[1. Call to Order]
[00:00:17]
BOARD MEETING TO ORDER. TODAY IS THURSDAY, JANUARY 11.
EVERYONE PLEASE RISE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
>> WELCOME, EVERYBODY. ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
>> PLEASE MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT SPEAKING INTO THE
SPEAKER. >> EVERYONE IN THE DAIS AND ALSO THE STAFF, PLEASE SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE DIRECTLY SO THAT THE WORD YOU SAY CAN BE PICKED UP PROPERLY FOR THE MINUTES . THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
[4. Approval of Minutes]
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 12, 2023 . IS THERE A MOTION?>> MOTION APPROVED FOR >> SECOND.
>> MOTION BY JOEL AND SECOND BY DEREK.
>> ALL IN FAVOR SAY I. -- TRANS 18 PER
>> AYE. >> IS THERE ANY ONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AN ITEM CURRENTLY NOT ON THE AGENDA? YES, SIR. THE NEXT THING IS I WILL CLOSE IT FOR ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING. KATELYN, IS THERE ANY CHANGE TO THE
[7. Approval of the Agenda]
AGENDA THIS EVENING AS IT STANDS WITH THE ITEMS ?>> THERE IS NO CHANGE, CHAIR. I WANTED TO BE NOTED ON ITEM 8D IT IS REFERENCED IN THE SHORT TITLE IN BOLD BUT IT SAYS CYCLING AND VARIANCE APPROVAL. THERE IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL . WANTED TO NOTE THAT FOR THE BOARD BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE FULL TITLE IT IS LISTED BUT NOT LISTED ON THE SHORT
TITLE IN BOLD. >> OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
AT THIS TIME, I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEMS A,
B, C, D, E . >> MR. CHAIRMAN, ARE WE HEARING
ALL OF THEM AT ONCE? >> THAT IS WHAT I AM STATING RIGHT NOW. I WILL READ THEM SO THEY ARE ON THE RECORD BUT WE WILL BE VOTING ON THEM INDIVIDUALLY.
>> I BELIEVE BOTH STAFF AND THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE PLAN ON PRESENTING ALL OF THE ITEMS TOGETHER. AS YOU STATED, THE BOARD WILL HAVE TO VOTE ON EACH ITEM INDIVIDUALLY FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. AND ONE CLEANUP ITEM. I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE AN ACTUAL MOTION ON THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. WE DID AND WE MISSED IT , MY
APOLOGIES. >> MOTION TO APPROVE.
>> MOTION BY ANTHONY >> ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> AYE. >> THANK YOU . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT IS GOING TO BE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THE AGENDA ITEMS THAT WOULD NEED TO SIGN IN ? I UNDERSTAND ONE GENTLEMAN HAS. IF THERE IS ANYONE ELSE, PLEASE SIGN IN WITH YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. PUBLIC HEARING
[Items 8.A. - 8.E.]
EIGHT A. AMENDING FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO COMMERCIAL CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4.35 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LOXAHATCHEE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 0.7 MILES WEST OF PARKSIDE DRIVE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY RR-10 TO CITY OF PARKLAND COMMERCIAL; PROVIDING FOR RECERTIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. CASE NUMBER LUPA23-002. ITEM BE.ORDINANCE 2024-002: REZONING 4.35 ACRES TO SELF STORAGE DISTRICT CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
[00:05:01]
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA, REZONING APPROXIMATELY 4.35 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LOXAHATCHEE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 0.7 MILES WEST OF PARKSIDE DRIVE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL TO CITY OF PARKLAND S-1, SELF STORAGE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE CASE NUMBER RZ23-001. ITEM C. RESOLUTION 2024-004: APPROVING PLAT FOR SELF-STORAGE USE CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE PLAT APPLICATION FROM PARKLAND STORAGE, LLC, FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.35 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LOXAHATCHEE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 0.7 MILES WEST OF PARKSIDE DRIVE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", TO LIMIT THE PROPERTY TO 148,722 SQUARE FEET OF SELF-STORAGE USE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. CASE NUMBER PL23-002. ITEM D. RESOLUTION 2024-005: SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR PARKLAND STORAGE, LLC CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA, APPROVING A SITE PLAN FROM PARKLAND STORAGE, LLC, TO CONSTRUCT A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY ON APPROXIMATELY 4.35 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LOXAHATCHEE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 0.7 MILES WEST OF PARKSIDE DRIVE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" KNOW AS THE "PROPERTY." CASE NUMBER SP23-001; APPROVING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE APPLICATION TO PERMIT A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY ON THE PROPERTY CASE NUMBER SE23-001; APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 95-1515(A) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REDUCE THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE SOUTHERN, WESTERN, AND EASTERN PROPERTY LINES FOR THE PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. CASE NUMBER V23-003. FINALLY CAPITAL E. RESOLUTION 2024-006: COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD APPROVAL FOR PARKLAND STORAGE, LLC A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA, APPROVING A COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD APPLICATION FROM PARKLAND STORAGE, LLC, FOR A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON APPROXIMATELY 4.35 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LOXAHATCHEE ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 0.7 MILES WEST OF PARKSIDE DRIVE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. CASE NUMBER CAB23- 001. A REMINDER WE WILL BE HEARING ALL THE ITEMS TOGETHER BUT WE WILL BE VOTING ON THEM INDIVIDUALLY BY EACH ITEM NUMBER. THANK YOU.PERFECT. THIS IS THE CLICKER ?
>> CAN I HAVE WHOEVER IS GOING TO PRESENT OR SPEAK?
>> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. KATELYN FORBES. VERY NICE TO SEE EVERYONE AGAIN. WE HAVE QUITE A NUMBER OF ITEMS O OUR AGENDA A DAY ALL RELATING TO THE PARKLAND SELF STORAGE. THIS HAS BEEN AN ITEM IN THE WORKS FOR QUITE A WHILE. IT SEEMS LIKE YOUR FORMER SENIOR PANEL AND
[00:10:05]
ON THE BACK AND WE WERE ABLE TO STEP IN AND CREATE THE STAFF REPORT AND THE AGENDA ITEMS THAT ARE HERE. WE ARE CAUGHT UP WITH WHAT ALL OF THE EXCITEMENT THAT HAS BEEN GOING ON IN THE CITY RELATING TO THIS SITE HERE. JUST TO FAMILIARIZE EVERYONE WITH THE LOCATION, IT IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR ACRES OF VACANT PROPERTY SOUTH OF LOXAHATCHEE ROAD ABOUT SEVEN MILES WEST OF PARKSIDE DRIVE. YOU CAN SEE SURROUNDING THE LOCATION IS THE FALLS, WHICH WE ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH. SOUTH OF THAT SUBJECT SITE IS A VACANT PARCEL UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP. ALSO UNDER OWNERSHIP BY THE PARKLAND STORAGE LLC . ADJACENT TO THE WEST IS A NURSERY OPERATION AND OF NOTE THE PARCEL TO THE NORTH IS BROWARD COUNTY. THAT IS IN THE COUNTY BUT NOT WITHIN THE CITY JURISDICTION.ALSO CYPRUS HAD IS TO THE SOUTH , SOUTH WOULD BE WHAT WHAT IS THE FUTURE HILLSBORO BOULEVARD EXTENSION . A LITTLE PREVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL. IT IS THE SITE PLAN AND TWO IMAGES THAT GIVE YOU BE AERIAL ELEVATION THERE SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING APPROXIMATELY 140,000 SQUARE FEET OF SELF STORAGE IN A THREE-STORY BUILDING. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE ARCHITECT DID WORK WITH THE CITY THE DRP TO MAKE THE BUILDING APPEAR OR READ VISUALLY AS A TWO STORY BUILDING. THAT IS A BENEFIT TO THE OVERALL DESIGN. WE WILL GET INTO SOME OF THE SPECIFICS A LITTLE MORE IN THE PRESENTATION IN JUST A MINUTE. THE APPLICATION REQUEST. WE HAVE SEVEN DIFFERENT ITEMS AND THREE OF THEM WERE COMBINED INTO ONE RESOLUTION. WE WILL TALK ABOUT THE LAND LOOSE -- LAND-USE MAP A MINUTE, THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION VARIANCE AND THE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE PORT APPLICATIONS TO GATHER. THAT WOULD CREATE ONE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND THE FINAL APPROVAL FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. THE LAND-USE PLAN AMENDMENT, THE REQUEST IS TO AMEND THE EXISTING DESIGNATION FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY R-10 TO CITY OF PARKLAND COMMERCIAL. IF YOU REMEMBER , THIS PROPERTY WAS SUBJECT OF AN ANNEXATION THAT TOOK EXCEPT -- IN EFFECT IN SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR AND TO BE PLACED ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP . A LOCAL DESIGNATION NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE SITE. THIS IS A REQUIRED STEP IN THE PROCESS AND IT IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE PROCESS TO ENTITLING THE SITE. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT SITE IS SHOWN IN RED FAIR. AND THE GRAY HATCHED AREA, INDICATES IT IS NOT CURRENTLY ON THE CITY'S MAP. THE REZONING , THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY AGRICULTURE RESIDENTIAL TO CITY OF PARKLAND S-ONE 1 ALSO DONE WITHIN THE LAST YEAR OR SO. AND BROUGHT FORWARD AND APPROVED. THE S-1 DISTRICT IS SPECIFICALLY TO PROVIDE FOR LOCATIONS FOR SELF STORAGE FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. THIS IS THE APPROPRIATE REZONING REQUEST AND WITHIN THAT ZONING CATEGORY , SELF STORAGE IS CONSIDERED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE. WE WILL GET TO THE ESPECIALLY EXCEPTION IN JUST A MINUTE. NEXT IN THE ORDER OF OPERATIONS IS THE PLAT APPLICATION. IT IS FAIRLY SIMPLE IN NATURE. A PLATTING IS GENERALLY CONSIDERED A FUNCTION OF THE COUNTY. YOU WILL SEE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SITE HERE. YOU WILL SEE WHAT LOOKS LIKE A HASH MINE OR A SQUIGGLY LINE, DEPENDING ON HOW FUZZY IT IS ON THE SCREEN ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY . THAT IS WHAT WE CALL THE NON-VEHICULAR ACCESS LINE. YOU WILL ALSO SEE AN OPENING TO THE LEFT OF THE SITE OR TO THE WEST AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER. THAT IS DESIGNATING THE DRIVEWAY LOCATION. ONCE THE CITY APPROVES, IF THE CITY SHOULD APPROVE THE PLAT, THIS WOULD GO ON TO THE COUNTY FOR FINAL APPROVAL AND RECORDATION.
MOVING INTO THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION. CRITERIA IS LISTED HERE AND ON THE NEXT SLIDE, AS I NOTED, IT IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE IN THE S-1 DISTRICT. THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL TO COMPATIBILITY TRAFFIC AVAILABILITIES AND IMPACT ON UTILITIES AND OTHER PUBLIC SERVICES. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND ABOUT MY COAT AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
CONSIDERING WHETHER THE USE WOULD BE ADVERSELY INFLUENCING ADJACENT LIVING CONDITIONS AND SIMILARLY PROPERTY VALUES IN THE AREA , WHETHER IT BE A DETERRENT TO FUTURE REDEVELOPMENT OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND H IS A CATCHALL FOR ANY ADDITIONAL FACTORS. LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN, THE BUILDING IS CENTRALLY LOCATED ON THE SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE
[00:15:03]
DRIVEWAY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER . I AM SURE YOU HAVE AL HEARD OF THE DIFFERENT IMPROVEMNTS THAT ARE HAPPENING ALONG LOXAHATCHEE ROAD SINCE IT HAS BEE UNDERWAY FOR QUITE A WHILE. THE TIMING OF THAT THE APPLICANT CAN PROBABLY SPEAK TO THE TIMING OF THE DRIVEWAY AND THE LOXAHATCHEE IMPROVEMENTS. I KNOW THAT HAS BEEN A DISCUSSION TOPIC. ONCE YOU ARE INSIDE THE SITE, CIRCULATION IS ROUTED AROUND THE BUILDING WITH THE ON-SITE PARKING LARGELY BEING PROVIDED TO THE NORTH OF THE BUILDING. THERE ARE TWO LOADING ZONES.ONE AT THE NORTH. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS HAS A LITTLE LASER FUNCTION. IT WILL PICK UP. AT THE CENTER PORTION OF THE BUILDING, ANYWAY, ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH, YOU WILL SEE FOUR LOADING SPACES WORK OF THE PURPOSES OF LOADING AND UNLOADING WITH SMALL TRUCKS AND U-HAUL'S. ON THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE , WE WILL GET INTO SOME OF THE IMAGES OF THE LANDSCAPING. THERE IS A PERIMETER LANDSCAPE PROVIDED ALONG LOXAHATCHEE ROAD AND THE OTHER ADJACENT -- THE OTHER PROPERTY LINES THERE WITH A MASONRY WALL ON THE SOUTH, EAST AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. AND MOVING ON TO THE NEXT SLIDE IS A ZOOMED IN IMAGE. WE CAN COME BACK TO THIS IF ANYONE HAS SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ON THE SLIDE. THE NEXT ITEM THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING IS APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE SPECIFIC TO THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT. THE REQUEST IS TO REDUCE THE BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS IN THE SOUTH EAST AND WEST YARDS FROM 50 FEET TO A MINIMUM OF 16 FEET AND NINE INCHES. THAT IS A REQUIREMENT FROM THE SECTION NOTED ON THE SCREEN. THAT IS OUR LANDSCAPE PROVISIONS WITH IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE APPLICANT DID COORDINATE WITH THE LANDSCAPER REVIEW TEAM AND THE CITY TO PROVIDE AN ENHANCED BERM DESIGN. BY WAY OF AN INCREASED WALL HEIGHT . IT WENT FROM SIX FEET TO EIGHT FEET.
