Jun 07, 2023 City Commission Meeting

[1. Call to Order]

[00:00:14]

>>ALL RIGHT, GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. GOOD EVENING EVERYONE.

I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING FOR THE CITY OF PARKLAND ON

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 7. 2023. >>OKAY. GOOD EVENING EVERYONE.

THE PLEDGE ALWAYS SOUNDS MUCH NICER WITH A ROOM FULL OF STUDENTS.

ROLL CALL? >>COMMISSIONER ISRAEL? BRIAR? MAYOR WALKER? COMMISSIONER MEYERSON? COMMISSIONER CUTLER?

[4. Approval of Minutes]

>>HERE. >>HERE. >>HERE.

>>HERE. >>APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. >>MOTION TO APPROVE.

>>SECOND. >>ONE BY MAYOR BRIAR AND SECOND BY CUTLER.

[5. Comments from the Public on Non-Agenda Items]

ALL IN FAVOR SAY I. >>I. >>MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. >>I ONE SPEAKER.

>>JERRY CAMPBELL. >>YES? >>DOCTOR KIMMEL?

>>NAME AND ADDRESS ANY OF THREE MINUTES. >>JERRY CAMPBELL, 1456 NORTH LAGO CIRCLE. I'M HERE JUST TO GIVE A BIG THANK YOU TO ALEXANDER BAR.

I WOULD LIKE TO GO ON PUBLIC RECORD AND ACKNOWLEDGES HARD WORK.

IMHO A PRESIDENT OF COAST KAVA. AND HE HAS BEEN ABSOLUTELY A CHAMPION FOR OUR COMMUNITY.

AS HAS EVERYBODY ON THE DAIS. BUT IN PARTICULAR, WE HAVE PARTICULAR PATENT SIGNS AT OUR FRONT AND BACK ENTRANCES THAT HAVE HAD NOTHING BUT IN ISSUES. THE DEVELOPER WAS GOOD TO HAVE THEM REFURBISHED. AND ALEXANDER BAR SUCCESSFULLY WAS ABLE TO GET AND COLLABORATE WITH THE DEVELOPER TO HAVE THEM REPLACED WITH MARINE GRADE ALUMINUM.

SOMETHING WE HAD BEEN HEARING ABOUT, LEARNING ABOUT, AND HOPING FOR FOR A YEAR AND 1/2.

SO ÃÃTHIS IS A BIG WIN AND I REALLY OWE IT ALL TO ALEXANDER BAR AND I CANNOT THANK HIM ENOUGH.O I WANTED TO DO SO PUBLICLY. THANK YOU.

[APPLAUSE] >>ANYBODY ELSE? ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK ON

HIS AGENDA ITEMS? SEEN THAT THERE IS NONE. >>WHAT IS THIS?

>>THAT WAS A LETTER HANDED TO ME TODAY AT MY OFFICE. SHE DID NOT WATCH IT JUST TO

HAVE IT. >>IT'S A NON-AGENDA ITEM. WE JUST

>>WE DO NOT NEED TO READ ANYTHING BUT WILL START COMMISSIONER COMMENTS.

COMMISSIONER CUTLER? >>THANK YOU MAYOR. FIRST OF ALL, FIRST AND FOREMOST TO CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL THEIR GRADUATES AND ALL THE KIDS MOVING UP FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL TO HIGH SCHOOL. THIS WAS MY NINTH GRADUATION ATTENDING FOR MSD. TWO OF WHICH WERE MY OWN CHILDREN.

BUT IT'S A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE WITH SOME REALLY GREAT SPEAKERS.

ADD IT'S QUITE INCREDIBLE THE 800+ KIDS. AMAZING.

SO CONGRATULATIONS IN THAT REGARD. I WANTED TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COMMISSION. YOU KNOW ÃÃI RECEIVED A LETTER FROM CACERES AND PARKLAND GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB THERE IN MY DISTRICT. APPARENTLY THEY ARE EXTREMELY UNHAPPY WITH SOME OF THE MATERIALS THAT HAVE BEEN PLACED ON THE SITE THAT ÃÃTHAT BUCKS THE COUNTRY CLUB AREA. YOU PROBABLY DROVE BY IT TODAY. SO THE PILES OF DIRT OUT THERE.

THEY HAVE TO FENCE DIDN'T AS AN ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE KIND OF THING.

