LOT 95 WILL BE THE SALES CENTER. WE'LL SHOW YOU THAT MOMENTARILY. AND THEN 96, 97, 98 ANDAND 99 THE FOUR MODEL LOTS. AND SO ALL THREE OF THOSE LOTS ARE 63 FOOT WIDE, BUT TWO OF THEM WILL HAVE 53 FOOT PRODUCT ON THEM AND TWO WILL HAVE 63 FOOT PRODUCT ON THEM. AND THEN, OF COURSE, ONCE EVERYTHING IS BUILT AND THE SALES CENTER AND THE PARKING LOT WILL BE REMOVED, THEN THE LAST TWO HOUSES WOULD BE BUILT ON THOSE LOTS 94 AND 95. SO WE'LL KIND OF GO THROUGH THE MODEL ROW AND SHOW YOU EACH ONE, BUT YOU SEE THERE'S TWO 53S, THERE'S TWO 63S, AND YOU NOTICE THAT THE ELEVATIONS ARE DIFFERENT ON EACH ONE AND THE COLOR SCHEMES ARE DIFFERENT ON EACH ONE SO THAT PEOPLE CAN SEE REAL DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES FOR EVERY SINGLE ONE AND LOOK AT THE COLORS AND STONE AND SEE WHAT THEY LIKE. SO THEN THIS IS WHERE THE -- YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT WHERE THE MODEL ROW IS LOCATED, RIGHT NEXT TO THE RECREATION FACILITIES. AND THEN YOU SEE THE LOTS THAT ARE PART OF THE MODEL ROW THERE AND ALSO WHERE THE PARKING [00:20:02] LOT AND THE SALES CENTER BUILDING WILL GO. AND THEN THESE ARE THE FOUR MODELS. I APOLOGIZE, I DON'T HAVE RENDERINGS FOR THESE, I JUST HAVE ELEVATIONS, BUT JUST SHOWING YOU EACH ONE OF THEM SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THEY'RE ALL DIFFERENT. AND THEN THE MODEL ROW SIGNAGE, SO YOU SEE THERE WILL BE A SIGN IN FRONT OF EACH OF THE FOUR BUILDINGS. OBVIOUSLY THESE GO AWAY AFTER THE MODELS ARE DONE BEING USED AS MODELS. AND YOU SEE WHERE THE SIGNS GO. THEY'RE RELATIVELY SMALL AND THEY HAVE THE NAME OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THE NAME OF THE MODEL, THE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS, NUMBER OF BATHS AND SQUARE FOOTAGE. SO BEFORE PEOPLE GO IN AND LOOK, THEY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING AT. SALES TRAILER, THIS IS THE SITE PLAN. YOU SEE THE PARKING LOT AT THE TOP, YOU SEE THE SALES TRAILER BUILDING AT THE BOTTOM, AND YOU SEE -- OBVIOUSLY WE'LL BE REMOVING ALL OF THIS AND BUILDING TWO, THE LAST TWO HOMES HERE AT THE TAIL END OF THE PROJECT. THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE OF THE SALES TRAILER. IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD, PRETTY SIMPLE. WE LANDSCAPE IT HEAVILY SO IT LOOKS AS GOOD AS YOU CAN MAKE A TRAILER LOOK UNTIL WE REMOVE IT. THERE'S DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE TO DIRECT PEOPLE TO THE SALES OFFICE, SO THIS IS SHOWING YOU SOME OF THE LOCATIONS AND THEN I'LL SHOW YOU SOME OF THE SIGNS THEMSELVES. SO NUMBER ONE AND FOUR ARE, LIKE, RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE SALES CENTER AREA AND THEN NUMBER -- THOSE NUMBER THREES AT THE BOTTOM ARE ALONG THE ROAD AS YOU'RE DRIVING TOWARD THE SALES CENTER. AGAIN, ALL OF THIS STUFF GETS REMOVED WHEN THE SALES CENTER GETS REMOVED. AND THEN THE TWO SIGNS AT THE TOP ARE OUT BY THE ENTRANCE AND THE THREE AT THE BOTTOM ARE ALONG THE ROADWAY ON THE INTERNAL OF THE PROPERTY THAT'S TAKING YOU TOWARD THE SALES CENTER. AND THEN THIS IS KIND OF THE MOST INTERESTING THING. SO WE HAVE A RECORDED PLAT AND ON THE PLAT EVERY LOT IS IDENTIFIED BY LOT NUMBER AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE LOT IS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. NOW, I WANT TO BE THE FIRST ONE TO POINT OUT THAT WHEN THE PLAT WAS RECORDED, KATELYN WAS HERE. THAT WAS DURING THE TIME BETWEEN WHEN THEY WERE HERE BEFORE AND WHEN THEY CAME BACK. AND WE WEREN'T HERE, EITHER, BECAUSE WE HADN'T EVEN BOUGHT THE PROPERTY YET. BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PLAT, I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU IN A MINUTE, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THAT LOT 29 WAS ONE SQUARE FOOT SHORT OF WHERE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE. LOT 60 WAS ONE SQUARE FOOT SHORT OF WHERE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE. YOU COULD SEE RIGHT ON IT, IT SAYS 6359, RIGHT IN THE LITTLE BOX. THEN THE OTHER TWO, ONE WAS 32 FEET SHORT AND THE OTHER ONE 26. SO WHEN KATELYN SENT US AN EMAIL AND SAID I WAS JUST LOOKING AT -- IN FACT, SHE SENT THE EMAIL AND CALLED ME AND SHE SAID I WAS JUST LOOKING AT THE RECORDED PLAT AND YOU'VE GOT FOUR LOTS THAT ARE SHORT. THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED A VARIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE BEING 6360 SQUARE FEET. THIS IS THE RECORDED PLAT AND THAT'S JUST THE COVER SHEET, BUT I WANTED YOU TO SEE THAT IT WAS RECORDED. AND THEN THIS IS THE DEDICATION BLOCK AND THEN THE PART THAT'S IN YELLOW, YOU'LL SEE IN A MINUTE WHAT I'M SHOWING IS THE AREA BEHIND THESE LOTS WAS COMMON AREA THAT WAS TO BE DEDICATED TO THE HOA. SO WE NEED TO FIX THAT BEFORE WE SELL ANY HOUSES AND BEFORE THE HOA GETS STARTED ON ITS WORK TO RECTIFY THIS ONE SQUARE FOOT SHORT AND 32 SQUARE FEET SHORT, ET CETERA. SO THESE ARE THE FOUR LOTS AND WE'LL ZERO IN ON THEM MORE CLOSELY SO YOU CAN SEE HOW MUCH SHORT THEY WERE AND HOW WE'RE MAKING UP THE DIFFERENCE. BUT YOU SEE THEY'RE SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY. AND, FORTUNATELY, EVERY ONE OF THEM WAS NEXT TO A COMMON AREA TRACT, SO WE COULD MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE WITHOUT AFFECTING ANY OTHER LOTS. AND, BY THE WAY, EVEN THOUGH IT'S A TOTAL OF 60 SQUARE FEET, ONE, PLUS ONE, PLUS 26, PLUS 32, 60 SQUARE FEET, IT'S A VERY SMALL AREA. IT DOESN'T CHANGE OUR RETENTION, IT DOESN'T CHANGE OUR OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT. IT'S INSIGNIFICANT. WE'LL SHOW YOU MOMENTARILY. OKAY, SO HERE IS THE FIRST ONE, LOT 29. AND I KNOW IT'S HARD TO SEE OVER ON THE RIGHT, BUT IT ACTUALLY SHOWS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE RIGHT UNDER THE LETTERS 29, THE NUMBERS 29. AND IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CAUGHT. SO WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE ADDING 0. 2 FEET IN A STRAIGHT LINE ON THE BACK OF THE LOT WHERE YOU SEE THOSE LITTLE DASHED LINES ON THE LEFT- HAND SIDE. SO I ASKED SOMEBODY, WHAT IS 0. 2 -- NO, 0. 2 FEET, I [00:25:06] GUESS IT'S LIKE AN INCH OR SOMETHING. ANYWAY, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING ON THAT ONE. AND I HAVE TO DIGRESS FOR JUST A MINUTE. WHEN I FIRST HEARD THIS, I SAID, WHO TOLD YOU THIS? THEN THEY REMINDED ME KATELYN CALLED ME ABOUT IT. I SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT, SHE'S PROBABLY RIGHT, BECAUSE EVERYWHERE THAT SHE HAS GONE, INCLUDING PARKLAND AND OTHER PLACES WHEN SHE TAKES OVER THIS WORK, SHE FINDS STUFF THAT WASN'T RIGHT. AT LEAST IN MY EXPERIENCE, EVERY TIME SHE'S FOUND IT, SHE'S CORRECT, IT'S IN THE CODE. SO WE'RE FIXING IT, BECAUSE WHAT ELSE ARE WE GOING TO DO? THE NEXT ONE, LOT 135 -- WAIT, I WENT TOO FAST. THE NEXT ONE IS LOT 29. THAT'S THE ONE I ALREADY DID. LOT 60 IS ACTUALLY 0. 