THEY ASO UPSIZE THE MATERIALS WITH IN THE BUFFER YARD. WHILE THE WITS -- WITS OF THE BUFFER IT SELF IS REDUCED, THE NUMBER OF TREES AND MATERIALS REMAINS THE SAME WITHIN THAT REDUCED BUFFER AREA AND THE WALL -- THE COMBINATION OF THE WALL HEIGHT AND THE INCREASED MATERIAL HEIGHT AT TIME OF PLANTING AND IT MITIGATES SOME OF THE CONCERN RELATING TO THAT PARTICULAR REQUEST. WE WILL SEE WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE ON THE NEXT COUPLE SLIDES. HERE IS A VIEW OF THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. IT WAS AT TIME OF INITIAL PLANTING. AND THEN WE WILL SEE THE TREES GROW UP HERE. THIS IS FULL MATURITY.
THE SAME EASTERN PROPERTY LINE SHOWING THE EIGHT FOOT WALL AT THE TOP OF THE BERM AND THE MATERIALS TO THE LEFT OR THE WEST OF THE WALL . THIS WOULD BE A PERSPECTIVE FROM THE ADJACENT PAUL'S PROPERTY. THE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE PORT APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT WORKED CLOSELY WITH THE DD RP TO GO THROUGH SEVERAL ITERATIONS, AS MY UNDERSTANDING , OF THIS DESIGN. AND ENDS UP WITH A VERY NICE LOOKING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PACKAGE HERE . THIS IS THE NORTHWEST AND THE SOUTHEAST VIEW. AGAIN, IT IS A THREE-STORY BUILDING BUT DESIGNED TO LOOK LIKE ONLY TWO STORIES TO HELP MITIGATE SOME OF THE MASSIVE SCALE OF THE BUILDING. HERE IS THE OPPOSITE CORNER WITH THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST. YOU WILL SEE THAT IT INCLDES A MIX OF MATERIALS , EARTH AND NATURAL TONE FINISHES AND PAINT SCHEMES ARE SHOWN IN THE UPPER LEFT OF THE SLIDE ALONG WITH SOME OF THE STONE AND TILE THAT IS USED AND THE OTHER ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THAT ARE ADDED TO ADORN THE FACADE THERE. THEY ALSO INCORPORATED DIFFERENT BALCONIES, FULL BALCONY PIECES TO ARTICULATE THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. MORE IMAGES OF THE DIFFERENT DESIGN COMPONENTS THROUGHOUT THE SITE INCLUDING THE WALL AND SOME OF THE LIGHTING SCHEMES THAT ARE USED ON SITE. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING APPROVAL OF ONE WALL SIGN. THIS IS ON THE NORTH FACADE IN THE CENTER OF THE BUILDING AT THE UPPER STORY LOCATION. THE SIGN IS SHOWN AS MEASURING NINE FEET BY THREE FEET . AND NO GROUND SIGNS ARE PROPOSED AT THIS POINT. IN
[00:20:01]
CONCLUSION, BEFORE RETURNING OVER TO THE APPLICANT TO MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION AND PROVIDE SOME ADDITIONAL DETAILS FOR YOU, STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ALL APPLICATIONS OF NOTE. THE LAND-USE PLAN AMENDMENT IS A LEGISLATIVE DECISION TO BE MADE BY THE COMMISSION, ULTIMATELY. WHILE STAFF IS RICK MANNING APPROVAL, THERE IS OTHER CONSIDERATIONS THAT THE CITY MAY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT. WE HAVE TWO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NOTED RELATING TO THE LAND-USE PLAN AMENDMENT. THESE ARE DRAFTS THAT WERE PROVIDED TO YOU. WE ARE WORKING WITH CITY COUNCIL TO GO THROUGH THOSE AND PREPARE THE FINAL VERSIONS FOR CITY COMMISSION FIRST READING .ORDINANCES? >> THAT IS CORRECT. THE SECOND ITEM -- MOVING TO THE REZONING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL , A HANDFUL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THERE LARGELY RELATING TO RECERTIFICATION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND APPROVAL OF THE LAND-USE PLAN AMENDMENT ITSELF. THE PLAT -- JUST ONE STANDARD CONDITION RELATING TO COST RECOVERY . THE SITE PLAN, SPECIAL EXEMPTION AND IT VARIANCE. A HANDFUL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATING TO ISSUANCE OF PERMITS , TYING IT BACK TO RECERTIFICATION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP . THIS IS UPDATING THE ZONING MAP, WHICH IS THE ITEM BEFORE THIS.
IMPORTANTLY, THAT THE PLAT SHALL BE ON FILE AND RECORDED WITH BROWARD COUNTY. AND ALSO VERY IMPORTANT THAT THE PERIMETER BERMS AND PLANTING SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE FIRST TITHING INSPECTION. THAT ALSO HELPS MITIGATE SOME THE IMPACTS FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. THAT WILL BE INSTALLED EARLY IN THE PROCESS VERSUS TOWARDS THE END, WHICH IS MORE TYPICAL.
THEY WILL HAVE THE NICE PLANTINGS TO HELP SCREAM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY EARLIER THAN TYPICAL. THIS NEXT SLIDE SHOWS ARE STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATING TO INSPECTION . COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD AS STANDARD CONDITION OF APPROVAL RELATED TO COST RECOVERY. TIMELINE AND PROCESSING , WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT BE ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD WILL BE THE TRANSMITTAL AND ADOPTION OF THE TEXT AMENDMENT THAT WAS RELATED TO THIS ITEM. YOU DID SEE THAT BEFORE. THAT ITEM WILL BE TRANSMITTED TO THE STATE. THE STATE WILL PROVIDE ANY COMMENTS . I WOULD EXPECT NONE FROM THE STATE AT THIS POINT.
OTHER REVIEW AGENCIES WILL COME BACK FOR A SECOND READING WITH THE CITY COMMISSION ALONG WITH THE OTHER ITEMS ON THE SECOND READING THAT IS SCHEDULED SOMETIME IN FEBRUARY OR MARCH, DEPENDING ON THE TIMING. A GENERAL APPLICATION WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR A MODIFIED BERM DESIGN ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE . OF IMPORTANCE IS THE FACT THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OWNER AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER ON THE FALLS PROPERTY ARE COMING TOGETHER TO DESIGN ONE UNIFIED BERM SO WHAT WAS APPROVED ON THE FALLS WAS A FULL BURN WITHIN THEIR PROPERTY LINE. AND THAT WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS ANOTHER FULL BERM. YOU END UP WITH A VALLEY IN THE MIDDLE AND WORKING WITH THE LANDSCAPE STAFF, THAT WAS DETERMINED IT IS TYPICALLY AN UNDESIRABLE CONDITION BUT YOU END UP WITH MUD AND OTHER ISSUES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE VALLEY. WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS THE BERM WILL BE REDESIGNED TO HALF IS LOCATED ON EACH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE. IT MEETS IN THE MIDDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. THE GENERAL APPLICATION WILL ALLOW FOR THAT APPROVAL TO COME FORWARD TO THE GA PROCESS. THAT WILL BE PROCESSED WITHIN THE NEXT MONTH OR SO.
THAT IS WHEN WE ARE EXPECTING MAGIC. THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS DO HAVE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEMSELVES TO GO AHEAD AND CONDUCT THAT WORK AND THE APPLICANT CAN PROBABLY SPEAK TO THAT MORE IN DETAIL IF YOU ARE INTERESTED. FROM THERE, WE HAVE FIRST READING OF THE CITY COMMISSION SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 24TH FOLLOWED BY SECOND READING, DEPENDING UPON THE TIMING OF THE STATE AND ULTIMATELY THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT WILL BE CERTIFIED BY BROWARD COUNTY. AND OF COURSE RECORDATION OF THE PLAT. WITH THAT, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT'S TEAM TO PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON THE APPLICATION AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. I'M NOT SURE, JEAN, HOW TO SWITCH THAT OVER FOR THEM.
[00:25:01]
>> I WANT TO ADD WE HAVE BRIAN HERBERT IN THE AUDIENCE. HE IS OUR DESIGN REVIEW PROFESSIONAL TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. WE HAVE OUR LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT, OUR ARBORIST IS ALSO IN THE AUDIENCE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS REGARDING LANDSCAPING. OUR CITY ENGINEER, ALEXANDER BARR IS ALSO HERE FOR QUESTIONS.
>> THANK YOU. AS SOON AS HE HAS DONE , I WILL INVITE DENNIS . I BELIEVE HE WILL START THE PRESENTATION. WELCOME.
>> THANK YOU. MY NAME IS DENNIS MEALY. 200 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD, FORT LAUDERDALE , ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT.
KATELYN DID A VERY THOROUGH JOB. I KNOW A LOT OF MY SLIDES WILL BE REPEAT . I WILL GO THROUGH THEM QUICKLY. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, PLEASE STOP ME. AGAIN, THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. I WANT YOU TO PLEASE LOOK TO OUR EAST IS THE FALLS.
WE BORDER , BASICALLY, THE NORTHERNMOST TOWNHOUSE BUILDING IN THE FALLS . WE BORDER LIKE A PORTION OF IT. SOUTH OF THE BLUE , WHATEVER THAT GEOMETRIC SHAPE IS IS THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ALSO OWNED BY MY CLIENT, THE FELDMAN COMPANY.