WE PROTECT IT. THE SITE FROM KIDS CLIMBING IN THERE AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

AND I HAD EXPRESSED TO SOMEONE DAY THAT PERHAPS WE SHOULD HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING ALONG THE LINES OF THAT.UT APPARENTLY THE SCHOOL BOARD CONTRACTED WITH A CONTRACTOR TO DO THIS DEVELOPMENT STUFF AND THEN THEY CONTRACTED WHERE THEY WERE GOING TO PLACE IT. SUPPOSEDLY IT'S GOING TO BE OUT OF THERE IN A VERY SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. I WALKED THE COMMISSION TO KNOW THAT AS SOON AS I RECEIVED THIS LETTER, HE IMMEDIATELY FORWARDED IT TO L'OREAL ÃÃ THIS CAN BE ADDRESSING THE ISSUE AS WELL. SO HOPEFULLY FOR THE PEOPLE AT THE PARKLAND GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB ÃÃTHIS WILL GET RECTIFIED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

[00:05:06]

THIS WAS A VERY IMPORTANT EVERGLADES RESTORATION PROJECT THAT WILL RESTORE WATER LEVELS IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE CENTRAL EVERGLADES. AND IMPROVE OUR WATER RESOURCE RESILIENCY HERE IN SOUTH FLORIDA. THE NORTH FACE IS A COMPONENT OF A MUCH LARGER PROJECT THAT IS BEING DONE. AND IT RESTORES WATER LEVELS IN THE CENTRAL EVERGLADES, WHICH MAKE UP NEARLY HALF OF THE LANDMASS FOR OUR COUNTY.ND ULTIMATELY ORGAN HELP TO DELIVER MORE WATER TO SOUTH FLORIDA TO REPLENISH OUR AQUIFERS AND NOURISH THE EVERGLADES AND FLOOR BED. AND WE WILL BE SENDING WATER SOUTH TO EVERGLADES CITY AND STUFF LIKE THAT. SO ÃÃTHE IDEA IS THAT IT'S GOING TO ACTUALLY REVITALIZE THE EVERGLADES, WHICH IS A VERY INTEGRAL PART OF OUR FRESHWATER AND VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE OF THE SEA WATER LEVEL RISES AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

SO ÃÃTHAT WAS A GREAT EVENT. I WANT TO CONGRATULATE COASTAL CHURCH ON ITS GRAND OPENING AND THAT OCCURRED ON MAY 21. I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND THE ONE PUT ON BY THE FRENCH ATTORNEY ORGANIZATION ON MAY 21 AND I WANT TO CONGRATULATE THE RECIPIENTS OF THE JANIE GARTENBERG AND GINA MONTALTO SCHOLARSHIPS. JOHN PENNER AND CHASE COOPER.

T'S WONDERFUL THAT THEY ACHIEVE THOSE SCHOLARSHIPS THIS YEAR.

I HAD A CHANCE TO ATTEND THE APPARENT WOMEN'S EVENT. PARKLAND CHAMBER, WHICH WAS A GREAT EVENT AND CHAT TO OUR INSPIRING SPEAKER, ALLISON TONKIN AT THERAPY EDGE.

SHE DID A WONDERFUL JOB OF TALKING ABOUT THE NEED FOR THERAPY IN OUR COMMUNITY.

WHEN AND IF YOU FEEL YOU ARE HAVING OPPRESSION OR ANXIETY OR STOP THAT.

SO DO NOT BE AFRAID TO REACH OUT. I WANT TO SEND MY CONDOLENCES TO THE FAMILY OF EMERSON ALL'S WORK. WHO IS A LOCAL LAWYER AND SERVED IN THE FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FROM 1959 TO 1966 REPRESENTING BRIAR COUNTY.

HE DIED IN POMPANO ON THE 24TH AT THE AGE OF 96. HE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO PARKLAND'S HISTORY BECAUSE OF AN EARLY 1963, OUR FOUNDER, BRUCE BLUNT APPROACHED THE BRIAR COUNTY STATE LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVES TO TRY AND GET A BILL PASSED ACTUALLY FORMED THIS CITY. EMERSON ALWAYS WORTH WAS THE REPRESENTATIVE THAT TOOK THAT BILL UP TO TALLAHASSEE AND PRESENTED IT. AND ON MAY 25, 1963, THAT BILL PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. THERE WAS A DEBATE WHETHER OR NOT ACTUALLY THEY WERE GOING TO ALLOW PARKLAND TO BECOME A CITY BECAUSE AT THE TIME ÃÃTHERE WERE ONLY 12 FAMILIES LIVING HERE. ONE OF THE REPRESENTATIVES KIND OF DEBATED HIM ON THE ISSUE WHETHER OR NOT WE SHOULD ACTUALLY BE A CITY. BUT FORTUNATELY MR. ELLSWORTH WAS ABLE TO CONVINCE HIM AND SO THE BILL PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. AND 60 YEARS LATER, HERE WE SIT AS A WONDERFUL CITY THAT WE ALL LOVE. THE CITY OWES HIM A GREAT DEBT

AND IT'S ALL I HAVE. >>THANK YOU VERY MUCH COMMISSIONER CUTLER.