1 FEET, SO IT'S EVEN LESS, AND IT'S A STRAIGHT LINE ALONG THE EDGE WE'RE ADDING TO MAKE IT BE 6360 LIKE IT'S SUPPOSED TO. THEN THE NEXT ONE WAS 32 SQUARE FEET SHORT, AND, AGAIN, WE'RE ADDING -- THIS IS LIKE 7 INCHES OR SOMETHING ALONG THE BACK TO MAKE IT THE RIGHT SIZE. AND THEN THIS IS THE LAST ONE, WHICH WAS 26 SQUARE FEET SHORT, AND IT'S 0. 5 FEET. THAT I UNDERSTAND, THAT'S 6 INCHES WE'RE ADDING ALONG THE BACK OF THE LOT. BY ADDING THESE TO THE LOTS AND MODIFYING THE DEDICATION LANGUAGE, WE CAN FIX THIS DISCREPANCY THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIXED THREE YEARS AGO AND TAKE CARE OF IT SO EVERYTHING MEETS THE CODE REQUIREMENT. SO THIS IS A TABLE THAT SHOWS YOU, AND I KNOW THE MATH YOU'VE GOT TO DO, BUT IF YOU LOOK AT LOTS, YOU SEE THAT THE LOTS WENT UP BY 60 SQUARE FEET AND YOU SEE THAT THE OPEN SPACE TRACT AND BUFFER WENT DOWN BY 60 SQUARE FEET. BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ACREAGE AND THE PERCENTAGES, IT'S A ROUNDING ERROR, IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE PERCENTAGE, IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE ACREAGE DOWN TO A SECOND DECIMAL POINT. THAT'S HOW WE'RE FIXING THIS PRE- EXISTING PROBLEM THAT WE ALL DISCOVERED AS WE WERE WORKING THROUGH WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOCUSED ON THE HOUSE GOING ON THE LOT, NOT THE FACT THAT THE LOT WAS SHORT. AND NORMALLY YOU CAN RELY ON A RECORDED PLAT, BUT IT WAS AN ERROR AND WE'RE FIXING IT. SO THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. WE HAVE THE WHOLE DESIGN TEAM WITH US, THE FOLKS FROM MY CLIENT WITH US. SO HOPEFULLY IF THERE'S QUESTIONS, WE'VE GOT SOMEBODY HERE WHO CAN ANSWER THEM. >> THANK YOU, DENNIS. AT THIS TIME I THINK WE'RE GOING TO START -- USUALLY WE'LL CHIME IN INDEPENDENTLY. I THINK WE'LL START WITH FABIO. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR THE APPLICANT? >> NO COMMENT. >> I KNOW IT'S RARE BUT I ACTUALLY DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. >> JOEL? >> I DO. THANK YOU, DENNIS, FOR MAKING THAT VERY CLEAR, WHAT MIGHT SEEM TO BE A LITTLE CONVOLUTED, I THINK YOU EXPRESSED VERY WELL. QUESTION, WHERE WHERE THE PAVERS PROBLEMATIC? WAS THAT JUST THE COLOR? >> THE ONES THAT WE CHANGED THE COLORS, YOU WANT TO KNOW WHERE THE OLD ONES WERE WE SWITCHED OUT? >> IN LOOKING AT ANTI-MONOTONY, IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE FOUR ALLALL SAME COLOR. >> GOOD EVENING. WE'RE THE ARCHITECTS FOR THE PROJECT I THINK THERE WERE SOME INCONSISTENCIES IN THE DRAWINGS OF THE PAVER PATTERNS, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, SO THAT WAS -- >> OKAY, IT WASN'T COLOR SO MUCH. THANK YOU FOR THAT. AND THEN AS A BUILDER, I'M ALWAYS -- THE DRAINAGE FOR THE BALCONIES YOU HAD TALKED ABOUT NOT HAVING THEM FACE THE FRONT, BUT THE SIDE. DOES THAT AFFECT ANYTHING FOR THE NEIGHBORS INSOFAR AS, YOU KNOW -- THESE ARE ZERO LOT LINES HOMES AND WE KNOW THE DRAINAGE IS BETWEEN THE HOMES AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE AND THEN IT FLOWS TO THE BACK. ARE WE CREATING ANYTHING OR IS THIS GOING TO BE -- >> NO, THE DRAINAGE -- I DON'T THINK -- THERE'S SITE SETBACKS ON BOTH SIDES SO THE DRAINAGE THE RAINWATER MUST BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE PROPERTY. >> SO IT'S GOING TO BE A DOWNSPOUT HERE? >> AND I DIDN'T GO OVER IT, BUT IN THE BACKUP THERE'S A REFERENCE TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND WE HAVE, I THINK IT WAS SIX DIFFERENT SPECIFIC DRAINAGE THINGS WE HAVE TO DO WITH GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS, CONNECTED TO UNDERGROUND, S TO COLLECT ANY W THAT MIGHT COME OUT OF THE AIR-CONDITIONING UNIT. SO WE'VE INCORPORATED ALL OF THAT INTO THE PLAN. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT, I HAVE SLIDES TO SHOW IT. [00:30:03] >> AND THE NEXT QUESTIONQUESTION ABOUT DRIVEWAYS, AND I WAS SCROLLING THROUGH TRYING TO BLOW UP THE DOCUMENTS JUST TO SEE. CAN THE DRIVEWAYS THAT HAVE EITHER A RIGHT OR LEFT TURN- IN, ARE THOSE USABLE FOR TWO VEHICLES? CAN YOU GET TWO VEHICLES PARKED IN THERE MAKING A 90- DEGREE TURN OR IS IT GOING TO BE JUST FOR SHOW? >> THE DRIVEWAYS ARE 22 FOOTFOOT WIDE, SO THERE'S BACKUPBACKUP SINCE IT'S A SIDE- LOADED GARAGE, THERE'S PLENTY OF LENGTH IN THE DRIVEWAY. >> WHAT ARE THE DIMENSIONS FOR A CAR TO BACK OUT? >> THE MINIMUM IS 22 FOR A BACKOUT AND THEN YOU HAVE EXTRA WITH THE SIDE SETBACK. >> HOW DEEP IS THE GARAGE? >> IT'S A 20- FOOT MINIMUM DEPTH ON THE GARAGE. >> SO THE GARAGES ARE 20 FEET, MOST CARS ARE 18. >> RIGHT. >> YOU'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF ROOM. >> THAT'S A STANDARD SIZE. >> THEY WILL HAVE PLENTY OF ROOM TO BACK OUT DIRECTLY, LIKE I'M LOOKING AT -- I FORGET WHICH ONE I'M LOOKING AT. >> THE SIDE- LOADED GARAGES? >> I'M MORE FOCUSED ON THE SIDE- LOADED GARAGES, JUST BECAUSE IT'S HARD TO MAKE THEM FUNCTIONAL. I DON'T KNOW ANYBODY THAT REALLY PARKS TWO CARS IN A SIDE- LOADED GARAGE. THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING. >> YOU MEAN INSIDE THE GARAGE OR ON THE -- WELL, IT'S DESIGNED THAT THE DRIVEWAY IS COMFORTABLE TO PARK MORE THAN TWO CARS ON THE DRIVEWAY AND, OBVIOUSLY, IF YOU PARK IN THE GARAGE YOU WOULD HAVE TO DO SOME REMOVING OF CARS TO BACK OUT. >> THAT I'M NOT WORRIED ABOUT. I MEAN GETTING TWO FULL-SIZED CARS IN A GARAGE THAT IS A SIDE LOAD LIKE THIS. YOU HAVE THE DEPTH GOING AWAY FROM THE GARAGE? >> YES, YES, YES. >> NOW, IS THAT A CODE DEPTH? ARE WE DOING MINIMUM CODE ON THAT? >> THE DRIVEWAY IS THE MINIMUM BUT THERE'S ADDITIONAL BACKUP SPACE WITH A SETBACK. IN OTHER WORDS, THE END OF THE CAR CAN HAVE MORE THAN 22 FEET. >> ALL RIGHT. AND THE PLAT MAPS, AGAIN, DENNIS, THANK YOU, I UNDERSTAND. I WANT TO GET OUT IN FRONT OF, IS THERE ANY NEED FOR ANY VARIANCES FOR HVAC UNITS AND SETBACKS OR IS IT ALL FIGURED OUT? >> NO, THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT WHATEVER VARIANCES WERE NEEDED WERE DONE IN 2021 WITH MR. TUTTLE. AND WE DON'T NEED ANY VARIANCES FOR WHAT WE'RE DOING. >> EVEN IN THE FUTURE? IT'S BEEN PLANNED OUT PROPERLY, SO WHEN THOSE PLANS GO TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR THE HOUSES AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT LOOKS AT IT, WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A SITUATION WHERE WE NEED TO MODIFY AND GRANT VARIANCES BECAUSE HVAC UNITS HUNG OVER THE SETBACKS BY 6 OR 8 INCHES? >> I JUST CHECKED WHILE YOU WERE I GOT THE THUMBS UP, NO VARIANCES. >> GLAD TO HEAR THAT. MR. CHAIR, THAT CONCLUDES MY QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU, JOEL. >> I HAD SOME QUESTIONS REGARDING THE GUTTERS AND THE DOWNSPOUTS. CAN I SEE THOSE SLIDES? >> WHICH ONES? >> THE GUTTERS AND THE DOWNSPOUTS. I'M CURIOUS TO SEE WHAT THOSE LOOK LIKE. >> SO THIS IS