THAT IS UNUSUAL THING. WE HAVE THIS PROPERTY AND THE SOUTHERN PIECE WAS ALREADY IN THE CITY OF PARKLAND AND THE NORTHERN PIECE WAS NOT BECAUSE IT WAS PREVIOUSLY IN PALM BEACH COUNTY. I AM SURE YOU ARE WHERE THE WEDGE AREA WAS BROUGHT FROM PALM BEACH INTO BROWARD. AS WE GO, THESE PROPERTIES ARE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF PARKLAND. WE DID AN ANNEXATION AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. WHAT WE ARE SHOWING YOU TONIGHT IS WHAT WE SHOWED IN THAT ANNEXATION AGREEMENT. THE ANNEXATION TOOK EFFECT SEPTEMBER 15TH OF LAST YEAR. WE HAVE BEEN PROCESSING ALL OF THESE APPLICATIONS. WE ALREADY COMPLETED THE LEEANN -- LAND-USE APPLICATION AND THEN THE CITY APPLICATION IS ITEM 8 A, THE FIRST OF THE FIVE ITEMS ON YOUR AGENDA. WHAT WE HAVE DONE SO FAR, WE HAVE THE ZONING CONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE S-1 DISTRICT. THE ONLY USE PERMITTED IN THE S-1 DISTRICT IS SELF STORAGE AND THE ONLY WAY IT IS PERMITTED THROUGH A SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
THE REASON IS TO ALLOW YOU TO LOOK AT THE SITE INDIVIDUALLY AND SEE IF THERE IS SPECIFIC CONDITIONS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AS OPPOSED TO USE THAT IS EMITTED WHERE THERE IS NOT AS MUCH OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT. THE ONLY USE PERMITTED IS SELF STORAGE AND IT IS ONLY PERMITTED AS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION. THE TEXT AMENDMENT FROM THE PLAN THAT WAS NECESSARY WAS ALSO APPROVED LAST YEAR. THE ANNEXATION TOOK EFFECT LAST YEAR THE COUNTY APPROVED THE LAND-USE AMENDMENT LAST YEAR AS WELL. AGAIN, I THINK KATELYN ALREADY SHOW DESPERATE ON THE LEFT-HAND PANEL YOU SEE THE PALM BEACH CANDY INVESTMENT COUNTY . AND ON THE RIGHT YOU HAVE THE PROPOSED CITY OF PARKLAND LAND-USE DESIGNATION OF COMMERCIAL. AS I MENTIONED, THE RED GEOMETRIC SHAPE HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY THE COUNTY FOR COMMERCIAL OBVIOUSLY, FOR IT TO BE EFFECTIVE. YOU SEE OUR EXISTING ZONING AND OUR PROPOSED ZONING. AND THE LANGUAGE THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE NEW S-1 DISTRICT AS TO THE PURPOSE OF THE DISTRICT. THIS IS OUR PLAT. I KNOW KATELYN ALREADY SHOWED IT. IT IS A BOUNDARY PLAT PROVIDING FOR DEDICATIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY FROM LOXAHATCHEE ROAD ROAD AND THE EASEMENT THAT ARE NEEDED. AND ALSO PROVIDING A PLAT NOTE FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT MATCHES THE SITE PLAN SQUARE FOOTAGE, THE HUNDRED 48,722 SQUARE FEET. WE HAVE TURNED IT SIDEWAYS.
LOXAHATCHEE IS ON THE RIGHT. I HAVE A COLOR VERSION THAT IS A LITTLE EASIER TO READ. THIS IS A COLOR VERSION. ECR BUILDING IN THE CENTER. WORK OF THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS FOR PATRONS BUT ALSO FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, WE HAVE CIRCULATION GOING ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS RECOGNIZED IS SELF STORAGE IS THE LOWEST TRAFFIC GENERATOR OF ANY COMMERCIAL USE. SIMPLY BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T GO THERE EVERY DAY TO TAKE THEIR STUFF OUT OR PUT IT IN. A VERY LOW TRAFFIC GENERATION RATE WHICH WE HOPE WILL HELP US BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR. YOU SEE THAT WE HAVE DONE A LOTOF EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING. I WILL SHOW YOU IN A FEW MINUTES HOW WE EXCEEDED THE CODE AS TO THE NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRBS. ALSO, PLANTING THEM AT A TALLER HEIGHT AND A BIGGER SPREAD THAN WHAT THE CODE WOULD NORMALLY CALL FOR. WE HAVE DONE THAT THROUGHOUT AND WE WILL SHOW YOU EXAMPLES OF THAT MOMENTARILY. I KNOW YOU SAW
[00:30:04]
THESE ALREADY AND I WILL GO THROUGH THEM QUICKLY. THESE ARE THE MATERIALS AND COLORS AS WAS MENTIONED EARLIER.PATTY, WHO DOES THE LANDSCAPE REVIEWS FOR THE CITY , WORKED CLOSELY WITH US. SHE MADE SURE WE UPSIZE AND UPGRADED OUR MATERIAL AND THEN BRIAN HERBERT, THE ARCHITECT FOR THE CITY, DID THE SAME THING WITH THE FINISHES THAT YOU ARE SEEING TO MAKE SURE THIS WAS A BUILDING THAT WAS GOING TO LOOK GOOD. IT WAS NOT GOING TO LOOK LIKE THE SELF STORAGE BUILDINGS YOU SEE WITH THE ORANGE GARAGE DOORS AND THAT SORT OF STUFF.
IT IS A FULLY CONTAINED BUILDING. THERE IS NO OUTDOOR ACTIVITY OR OUTDOOR STORAGE. WE DID THE SAME THINGS WITH THE RENDERINGS. WE DID THIS IN THE MIDDLE SO WE COULD SEE WHICH DIRECTION WE WERE LOOKING AT AT ANY TIME. YOU SEE THE FOUR VIEWS THAT WE HAVE FOR THE RENDERINGS. AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS ONE OF THE APPROVALS THAT WE NEED. SELF STORAGE IS A SPECIAL EXEMPTION USE. NOW WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE VARIANCE. THE VARIANCE IS DEALING WITH THE WIDTH OF THE BUFFER YARD. IT IS NOT AFFECTING THE SETBACKS. WE NEED THE CODE FOR ALL THE BUILDING SETBACKS. WE HAVE THIS VARIANCE FOR THE BUFFER. YOU MIGHT ASK, WHY DO WE HAVE A VARIANCE? THIS IS A BRAND-NEW PROJECT. WHAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR CODE NOW IS A TABLE THAT, AT LEAST IN THIS CASE PERTAINS TO EVERY NONRESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IN THE CITY . YOU EVEN HAVE A CAPITAL-1 DISTRICT. DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY ON THE DISTRICT. AND THEN YOU HAVE COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SOME OF THE OTHERS. THE THINKING WAS RATHER THAN TRY TO DO SOMETHING THAT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT PROPERTIES IN THOSE OTHER DISTRICTS SINCE THIS IS A STANDALONE THING, ONE SITE THE BETTER COURSE OF ACTION WAS TO DEAL WITH SPECIFICALLY IN THIS MANNER. WHAT I WANTED TO SHOW IS THAT YOU SEE THE SIDE OF THE PROPERTY WE ARE LOOKING AT, THE CODE REQUIREMENT IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF FEET , THE NUMBER OF FEET PROVIDED. ON THE NORTH SIDE, WE HAVE A HUGE EXPANSE BETWEEN US AND LOXAHATCHEE ROAD. YOU HAVE THE OTHER THREE SIDES. WE PUT IN MORE TREES OF THE TALLER TREES, MORE TREES OF THE UNDERSTORY TREES, MORE SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER. AND THEN WE ALSO PLANTED EVERYTHING AT A TALLER HEIGHT AND BIGGER SPREAD. IN FACT, WHAT I LIKE TO DO IF I COULD -- COULD ONE OF YOU -- THERE IS TWO BOARDS THERE. I WOULD LIKE THE BOARD TO SEE BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.
WE COULD NOT FIT EVERYTHING ON ONE SLIDE. IF SOMEONE COULD HELP . WE COULD MAYBE GO OVER THERE AND HOLD THEM UP SO THE BOARD MEMBERS CAN SEE THEM BOTH AT THE SAME TIME. IN ADDITION TO PLANTING MORE TREES, WE ALSO PLANTED THEM TALLER AND BIGGER.
WE WANTED YOU TO SEE THAT PERMIT OR BUFFER TREES WILL BE 16 THING CALL -- FEET TALL. AND THEN THE SAME THING IS TRUE OF ALL THE OTHER CATEGORIES. NOT ONLY GREATER NUMBERS BUT BIGGER HEIGHTS AND BIGGER SPREADS SO THAT, OBVIOUSLY, THEY WILL GET TO THEIR MATURITY FASTER BY BUYING BIGGER MATERIAL AND PLANTING. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS, WE WILL SHOW IT. IN ADDITION, THE CODE WOULD NORMALLY CALL FOR A SIX-FOOT WALL ON THE PERIMETER AND WE PUT IN AN EIGHT FOOT WALL. IN THE PICTURE OF IS THAT KATELYN SHOWED EARLIER, YOU SAW A FINISHED PICTURE OF THE WALL AND YOU SAW ONE THAT LOOK LIKE IT WAS DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE REASON SHOWING DURING CONSTRUCTION IS TO SHOW YOU THAT IT IS A POURED CONCRETE WALL, NOT A PANEL AND COLUMN TYPE SCENARIO. WE OFTEN DO THE PANEL AND COLUMN BUT THE CITY SAID, NO. WE WOULD LIKE TO HAD POURED AND WE SAID WE WOULD DO IT. BY HAVING THE EIGHT FOOT WALL, THE TALLER LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND MEETING ALL OF THE CODE SETBACKS, IT IS OUR BELIEF THAT WHEN OUR NEIGHBORS WILL SEE IS A VERY GOOD BUFFER IN ALL DIRECTIONS. THE WALL IS TALLER AND THE BUILDING IS SET BACK THE PROPER DISTANCE. OBVIOUSLY, THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IS THICKER AND TALLER AS WELL. KATELYN WAS TALKING ABOUT THE BERM. YOU OFTEN SEE THE SITUATION WHEN PROPERTIES ARE DEVELOPED AND EACH ONE HAS TO HAVE A BERM. YOU HAVE A VALLEY IN A MIDDLE, WHICH IS NOT A GOOD WAY TO GO. YOU SEE WHAT WE ARE DOING. WE ARE GOING TO BE FINISHING THE LAST BIT OF FILMING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE
[00:35:01]
MIDDLE AND YOU SEE WHERE THE WALL IS. TO THE RIGHT IS THE PART OF THE FALLS ELEVATION AND THEY CANNOT DO THAT YET AND IT WOULD JUST DROP OFF RIGHT AT THE MINE. WHEN WE COME IN, WE WILL FINISH UP THE LAST PART. IT WILL BE ONE BIG BERM INSTEAD OF TWO WITH A VALLEY IN THE MIDDLE. WE WILL BE PROVIDING THE MATERIAL BOTH ON OUR SITE AND THEIR SIDE. OF COURSE, PLANTING ALL OF OUR MATERIALS AS WELL. THIS IS SHOWING A DEPICTION AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. THIS IS A PICTURE AT THE TIME OF MATURITY. I WAS THE, THE TREES ON THE FALSE SIDE WILL GET BIGGER TOO. I AM NOT SURE WHY WE DID NOT MAKE THOSE TALLER. I GUESS THEY ARE NOT OUR TREE SO WE DID NOTHING TO MESS WITH THE PICTURE. YOU SEE ABE SUBSTANTIAL BERM WITH AN EIGHT FOOT WALL TO PROVIDE A GOOD BUFFER. AND THEN AS YOU LOOK AT THE LINE OF SIGHT IN THE DRAWING, IT IS IF AS SOMEONE IS STANDING IN THE BACKYARD IN ONE OF THE VILLAS AT THE FALLS AND LOOKING TOWARDS US. THE IDEA IS THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO SEE OUR BUILDING BECAUSE BETWEEN OUR WALL AND LANDSCAPING, IT WILL BLOCK THE VIEW COMPLETELY. I THINK OUR BUILDING LOOKS NICE BUT CERTAINLY PEOPLE WOULD PROBABLY RATHER SEE LANDSCAPING. EVERYTHING THAT IS IMPORTANT IS THIS IS NOT LIKE AN OFFICE BUILDING WHERE SOMEONE COULD LOOK AT OF A WINDOW INTO THE BACKYARD OF A HOME. THESE ARE SOLID AND THE WINDOWS ARE NOT SOMETHING WHERE YOU ARE INSIDE AND LOOKING OUT. THEY LOOK LIKE WINDOWS. I THINK YOU UNDERSTAND THE SELF STORAGE AS OPPOSED TO IF WE WERE DOING AN OFFICE BUILDING. I KNOW NEIGHBORS WOULD BE CONCERNED THAT SOMEONE COULD BE UP THERE LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW INTO THEIR YARD. WE WILL NOT HAVE THAT HERE. THOSE ARE ALL OF THE SLIDES TO SHOW. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.>> I'M GOING TO START WITH ALEX. I WANT TO ASK A QUESTION FIRST. THIS IS FOR CLARIFICATION. ONE OF THE SLIDES IS A TIMELINE SLIDE. JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY.
>> I THINK THAT WAS KATELYN'S SLIDE
>> NO, IT IS YOURS. >> I AM SORRY. TELL ME WHEN I AM IN THE RIGHT PLACE. I KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN. THIS ONE?
>> OF THE ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE -- RIGHT THERE.
>> CURIOSITY, WHERE IT HAS CITY COMMISSION FIRST READING, JANUARY 24TH AND THEN CITY COMMISSION SECOND READING.
LOOP AND RZ. AFTER THAT THE PL SITE PLAN AND THE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE , THOSE ARE FIRST READING OR ONLY READINGS? THOSE ARE NOT HAVING SECOND READINGS? THOSE ONLY NEED ONE
READING. >> THAT IS CORRECT. THE PLAT, SITE PLAN AND BOARD ARE RESOLUTIONS.