COMMISSIONER MEYERSON? >>I MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT BRIEF.

AGAIN ÃÃCONGRATULATIONS TO ALL OF THE GRADUATES. THOSE THAT ARE MOVING UP.

AS WELL AS TO THE TEACHER STAFF, ADMINISTRATORS, THEY ALL DONE A FANTASTIC JOB.

AS MS. SELTZER SAYS ÃÃTHE PRINCIPAL EVERGLADES LISTENED TO YOUR PARENTS ÃÃTHEY NOW.

I ALSO WANT TO CONGRATULATE THE MSD BASEBALL TEAM. I BELIEVE THAT THE THREE REPEATED. AND THEY WENT UNDEFEATED. THE INTERESTING PART OF NEXT YEAR'S TEAM IS THAT THEY ARE ONLY LOSING THREE STARTERS. SO ÃÃHOPEFULLY THEY WILL BE HERE ÃÃOF THE COMING HERE AGAIN? WHAT? [LAUGHTER] FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE NOT SIGNED UP YET FOR THE PARKLAND ÃÃÃI DON'T KNOW WHO THE FIRST PERSON TO SIGN UP WAS THIS YEAR ÃÃBUT SOMEBODY TOLD ME IT WAS ME.

BUT TODAY IS A GLOBAL RUNNING DAY. SO ÃÃYOU GET A 50 PERCENT DISCOUNT OFF THE SIGN-UP. AND THE REASON WHY I SAY THIS IS THE PROCEEDS OF THIS EVENT GO TO SOS VILLAGE. SOMETHING THAT WE ALL AS A COMMISSION AND OUR CITY CERTAINLY CARES ABOUT AND SUPPORTS. SO ÃÃAGAIN ÃÃEVEN IF YOU DO NOT RUN. YOU WANT TO WALK. YOU WANT TO JOG AND WALK AND JOG. I URGE EVERYBODY. ESPECIALLY TO TAKE THE DISCOUNT TODAY. I THINK NEXT TOLD ME THERE WERE 43 PEOPLE TODAY THAT SIGNED UP TO DISCOUNT. SO ÃÃHOPEFULLY BY THE END OF TODAY ÃÃTODD WILL GIVE US A TALLY AND IT WILL BE IN THE THOUSANDS. I ATTENDED THE TWO ON ONE HUNTER MARKETING MAKING REAL CONNECTIONS BREAKFAST. I DO WANT TO GIVE A SHOUT OUT

[00:10:05]

THIS WEEKEND ÃÃFOR THOSE OF YOU INTERESTED IN ENTERTAINMENT ÃÃWE HAVE SURPRISED COMMISSIONER CUTLER DID NOT MENTION HIS FAVORITE EVENT THAT WE DO THE FISHING DERBY.

SO HE WILL BE THERE HELPING YOU FINISH. IF YOU DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT ÃÃYOU WILL BE ABLE TO GUIDE YOU. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE ÃTHAT BECAUSE LAST WEEK WAS EAT AND BEAT WAS POSTPONED AND WE ARE UP THIS WEEKEND.

AND THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS. >>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COMMISSIONER ISRAEL?

>>THANK YOU MARY. KEEP IT BRIEF AND I KNOW WE'VE GOT A LOT OF PEOPLE HERE.

I WANT TO SEND CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYBODY ELSE FOR FINISHING THE SCHOOL YEAR INCLUDING THE PARENTS. I KNOW IT'S JUST AS MUCH OF A CHALLENGE.

I JUST THANK YOU ALL AND AT THE END OF THE DAY ÃÃI HOPE MOST OF YOU WILL STAY HERE TONIGHT.

WE WILL BE MAKING A SELECTION ON THE DEVELOPER FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE HERON BAY, WHICH IS AN EXCITING PROJECT AND WE'VE GOT A LOT OF PROGRESS MADE HEADWAY SINCE WE FIRST STARTED THIS CONVERSATION. SO ÃÃI HOPE YOU GUYS WILL STAY. IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT. AND GO HEAT.