THE -- ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE. THE SIX CONDITIONS REGARDING DRAINAGE THAT CAME OUT OF THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT. AND, REMEMBER, THIS IS BASED ON EXPERIENCE WITH OTHER HOMES IN THE WEDGE WHERE WE SAW THESE DRAINAGE ISSUES, RIGHT? AND WE SAW HOW WE FIXED THEM, SO HOW WE PLAN AHEAD TO FIX THEM INSTEAD OF DOING IT AFTER THE FACT. THESE ARE THE SIX THINGS. AND I HAVE A SLIDE FOR THE ONES THAT ARE SPACIAL. SO WHAT THIS IS, IS WHEN YOU HAVE GUTTERS, YOU HAVE A DOWNSPOUT FROM THE GUTTER AND THEN YOU HAVE A CONNECTION UNDERGROUND TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. SO THIS ISN'T SHOWING YOU THE GUTTER ON THE HOUSE, BUT IT'S SHOWING YOU THE DOWN SPOUT AND THE UNDERGROUND CONNECTION. >> HOW BIG IS THIS? IS IT A 6 INCH, 7 INCH? >> LET ME SEE IF WE CAN FIND OUT. IT'S A 6 INCH. THE DOWNSPOUT IS A 6 INCH? 6 INCH. THAT'S THE STANDARD, YEAH. >> HOW BIG IS THE TILE ON THE ROOF? >> I'M SORRY? >> HOW BIG IS THE TILE ON THE ROOF? >> HOW BIG IS THE TILE ON THE ROOF? >> I KNOW SOMETIMES WHEN THE WATER COMES OFF OF THE ROOF, DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF THE TILE, SOMETIMES IT COMES OFF OF THE ROOF. SO WHEN THE WATER COMES DOWN FROM SOME OF THE HOMES I'VE SEEN -- >> IT MIGHT FLY PAST THE GUTTER? >> 100%, FLIES RIGHT PAST THE GUTTER AND NEVER GETS INSIDE. >> I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S 13 INCHES. THEY'RE STANDARD INDUSTRY TILES. WE DON'T HAVE A SAMPLE OF ONE BUT WE'VE USED THEM A MILLION TIMES, SO WE HAVEN'T RUN INTO THAT PARTICULAR -- I COULD SEE HOW THAT COULD HAPPEN, BUT WE HAVEN'T EXPERIENCED THAT PROBLEM. >> I MEAN, ANY OF YOU WHO LIVE IN THOSE DEVELOPMENTS MAY KNOW BETTER THAN I DO, BUT I WAS TOLD THAT ONCE WE MADE THESE RETROFITS WITH THE GUTTERS, EVERYTHING HAS BEEN WORKING WELL. IT WAS PRIOR TO THAT WE WERE HAVING THE ISSUES. [00:35:01] >> ALSO, TO MENTION, THE SPACE THAT YOU HAVE IN THE DRIVEWAY BETWEEN TWO CARS SITTING IN THERE, YOU BROUGHT UP A VERY GOOD POINT. IT SEEMED TO BE VERY NARROW. DO YOU HAVE AN AERIAL SHOT? I'VE SEEN IN SOME OF THE NEWER COMMUNITIES WHEN YOU PUT TWO CARS IN THERE YOU DON'T HAVE MUCH SPACE TO GET TO THE FRONT DOOR BECAUSE OF THE CONGESTION. >> WHY DON'T YOU JUST WALK UP THERE. IT'S GOING TO BE EASIER TO SHOW YOU ON THIS PLAN. AND I KNOW EVERYBODY CAN'T SEE IT. IF THERE'S A DISCUSSION, WE'LL TRY TO DESCRIBE IT SO IT'S ON THE RECORD. >> THIS MODEL IS MOSTLY, FOR THE RECORD, WHICH MODEL IS THIS? SEEMS TO BE A LOT DEEPER SO YOU HAVE MORE SPACE. THE SILVERSTONE. >> WHICH IS THE BIGGER MODEL, THE 63 FOOT. IF YOU'RE PUTTING TWO CARS IN -- >> WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO GO TO THE NEXT PICTURE OR DO YOU WANT TO LOOK AT THIS ONE? >> YOU STILL HAVE TO GET IN HERE. >> IT'S TIGHT, BUT THIS IS THE BIGGER MODEL. ANY REPRESENTATION OF THE ONES THAT ARE SMALLER, LESS SPACE THAN 22? P. >> THE DRIVEWAY IS THE SAME ON ALL OF THEM. >> THE MINIMUM WIDTH IN CODE IS 22 FEET. AND WE ACTUALLY INCREASED THAT AFTER WE HAD SOME CONCERNS WITH THE DRIVEWAY SIZES IN OTHER COMMUNITIES. WE WENT AHEAD AND ADD TODAY 22 FOOT WIDTH SO YOU CAN HAVE SIZABLE SUVS PARK THERE WITHOUT STEPPING INTO THE GRASS. >> I REMEMBERED THAT. THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING. >> DO YOU WANT ME TO SHOW THE NEXT DRAIN AGE? THIS IS SHOWING YOU THE VARIOUS SETBACKS THAT WERE APPROVED FOR THIS PROPERTY, AND THEN THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT TO HAVE THIS CLEAN SAND IN BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS. SO WE'RE SHOWING YOU THE LITTLE CROSS- SECTION WITH THE CLEAN SAND AND THEN THE PIPE THAT'S UNDERNEATH. >> VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. >> AND THEN THIS ONE IS SHOWING YOU THE -- SEE WHERE IT SAYS AT THE BOTTOM CONNECT AIR CONDITIONER CONDENSATION DRAIN TO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM AND THIS IS SHOWING YOU HOW. >> DRAIN INTO THE SYSTEM RATHER THAN INTO THE GRASS. >> CORRECT. IT GOES INTO A PIPE AND THEN THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. >> VERY NICE. >> WHATEVER CONDENSATION, THAT'S HOW YOU GET IT OUT OF THERE. THIS ONE, THERE'S AN UNDER- DRAIN SYSTEM AND IT SAYS CONTRACTOR SHALL -- I'M READING THIS BECAUSE IT'S PRETTY SMALL, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE IT. CONTRACTOR SHOULD COORDINATE CONNECTIONS WITH UNDER- DRAIN SYSTEM CONTRACTOR AND INCLUDE ANCILLARY CONNECTION FITTINGS IN THE BID COST. THE UNDER- DRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY AS WELL AS UNDER THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS. SO THAT'S COLLECTING ANY WATER THAT MIGHT BE IN A FRONT SWALE INTO A PIPE AND INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. >> IS THERE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE ON THIS SYSTEM? DO YOU HAVE TO CLEAN THIS UP? DOES IT GET FILLED UP WITH ANY SORT OF FILM OR WHATEVER COMES INTO YOUR GUTTER? >> YES, THERE IS MAINTENANCE, BUT IT'S PIPE MAINTENANCE, APPARENTLY, FAIRLY STANDARD. >> IS THAT HOA? >> YES, HOA, BECAUSE IT'S ON THE LOT. AND THEN THIS IS JUST EVERYTHING THAT WE DID. SO THOSE WERE THE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS AND NOT ONLY WERE THEY IN THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT, BUT THEY'RE ALSO IN THE KEITH & ASSOCIATES REPORT, SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING ON DRAINAGE. >> THANK YOU. >> THANKS, ALEX. JORDANA? >> I HAVE A QUESTION OR CONCERN, GENERALLY SPEAKING. I MEAN, LENNOR OBVIOUSLY IS NOT NEW. SEVERAL OF US I THINK MAY LIVE IN COMMUNITIES, INCLUDING MYSELF, THAT WERE DEVELOPED AND CONSTRUCTED BY LENNAR. IT'S ALSO NO SECRET THAT THERE WERE ISSUES IN SOME OF THOSE DEVELOPMENTS, INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE ISSUES. I CAN TELL YOU THAT IN MY OWN COMMUNITY, ISSUES WITH LANDSCAPING, PREMATURE TREES THAT NEVER GREW, GATES, FOUNTAINS, CLUBHOUSES, THERE WERE ISSUES. AND, TO ME, THIS IS, I GUESS, ANOTHER SHOT FOR LENNAR IN OUR COMMUNITY. AND I WOULD JUST LIKE TO KNOW GENERALLY WHAT STEPS BOTH LENNAR AND THE CITY TOOK TO MAKE SURE THOSE MISTAKES WON'T BE [00:40:01] REPEATED FOR OTHER PEOPLE AND OTHER HOMEOWNERS. >> I THINK THERE'S A FEW THINGS. FIRST OF ALL, THE CITY DID AN EXTENSIVE CODE REWRITE, I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY YEARS AGO, BUT AFTER THOSE OTHER SUBDIVISIONS WERE BUILT, BUT BEFORE NOW. AND I THINK THAT HELPED, CHANGING SETBACKS, CHANGING RULES ABOUT THE POSITIONS OF AIR- CONDITIONING UNITS. BUT THE BIGGEST THING, I THINK, WHEN THIS ANNEXATION AGREEMENT CAME IN BEFORE LENNAR WAS EVEN HERE, WHEN IT WAS MR. TUTTLE, THE CITY SAID WE'VE HAD THESE DRAINAGE ISSUES IN THE WEDGEWEDGE WE'VE COME UP WITH WAYS TO FIX THEM AND WE WANT YOU TO USE THOSE WAYS TO FIX THEM. LIKE I WAS SAYING EARLIER, WE'RE