>> IT JUST READ FUNNY. FIRST READING ARE THE TWO ITEMS .
AND THEY WILL HAVE THE TWO ITEMS WITH A SECOND READING BUT THEY WILL NOT HAVE THE REST OF THE ITEMS. THEY WILL HAVE AN ONLY READING OR APPROVAL. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? DO YOU
UNDERSTAND MY QUESTION? >> WHAT WE NORMALLY SEE. I DO'S UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION. I THINK WHAT WE NORMALLY SEE IS THE ITEMS THAT ONLY REQUIRE ONE MEETING GO ON THE SAME AGENDA AS THE SECOND READING OF THE ITEMS THAT REQUIRE TWO
READINGS. >> IT LOOK LIKE IT WAS HAVING A SECOND READING AND IT APPEARS -- I KNOW THAT. IT APPEARED AS THOUGH WE ARE THE FIRST READINGS FOR PLS .
>> THE REASON THERE IS A GAP IN TIME BETWEEN THE FIRST READING AND THE SECOND READING OF THE LAND-USE AMENDMENT IS BECAUSE THE CITY HAS TO SEND IT TO TALLAHASSEE OR WHOEVER ELSE
THEY SEND TO FOR REVIEW. >> THAT WAS A CLARIFICATION FOR MYSELF AND HOW IT WAS LAID OUT. THANK YOU.
>> I WILL SAY THAT ON THE COUNTY LAND-USE AMENDMENT, FOR THE EXACT SAME THING WE ARE DOING HERE. WHEN THE COUNTY SENT IT TO ALL THE REVIEWERS, NO ONE HAD ADVERSE COMMENTS.
THE D.O.T. AND MANAGEMENT DIFFERENT, NO ADVERSE COMMENTS
AT ALL. >> CHAIRMAN, I HAVE A QUESTION.
>> WE HEARD FROM THE CITY AND APPLICANT BUT DO YOU THINK IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE BEFORE THE BOARD TO ASK QUESTIONS TO HEAR FROM ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? I WILL
LEAVE IT UP TO YOUR JUDGMENT. >> WE WILL HOLD THE PUBLIC UNTIL AFTER OUR COMMENTS. ALEX.
>> THANK YOU , BOTH FOR THE PRESENTATION. AS YOU HEARD
[00:40:02]
BEFORE, I AM NOT ALL THE WAY IN FAVOR OF STORAGE IN PARKLAND .REALLY, THANK YOU FOR THE EFFORT TO MAKE IT , YOU KNOW, AS COUNTRY ELEGANT AND NICE AS POSSIBLE. ITEMS A AND B ARE PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. THE VARIANCE THAT YOU WERE TALK ABOUT , WHAT ARE WE LOOKING FOR VARIANCE ON A NEW PROPERTY? I LOVE WHAT YOU DID WITH THE LANDSCAPING. THE SUPERIOR LANDSCAPING. WE REALLY FOCUSED ON THE FALSE SIDE AND THAT IS LOOKING REALLY WELL . IT DOES NOT SEEM THAT WE SHOULD BE REALLY GIVING SO MUCH ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER SEEING THAT THE APPLICANT OWNS BOTH PROPERTIES AND WERE DOING A PLAT RIGHT NOW. WE ARE ACTUALLY -- THAT IS A PRETTY BIG GIFT FOR THE CITY TO SAY THAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE 50 FOOT.
WERE ASKING NOW FOR 16 FOOT, I THINK IT WAS ON THE SOUTH? THERE IS ROOM TO GET ON THE SOUTH SIDE. WE HAVE SEEN A LOT OF , YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE THE BOARD UP HERE OF HOW MUCH MORE LANDSCAPING THERE WOULD BE. AND THAT ALSO GOES WITH THE WESTERN SITE TOO. THERE IS NOTHING THERE RIGHT NOW BUT THERE WILL BE SOMETHING BEAR ON BOTH THE WEST AND THE SOUTH SIDE. THOSE WERE MY CONCERNS. HERE WE GO. WE ARE GIVING AWAY THIS LANDSCAPE AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WILL BE IN THE FUTURE. I'VE CEE VEE SUPERIOR LANDSCAPING HERE BUT IS THAT GOING TO BE GOOD ENOUGH FOR WHAT WILL GO IN THE FUTURE? IT IS A BIG RISK TO TAKE AS A WARD.
>> IF I COULD RESPOND BRIEFLY. ON THE SOUTH SIDE IS WHERE WE ON THE REST OF THE PROPERTY. THAT PROPERTY HAS A DIFFERENT LAND-USE. IT IS NOT COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL. WE MAY BE ABLE TO DO MORE ON THAT WHEN WE DO THE SOUTH SIDE. I CANNOT SHOW IT ON THIS BECAUSE IS A TOTALLY SEPARATE LAND USE, ZONING AND
EVERYTHING ELSE. >> OF COURSE. IT IS NOT AN EXISTING HARDSHIP. IF YOU REALLY WANT TO TALK, THEY CAN BE PART OF THIS WHOLE PROCESS TO ADD IN ANOTHER.
>> LET ME SAY THIS. WHEN WE WERE STARTING TO WORK ON THIS , OUR ENGINEER, CHRIS COLLINS, WAS MEETING WITH STAFF AND GOING OVER ALL THE REQUIREMENTS. WHAT WE HAD HOPED TO DO WAS DRAFT AN ORDINANCE THAT TOOK EVERYTHING INTO ACCOUNT. AFTERWARDS WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT I TALKED TO CHRIS AND HE SAID IN HIS MEETINGS AND STAFF THAT THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT AMENDING THE TABLE AND THE CODE THAT DEALS WITH THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH . IT IS AN ELABORATE TABLE AND IT DEPENDS ON WHAT YOUR YOUTH IS AND THE NEXT YOUTH -- USE IS TO SEE HOW MUCH BUFFER YOU NEED. THE DETERMINATION WAS , AT THAT LEVEL THAT YOU TALK ABOUT HERE.
YOU HAVE TO GO WITH WHAT YOU FEEL IS RIGHT. AT THE STAFF LEVEL, THIS WAS THE WAY TO HANDLE IT RATHER THAN OPENING UP THE CODE. I RECOGNIZE WHEN WE ARE STANDING HERE AND YOU JUST ADOPTED A NEW DISTRICT AND THE FIRST THING THAT COMES IN IS A VARIANCE. IT DOES NOT SEEM RIGHT. I UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT.
ONE OTHER THING I WANTED TO SAY ABOUT SELF STORAGE AND IT WAS NOT A QUESTION. I KNOW IT IS A CONCERN THAT I HAVE HEARD. I WANT TO SHOW YOU REAL QUICK. WHEN THE NEW ORDINANCE WAS DONE , THERE WAS A PROVISION PUT IN THE ORDINANCE THAT SAYS THAT ANY SELF STORAGE FACILITY HAD TO BE AT LEAST A MILE AND A HALF AWAY FROM ANY OTHER SELF STORAGE FACILITY EVEN IF THE OTHER SELF STORAGE FACILITY WAS IN A DIFFERENT CITY. WHAT THIS MAP IS SHOWING YOU IS THAT WE IDENTIFIED ALL OF THE SELF STORAGE FACILITIES IN CORAL SPRINGS, COCONUT CREEK AND BOCA THAT WERE CLOSE TO ASPIRATE AND THEN WE LAID OUR RESENTMENT. ALL OF THE ONES IN YELLOW OUR EXISTING SELF STORAGE FACILITIES WITH A ONE HALF MILE RING AROUND THEM. THE ONE IN BLUE IS US. YOU NOTICE THAT THE ONLY COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF PARKLAND THAT IS OUTSIDE OF THOSE CIRCLES IS THE RED PIECE AT THE BOTTOM. THAT IS ASHTON GARDENS. I NEVER REALIZED THAT ASHTON GARDENS HAD A COMMERCIAL LAND-USE. I GUESS IT MUST HAVE BEEN FLEXED TO RESIDENTIAL. THE WHOLE POINT IS TO SHOW ONCE YOU DO THIS, THIS IS PROBABLY THE ONLY ONE. IF ANYONE ELSE WANTED TO DO IT TO AMEND THE LATIN -- LAND USE MAP. THEY HAVE TO DO EVERYTHING AND THE CITY WOULD HAVE THE DISCRETION TO SAY, NO , IF IT IS A LOCATION THEY DON'T WANT IT. I WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT SELF STORAGE, GENERALLY, A LOT OF ATTENTION WAS PAID TO -- WHAT IS NOT AND END UP WITH A WHOLE BUNCH OF THINGS. WHAT WE DID TO MAKE UP FOR THE NARROW WIDTH WAS JUST TO PUT IN A TALLER WALL, MORE TREES AND TALLER TREES TO CREATE THE SAME ENVIRONMENT AS
[00:45:01]
THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LOOKING IN. AT LEAST THAT IS WHAT WEHOPE TO DO. >> DEFINITELY THANK YOU FOR THAT RESPONSE AND THIS MAP. THAT IS HELPFUL. YOU CAN SEE ALONG 441. YOU SEE THESE THINGS ALL OVER THE PLACE. BACK TO THE BUFFER ON THE WESTSIDE , WE LOOKED AT THE EAST SIDE BUFFER AND YOU HAVE THE BERM THERE. ON THE WEST SIDE IT LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE A RETENTION SIDE. WHAT WILL BE THE ELEVATION DIFFERENCE ? WHEN WE LOOK AT THIS AND SAY, THIS IS GOING TO BE UP TO 26 FEET BUT THAT SIDE WILL BE ALL THAT WILL SIT IN THE RETENTION POND . WILL THAT BE MUCH LOWER? IT IS HARD TO
SEE . >> CHRIS COLLINS WITH URBAN DESIGNS. ON THE WEST SIDE THERE IS A SMALL DRY RETENTION AREA THAT OF ACTUALLY BERMS BACK UP WITH VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SAW AND THE CROSS-SECTION ON THE EAST SIDE PRETTY SPECIFICALLY IN THAT AREA DROPS DOWN ABOUT TWO FEET OR BACKUP.
GOING UP SIX FEET TO THE WALL?
>> ON THE EAST SIDE IT IS ABOUT FIVE FEET. IN ADDITION TO THAT , OUR CLIENT HAS OFFERED TO BUILD UP THE BERM THAT IS ON THE FALSE SIDE, WHICH IS NOT CONSTRUCTED INITIALLY. THE WALL IS PLACED RIGHT AT THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE BERM.
>> DID YOU HAVE PHOTOS? YOU SAID THERE WAS A PHOTO OF THE
WALL. MAYBE I MISSED IT. >> I WILL SHOW YOU. LET ME
JUST FIND THE SLIDE. >> WE SAW A WALL GO UP AND I ASKED BECAUSE WE SAW A WALL GO UP IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA IN PARKLAND AND THE RESIDENTS WERE NOT TOO HAPPY ABOUT IT.
>> LEFT. IN CAITLIN'S PRESENTATION, THERE WAS TWO PICTURES. ONE WAS THIS ONE THAT YOU SEE AND ANOTHER ONE WAS THE WALL DURING CONSTRUCTION. I TOOK IT OUT OF HOURS BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT LOOKED CRUMMY BECAUSE THE WALL IS NOT FINISHED AND NO LANDSCAPING. I REALIZE ONCE I GOT HERE ABOUT THE REASON WE WERE SHOWING THAT WAS TO SHOW YOU IT WAS A POURED
CONCRETE WALL. >> THE DOUBLE LOADING -- I DON'T KNOW IF I'VE SEEN THAT AT OTHER STORAGE FACILITIES.
WHAT WAS THE INTENT OF LOADING ON THE FRONT AND BACK SIDE ? NOT KNOWING WHAT WILL BE ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND NOW WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A POTENTIAL LOADING IN THE BACK THAT COULD BE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL . IS THAT A CONCERN? KNEW IT LET ME GET BACK TO THE SITE PLAN SO THAT WE CAN SEE IT BETTER. THERE YOU GO. OKAY, PERFECT. YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THESE TWO
LOCATIONS HERE, RIGHT ? >> YET. ONE ON THE NORTH. IT
LOOKS LIKE THERE IS FOUR . >> THE QUALITY OF THE STORAGE BUILDING BUT YOU DON'T HAVE TO PUSH DISTANCE FROM SOMEONE MOVING ITEMS BEYOND 150 FEET. FOR THIS SIZE FOOTPRINT, WE NEEDED TO HAVE A LOADING AREA IN TWO DIFFERENT SECTIONS BUT THE ONE THAT IS ON THE NORTH SIDE, THE ONE THAT IS CLOSE TO LOXAHATCHEE IS ENCLOSED INSIDE THE BUILDING .