THANKS. >>VICE MAYOR BRIAR? >>NOT TO BE REDUNDANT AND I WILL BE BRIEF. I JUST WANT TO ALSO WISH CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL THE STUDENTS AND FACULTY AND STAFF ON TEACHERS, PARENTS, FOR ANOTHER GRADUATION OF ANOTHER GREAT SCHOOL YEAR. I HAD THE HONOR ALONE WITH OUR AMAZING STATE REPRESENTATIVE TO SPEAK AT THE PARKLAND SOMERSET ACADEMIES EIGHTH GRADE GRADUATION CEREMONY.

IT IS THEIR INAUGURAL CLASS OF EIGHTH GRADERS 76 EIGHTH GRADERS FROM SOMERSET GRADUATED AND MOVING ON TO HIGH SCHOOL AND IT WAS AMAZING TO SEE THE TALENTS THERE.

SO ÃÃWITH THAT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH MAYOR. HAVE A GOOD NIGHT.

[LAUGHTER] OKAY. GOOD NIGHT EVERYBODY.

[LAUGHTER] I DON'T WANT TO BE MORE REDUNDANT THAN VICE MAYOR BRIAR WAS REDUNDANT TO JORDAN'S REDUNDANCY. BUT ALL KIDDING ASIDE, CONGRATULATIONS TO HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES, COLLEGE GRADUATES, THOSE OF YOU TAT ARE PROMOTED UP TO HIGH SCHOOL OR MIDDLE SCHOOL OR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. WHATEVER IT IS.

THANK YOU TO THE TEACHERS. OBVIOUSLY PARKLAND, WE VALUE EDUCATION GREATLY.O WE CANNOT THINK OUR TEACHERS ENOUGH FOR ALL THAT YOU DO AND OUR PARENTS WERE CONTINUING TO BE ENGAGED AND MAKING SURE OUR STUDENTS ARE HEADED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION AT ALL TIMES.

[7. Presentation]

AND IF WE CAN HAVE OUR PRESENTATION BY OUR STATE REPRESENTATIVE ÃÃTHAT EVERYBODY SAYS GREAT THINGS ABOUT AS I DO AS WELL ÃÃI JUST DID NOT HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY. BUT SHE'S GONNA GIVE US A LEGISLATIVE UPDATE.

SO æ >>THANK YOU VERY MUCH MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS, CITY MANAGERS, CITY ATTORNEYS, CITY CLERK. JUST FOR THE RECORD, I DID JUST REGISTER FOR THE PARKLAND ÃAT SEVEN: 12 PM WHILE I WAS LISTENING TO THE COMMENTS.

SO ALWAYS A GREAT EVENT AND FOR A GREAT CAUSE. WHAT A GREAT TIME TO SEE THE COMMUNITY AND EVEN I CAN WALK 5K. SO THANK YOU.

IF I CAN DO IT, ANYBODY CAN DO IT. THAT'S AWESOME.

I WANT TO GIVE EVERYBODY A QUICK LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. I WILL GO THROUGH SOME OF THE THINGS. SO WE ACTUALLY FINISHED ON TIME THIS SESSION COULD BE A 60 DAY SESSION AND FINISHED ON MAY 5. AND WE APPROVED A 117 BILLION DOLLAR BUDGET, WHICH IS A RECORD FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. NOW TO BE CLEAR ÃÃ1/3 OF THIS COMES FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. BUT STILL ÃÃIT'S A RECORD-BREAKING WITH 1/3 OF THE BUDGET. LIKE I SAID ÃÃCOMING FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ÃÃWE INVESTED LIKE NEVER BEFORE. IN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH.

SEALEVEL RISE RESILIENCE. THERE IS MONEY THEREFORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

THE PER STUDENT FUNDING FOR EDUCATION IS HIGHER THAN IT'S EVER BEEN.

AND I WAS ALSO HAPPY TO SECURE IN THE BUDGET. THE BUDGET HAS NOT BEEN SENT TO THE GOVERNOR YET. SO WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT THOSE LINE ITEMS ARE GOING TO BE.

BUT I WAS HAPPY TO SECURE $600,000 AGAIN THIS YEAR FOR EAGLES HAVEN AND WELLNESS

[00:15:03]

ADD AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND VERY IMPORTANT WORK THAT THEY DO.