BUILDING IT IN UP FRONT AND WE THINK THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT HAVE WORKED ELSEWHERE. THE WEDGE, IT'S SURROUNDED ON TWO SIDES BY -- I DON'T KNOW IF EVERGLADES IS THE RIGHT WORD, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING. SO THAT AREA, BEFORE IT WAS DEVELOPED, IT WAS LOW, IT WAS WET, A LOT OF WILDLIFE, AND NOW YOU COME IN TO BUILD AND IT'S A LITTLE MORE COMPLICATED THAN AREAS THAT WERE FURTHER EAST OR SOUTH BECAUSE OF THE WATER AND EVERYTHING THAT WAS THERE. SO IN THE PLACE WHERE'S IT'S BEEN FIXED, DOES IT SEEM TO BE WORKING WELL NOW? I'M HOPING. >> I COULD CERTAINLY SAY ON MY BLOCK, YES. BUT THERE ARE CERTAINLY AREAS IN THE COMMUNITY WHERE THERE STILL REMAINS ISSUES WITH DRAINAGE. >> I'M HOPEFUL THAT WITH THE STAFF YOU HAVE HERE, YOUR CONSULTING ENGINEERS, OUR FOLKS, THAT WE IMPLEMENT EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THESE THINGS AND IT SHOULD WORK AND IT SHOULD WORK WELL. BUT YOU NOTICE THAT THERE'S NONE OF THIS TRUST ME. EVERYTHING WE'RE DOING IS IN WRITING ON THE PLANS. WE MADE ALL THE CORRECTIONS WE WERE ASKED SO THAT YOU COULD KNOW THAT AS THIS GOES FORWARD, THE CITY COMMISSION, IT'S 100% CORRECT. >> THANKS, JORDANA. I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. WITH RESPECT TO THE VACATION ISSUE, I SEE IT WAS HANDLED PROPERLY, AND GOOD CATCH, KATELYN. I'M NOT AN ATTORNEY. BEING CALLED A VACATION VERSUS IT'S CARVED, IT'S IN BLACK AND WHITE, PART OF THE PLAT, I UNDERSTAND THAT, COULD IT BE CALLED -- AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO GO BACKWARDS, I'M JUST ASKING, COULD IT BE CALLED A SCRIBENER'S ERROR. SO IT DOESN'T SET A PRECEDENT. FOR EXAMPLE, I KNOW THE CORRECTION AND REMEDY WAS BASED ON AN ERROR CAUSED BY OTHERS, FOR EXAMPLE, BUT WHAT IF IN THE FUTURE THERE'S AN ERROR AND THERE ISN'T AN OPEN SPACE NEXT TO IT BUT THERE'S A LARGER LOT. CAN YOU START GOING AND REWORKING PLAT -- LOTS THAT ARE ALREADY IDENTIFIED, ENUMERATED AND TAKE LAND FROM ANOTHER LOT THAT'S BIGGER BECAUSE ONE NEXT TO IT MIGHT BE SHORTER? IT'S JUST A QUESTION. >> I'LL ANSWER THE SECOND PART AND THEN I'LL LET THE CITY ATTORNEY ANSWER THE FRONT END OF THE QUESTION. GENERALLY THE PRACTICE IS ONCE A PROPERTY IS PLATTED AT THE COUNTY LEVEL, YOU CAN THEN MAKE INTERIOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS BY METES AND BOUNDS AND IT DOESN'T REQUIRE YOU TO NECESSARILY GO BACK TO THE COUNT. THE ISSUE AT HAND IS MORE OF THE RESTRICTIVE LANGUAGE THAT THEY'RE VACATING THE RESTRICTION AS IT RELATES TO THE OPEN SPACE TRACTS. YOU'LL SEE IT'S SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR OPEN SPACE BUFFER AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES, SO SINCE THAT WILL NOW BECOME PART OF THE FEE SIMPLE LOT, THE CORRECT WAY TO DO THIS WOULD BE TO VACATE RESTRICTION SO IT'S NOT ENCUMBERED AND CAN BE CLEARLY PART OF THE FEE SIMPLE LOT FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES. BUT THE SHORT ANSWER IS, YES, IF THERE WEREN'T ADJACENT OPEN SPACE TRACTS, YOU CONCEIVABLY COULD PULL FROM AN ADJACENT TRACT AND UPDATING THE SKETCH IN LEGAL. BUT I'LL LET THE CITY ATTORNEY ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. >> AS TO THE FIRST QUESTION, YOU COULD DEBATE WHAT TO CALL IT. WE CONFERRED WITH COUNTY STAFF WHO ULTIMATELY -- WE HAVE TO ADHERE TO THE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS AND PLATTING REQUIREMENTS, AND MADE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE USED LANGUAGE THAT THEY WOULD APPROVE, ESSENTIALLY. SO THAT'S WHY YOU SEE THAT LANGUAGE. >> IT'S JUST A QUESTION, SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. RESPECT TO THE PAVERS, DENNIS, I BELIEVE, STATED IT WAS THE COLORING. >> IT WASN'T THE COLORING, IT WAS THE PATTERN. WE FIXED THE PATTERN TO BE CONSISTENT. >> WITH THE CLUBHOUSE? >> CORRECT. >> SO ARE THE PATTERNS GOING TO ALL BE THE SAME THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY ON EVERY DRIVEWAY OR ARE THEY GOING TO BE DIFFERENT AND THERE WAS A [00:45:01] MONOTONY ISSUE? >> THE ISSUE WAS PRIMARILY IN THE DRIVEWAYS OF THE UNITS, THE UPPER PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY WAS SHOWING ONE PATTERN AND THE LOWER PORTION WAS SHOWING ANOTHER. SO THEY SHOULD BE CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT, THE DRIVEWAYS AND SO FORTH. THAT WAS THE COMMENT IN GENERAL. SO THEY DIDN'T LOOK DIFFERENT WITHIN ONE DRIVEWAY. AND I REALLY JUST THINK IT WAS A HATCH ERROR ON THE DRAWINGS, THAT A DIFFERENTLY PATTERN WAS USED IN AUTOCAD. >>÷÷ WITH RESPECT TO THE CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION AND THE GUARD GATE CONSTRUCTION, I ALREADY KNOW IT'S CARVED IN STONE. I DON'T KNOW THE NUMBERS. HOW MANY ARE REQUIRED -- WHAT'S THE TIMELINE WITH RESPECT TO THE -- WHERE YOU CAN'T BUILD ANY MORE HOUSES, YOU CAN'T GET ANY MORE PERMITS UNTIL CERTAIN ACHIEVEMENTS HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED AND ACHIEVED? >> IN THE SITE PLAN RESOLUTION THE CITY COMMISSION PASSED IN 2021 IT SAYS THE FOLLOWING, NO MORE THAN 25% OF THE TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED BEFORE THE GUARD HOUSE IS OPERATIONAL, NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE TOTAL OF ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL ENTRY FEATURES ARE COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL. THEN IT GOES ON TO SAY, IF THESE CONDITIONS AREN'T MET, THE CITY CAN WITHHOLD FUTURE BUILDING PERMITS. SO THERE'S A 25% AND A 50%. AFTER THAT, EVERYTHING HAS TO BE DONE. >> TRYING TO GET THE TIMELINE. I KNOW WHEN CERTAIN APPROVALS WERE DONE THERE WERE DIFFERENT BELTS AND SUSPENDERS, SO FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES, SOMEBODY CAN GO IN AND PULL AND FILE FOR EVERY PERMIT, BUT STILL NOT MAYBE COMPLETE ONE OF THE -- SOMETHING THAT WAS A COMMITMENT BECAUSE YOU WON'T GET ANY MORE PERMITS. DID THE BUYERS LEARN AND DISCLOSE THAT INFORMATION OR THEY DON'T TYPICALLY? >> I KNOW IT'S BEEN DISCLOSED TO US WHEN WE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY, AND OBVIOUSLY WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DISCLOSE IT TO PEOPLE IF THEY'RE BEYOND THE 25% OR THE 50% MARK. WE MAY HAVE TO TELL THEM, YOU CAN SIGN UP BUT YOU MAY HAVE TO WAIT. >> THANK YOU. >> MR. CHAIR, JUST AS A POINT OF CLARIFICATION, SINCE THERE ARE CERTAIN NUMBERS OF BUILDING PERMITS THAT CAN BE ISSUED PRIOR TO THE GUARDHOUSE BEING ISSUED, THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED WHAT THEY CALL TEMPORARY OR AN INTERIM SECURITY PLAN TO PROVIDE COMMUNITY SECURITY AHEAD OF THAT GUARDHOUSE OR GATEHOUSE BEING OPERATIONAL. SO THAT IS ON FILE WITH THE CITY AS WELL. >> ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? >> I DO. >> GO AHEAD, SIR. >> YOU MENTIONED THE DRAINAGE, THE UNDER- DRAIN THAT NEEDS TO BE -- THAT NEEDS