>> THE DOORS GO UP AND PEOPLE COLD -- PULLED THEIR CAR OR
TRUCK AND? >> YES, ON THE NORTH BESIDE IT.
ON THE SOUTH, NO. THAT IS ENCLOSED WITH THE WALL AND LANDSCAPING WORK WOULD NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY. >> POTENTIALLY SOMETHING BEHIND IT? WHATEVER THE FUTURE USE WILL BE FOR THAT LAND. JUST A CONCERN WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT REDUCING THE SOUTHERN BUFFER THAT WE HAVE LOADING IN THAT AREA. USUALLY, IF SOMEONE IS GOING TO DUMP TRASH , WHICH HAPPENS IN STORAGE FACILITIES OFTEN , THAT IS WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE DONE. JUST A CONCERN.
>> ACTUALLY, IF YOU LOOK AT THE STORAGE , THE LOADING IN THE BACK, WE DID NOT PUT ANY PARKING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THAT TO ENHANCE THE LANDSCAPING THAT WOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THOSE FOUR SPACES IN THE BACK.
>> THE OTHER THING I WANTED TO AT IN TERMS OF THE CONCERN ABOUT SOMEONE DUMPING, WE HAVE CAMERAS EVERYWHERE ON THE SITE.
WE HAVE A MANNED OPERATION. WE WILL KEEP AN EYE ON THAT. IF SOMEONE DOESN'T, WE WILL TAKE CARE OF IT RIGHT AWAY.
>> THE THOUGHT RIGHT NOW, HONESTLY, IT CAN CHANGE -- IT
[00:50:01]
WOULD BE A STAFFED OPERATION, NOT AUTOMATED?>> YES. STAFF OPERATIONS WITH SECURITY CAMERAS AS WELL.
>> I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THE LOADING IN THE BACK IS GATED.
YOU WILL NEED A KEY FOB ACCESS AS A GUEST TO EVEN GET BACK INTO THAT AREA. SO YOU WOULD NOT HAVE A RANDOM -- YOU HAVE TO HAVE CONTROL ACCESS TO GET TO THE BACK AREA.
>> THE PERIMETER WHILE ON THE DETAIL LOOKS LIKE IT IS TWO FEET OFF THE PROPERTY LINE. IS THERE ANY CONCERN ABOUT WHO IS MAINTAINING THAT AREA ? HOW ARE YOU GOING TO MAINTAIN THAT TWO FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER? IS THAT ED DEAL YOU WORKED OUT WITH THE FALLS . ON THE FALSE SIDE THERE LOOKS LIKE THERE IS ONLY
OTHER SIDE. >> THERE HAS BEEN DISCUSSION WITH THE NEIGHBORING ORDER -- ORDER THAT WE WILL MAINTAIN THE WALL. THE FIRST 25 FEET IS OWNED BY THE H AWAY. IT WILL
PROVIDE SEPARATION. >> THE COORDINATION WITH FDOT UNLOCKS. OBVIOUSLY, YOU MENTIONED TRAFFIC AT A LOWER VOLUME BUT HAS THERE BEEN COORDINATION WITH FDOT ON THIS PROJECT? AND ABOUT ANY , YOU KNOW, LEFT TURN, RIGHT TURN LANES -- HAS ALL THAT BEEN LOOKED AT?
>> BECAUSE WE ARE DOING A PLAT AND WE ARE LOCATED ON A STATE ROAD, BEFORE WE COULD EVEN FILED A PLAT APPLICATION IN THE COUNTY, WE NEEDED TO GO TO D.O.T. TO SHOW THEM THE PLAN AND ACCESS AND GET A LETTER FROM THEM ACKNOWLEDGING THAT WE HAD DONE IT PROPERLY. YES, WE HAVE DONE THAT WITH D.O.T.
>> PERFECT. >> THANK YOU, ALEX.
>> WOULD YOU MIND IF I HAD A COUPLE ? I HAVE TO LEAVE.
>> LET US DO THAT. >> I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM. --
>> IT IS TODD ROGERS. >> THERE IS NO VEHICLE RENTAL
STORAGE RETAIL ? >> NO, NEVER. IF YOU WANT TO MAKE IT A CONDITION AS PART OF YOUR MOTION, WE WOULD HAVE NO
PROBLEM WITH THAT. >> THREE STORIES BUT IT LOOKS LIKE TWO. IT IS 32 FEET HIGH WITHOUT ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE ON TOP. HOW TALL IS ONE-STORY?
PLEASE? >> WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING RIGHT NOW CURRENTLY IN PARKLAND, FEET
WISE? >> WHERE YOU ASKING WHAT IS THE TALLEST BUILDING IN PARKLAND NOW?
>> IT IS THREE STORIES BUT THERE SHOWING US TWO. I THINK
IT'S A 32 FEET. >> IF YOU LOOK AT THIS DRAWING, IT IS 34 FEET TO THE ROOF LINE, 40 FEET TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET AND THE TWO LITTLE ROOF THINGS GO UP ANOTHER THREE
>> THANK YOU. I DID NOT KNOW WHAT THE QUESTION WAS.
>> I AGREE WITH ALEX'S COMMENTS ON THE VARIANCE. SOMETIMES THOSE THINGS DISAPPEAR OVER TIME. I GET CONCERNED WHEN WE NARROW SPACE LIKE THAT. I APPRECIATE THE TWO FEET ADDED TO MAKE IT AN EIGHT FOOT WALL. I AM NOT GOOD WITH GEOMETRY ARE ALGEBRA OR WHATEVER THAT MATH IS CONSIDERED. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT DOES AS FAR AS THE ANGLE. ASSUMING THAT TWO FEET IS A BIG DEAL, THAT IS GREAT. I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED TO DELIBERATE ON THAT MORE. THE LAST THING, THIS IS MORE ON ME. I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THIS QUITE A BIT LAST TIME. IT SEEMS LIKE FOUR YEARS AGO. FROM A STAFF PERSPECTIVE, I THINK IT WOULD BE GREAT WHEN WE GET THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION OR WHATEVER AND BE GREAT TO TRY TO HAVE A RECOLLECTION OF WHAT OUR ISSUES WERE LAST TIME AND WHERE THEY STAND TODAY .
WHAT WAS RESOLVED OR ANYTHING THAT WAS OUTSTANDING . I KNOW YOU COVERED SOME OF THOSE ITEMS. I COULD NOT REMEMBER IF THERE IS ANYTHING OUTSTANDING BECAUSE IT WAS SO LONG AGO.
THE COMMISSION HAS BEEN INVOLVED FOR I DON'T KNOW WHERE SOME OF THOSE ITEMS ARE. IT IS REALLY JUST A THOUGHT THAT IT WOULD BE GREAT TO HAVE THAT. ESPECIALLY SOMETHING SIGNIFICANT LIKE THAT TO TRY AND UNDERSTAND WHERE WE LANDED FROM LAST TIME. OUTSIDE THAT , OBVIOUSLY, HOPEFULLY ALL THE CONCERNS ARE MET. THAT IS ALL I HAVE, REALLY. THANK YOU.
>> BACK TO JOAL. >> THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. I'M
[00:55:04]
GOING TO ASK THE ATTORNEY TO REFRESH MY MEMORY ON SOMETHING HERE AND EXPAND ON WHAT MR. ROGER SAID. WHEN WE MET ONTHIS THE FIRST TIME -- >> A REMINDER TO SPEAK INTO THE
MIC . >> I DON'T RECALL THERE BEING ANYTHING ABOUT THE OWNERSHIP OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. THAT PROPERTY WAS ALREADY ZONED RESIDENTIAL , CORRECT? I'M LOOKING AT OLD DOCUMENTS.
>> WHEN YOU SAY LAST TIME, IT MUST'VE BEEN WHEN WE --
>> WHEN WE -- >> THE CHANGES FOR SELF STORAGE. AS FAR AS I KNOW, THIS PROPERTY, FOR YEARS, HAS BEEN WITH THE CITY . I MEAN THE PROPERTY THEY OWN TO THE SOUTH HAS BEEN IN THE CITY AND INCORPORATED INTO THE CITY. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU KNOW WHAT THE YEAR IS, MR. MEALY. IT IS FIVE ACRES-ISH. IT HAS A RESIDENTIAL LAND USE.
>> IS A SIX ACRE PROPERTY. >> THAT WAS NOT PART OF THE FUTURE OF LAND-USE 11 THAT WAS DONE?
>> THE TEXT AMENDMENT THAT WAS ALREADY DONE WAS TO DEAL WITH SOME MEASUREMENT ISSUES AND ALSO TO ADD THIS USE AS A USE UNDER THE COMMERCIAL LAND-USE CATEGORY. THE SIX ACRES THAT IS ALREADY IN THE CITY WAS ALREADY IN THE CITY. IT DID NOT NEED TO BE PART OF THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BUT WE DID REFERENCE THAT IT WAS SIX ACRES AND SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING OR
LAND-USE TYPE CATEGORY. >> AM BRING IT UP. I DON'T HAVE A RECOLLECTION OF THAT.
>> IT WAS NOT A SITE-SPECIFIC TEXT AMENDMENT AT THAT TIME.
FOR THE BOARD'S RECOLLECTION, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU WANT MORE HISTORY. WHEN WE DID DO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT, THE DEVELOPER DID OFFER UP -- IT IS BUILT INTO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT, WHICH IS RECORDED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. THEY ARE DEDICATING A PORTION OF THAT SIX ACRE PROPERTY FOR THE CONTINUATION OF HILLSBORO BOULEVARD TO HEAD WEST.
>> I JUST REMEMBER IT SAYING -- I'M LOOKING ON THIS PDF.
INAUDIBLE ] >> IT HAS A RESIDENTIAL LAND
USE. >> I THOUGHT I HEARD MR. MEALY SAY IT WAS BROUGHT IN THAT TIME. THANK YOU.
>> IT WAS YEARS PRIOR. THEY MADE A CONTRIBUTION IN THE AGREEMENT. I THINK THEY WERE THE FIRST DEVELOPER FOR THAT
ROAD. >> THE WALL IS EIGHT FEET ABOVE GRADE AND TWO FEET BELOW. THANK YOU TO THE OWNERSHIP TEAM FOR PROVIDING SUCH A LARGE BUILDING. IT IS AN ATYPICAL USE. I DO THINK BEING WHERE IT IS, IT DOES SERVE A PURPOSE AND IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO BUILD HOUSES TO THE SOUTH, THAT NEED STORAGE, HELP THEMSELVES. AS MUCH AS I DON'T WANT MORE RESIDENTIAL. THE PERIMETER WALL FOOTING, I WANT TO MAKE SURE -- WE SHOW A LOT OF TREES. I UNDERSTAND IT IS FOR SHOW. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE SLOPE COMING OFF ON THE EASTERN BERM IS ENOUGH TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN PUT THE TREES IN THEIR THAT YOU WANT TO PLANT. IF YOU LOOK TO THE SIDE, THERE IS A TWO FOOT FLAT AREA. AND THAT IT SLOPES OFF DRASTICALLY ONTO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SIDE AND YOU WILL BE STOPPING A LOT OF TREES AND THEIR AND YOU DON'T WANT TO CUT YOURSELF SHORT. I'M SURE PATTY WOULD HAVE SOMETHING TO
SAY ABOUT THAT. >> WE ARE SHOWING A 4 TO 1 SLOPE ON OUR SITE BUT IT ALLOWS FOR TREES TO FLOURISH BUT ALSO TO CUT THE GRASS WITHOUT IT BEING DANGEROUS. ALL OF THOSE -- PATTY REVIEWED THAT TO MAKE SURE WE WERE MEETING ALL THE
STANDARDS. >> IT IS COUNTRY ELEGANT.
>> I ASKED MR. MARONE US MANY YEARS AGO. WHAT DOES COUNTRY ELEGANT MEAN? HE SAID WE KNOW IT WHEN WE SEE IT.