SO ÃÃI HOPE PEOPLE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT. ADDITIONALLY ÃTHIS IS SECURED IN THE BUDGET $200,000 PER PARKLAND FLOODING MITIGATION. AND $150,000 FOR PARKING PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY INITIATIVE. ADDITIONALLY WE HAVE $2.3 MILLION IN THERE FOR THE REAL-TIME BSO REAL-TIME CRIME CENTER AND WE ALSO HAVE A COUPLE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN THEREFORE BRIAR COUNTY MEDICAID ASSISTED TREATMENT.

THERE WAS A BIG YEAR FOR BILLS. 1820 BILLS WERE FILED THIS LEGISLATIVE SESSION.

ONLY 356 OF THEM PASSED BOTH CHAMBERS. PENS ARE ELIGIBLE TO BE LAW.

I WAS VERY HAPPY AND I'M JUST GOING TO SAY IT THIS YEAR BECAUSE IT WILL PROBABLY NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN. TO EACH MEMBER OF THE HOUSE CAN ONLY FILE SEVEN BILLS.

BUT IF YOU WORK WITH SOMEONE ELSE ON IT, YOU CAN CODE PRIME SPONSOR BUT THEM.

YOU CAN HAVE MORE BILLS.SO I WAS ABLE TO PASS MORE BILLS AS LEGISLATIVE SESSION.

AND I BRING THAT UP BECAUSE WHILE THERE ARE THOSE HEADLINES AND THE TALK ABOUT ALL OF THE THINGS THAT WE DO NOT AGREE ON ÃÃ90 PERCENT OF THE BILLS THAT WE PASS ARE PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. AND EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE THOSE OF US THAT MIGHT NOT AGREE WITH SOME OF THE CHOICES THAT WERE MADE ÃÃREGARDING A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE ABOUT REMOVING THE PERMIT REQUIREMENT WHO CARRY A GUN IN A CONCEALED MANNER IN PUBLIC.

IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE ARE NOT WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE WHO SENT US THERE TO GET THE JOB DONE. SO I JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO KNOW THAT WHILE THERE MIGHT BE DISAGREEMENTS ON CERTAIN CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES ÃÃI AM STILL DOING THE WORK THAT YOU ALSO BE THERE TO DO AND IT'S AN HONOR TO DO THAT WORK. SO PACKAGES GO THROUGH SOME OF THE BILLS. ONE WAS A PSYCHOLOGY INTERJURISDICTIONAL COMPACT.

THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN ASSIGNED. SO ÃÃYES. SO THAT'S WHAT MAKES FLORIDA COMPACT STATES. PSYCHOLOGISTS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA.ILL THAT BE ABLE TO CONTRIBUTE TO TREAT THE PATIENT IF THEY GO TO ANOTHER STATE THAT THE COMPACT STATE.

THEY ARE ABOUT 37 OR 38 COMPACT STATES NOW. THAT'S GREAT IF THE STUDENT IS GOING OUT OF STATE TO A COLLEGE. WE HAVE SNOWBIRDS HERE THAT ARE HERE PART-TIME AND ANOTHER STATE THE REST OF THE TIME. AND IT'S JUST MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS A CONTINUUM OF CARE. ADDITIONALLY ÃÃWE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH PSYCHOLOGISTS FOR ALL THE MENTAL HEALTH NEEDS RIGHT NOW. SO IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT.

ANOTHER ONE WAS HB 111 FLOODING IN SEALEVEL RISE. ALL THAT SAYS IS THAT IF YOU ARE SPENDING PUBLIC FUNDS ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND YOU ARE IN A FLOODED AREA.

NOT JUST ON THE COAST, BUT ANYWHERE IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA WHERE THERE'S AN ISSUE WITH SEALEVEL RISE OR FLOODING TESTIS YOU HAVE TO DO A SLIP. ANALYSIS.O SEE IF THE PROJECT WOULD BE IMPACTED TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN YOU ARE BUILDING.

ADDITIONALLY ÃÃTHERE IS EXTRA MONEY IN THEIR FOR RESILIENT FLORIDA FOR CITIES TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF. THAT GRANT PROGRAM SO ÃÃ THAT'S REALLY GOOD.

ANOTHER ONE WAS HOUSE BILL 165. LEGALIZING FENTANYL TEST STRIPS ARE CONSIDERED DRUG PARAPHERNALIA IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. AND THIS WOULD THEN LEGALIZE THEM. AND FENTANYL TEST STRIPS ARE JUST A WAY TO TEST ANY MEDICATION THAT YOU TAKEN TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S NOT LEAST WITH FENTANYL.