TO BE CLEANED. YOU SAID EVEN THOUGH IT WAS ON PROPERTY THE HOA WOULD CLEAN IT? >> YES. OH, THE HOMEOWNERS CLEAN IT. HOMEOWNERS CLEAN IT. >> WHICH MEANS YOU HAVE TO NOTIFY THE HOMEOWNER THEY DO HAVE TO CLEAN THAT. IT'S A SIMPLE JETTING PROCESS, IT'S NOT A MAJOR THING. BUT THAT MEANS YOU'RE PROVIDING CLEAN-OUTS. >> YES. AND THEN MR. ATTORNEY, SINCE WE'RE VACATING THIS LANGUAGE IN FAVOR OF LIMITING, I GUESS, OPEN SPACE AND BUFFER SPACE, THERE ARE NO -- CAN THEY COME IN AND STILL REDUCE IT IF THEY NEED -- THERE'S NO MORE MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE GOING TO TAKE PLACE TO OPEN SPACE AND BUFFER SPACE, RIGHT? >> NOTHING I'M AWARE OF. KATELYN, ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY? >> NONE THAT WE'RE AWARE OF AT THIS POINT. THE ONLY PENDING APPLICATIONS WE'RE AWARE OF ARE THE CLUBHOUSE AND ENTRY FEATURES AND THAT SHOULD CLOSE OUT THE ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT. >> THAT'S OPEN SPACE AND HOA SPACE? >> CORRECT, THAT WAS PREDETERMINED IN THE ORIGINAL SITE PLAN AND THEY'RE COMING IN WITH THE DETAILS FOR BOTH OF THOSE AREAS. >> I DIDN'T WANT EITHER A PARKING SPACE TO GO AWAY. I WASN'T SURE -- I DIDN'T WANT TO LIMIT PARKING SPACES IN FAVOR OF MORE GRASS IF THEY NEED PARKING, VARIOUS POOL LOCATIONS, PARKING CAN BE LIMITED. I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THAT EARLY ON. >> YES, THEY PROVIDE ONSITE PARKING FOR THE CLUBHOUSE AS WELL AS GUEST PARKING THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY AND NONE OF THOSE ARE IMPACTED AS A RESULT OF THE REQUEST. >> CAN THEY BE? >> NOT AS A RESULT OF THE SUBJECT APPLICATIONS. NOT TO SAY THAT PRESUMABLY SOMEONE COULD COME IN WITH ANY APPLICATION IN THE FUTURE. IT'S VERY SPECIFIC TO WHETHER IT'S THE ONE SQUARE FOOT OR THE 32 SQUARE FEET. THEY'RE ONLY VACATING IT FOR THOSE AREAS YOU'LL SEE IN THE BACK OF THE SKETCH IN LEGAL AS WELL, IT'S THAT SPECIFIC. >> THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. THE CLUBHOUSE, THAT IS NOT BEINGBEING LOOKED AT TONIGHT? >> IT IS NOT PART OF YOUR APPLICATION TONIGHT. [00:50:02] I WOULD EXPECT THAT LATER THIS SUMMER. >> MAKING NOTES, I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I DIDN'T MISS IT. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME I'M GOING TO OPEN THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON THIS AGENDA ITEM. SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE IT TO THE PUBLIC. ANY MOTION? >> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. >> IS THERE A SECOND? >> SECOND. >> MOTION BY JOEL, SECOND BY TODD. CALL FOR THE VOTE, PLEASE. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MUST BE SUMMER. >> GOOD TO SEE YOU. CONGRATULATIONS, TOO. [8.B. Ordinance 2025-005: Amending Future Land Use Map to Commercial ] LOST 50 POUNDS. >> AT THIS TIME WE'LL GO TO PUBLIC HEARING ITEM B, ORDINANCE 2025-005, AMENDING FUTURE LAND USE, MATH TO COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 34 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE FORMER HERON BAY GOLF COURSE WEST OF KNOB HILL ROAD AND SOUTH OF NORTHWEST 66TH DRIVE AS MORE PARTICULARLY DERIVED IN EXHIBIT A FROM THE PARKLAND R3, APPROXIMATELY 25.23 ACRES AND CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, RESIDENTIAL MODERATE 8. 6 ACRES TO CITY OF PARKLAND, PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL OF THE CORRESPONDING LAND USE PLAN TO THE BROWARD COUNTYCOUNTY MAP, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SERVER ABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE 2025- 21 LUPA. AGAIN, KATELYN. OH, YOU MOVED. >> MAGIC TRICK I LIKE TO DO TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE AWAKE. GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, KATELYN FORBES WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. EXCITED TO PRESENT THIS PROJECT. YOU MAY BE THINKING, DO I HAVE Â÷÷D\J VU BECAUSE YOU REMEMBER HAVING A READING ON THE FIRST 25 ACRES THAT'S CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CITY AS PART OF THE HERON BAY GOLF COURSE SIDE. IN THAT CASE YOU WOULD BE CORRECT. WE HAD A FIRST READING OF THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT LAST YEAR AND THEN THE CITY HAD SOME GREAT DIRECTION TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ANNEXATION REQUEST FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE VILLAGE IN THE PARK SITE. SO THE APPLICATION BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE COLLECTIVE 34 ACRES THAT ENCOMPASSES THE VILLAGE AND THE PARK PROJECT. SO JUST TO KEEP THE APPLICATION REQUEST CLEAN, TECHNICALLY YOU'RE RECONSIDERING THE 25 ACRES THAT'S WITHIN THE CITY AS WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL 8. 68 ACRES THAT WAS IN THE CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, AGAIN, COLLECTIVELY CREATING THE 34 ACRE VILLAGE IN THE PARK SITE. HERE IS OUR SUBJECT MAP. YOU'LL REMEMBER THAT TOLL BROTHERS WAS AWARDED THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH ON THE DOGLEG FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND WE HAVE THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL EARLIER LAST YEAR FOR THAT. SO WE'RE EXCITED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS PROCESS. OF COURSE, THE CITY HAS BEEN PUTTING IN A LOT OF HARD WORK AND EFFORT HERE TO GET THIS PROJECT AS SHOVEL READY AS POSSIBLE. THIS IS THE NEXT STEP TO AMENDMENT THE LAND USE. AS MR. CHAIR READ IN, PART OF THE REQUEST IS ALSO FOR THE BOARD AND COMMISSION TO GIVE US THE DIRECTION THAT WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY LAND USE MAP, BOTH THE CITY'S MAP AND THE COUNTY'S MAP HAVE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH EACH OTHER. SO WHEN WE AMEND OUR MAP, WE ALSO HAVE TO AMEND THE COUNTY'S LAND USE MAP TO A SIMILAR DESIGNATION, WHICH WOULD BE COMMERCE IN THIS CASE. AFTER WE MOVE THROUGH THE FIRST READING WITH THE CITY COMMISSION, WE'LL HAVE THE AUTHORIZATION THAT WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND SUBMIT TO THE COUNTY'S MAP. IT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT OF A TLA WHILE THE COUNTY TAKES ACTION AT THE COUNTY LEVEL, AND THEN WE'LL COME BACK FOR SECOND READING TO WRAP UP THE LOCAL MAP AMENDMENT PROCESS. SO, OF COURSE, SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS THE LIFETIME PROJECT, WHICH IS ANOTHER EXCITING PIECE OF THE CITY- OWNED PROPERTY AND THE EXISTING HOTEL AND OFFICE SPACE JUST FOR CONTEXT. THE AERIAL HERE, YOU CAN SEE THE DIVIDING LINE THAT KIND OF CUTS THE RED BOX, THE 34 ACRES THERE, NORTH OF THAT WHITE LINE IS WHAT'S IN THE CITY CURRENTLY. SOUTH OF THAT LINE, WHICH IS BASICALLY THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY, IS THE 8. 