>> I AM SORRY. I AM NOT SEEING ANY SITE MARKINGS. ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE A LEFT OUT OF THEIR ? BUS STOP IN THE --
>> -- LOXAHATCHEE? >> B D.O.T. CONSTRUCTION GIVES
US FULL ACCESS. >> AND THAT WAS PART OF WHAT
[01:00:05]
WAS REVIEWED WHEN WE WENT WITH THE MEETING.>> NICE JOB. THAT IS PRETTY GOOD. THAT IS IT, MR.
>> I WILL RELATE IT IS BEAUTIFUL.
>> AROUND THE BERM ON THE EAST SIDE AND THE CONCRETE WALL.
IS IT GOING TO BE A PORT IN PLACE WHILE OR PRECAST WALL?
>> PRECAST WALL. >> GOOD EVENING JORGE JORVLLE BASICALLY THAT PERIMETER WALL IS A PRECAST WALL THAT IS JUST ONE PANEL WITH CAST COLUMNS AS WELL. THIS IS COORDINATED WITH THE CITY ARQUETTE, BRIAN HERBERT. WE HAVE PROPOSED SOMETHING THAT WAS MADE UP OF INDIVIDUAL PANELS THAT IS PUT ON TOP OF THE OTHER. IT WAS DECIDED THAT IT WAS NOT CONVENIENT TO BE USED HERE. THE ONE THAT IS PROPOSED RIGHT NOW IS BEING APPROVED BY HIM. IT HAS BEEN USING IN THE AREA . IT IS BASICALLY COLUMNS SEPARATED 10 OR 12 FEET WITH ONE LARGE PANEL THAT IS INSTALLED WITH A CRANE AND SLIDES ON THE
>> WHAT IS THE CURRENT SITUATION, I GUESS, ON THE H AWAY PROPERTY ON THAT SIDE AS FAR AS THE PLANTINGS AND THE
BERM? >> AS I UNDERSTAND IT, IF YOU LOOK AGAIN AT THIS DRAWING AND YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE , YOU SEE HOW IT IS GREAT BUT THEN IT IS DARKER GRAY RIGHT AT THE TOP? CAN YOU SEE THAT? THAT LITTLE PART OF THE TOP HAS TO BE ADDED ON THAT SIDE AS WE ARE PUTTING IN THE BERM ON OUR SIDE. THE PLANTINGS THAT YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THOSE ARE ALREADY THERE. OBVIOUSLY, ONCE THE ADDITIONAL FILL MATERIAL PUT IN WITH A FACADE AND SO ON TO STABILIZE IT. THAT
IS WHAT IS HAPPENING. >> YOU ARE NOT RELOCATING OR
ASSUMING ANY OF THE TREES. >> NO, WE ARE NOT.
>> I PUT THE THOUSANDS OF FEET OF THE PRECAST WALLS AND I KNOW IT GETS A LITTLE -- YOU NEED QUITE A BIT OF A RUNWAY TO GET THOSE IN. ODDLY, YOU WILL DO A FROM YOUR PROPERTY SIDE.
>> WE CAN ACCESS FROM OUR SITE SO THAT IT SHOULD BE OKAY.
>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS ON A NUMBER OF SUBJECTS . THE SCREENING OF UTILITIES ARE DESIGNED PROFESSIONALS. ARE WE PROPERLY SCREENING THE UTILITIES IN TERMS OF FPL AND WHATEVER UTILITY BOX THEY
MIGHT BE? >> GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, BRIAN HERBERT, DESIGNATED RESIGN -- DESIGN REVIEW PROFESSIONAL. THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED. THE PARAPET HAS BEEN RAISED UP HIGH ENOUGH TO ADEQUATELY SCREEN ALL THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT. ANY GROUND MONITORING EQUIPMENT IS ADEQUATELY SCREENED BY LANDSCAPING.
>> THE LANDSCAPE THAT WILL BE INSTALLED, I KNOW THAT THAT PATTY APPROVED AND BELIEVES IT WILL DO THE JOB TO PROPERLY SCREEN THE BUILDING. THANK YOU, PATTY. I LIKE TO SEE AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL RELATING TO ANY RETAIL , MOVING TRACKS -- YOU MENTIONED YOU WOULD NOT BE DOING THAT. I THINK WOULD BE A GOOD CONDITION OF APPROVAL TO PUT IN THERE.
>> WE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO SUCH A CONDITION.
>> HOURS OF OPERATION. WHAT IS THE INTENTION IN TERMS OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION? IS IT A 24 HOUR A DAY ACCESS TO THE
FACILITY? >> I'M GETTING THE ANSWER.
[01:05:14]
ACCESS IS FROM 6:00 TO 10:00 .>> 6:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M.? >> THE OFFICE IS OPEN 9:00 TO 5:00. IT IS NOT TO:00 IN THE MORNING OR ANY OF THAT STUFF.
>> FOR THAT TO BE PART OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL HAVE IT
ON THE RECORD. >> NO OBJECTION.
>> LET'S HIM AND TAKING NOTE OF THESE?
>> CAN YOU RESTATE THE HOURS OF OPERATION?
>> ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS A STORAGE AND IS 6:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M. THE OFFICE IS OPEN 9:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. I WAS A, THOSE OTHER HOURS NO ONE ELSE CAN COME IN.
THE H AWAY. CAN YOU COMMUNICATE WHAT YOU'VE HAD WITH THE H AWAY? WHAT TYPE OF NOTIFICATION IS REQUIRED TO
THE NEIGHBORS AT THE FALLS ? >> I WOULD DEFER TO THE STAFF AS TO THE REQUIRED NOTIFICATION BUT I WILL GET YOU THE ANSWER.
>> TO ANSWER THE FIRST PART ABOUT THE REQUIRED NOTIFICATION THERE IS A MAILER RADIUS. A LARGE MAJORITY OF THE FALLS WOULD HAVE RECEIVED A MAIL NOTICE AS IS TYPICAL FOR MOST OF OUR APPLICATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
ALSO, TYPICAL NEWSPAPER NOTICING WAS PLACE FOR FLORIDA STATE STATUTES . THERE IS A SIGN ON THE PROPERTY THAT WAS
POSTED. >> I THINK IT IS ON THE BOARD IN FRONT OF CITY HALL AS WELL, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.
>> I WAS JUST CHECKING ON THE COMMUNITY OUTREACH. NOT ONLY DID WE COORDINATE WITH THE DEVELOPER WHO HIS RUNNING THE H AWAY BUT ALSO MET WITH SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS. WE HAD FOLKS COME OUT AND TALK TO THEM AND ANSWER QUESTIONS.
>> I REMEMBER THEM COMING TO ONE OF OUR MEETINGS MONTHS AGO.
VIEW THIS, THE COMMUNITY OUTREACH IS NOT DONE. IF THERE IS MORE THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE, AFTER NIGHT, WE ARE COMMITTED
TO DOING IT. >> I HAVE TO GIVE YOU AN AMENDMENT. THE OFFICE HOURS -- OKAY. THE DO NOT HAVE IT AS 9:00 TO 5:00 . IT IS AN:00 TO 7:00.
>> I AM NOT TOO CONCERNED WHEN YOU HAVE YOUR STAFF THERE. I AM CONCERNED ABOUT PATRONS COMING AT 3:00 IN THE MORNING AND MOVING THEIR THINGS. YOUR OFFICE HOURS -- I DON'T NEED YOUR OFFICE HOURS TO BE PART OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY FOR THE PATRONS IS WHAT I AM CONCERNED
>> IF YOU COULD BRING UP THE ELEVATION SHOWING WHAT IS CALLED THE GARAGE DOORS AND TAKE A COUPLE MOMENTS TO EXPLAIN THAT IF I AM A CUSTOMER OF THE STORAGE AND I WILL BRING MY STUFF THERE, TELL ME HOW IT WORKS . I DRIVE HIM THERE WITH MY CAR. I SEE THE TWO GARAGE DOORS IN THE FRONT.
TELL ME WHAT HAPPENS FROM THERE? THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL.
TO ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO IS HERE AND A NEIGHBOR, THEY
CAN SEE HOW THIS ALL WORKS . >> WOULD YOU RATHER SIT ON A PLAN YOU ARE THE ELEVATION VIEW?
>> I KIND OF LIKE THIS. I PREFER THIS.
>> THE WAY IT WILL WORK IS A GARAGE. THIS IS BASICALLY A GARAGE THAT IS INSIDE THE STORAGE FACLITY. IT WILL HAVE A SYSTEM LIKE ACCESS TO THE OTHER UNITS. WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SEE IS A TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL GARAGE DOOR . IT OPENS AND CLOSES AS PEOPLE NEED TO ACCESS IT. IT IS
THROUGH A SECURITY SYSTEM. >> WHEN THE GARAGE DOORS GOES UP, DO I DRIVE MY CAR IN OR DO I CARRY MY STUFF IN?
>> YOU DRIVE YOUR CAR IN. THERE IS AN ACTUAL PARKING SPACE
INSIDE. >> OKAY. I THINK THAT ANSWERS THAT. THE DUMPSTER CONDITIONS , WHERE IS THE DUMPSTER ON THE PROPERTY ? I AM NOT SURE. THERE IS A DUMPSTER ON THE
PROPERTY. >> IT IS A VERY SMALL TRASH BIN
[01:10:07]
THAT IS ONLY USED BY THE MANAGEMENT OFFICE. GUESS CANNOTACCESS THE DUMPSTER AREA. >> THAT IS PROBLEMATIC. I HAVE NEVER USED A STORAGE FACILITY BUT I DON'T KNOW.
>> I THINK PART OF THE REASON THAT THEY DO IT THAT WAY IS TO ELIMINATE THE ISSUE THAT WAS RAISED EARLIER.
>> TAKE HER STUFF WITH YOU. I GET IT.
>> I SUPPORT THE ITEM. I WOULD STILL LIKE TO HEAR FROM ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE. I SUPPORT THE ITEM. I THINK THIS WAS SOME INCREDIBLE PLANNING . I HAVE TALKED A LOT IN THE PAST THAT WE DO ALL BUT OF Z AND NOT A LOT OF P. I THINK THIS GIVES AN A+ ON THE PLANNING SIDE. WE HAVE AN APPLICANT WHO HAS BRINGING SOMETHING TO THE COMMUNITY AND WANTS TO BE A GOOD CORPORATE PARTNER HERE. IT IS NICE TO KNOW THAT HE OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. THAT IS GOING TO COORDINATE -- THAT WILL COORDINATE REAL WELL SINCE HE OWNS IT'S YOU NEVER KNOW YOU GET THE DIFFERENT OWNER AND WHO KNOWS WHAT. I APPRECIATE THE APPLICATION. AS I SAID, I SUPPORT THE
APPLICATION. >> LET'S, ANTHONY.
>> IF I MAY, TO THE COMMENTS ABOUT THE POTENTIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SHOULD THE BOARD MAKE AN EMOTION, I THINK THE PERMIT I WOULD DO THAT TO BE CAPITAL EIGHT -- 8D.
>> ASHLEY. >> I AGREE WITH ADDING -- WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT THE HOURS OF OPERATION. AND BEING STAFF DURING THE IT:00 TO 7:00 OR 8:00 TO 6:00 .
>> I HAVE A COUPLE COMMENTS FOR QUESTIONS. AND MY COLLEAGUES HERE ON THE DAIS ANSWERED ALL MY OTHER QUESTIONS BUT THE LAST ONE I HAVE WITH RESPECT TO THE LIGHTING AND PHOTO METRICS. JUST A COMMENT THAT IT STATES AND THE APPLICATION THAT IT LIMITS THE IMPACT TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THERE WILL BE CONFIRMATION THAT THERE WILL BE NO SPILL OVER INTO THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY --
PLURAL, PROPERTIES. >> YOU ARE CORRECT. THERE IS NO SPILL OVER. WE HAVE TO GET DOWN TO WHAT EVER THE FOOT CANDLE THING AT THE PROPERTY LINE AND WE HAVE DONE THAT.