WE HEARD STORIES FROM PARENTS WHOSE PRESCHOOLERS AND COLLEGE STUDENTS WERE TAKING ADDERALL FROM A FRIEND OF THEIRS TO STAY UP FOR A TEST. UNFORTUNATELY, IT WAS PLACED WITH FENTANYL AND THEY DIED. SO ÃÃTHIS IS JUST A HARM REDUCTION TOOL.

AND SOMETHING VERY NECESSARY AND HAD A 100 PERCENT BIPARTISAN SUPPORT, WHICH MADE ME VERY HAPPY BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH STIGMA ASSOCIATED WITH A SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER.

ANOTHER ONE IS HOUSE BILL 199. MAKING SURE THAT PEOPLE WHO ARE ELECTED OFFICERS IN WATER DISTRICTS HAVE TO HAVE FOUR HOURS OF ETHICS TRAINING A YEAR JUST LIKE ALL THE OTHER LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS DO. AND I'M SURE EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT THAT'S A GREAT THING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE IT HELPS YOU ARE MORE ABLE TO FOLLOW THE LAW IF YOU ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS ARE. HOUSE BILL 665 SUICIDE PREVENTION.

SO WHEN I FIRST GOT ELECTED TO THE STATE HOUSE IN WAS OUR FIRST SESSION ÃÃMARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS GRANGER HE CAME UP WITH THE THIRD INTERIM GRAND JURY REPORT.

AND THAT REPORT STATED THAT WE REALLY NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEM IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. SO FROM THAT ÃÃI FILED A BILL THAT ESTABLISHED THEN PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. AND ESTABLISHED A COMMISSION ON MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER. THIS YEAR WE TOOK THAT BILL AND WE EXTENDED THE LENGTH OF THE COMMISSION THROUGH 2026. AND ALSO ADDED A CHARGE TO THE COMMISSION.

[00:20:03]

I WAS APPOINTED BY THE LAST SPEAKER AS THEIR APPOINTEE ON THE COMMISSION AND THE SPEAKER DID THE SAME. SO I WILL CONTINUE TO WORK ON THAT.

SO ÃÃSOME OTHER COMPACTS AND OTHER THINGS. I WILL LOOK INTO ALL THOSE DETAILS. BUT I WILL TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE LOCAL BILLS.

THERE WERE SOME NOT SO GREAT LOCAL BILLS LIKE SENATE BILL 170, WHICH WILL BE EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1. AND THAT ALLOWS LOCAL BUSINESSES TO KIND OF COME AFTER GOVERNMENTS IF THEY PUT THINGS INTO PLACE THAT WILL AFFECT THE BOTTOM LINE. AGAIN ÃÃI WAS COMING FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT. I'VE NOT FORGOTTEN WHERE I'VE COME FROM.

JUST FOR THE RECORD ÃÃSTATE REPRESENTATIVE GOTTLIEB AND I WERE THE ONLY TWO NO VOTES IN THE HOUSE ON THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT FOR LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS.

I'M SORRY WE WERE ONLY TWO. BUT THIS IS A REALLY GOOD THING BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DO WHAT THEY DO AND I'VE ALWAYS KNOWN AND I'VE SEEN THE COMMISSION TO THE SAME THAT WHEN THERE'S A DISAGREEMENT WITH THE DEVELOPER FOR LOCAL BUSINESS ÃÃI MEAN YOU ALL ARE AVAILABLE. WHEN I SERVED IT WAS THE SAME THING. AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS JUST HAVE A DIFFERENT WAY OF GOING ABOUT THINGS. AND NEVER LETTING THINGS GET TO THE POINT WHERE THEY'VE ESCALATED SO MUCH THAT YOU WOULD EVEN NEED SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

I WOULD KEEP IT REALLY SHORT. I ONE MORE THING. THERE WAS HB 657 THAT JUST GOT SIGNED INTO LAW, WHICH WAS ENFORCEMENT OF SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMIT.

SO WITH THIS LEGISLATION DOES IS THAT IT AUTHORIZES COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES TO USE SPEED DETECTION SYSTEMS TO ENFORCE SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMITS FOR VIOLATIONS THAT ARE IN EXCESS OF 10 MILES PER OUR OVER THE SPEED LIMIT. DOES NOT REQUIRE YOU TO DO THIS. BUT IT GIVES YOU AN OPTION TO DO THIS.

SO IF YOU NOTICE THAT THERE'S AN AREA WHERE YOU HAVE A LOT OF SCHOOLS ALL AT THE SAME TIME Ã ÃPEOPLE ARE CONSISTENTLY NOT PAYING ATTENTION. THIS MIGHT BE SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD LOOK INTO. IT DOES REQUIRE EDUCTION BEFORE IMPLEMENTING IT.