68 ACRES IN THE CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS AND THAT WAS ANNEXED. THE CITY ATTORNEY DID A GREAT JOB IN GIVING US SOME [00:55:05] LATITUDE THROUGH AN ENTER LOCAL AGREEMENT, EVEN THOUGH IT BECOMES EFFECTIVE IN SEPTEMBER. WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT THAT GIVES US AUTHORITY UP UNTIL THAT POINT. THAT'S WHY WE'RE ABLE TO PROCESS THE APPLICATION AT THIS TIME, BECAUSE BACK IN APRIL THE CITY ATTORNEY CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, WHEN THE ANNEXATION BECAME LAW, THAT'S WHEN THE ILA STIPULATED THAT WE COULD MOVE FORWARD WITH THE LAND PLANNING PROCESS. >> THE GOVERNOR SIGNED THE BILL AND IT BECAME LAW VERY RECENTLY, A COUPLE WEEKS AGO WHEN HE SIGNED IT. YOU WERE CLOSE. THEY APPROVED IT IN APRIL AND HE SIGNED IT A COUPLE WEEKS AGO. >> THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION. WE NOW ARE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE APPLICATION, WHICH IS WHY WE'RE HERE FOR THE 34 ACRES. OF COURSE, YOU'VE SEEN THIS GRAPHIC SEVERAL TIMES. THIS IS JUST THE GENERAL TIMELINE OF THE SITE HISTORY. OF COURSE, IT PREVIOUSLY OPERATED AS A HERON BAY GOLF COURSE, WAS ACQUIRED BY NSID AND THEN THE CITY IN 2022. SO HERE IS THE CURRENT MAP FOR THE -- WE'LL CALL IT THE NORTHERN 25. 32 ACRES. SO THE REQUEST WILL BE TO AMEND THE MAP AS IT STANDS FROM THE CITY OF PARKLAN R3 LAND USE TO CITY OF PARKLAND COMMERCE. THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT ALLOWANCE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 75 RESIDENTIAL HOMES. THIS IS THE SOUTHERN 8. 68 ACRES. THE 8. 68 ACRES IS TECHNICALLY TWO PIECES. IT'S ONE THAT'S -- THAT YOU CAN GENERALLY SEE ON THE SCREEN THAT ENCOMPASSES ABOUT 8. 5 ACRES AND THEN THERE'S A FUNKY CLAW- SHAPED PIECE THAT LOOKS LIKE A LOBSTER CLAW AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THAT'S ANOTHER TENTH OF AN ACRE OR SO. SO THE AMENDMENT WOULD BE TO AMEND THE LAND USE PLAN FROM CORAL SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL MODERATE TO CITY OF PARKLAND COMMERCIAL. AND AT THE CURRENT DENSITY ALLOWANCE ON THAT PROPERTY, THE CURRENT ENTITLEMENTS WOULD ALLOW FOR APPROXIMATELY 69 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. SO HERE IS WHAT THAT MAP WOULD EVENTUALLY LOOK LIKE. AGAIN, 34 ACRES. THE CURRENT DESIGN GUIDELINES CONTEMPLATE ABOUT 170,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, OF COURSE THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEME WOULD BE FINALIZED THROUGH THE DEVELOPER'S SELECTION AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT YOUR BACKUP FOR THE ACTUAL AMENDMENT APPLICATION, THE COUNTY USES A STANDARD ESTIMATE OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET PER ACRE, SO THE NUMBERS THAT ARE IN THE APPLICATION WILL SHOW A MUCH GREATER IMPACT THAN IS ACTUALLY ANTICIPATED, GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE CITY HAS DONE THIS VISIONING PROCESS AND DOES NOT ANTICIPATE DEVELOPING NEAR THAT INTENSE. SO, OF COURSE, WE'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA. THIS IS A NATURAL EXTENSION OF THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR THAT'S TO THE SOUTH. YOU'LL SEE IT'S DIRECTLY ADJACENT, OF COURSE, TO THE HOTEL PROPERTY, AND SO THIS IS BASICALLY ONE AND TWO PARCELS NORTH. WE'RE JUST CONTINUING THAT COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. IMPORTANTLY, OF COURSE, FDOT IS WORKING ON OR WILL BE WORKING ON THE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH WILL CARRY NORTH TO THE SUBJECT SITE AND WILL ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL VOLUME AND KPASITY CAPACITY ON THE ROADWAYS. THIS IS THE VISION POINT, THIS IS THE OVERALL GUIDING MASTER WAS ADOPTED AS PART OF OUR DESIGN GUIDELINES, AND OVERALL WHEN WE PROCESS THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS, WE'RE LOOKING FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE LOCAL GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AS LONG AS BROWARD NEXT. WE DID REACH OUT TO THE SERVICE PROVIDERS AND OBTAINED CAPACITY TO SERVE LETTERS, INDICATING THAT THE CHANGE IN USE AND CHANGE IN DEMAND WOULD BE ACCOMMODATED. AND SO THE RECOMMENDATION TONIGHT WOULD BE APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION AS WELL AS, AGAIN, APPROVAL TO GO AHEAD AND SUBMIT THAT BROWARD COUNTY LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE COUNTY MAP TO COMMERCE. WITH THAT, I AM GOING TO TELL YOU THE NEXT STEPS, ACTUALLY, HERE, AND THEN I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. SO THE NEXT STEPS AND PENDING APPLICATIONS WOULD BE THE BROKER ART PIECE SELECTION PROCESS, SO THE CITY IS GOING THROUGH THAT PROCESS CURRENTLY TO SELECT A BROKER TO WORK WITH, TO THEN GO OUT TO MARKET A FIND A DEVELOPER TO ULTIMATELY WORK WITH THROUGH AN RFP OR RFQ OR SIMILAR PROCESS, DEPENDING ON WHAT THE BROKER SUGGESTS. I MENTIONED THE COUNTY LUPA PROCESS AND COMING BACK FOR THE SECOND READING AFTER THE COUNTY COMPLETES THEIR PROCESS. DOWN THE LINE ONCE THE DEVELOPER IS SELECTED, WE WOULD ANTICIPATE A FUTURE DEVELOPER TO SUBMIT MOST LIKELY A REZONING MASTER PLAN PLAT, SITE PLANNING [01:00:02] CAB, POTENTIALLY OTHER APPLICATIONS, BUT THAT'S WHAT WE WOULD ANTICIPATE AT THIS STEP. WITH THAT, I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS IF THERE ARE ANY. >> THANK YOU, KATELYN. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF KATELYN ? GO AHEAD. >> IT'S JUST -- MAYBE I MISSED IT AND JUST A CHECK IN, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT YOU PRESENTED. I'M JUST CURIOUS, THE TIMELINE OF WHEN THE PROJECT WILL BE DONE WILL BE APPROXIMATELY WHAT? HAS THAT MOVED AT ALL? >> SO I CAN'T GIVE YOU AN EXACT TIMELINE. I THINK ANY TIMELINES THAT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED ARE PROBABLY STILL ON TRACK AND I THINK THE CITY HOPES TO SELECT A BROKER OVER THE NEXT MONTH OR SO AND THEN MOVE FORWARD WITH THE DEVELOPER'S SELECTION THROUGH THE BROKER SELECTION PROCESS. WHICH DEPENDING ON THE SELECTED BROKER COULD BE A RANGE OF TIMEFRAMES. I THINK THE CITY WOULD, THROUGH THE RFQ PROCESS -- RFP PROCESS FOR THE BROKER SELECTION, I THINK HAD INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD HOPE TO WRAP THAT UP BY THE END OF THIS YEAR, AND THEN OBVIOUSLY A SELECTED DEVELOPER WOULD HAVE QUITE A BIT OF LEGWORK TO PUT TOGETHER PLANS AND GO THROUGH THE DRC PROCESS FOR ULTIMATE SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND THEN PERMITTING. >> JOEL? GO AHEAD, JOEL. >> KATELYN, YOU HAD MENTIONED THAT -- WHEN WE VOTED TO CHANGE THIS TO COMMERCIAL, I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT DOING A SPECIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, BUT WE LANDED ON COMMERCIAL. THAT WAS HOWEVER MANY MONTHS AGO. DID THE USES FOLLOW THIS LINE USE PLAN AMENDMENT? WE PUT RESTRICTIONS ON THAT, RIGHT, WHEN WE APPROVED IT, IF I RECALL, CERTAIN USES. DOES THAT FOLLOW -- DO THOSE USES FOLLOW THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY? >> ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT THAT WE CREATED? >> YES. >> OKAY, SO THE COUNTY HAS SOME VERY BROAD BRUSH TYPE OF USES, AND SO ANY OF THE ANTICIPATED USES THAT ARE WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT THAT WE ESTABLISHED WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COUNTY LAND USE ANDAND CONSISTENT WITH OUR LOCAL LAND USE PLAN AND ITS PERMITTED USES. >> MORE STRINGENT? >> CORRECT, AND THEN THE ZONING IS MORE RESTRICTIVE, COMP PLANNING BY NATURE IS MORE BROAD BRUSH. IT MIGHT SAY RETAIL AND THEN THE CODE SAYS WHAT TYPE OF RETAIL. >> THAT WALKS ME INTO MY NEXT QUESTION. WHY WOULD THEY NEED TO REZONE? I'M TRYING TO RACK MY BRAIN REAL FAST. IF WE ZONED IT SPECIAL DISTRICT, WHAT -- >> SO WE CREATED THE TEXT FOR A NEW ZONING DISTRICT, BUT WE DIDN'T ACTUALLY REZONE THE PROPERTY ITSELF BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THE LAND USE IN PLACE YET. WE HAVE TO GET THE LAND USE IN PLACE AND THEN THE CITY'S PROCESS STOPS AFTER WE GET THE LAND USE. THAT'S OUR DIVIDING MARK. THEN WE CAN TURN IT OVER TO THE DEVELOPER. THEY'LL COME IN FOR THE REZONING AND THE MASTER PLAN AND ALL OF THOSE APPLICATIONS. >> THEY'LL REZONE IT? >> THEY'LL REZONE IT, YEP. >> THEY'LL BE FORCE TO DO REZONE IT TO COMMERCIAL, ALL RIGHT. >> THEY'LL REZONE IT TO THE VILLAGE AND THE PARK ZONING. >> IT'S ALREADY COMMERCIAL. >> RIGHT. >> THE CURRENT ZONING IS AG. >> THEN THEY'LL HAVE TO GO -- >> THEY'LL REZONE IT TO THE VILLAGE AND THE PARK ONCE THE LAND USE IS IN PLACE. WE HAVE TO GET THE LAND USE IN PLACE, THEY'LL REZONE IT, DO THE PLAT. >> LAND USE AND ZONING, I CONFLATED THE TWO. AND THEN REAL QUICK, DOES ANYBODY KNOW THE DOT TIMELINE FOR CORAL RIDGE? I HAVEN'T SEEN IT. THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING. >> ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? >> JUST ONE QUICK ONE. YOU MENTIONED -- AND I APOLOGIZE, WITH RESPECT TO LUPA GOING TO COUNTY ON THE COMMERCIAL ZONING , THEY ACTUALLY ALLOW FOR LARGER SQUARE FOOTAGE. I DON'T REMEMBER WHEN IT WAS DESIGNATED FOR THE VILLAGE. THERE'S A MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOTTED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT? IF THE COUNTY HAS ALLOWABLE 600,000 SQUARE FEET, THE DEVELOPER THAT COMES IN, THE CITY IS GOING TO RESTRICT THAT TO WHATEVER THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT IS FOR THE VILLAGE, CORRECT? >> SO TWO KIND OF PIECES. WE DON'T HAVE A FLAT- OUT SQUARE FOOTAGE MAXIMUM WITHIN THE LAND USE REGULATIONS BY PROXY THROUGH LOT COVERAGE, FLOOR AREA, RATIO, SETBACKS, THINGS LIKE THAT. YOU KIND OF BACK YOURSELF INTO A MAXIMUM. BUT THERE'S NOT A YOU CANNOT EXCEED 100,000 SQUARE FEET. THERE'S NOT A SPECIFIC NUMBER. NOW, WHAT THERE IS IS ON THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT [01:05:01] PLAN THROUGH THE 505 TEAM, THEY GAVE AN APPROXIMATION OF WHAT THAT PLAN THAT THEY INCLUDED, THAT EVERYONE KIND OF AGREED WE LIKED, TRANSLATED TO IN TERMS OF SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE CITY HAD KIND OF A BACKUP ENVELOPE REFERENCE, WHICH WAS ABOUT 170,000 SQUARE FEET, WHICH IS WHAT WAS SHOWN ON THAT PLAN. SO SINCE THAT'S THE SCALE AND THE CHARACTER AND THE INTENSITY THAT THE CITY WAS COMFORTABLE WITH, I DON'T FORESEE THE CITY NECESSARILY APPROVING 600,000 SQUARE FEET, WHICH WOULD BE DRASTICALLY INCONSISTENT WITH THE VISION THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED SO FAR, NOT TO SAY THAT THERE IS A FLAT- OUT SQUARE FOOTAGE MAXIMUM. >> AND TO ADD ON TO WHAT KATELYN SAID, SIMILAR TO WHAT WE DID WITH THE 21 ACRES WITH TOLL, THE CITY OWNS THE PROPERTY, SO ULTIMATELY THEY'LL GO THROUGH A SELECTION PROCESS AND A DEVELOPER WILL BE SELECTED. I ANTICIPATE, SIMILAR TO WHAT WE DID WITH TOLL, WE CAN HAVE AN OBLIGATION OR COMMITMENT, YOU SHALL SUBMIT A SITE PLAN OF NO MORE THAN X AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL SQUARE FEET. SO TOLL, WE SAID NO MORE THAN 52 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, SO . >> YOU MEAN A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT? >> WE COULD DO THAT. YES, WE COULD DO THAT THROUGH A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT. BUT EVEN BEFORE THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT, WE MAY PUT KNIT THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT. IT WON'T COMMIT TO ANY APPROVALS, LAND USE ZONING. THOSE WILL ALL BE CONSIDERED. WITH TOLL, WE PUT A CAP ON THE AMOUNT OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THEY COULD APPLY FOR. >> THANK YOU. >> AT THIS TIME I'M GOING TO OPEN THE MEETING AGENDA ITEM TO THE PUBLIC. COME ON UP, SIR, AGAIN, THANK YOU. AND PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> YOU ALREADY DID THAT. >> ONE MORE TIME. >> I'LL BE HAPPY TO DO IT AGAIN. IT'S PETER, 6761 NORTHWEST 117TH AVENUE, PARKLAND. >> 117? >> 6771, 117TH. IF YOU COULD POSSIBLY PUT UP THAT MAP AGAIN THAT SHOWED THE AREA THAT YOU ARE CONSIDERING FOR REZONING. THAT'S GOOD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GENTLEMEN CAN SEE THE MAP, ALSO. >> WE HAVE IT AT OUR DESK. >> YOU SEE ON THE MAP, ON THE NORTH SIDE YOU SEE ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE PROPERTIES THAT ARE BACKING UP, ESSENTIALLY, TO YOUR PROPOSED REZONING AREA. I LIVE IN THE MIDDLE OF ONE OF THOSE FIVE HOUSES. WHEN I PURCHASED THAT PROPERTY, WE BOUGHT PROPERTY SPECIFICALLY THAT HAD GOLF COURSE VIEW -- ACTUALLY IT WAS THE BACK OF THE DRIVING RANGE, AND THEREFORE WE WERE ASSURED TOTALTOTAL AND PRIME PRIME LOCATION, FOR WHICH WE HAVE PAID PRIME PRICES. IS THE CITY CONSIDERING THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGE, FINANCIAL DAMAGE THAT ARE CAUSING TO US BY THIS REZONING? AND HOW IS THE CITY CONTEMPLATING COMPENSATING US FOR THIS? >> AT THIS TIME, GIVEN THE PERIOD OF TIME IN OUR MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS, I SUGGEST WE'RE NOT ABLE TO HAVE A DIALOGUE. BUT I WOULD SUGGEST, WE CAN'T AND I CAN'T ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. BUT I DO SUGGEST THAT YOU MEET WITH KATELYN OR ANTHONY, YOU CAN SUGGEST SOMEBODY THAT CAN PERHAPS ANSWER HIS QUESTION. MAYBE NOT SPECIFICALLY, BUT -- >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU FOR THAT. POSSIBLY, I'LL HAVE TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION, I DO RECOGNIZE THAT. BUT ONE REQUEST I HAVE ON THE ZONING, AND I WONDER HOW THAT WOULD BE RECEIVED. CAN WE SPECIFICALLY, IN CASE YOU GO AHEAD WITH THIS, ASK FOR ABOUT 150- FOOT SETBACK ON THE NORTH SIDE FROM THE WATER EDGE? >> AGAIN -- >> THE QUARTER'S EDGE, 150 FOOT SETBACK. >> UNDERSTOOD, YOUR INQUIRY. TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS AND YOUR COMMENTS, THERE WILL BE A SITE PLAN THAT GETS DEVELOPED AND PRESENTED AND REVIEWED AND AND ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY WHERE PERHAPS SOMEBODY, BASED ON -- THE END USER, THE DEVELOPER, IF YOU WILL, WOULD BE PROVIDING CERTAIN OF LANDSCAPING AND OTHER THINGS THAT NOT ONLY ARE BY CODE, BUTBUT BY DESIGN. [01:10:06] AGAIN, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE. >> THAT'S SOMETHING ELSE. I'M LOOKING ACTUALLY FOR THE ZONING NOT TO EXTEND SO FAR NORTH, BUT ACTUALLY STOP 150 FOOT FROM THE WATER'S EDGE. AND THAT IS YOUR COMMENT, SIR. >> I UNDERSTAND. I'M GOING TO REFER TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY TO ASK THAT. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. OBVIOUSLY, I CAN'T PROVIDE ANY LEGAL ADVICE TO YOU. I REPRESENT THE CITY, SO IF YOU'RE PLANNING ON TAKING LEGAL ACTION, I CAN'T DO THAT. BUT WHAT I WILL SAY IS, ONE, WE'RE HERE ON THE LAND USE, WE'RE NOT DOING ZONING. I JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT. TWO, WHEN THE CITY PURCHASED THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH THAT PURCHASE, THE CITY ENTERED AN AGREED WITH THE HERON BAY HOA FOR THE WAIVER OF A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND ADDED A NEW COVENANT ON THE PROPERTY AT THE HOA'S REQUEST SO THAT WILL BE SIGNIFICANT BUFFERS BETWEEN ANY COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THAT'S RECORDED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. THE CITY HAS EVERY INTENTION OF ADHERING TO THAT AGREEMENT, AND SO YOU MAY WANT TO SPEAK WITH YOUR HOA ABOUT THAT AS WELL. THEY'RE AWARE OF IT, THEY REQUESTED IT. WE'LL ADHERE TO THE BUFFERS THAT WE COMMITTED TO. >> BUT THE ZONING ITSELF CAN TAKE CARE OF THAT ISSUE, CAN'T YOU? IF YOU ARE ZONING IT -- >> SIR, WE'RE NOT HERE ON THE ZONING TODAY, WE'RE HERE ON THE LAND USE. AT SOME POINT THERE WILL BE A REZONING. >> THE ZONING COMMITTEE, I BEG YOUR PARDON. >> IT'S THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. WE'RE HERE ON THE LAND USE AMENDMENT. THERE'S GOING TO BE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMENT INCLUDING WHEN A DEVELOPER COMES IN FOR REZONING, WHEN A DEVELOPER COMES IN FOR SITE PLAN. THEY'LL HAVE TO GO TO THE CITY COMMISSION, ET CETERA. >> PERFECT, IN THAT CASE THE LAND USE SHOULD HAVE A 150 FOOT NATURAL RESERVE ALONG THE NORTH EDGE. >> WE'VE LISTENED AND HEARD YOUR COMMENTS AND I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU VERY, VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC? THANK YOU. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. >> 6771 NORTHWEST 117TH AVENUE, PARKLAND, NEXT TO PETER. SO THERE'S MANY REASONS WHY PEOPLE HAVE TALKED ABOUT WHY THIS IS NOT A GREAT IDEA, BUT YOU GUYS HAVE ALL MADE UP YOUR MIND AND YOU'RE GOING FORWARD WITH THIS. A LOT OF PLANNING HAS HAPPENED, I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE POTENTIAL FINANCIAL IMPACT TO MY PROPERTY VALUE BASED ON WHAT YOU'RE DOING, CONSIDERING IT IS RIGHT IN MY BACKYARD, AND, YOU KNOW, THAT IS REALLY MY PRIMARY CONCERN. AND ALSO PRIVACY AND WHAT IT'S GOING TO MEAN LIVING IN THAT HOUSE. I KNOW THAT YOU ARE PLANNING ON GOING FORWARD, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME THAT YOU HAVE NOT REALLY THE CODE OF ORDINANCE IN THE CITY OF PARKLAND, ARTICLE 20, GERM PROVISION, SECTION 20-190, COMPATIBILITY AND CONSISTENCY, WHICH HAS A VERY LARGE PARAGRAPH THAT TALKS ABOUT HOW YOU DECIDE WHAT THE ZONING IS GOING TO BE FOR ADJACENT PARCELS OF LAND. I DID PRINT COPIES IF YOU WANT ME TO LEAVE THEM, I CAN. OTHERWISE, YOU CAN FIND THEM ON THE MUNICIPAL CODE WEBSITE. AS PETER STATED, I THINK FOR THE SIX HOMES WHO HAVE BEEN MEETING AND TALKING ABOUT THIS AND THE IMPACT TO US, WE ARE GOING TO SEEK THE ADVICE OF COUNSEL TO MAKE SURE OUR INTERESTS ARE REPRESENTED. I THINK HIS RECOMMENDATION OF 150 FOOT SETBACK WOULD CERTAINLY GO A LONG WAY TOWARDS, YOU KNOW, REDUCING THE IMPACT TO OUR HOMES, AS WELL AS THE SIZE OF A BERM, AND WHAT ELSE MIGHT BE DONE TO REDUCE THE IMPACT. SO THOSE ARE MY CONCERNS. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. >> WOULD YOU LIKE THESE PAPERS? NOT MYSELF, NO, THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> ANYBODY ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC AT THIS TIME? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE IT TO THE PUBLIC. >> MR. CHAIR, IF I MAY JUST ADD A COUPLE NOTES IN REGARDS TO THE COMPATIBILITY, IN ADDITION TO THE AGREEMENT THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY MENTIONED WHICH DOES INCLUDE SIGNIFICANT BUFFERING AND BERM DESIGN, AND WAS CAREFULLY COORDINATED WITH THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARBORIST, THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED CERTAINLY CONTEMPLATES SIGNIFICANT SETBACKS. I'LL SCROLL BACK TO THAT SLIDE HERE. YOU CAN SEE THE TYPES AND QUALITIES OF GREEN SPACE AND THE SETBACKS. THE ZONING DISTRICT THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE ANTICIPATED TO REZONE TO ALSO HAVE DOES SETBACK, ADDITIONAL BUFFERING STANDARDS. COMPATIBILITY WAS CERTAINLY AT THE FOREFRONT OF THE CITY'S DESIGN AS SHOWN HERE IN THE GRAPHIC, AS WELL AS IN THE TEXT OF THE ZONING DISTRICT THAT WAS ESTABLISHED. >> THANK YOU FOR THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. >> THAT'S PART OF THE CITY'S ADOPTED DESIGN GUIDELINES. [01:15:01] IF YOU EMAIL, WE CAN GET YOU A COPY. >> ANY OTHER ISSUES, COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, A MOTION? >> TO APPROVE? >> ARE YOU MAKING A MOTION? >> YES. >> FABIO MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THERE A SECOND? >> SECOND. >> SECONDED BY JORDANA. PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE >> MOTION CARRIES. AGENDA ITEM CARRIES. >> CAN I JUST MAKE ONE COMMENT? JUST IN REFERENCE TO THE ITEM WE JUST PASSED. >> YES, YOU CAN MAKE A COMMENT. >> AND I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE A DIALOGUE. I DO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEIR COMMENTS ARE PUT TO WHERE THEY NEED TO BE PUT, SO WHEN THE NEXT TIME WE'RE TALKING ABOUT RELEVANT ZONING THAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT, THAT IT'S IN THE RIGHT PLACE. >> THAT'S WHY I ANSWERED THETHE GENTLEMAN. >> I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IT DOESN'T GET LOST. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S ADDRESSED. NOT SAYING WE KNOW THE ANSWER, BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S HEARD. >> THANK YOU. KATELYN, COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNING & ZONING MANAGER? >> NONE AT THIS TIME, THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER COMMENTS, ISSUES FROM THE BOARD? >> WE JUST FLIPPED THE ORDER. ANY MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT? >> MOTION TO ADJOURN. >> THANK YOU. I'LL SECOND IT. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.