>> THAT ENDS MY QUESTIONS. I AM GOING TO OPEN IT UP, AT THIS TIME . I HAVE TWO INDIVIDUALS THAT SIGNED UP TO SPEAK PUBLIC COMMENT WISE. I JUST WANT TO ASK THAT IF THERE ARE ANY ADDITIONAL BESIDES THE TWO KNOW THAT THEY HAVE ALREADY SIGNED THE SIGN-UP SHEET . SEEING THEM, I WILL FIRST CALL UP STEVE ROSINSKI . IF YOU COULD PLEASE COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
WELCOME. >> STEVE MINSKY, 8330 WEST DRIVE. I LIVE IN ONE OF THE BUILDING UNITS BUT NOT ON THE SIDE WHERE THE BERM WILL BE BUT ACROSS THE STREET. I WAS GOING TO ASK ABOUT BITING. THAT CLEARED THAT UP. I WAS CONCERNED YOU WERE CREATING A BERM AND LANDSCAPING. HOW ABOUT THE LIGHTING? WITH THAT IMPACT ANY OF THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS? I AM HEARING THAT IT WON'T. I WANTED TO KNOW IF THERE IS A POTENTIAL ENTRY OR ACCESS THAT WILL BE FROM HILLSBORO BOULEVARD AT SOME POINT?
>> I AM SEEING HAD BUT I UNDERSTAND -- OKAY. I KNOW WE TYPICALLY DON'T ANSWER QUESTIONS FROM PUBLIC COMMENTS BUT I THINK THAT QUESTION COULD BE ANSWERED IF IT IS
>> THANK YOU. >> I APPRECIATE AND THE WALL IN THE LANDSCAPING BUT JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THE WALL GOES AROUND THE ENTIRE PROPERTY OR JUST THE SIDE WHERE THE FALLS
[01:15:03]
IS LOCATED? LIKE ANYTHING ELSE, YOU HAVE BEAUTIFUL PLANTINGS GO IN AND AWOL. THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT IS A CONCERN TO ME. IS THE DEVELOPER REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ALL THE PLANTINGS OR WILL THE WALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION AND REPAINTED AS NECESSARY? AS OPPOSED TO JUST PUTTING IT IN AND LETTING IT GO DORMANT , WHICH WOULD DETRACT FROM ITS ORIGINAL PURPOSE. THE SECTION ON THE SOUTH SIDE, WHICH YOU HAVE APPARENTLY REDUCED THE AMOUNT OF PLANTING -- SOME OF THE UNITS ON THAT SIDE OF THE STREET THAT ARE BEYOND THAT PROPERTY THAT THEY BACKUP NOW TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. WOULD THEY BE ABLE TO SEE INTO THE COMMERCIAL SECTION OF THAT PROPERTY? THE WALL WILL NOT BE BEHIND THE BELOW UNITS. THEY WILL ONLY BE BEHIND THE FIRST OR SECOND BUILDING OF THE UNITS. THERE IS TWO OR THREE MORE THAT GO DOWN THAT STREET. THOSE WILL BE -- THE BACK OF THOSE HOMES AFTER THE BERM WILL BE LOOKING AT THE SOUTH SIDE WALL AND LANDSCAPING . FROM WHAT I HAVE HEARD IS MORE LIMITED THAN THE SECTION THAT IS GOING TO BE BEHIND THE OTHER UNITS THAT ADJOIN THE PROPERTY. THAT IS ALSO A QUESTION I WOULD LIKE RESPONDED TO. I WAS GOING TO ASK ABOUT NOISE BUT APPARENTLY SINCE THE HOURS OF OPERATION ARE LIMITED, THAT IT WILL PROBABLY NOT BE AN ISSUE. I THINK THAT IS ALL I HAVE. IF THE DEVELOPER OR THE APPLICANT COULD GIVE ME SOME MORE CLARIFICATION, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. WE WILL HAVE THE ANSWERS FOR YOU. DENNIS, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND RESPOND TO SOME OF THE QUESTIONS , THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL. THANK YOU.
>> THEN IS MERELY ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. THE SELF STORAGE FACILITY WILL NOT HAVE ACCESS TO HILLSBORO BOULEVARD. THERE WILL BE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN BETWEEN OUR SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. OUR ACCESS IS ONLY TWO LOXAHATCHEE. THE WALL IS ON THE SOUTHEAST AND WEST PROPERTY LINE. THE ONLY PLACE THE WALL IS NOT IS A LONG LOXAHATCHEE ROAD. ALONG OTHERS IS THE EIGHT FOOT WALL WITH LANDSCAPING. WE WILL MAINTAIN ALL OF THE LANDSCAPING ON THE PROPERTY. WE WILL MAINTAIN BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL. IT IS NOT JUST BECAUSE WE'RE GOOD GUYS, THAT IS WHAT THE CITY OF PARKLAND REQUIRES YOU TO DO AND THAT IS WHAT WE WILL DO. WE DON'T HAVE AN AREA WHERE THERE IS LESS PLANTING. WE HAVE AREAS WHERE THE WITH OF THE BUFFER IS IN ERROR BUT WE ACTUALLY HAVE MORE PLANTING THAN THE CODE WOULD HAVE REQUIRED IN THOSE AREAS. I HAD A LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM EARLIER IN THE EFFORT WAS TO SHOW THAT IF YOU ARE IN THE FALLS AND LOOKING TOWARDS THE WEST, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEE OUR BUILDING BECAUSE OF EVERYTHING IN FRONT OF IT WITH LANDSCAPING, ET CETERA. THAT IS TRUE FOR THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. THAT WALL GOES ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE SOUTH END AND ALONG THE SOUTH AS WELL. WHEN WE WERE LOOKING AT THE AERIAL PHOTO EARLIER , I'M SORRY TO KEEP GOING BACK AND FORTH BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE I AM ANSWERING THE QUESTION PROPERLY. YOU SEE WHERE WE ARE AT . THERE IS ACTUALLY AN AREA SOUTH OF LOXAHATCHEE ROAD AND EACH OF US THAT IS OUTSIDE OF THE FALLS AND OUTSIDE OF OUR PROPERTY TOO. YOU SEE WHERE THE HOUSES START AND YOU SEE THAT ARE WALL GOING ALL THE WAY ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE, SOUTH AND WEST WILL COMPLETELY SCREEN US FROM OUR NEIGHBOR. ALSO, THE FACT -- SOMEONE POINT OUT EARLIER BUT THE WALL HAS RECESSED A COUPLE FEET. THAT IS TO MAKE SURE WE CAN MAINTAIN BOTH SIDES. WE CAN DO WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL TO MAKE IT LOOK AT AT ALL TIMES. I HOPE I HAVE
ANSWERED ALL THE QUESTIONS. >> HOLD ON A SECOND.
>> IF I MAY, MR. CHAIR. ONE ADDITIONAL POINT , WHILE STAFF WAS REMOVING THE VARIANCE REQUEST, JUST WANTED TO MAKE THE NOTE THAT SINCE THE WALL IS PLACED , AS MR. MEALY NOTED, ON
[01:20:05]
THE SOUTH, EAST AND WEST PROPERTY LINES FOR THE REDUCTION IN THE WIDTH OF THE BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENT IS ONLY IMPACTING THE APPLICANT THEMSELVES VISUALLY BECAUSE THE USERS AROUND ALL THREE OF THOSE SIDES WOULD ONLY SEE AS THE IMAGE SHOWED THE WALL IN THE LANDSCAPE. THEY WOULD NOT SEE A REDUCTION IN THE DEPTH OF THE BUFFER YARD AS RESULT OF THE DESIGN COMBINATION. AS MR. MEALY AND THE TEAM NOTED, THERE IS NO REDUCTION IN THE PLANT MATERIALS AND THEY'RE ACTUALLY UP SIZED ALONG WITH THE WALL. THE IMPACT, VISUALLY TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS IS FAIRLY WELL MITIGATED THROUGH THE DESIGN COMBINATION THAT IS PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANTTEAM. >> DAVID IS THE NEXT INDIVIDUAL THAT SIGNED UP FOR PUBLIC SPEAKING.
>> DAVID'S IKE , I RESIDE AT ANY 423 WEST SPRING DRIVE. I AM ONE OF THE HOUSES THAT IS DIRECTLY TO THE EAST OF THE BUILDING. THAT WALL WOULD BE RIGHT UP AGAIST OUR UNIT.
CURRENTLY, AS WAS MENTIONED, THERE IS TWO BERMS WITH A DITCH IN THE MIDDLE. IT IS A GREAT IDEA TO FILL IN THE DITCH AND MAKE ONE MASSIVE BERM. IF YOU LOOK AT SLIDE 14
-- >> YOU WANT TO PUT IT UP FOR
YOU? >> YES, PLEASE. IF YOU LOOK AT SLIDE 14 AND YOU LOOK ON THE FALSE SIDE OF THAT , WE KNOW WHAT WATER DOES AND THE RAINSTORMS IN SOUTH FLORIDA, THAT WATER INSTEAD OF GOING INTO THE DITCH APPEARS TO ME LIKE IT WILL FLAT ONTO OUR PROPERTY. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS A LOWER ELEVATION THAT ON THE STORAGE FACILITY SIDE.
>> BESIDES THE COMMENTS YOU JUST MADE, WE ARE NOT GOING TO ANSWER -- WE WILL ADDRESS YOUR QUESTION WITH OUR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT READ YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO YOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS? WE WILL GET ANSWERS FOR YOU.
>> THE ANSWERS WILL BE TONIGHT?
>> IF THEY HAVE AN ANSWER. >> THAT WAS IT.
>> SIR, I'M GOING TO ASK THAT QUESTION.
>> YOUR AND YOUR COMMUNITY CONCERNS ARE OUR CONCERNS AS WELL. WE WILL GET AN ANSWER. I'M SURE THEY WILL BE ABLE TO
>> IS EARNING ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC THIS
EVENING? >> GO TO THE MICROPHONE, PLEASE. I WILL WELCOME THE GENTLEMEN BACK UP TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL QUESTION. WE TYPICALLY HAVE A THREE-MINUTE
PERIOD OF TIME. >> THANK YOU FOR ALL THE RESPONSES. I WANTED TO CLARIFY IS THE MAINTENANCE OF THE WALL AND LANDSCAPING A PARKLAND ORDINANCE OF SOME SORT ? OR IS THAT SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE PUT INTO THIS APPLICATION SO THE RESIDENTS , ADJACENT RESIDENTS CAN BE ASSURED THAT IT WILL BE DONE PROPERLY AND INTO THE FUTURE?
>> I WILL LET THE APPLICANT ANSWER IF THEY DESIRE. OR OUR STAFF CAN ANSWER. BESIDES OUR CODE ENFORCEMENT.
>> MAINTENANCE IS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL ALREADY ANTICIPATED IN THE ORDINANCE. IT IS ALREADY CONTEMPLATED AND A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. IT IS A STANDARD FOR ALL APPLICATIONS.
>> I KNEW WE COULD GET PATTY UP TO SPEAK.
>> HAPPY NEW YEAR. PATTY SUITS, ARBORIST. IN REGARDS TO THE MAINTENANCE OF THE UPKEEP OF THE FACILITY. WE DO CODE ENFORCEMENT AND MYSELF. WE DO MONTHLY INSPECTIONS ON ALL THE PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY. AND THIS WAREHOUSE WILL BE NO EXCEPTION. IT IS REQUIRED. IF IT IS NOT DONE, THEY WILL GET A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND THEY WILL HAVE A SMALL TIMEFRAME TO GET IT BACK INTO THE RIGHT ORDER THAT IT SHOULD BE IN.
HAVE NO FEAR, WE ARE OUT THERE WITH IT.
>> THANK YOU. >> PATTY, I'M SURE YOU ALREADY THOUGHT ABOUT THIS. JUST CURIOUS, THE ROOTS -- ONE OF THE THINGS WHEN YOU PUT THE SUPERIOR LANDSCAING IN THIS BUFFER , THE ROOTS CAN NOW COME UP INTO THE PAVEMENT.