IT CAN ONLY BE READ BEFORE AND AFTER SCHOOL TIMES. WENT TO A CERTAIN TIME.

AND THEN IT WILL RESULT IN A $100 FINE FOR ANYBODY WHO VIOLATES IT.

60 OF WHICH WILL GO TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. SO ÃÃI JUST WANT TO MAKE YOU AWARE THAT THIS IS ONE MORE TOOL IN YOUR TOOLBOX SHOULD YOU CHOOSE TO.

BUT IT'S NOT MANDATORY. OTHER THAN THAT ÃÃWE'VE A LOT OF BILLS REGARDING WORK PERFORMED AND UNFORTUNATELY ÃÃ THE PROPERTY INSURANCE CRISIS IS STILL CONTINUING AND THE BILLS THAT WERE SAID TO BE STARTING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE ARE NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT REALLY ADDRESSING THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM OF REINSURANCE, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT MANY OF US TALK ABOUT. THE WORK PERFORMED WHILE IT WAS INTENTION GOOD IN THE SENSE OF THEY WANTED TO GO AFTER THE BAD ACTORS IN THE LEGAL FIELD Ã JUST A SMALL GROUP OF BAD ACTORS WHO WERE SUING INSURANCE COMPANIES IF THEY PAID OUT A DOLLAR LESS THAN THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO. WHAT IT DID IS NOW ÃTHIS IF YOU SUE AN INSURANCE COMPANY AND YOU ARE CORRECT AND THEY DID NOT PAY OUT WHAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO ÃÃYOU ARE STILL HELD ÃÃYOU STILL HAVE TO PAY YOUR OWN LEGAL FEES. THEY DO NOT HAVE TO PAY THEM.

SO ALL THAT'S GOING TO DO IS UNFORTUNATELY HEARD THE GOOD ACTORS PER THE PEOPLE WHO NEED THE ACCESS TO THE COURTS. BUT I SWEAR TO GIVE A BRIEF UPDATE.

I KNOW WE HAVE A BUSY ROOM. IF I MIGHT ÃÃCONGRATULATIONS. EVERYBODY ON ALL OF YOUR REWARDS. PARENTS. I HAVE A 25 AND 22-YEAR-OLD NOW. I WILL TELL YOU THAT ARE LONG, BUT THE YEARS ARE ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] OF IT.

AND I HOPE YOU ALL HAVE A WONDERFUL SUMMER. AND THAT'S IT.

[APPLAUSE] >>THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING THAT YOU DO.

[CHEERING] >>I THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR PARTNERSHIP.

I KNOW THAT COMMISSIONER MEYERSON IS THE HOME RULE HERO. BUT I KNOW ALL OF YOU ARE CONTINUALLY ENGAGED. I HEAR CONSTANTLY FROM YOU. RIGHT COMMUNICATION WITH THE CITY MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION AND I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR YOUR

PARTNERSHIP WITH THE WORK THAT YOU DO. >>THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

[APPLAUSE] >>COMMISSIONER MEYERSON? >>NANCY?

>>CAN WE GET A LOOK AT WHAT IS IT BACK HOUSE BUILT 657 IF IT'S FEASIBLE?

[00:25:06]

AND SEE IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE MIGHT WANT OR MAY NOT. >>WE ARE ONE STEP AHEAD OF YOU.

MERELY MET WITH THE VENDOR THAT IS INQUIRING ABOUT HOW TO IMPLEMENT A SYSTEM.

[6. Proclamations and Recognitions]

SO 30 ON MY STRATEGIC PLANNING LIST. >>THANKS.

OKAY ÃÃLET'S GET INTO THE WELL AND GET SOME OF THESE PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOING.

>>YOU GUYS ARE SHARING GLASSES? VIOLET EDWARDS, COULD YOU COME DOWN HERE WITH INDISCERNIBLE] THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THAT YOU ARE HERE. YES.

BECOMING A REGULAR. >>WONDERFUL. WONDERFUL TO SEE YOU.

PRESIDENT ABRAHAM LINCOLN ISSUED THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION AND GENERALLY FIRST 1863 AS THE NATION APPROACHED ITS THIRD YEAR OF CIVIL WAR.