ESPECIALLY ON THE SOUTH SIDE, WHERE IT IS SO TIGHT. HAVE YOU EXAMINED THAT HAVING REQUIRED TO PUT IN TYPE OF, YOU KNOW, A ROOF TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE SHOWING THIS IS GOING TO FULL HEIGHT. IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH ROOM, ARE THEY GOING TO BE ABLE TO? I HAVE SEEN THESE DONE, I HAVE
[01:25:04]
TYPICAL'S SEEN SL PUT OUT OF THE PAVEMENT TO ALLOW THE ROOTSTO GROW MORE. >> I SEE THAT SCENARIO MANY TIMES. WHEN WE ARE IN A BERM SITUATION AND WE ARE ON A FOUR TO ONE GRADE. YOU HAVE PLENTY OF EARTH FOR THE ROOTS TO GO IN. THE ROOTS ARE MUCH HIGHER THAN THE GRADE OF THE ROADS. I HAVE NOT SEEN THAT WHEN YOU HAVE A BERM SITUATION WHERE I HAVE A ROOT PROBLEM. THE ROOTS ARE NOT GOING TO BE THE WELL-MAINTAINED SOILS AND THE IRRIGATED SOILS TO GO REACH ALL THE WAY TO THE BEYOND TO LIVE IN A COMPACTED ASPHALT AREA AND JUST TO MAKE A NOTE ON ONE OF THE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SLOPE AND THE WATER COMING ON TO THE EASTERN PORTION. ON THAT PROPERTY -- AND I KNOW THE CENTERLINE IS HERE. ALL THE YARD DRAINS ARE ALSO ON THAT SIDE TOO. THE BERM IS ALREADY THERE AND THE SLOPE IS ALREADY THERE. IT IS NOT GOING TO CREATE MORE WATER. ALTHOUGH LANDSCAPE IS THERE. AND ALL OF THE ROOTS AND ALL THE EXISTING VISITATION WILL HELP ABSORB ALL THE WATER. IN ADDITION TO THE YARD DRAINS THAT EXIST. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY FLOODING.
>> THAT IS ALL AND ENGINEERING , DRAINAGE AND DESIGN BASED
>> IT WAS ONE -- IT IS ON A BERM. YOU THINK THE PLANS OF THEIR PUTTING THERE, THE ROOTS WILL BE FINE AND NO ISSUE?
>> YES. IT IS THE SCENARIO THAT WE HAVE THROUGHOUT ALL THE
PROPERTIES IN THE CITY. >> I THINK THEY HAVE THE
QUESTION. >> THE DRAINAGE WHEN I AM FINE.
ENGINEER? >> THERE KEEPING THE FALLS
WATER. >> CAN I JUST ADD SOMETHING ON THE ANSWER TO THE DRAIN AS QUESTION?
>> YES, SIR. >> THE CROSS-SECTION THAT YOU SEE UP HERE WHEN THE FALLS WAS APPROVED, IT WAS APPROVED AND DISSIPATING THE TWO FIRMS WOULD BE TIED TOGETHER. BUT DURING THIS CALCULATION, THE PLACEMENT AND ALL OF THAT ON THE FALLS WAS DONE ANTICIPATED IT WOULD LOOK LIKE THIS AT THE
>> AT THIS TIME, ONE LAST QUESTION. I KNOW IF WE DID JUST TO ASK, JEANNIE, IF ANY EMAILS OR OTHER CORRESPONDENCE
ON THIS? >> I ACTUALLY TOLD THEM THAT THEY ARE LUCKY TO HAVE SOME BUILDING VERSUS RESIDENTS BECAUSE THEY WON'T HEAR ANY NOISE . THEY REALLY LIKE THAT
ANSWER. >> THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME I WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION AMONGST
>> SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE. >> IF YOU LOOK AT THE ELEVATIONS I WILL BE AT 1450 OF THE NEW BUILDING. THE TOP OF THE BERM IS AT AN 18. I THINK IT PUTS THE PROPERTIES AT , I THINK IT HAS TO BE AT LEAST A 12, AT MOST. THE WAY IT WAS DESIGNED, IT WOULD BE THERE ANYWAY. THE ARE FINISHING YOUR BERM. THAT BERM WAS THERE AND THE WATER WAS GOING TO BE THERE TO HELP SUEDE WHAT YOUR CONCERNS ARE. THAT CONDITION WAS GOING TO BE THERE WHETHER OR NOT THIS PROPERTY WAS THERE FOR THIS BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED. I AM WITH YOU. I I DO APPRECIATE THAT QUESTION.
>> ANY OTHER OF THE TWO GENTLEMEN HAS ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS , YOU CAN SURELY REACH OUT TO STAFF AT
ANY POINT IN TIME. >> I ONLY CLOSER TO THE PUBLIC
. I DID NOT CLOSE IT TO YOU. >> IT ALL STOPS AT THEIR GATE
TO GO TO THE BACK? >> HE IS GOING TO GET A SLIDE,
I THINK. >> IT HEADS OUT TOWARDS LOXAHATCHEE PASS , THE GATE WHERE THE CAR WOULD ENTER THE
REAR AREA. >> NOT SEE CONFLICTING DRAWING.
[01:30:19]
PROBLEM WITH THAT. >> FOR CLARIFICATION , YOUR INQUIRY IS ABOUT THE GATE THAT LACKS THE FACILITY AFTER HOURS AND AT THE GATES TO ALLOW PATRONS INTO THE --
>> YOU CANNOT DRIVE IN AND OUT AFTER HOURS, CORRECT? YOU
CANNOT ACCESS THE BACK. >> YOU CANNOT.
>> ON THIS DRAWING, THAT IS THE MASSIVE DOWNLOAD WITH PAGE 185 OUT OF 191. IT IS THE FLOOR PLAN. IT SHOWS THE WALL STOPPING AT THE GATE. THERE IS A CONFLICTING INFORMATION . I WANT TO GO ON RECORD SAYING IT WILL EXTEND PAST THAT.
>> WHAT I WOULD ASK IS THAT THIS IS DRAWING, THIS IS THE SITE PLAN DRAWING, C- 5.0. THAT SHOWS THE WHILE LOCATION.
AT ANY OF THE OTHER SHEETS ARE NOT MATCHING THIS WILL CHANGE
THEM TO MATCH THIS. >> GOT IT .
>> IS THERE A MOTION -- ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IF NOT, DO I HEAR A MOTION FOR ITEM A, WHICH IS AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE
MAP TO COMMERCIAL? >> I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, MR. CHAIRMAN, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 2024-001 AMENDING THE FUTURE
LAND USE MAP TO COMMERCIAL. >> IS OUR SECOND, YOU KNOW,
>> SECOND GRADE >> SECONDED BY DEREK. A MOTION MADE BY ANTHONY. PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE. A REMINDER WE WILL GO THROUGH EACH ONE INDIVIDUALLY.
>> VICE CHAIR ANTHONY AVELLO .
>> YES. >> ASHLEY GOBEO . DEREK
>> MOTION CARRIES. ITEM B, ORDINANCE 2024-002. A SELF STORAGE DISTRICT. IS THERE A MOTION?
>> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 2024-002 REZONING 4.35 ACRES TO SELF STORAGE DISTRICT.
>> SECONDED BY ALEX. BEIT JOEL, I APOLOGIZE. SECONDED BY
JOEL. CALLED FOR THE VOTE . >> ALEX LAZOWICK, JOEL KAPLAN,
>> WE WILL HAVE A POSE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. THOSE
OF BE FOR ITEM EIGHT D. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE 204 E- 004 UP LIVING THE PLAT FOR SELF
STORAGE USE. >> IS THERE A SECOND?
>> SECONDED APPEAR >> SECONDED BY ASHLEY. CALL FOR
>> ITEM D >> MR. CHAIRMAN. CAN I ASK THE CLERK OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION THAT WAS DISCUSSED EARLIER.
WHAT ARE THE HOURS OF OPERATION THAT WE ARE GOING TO --
>> NO OTHER STORAGE FACILITY THAT THERE IS NOT AN AVAILABILITY .
THERE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ANY RETAIL OR MOVING TRUCKS.
THREE, ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY IS 6:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M.
>> I WANT TO CLARIFICATION ON THE FIRST CONDITION. I WAS NOT
SURE WHAT THE INTENT WAS. >> I THINK ACKNOWLEDGMENT THAT THERE IS NO OTHER CURRENT STORAGE FACILITY IN PARKLAND
STORAGE FACILITY. >> I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT CONDITION. WE ARTY HAVE AN ORDINANCE THAT DOES HAVE DISTANT SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS IF THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE
REFERRING TO. >> THAT IS WHAT WAS PRESENTED.
[01:35:06]
RESOLVED WITH EXHIBIT THAT WAS SHOWN PER>> THAT IS ALREADY IN PLACE, MR. CHAIR. IT IS IN OUR CODE.
TRUCKS AND LEAVE LIMITED -- NOT LIMITED TO, BUT STATED DESIGNATED HOURS OF OPERATION AND PATRON, PUBLIC WISE. IF YOU ARE GOING TO CONTINUE WITH THAT, IT COULD BE PART OF YOUR
MOTION. >> I HAVE A QUESTION BEFORE YOU DO THAT. THEY CAN CHANGE THEIR HOURS , SHOULD THEY CHOOSE? LET US SAY THEY CANNOT GET SOMEONE TO WORK UNTIL 7:00 OR
6:00. >> MY MOTION IS NOT GOING TO MENTION THE STAFF. I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE PATRONS.
WHAT THE HOURS OF EMPLOYMENT ARE, I AM NOT CONCERNED WITH
THAT. >> YOU CAN MAKE THEM NOT BEFORE 6:00 A.M. AND NOT LATER THAN 10:00 P.M. , IF THAT IS WHAT
YOU ARE REFERRING TO . >> I WOULD LIKE THE OWNER OF THE SELF STORAGE TO HIRE WHATEVER EMPLOYEES HE NEEDS TO HAVE A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS AND FOR US TO METAL END, I DON'T
THINK WE NEED TO DO THAT. >> IF YOU PHRASE IT THAT WAY .
IF THEY WANT TO OPEN AT 7:00 FOR THE PATRONS INSTEAD OF 6:00 , IT WOULD NOT PREVENT THAT AND THEY WOULD NOT HAVE TO COME
BACK. >> I DON'T WANT TO PUT UNDUE
-- >> NO OPENING PRIOR TO 6:00 A.M. AND NO CLOSING AFTER 10:00 P.M. , RIGHT ?
>> TONY , ARE YOU GOOD WITH THAT? FOR THE PATRONS.
>> THAT RUNS WITH THE LAND. >> IT WOULD BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL AT THE SITE PLAN. AND IT WOULD.
>> IF THEY DECIDE TO SELL AND THE NEW OWNER WANT TO DO
SOMETHING DIFFERENT -- >> THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME
BACK. >> NO PUBLIC ACCESS BEFORE
6:00 A.M. AND -- >> AFTER 10:00.
>> NO LATER THAN 10:00 P.M. IS THAT CORRECT? LET ME GIVE IT A
TRY. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 2024-005 SPECIAL EXCEPTION , SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR PARKLAND STORAGE LLC WITH THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT THE FACILITY WILL HAVE NO PUBLIC ACCESS BEFORE 6:00 A.M. AND NONE NO LATER THAN 10:00 P.M. IN ADDITION TO THAT CONDITION OF APPROVAL , THAT NO RETAIL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE RENTING OF MOVING TRUCKS.
>> INCLUDE IF YOU WOULD, STAFF CONDITIONS AS WELL. IT IS PART
OF THE APPLICATION. >> MY MOTION DOES NOT INCLUDE ANYTHING RELATING TO THE STAFF.
>> I APOLOGIZE. THE CITY OF PARKLAND STAFF ALSO HAS --
>> THE STAFF HAS CONDITIONS. >> I GET WHAT YOU ARE SAYING BUT AND ALSO TO INCLUDE THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PROVIDED BY THE STAFF IN THE BACKUP. IS THERE A SECOND?
>> SECOND AMBER >> SECONDED BY JOEL AND ORIGINAL MOTION BY ANTHONY. CALL FOR THE VOTE.
>> DEREK BIXBY. >> MURRAY ZWEIG.
>> YES. >> MOTION CARRIES. IS THERE MOTION FOR ITEM A -- 8 E PRINT
>> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 2024 E- 006 , COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD APPROVAL PER PARKLAND STORAGE
>> PLEASE CALL FOR THE VOTE. >> VICE CHAIR TONY AVELLO
>> YES. >> MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU.
[9. Comments from the Planning & Zoning Manager]
GOOD LUCK . >> THANK YOU, DENNIS.
>> CAITLIN, ANY COMMENTS? >> ONLY TO LET YOU KNOW THAT WE DO PLAN TO HAVE A FEBRUARY MEETING AND AT THAT MEETING WE PLAN TO BRING A CITY INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS RELATING TO WALKWAYS AND
DRIVEWAYS. >> OKAY. WELCOME BACK, JEANNIE.
WELCOME BACK, JEANNIE. >> FIRST WORLD PROBLEMS.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.