THE PROCLAMATION DECLARED THAT ALL PERSONS HELD AS SLAVES WITHIN THE REBELLIOUS STATES ARE HENCE FORWARD SHALL BE FREE. ON JUNE 19, 1865 ÃÃGENERAL GORDON GRANGER LED THOUSANDS OF FEDERAL TROOPS TO GATHER IN TEXAS TO ANNOUNCE THAT THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR HAD ENDED. AND THAT SLAVES HAD BEEN FREED. JUNETEENTH IS THE OLDEST KNOWN CELEBRATION HONORING THE END OF SLAVERY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

THE CITY OF PARKLAND EMBRACES EQUITY, EQUALITY, COMMUNITY, AND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MEETING OF JUNE 6 ÃÃ JUNETEENTH AND BLACK HISTORY. MISS VIOLET EDWARDS, A PARKLAND RESIDENT, WHO IN 2022 BECAME THE FIFTH OLDEST PERSON IN THE WORLD TO EARN HER COLLEGE DEGREE AT THE AGE OF 96. [APPLAUSE] [CHEERING] THIS EDWARDS IS ALSO THE OLDEST BLACK WOMAN TO GRADUATE FROM COLLEGE IN THE UNITED STATES. MISS VIOLET EDWARDS, HER ANCESTORS, AND SISTERS AND HER DESCENDENTS EMBODIED A DEFINITION OF VISION, HOPE, AND GENERATIONAL FORTITUDE.

THE CITY OF PARKLAND CELEBRATES MRS. EDWARDS AND ALL OF HER LEGACY REPRESENTS NOT ONLY HER FAMILY, BUT ALSO THE ENTIRE CITY OF PARKLAND. THE RESULT THAT I, MAYOR RICH WALKER IN THE CITY OF PARKLAND CITY COMMISSION HEREBY PROCLAIM JUNE 19 AS JUNETEENTH.

[APPLAUSE] [APPLAUSE]

[CHEERING] >>IT'S GREAT TO SEE YOU GUYS AGAIN.

[00:30:11]

WONDERFUL. >>OUT LIKE TO CALL UP THE PORTRAYALS ELEMENTARY DEBATE TEAM. [APPLAUSE]

[CHEERING] >>,.,.CONGRATULATIONS. ONGRATULATIONS GUYS.

>>,ANNA. CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS.

CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. I LOVE IT.

I LOVE IT. GOLD MEDALIST. DEBATE KIDS ARE SOME OF MY FAVORITES. [APPLAUSE] CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS.

CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. I LIKE IT.

ELLICOTT. CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS.

>>ONE MOST OF US THINK ABOUT PECTORAL BOOK REPORTS AND POETRY READINGS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JUST AS PUBLIC SPEAKING PROBABLY DOES NOT RISE TO THE TOP IS ONE OF OUR FAVORITE MOMENTS. IN FACT PUBLIC SPEAKING IS SOMETHING MANY OLDER STUDENTS AND ADULTS SHY AWAY FROM. THIS IS NOT THE STORY HOWEVER FOR THESE KIDS.

FOR THE PORTRAYALS ELEMENTARY DEBATE TEAM HERE WITH US TODAY. IN FACT, THESE STUDENTS RANGE FROM THIRD THROUGH FIFTH GRADERS CAPABLY DELIVERED SPEECHES PERFORMANCES AND DEBATE WITH FOCUS AND POISE. PORTRAYALS ELEMENTARY DEBATE TEAM OF 19 BROUGHT HOME FIVE TROPHIES WHEN THEY COMPETED IN THE ALL COUNTY COMPETITION AND A 36 METALS DURING THE SEASON.

THE COMPLETED IN THE AREA OF IMPROMPTU SPEECH, IN WHICH THEY WERE REQUIRED TO EXPAND UPON ANYTHING. THEY COMPETED IN THE CATEGORY OF CONGRESS, WHICH INCLUDED PREPARING PROS AND CONS OF DIFFERENT LEGISLATIVE BILLS. SOME ACTED OUT AND OTHERS WORK IN A CREATIVE WAY IN THE CATEGORY OF INTERPRETATION. AND SOME DELIVERED A 3¥ MINUTE SPEECH IN THE ORATORY CATEGORY KNOWING THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DEBATE TEAMS ARE FEW AND FAR BETWEEN. WE ARE ESPECIALLY HAPPY TO CONGRATULATE THESE OUTSTANDING PUBLIC SPEAKERS. ON BEHALF OF THE ENTIRE CITY COMMISSION ÃTHIS CONGRATULATIONS TO THE PORTRAYALS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEAM.

THE DEBATE TEAM ÃÃTHEIR ADVISOR ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] AND TEACHER GLENDA LEE PERFUME FOR THIS STELLAR ACHIEVEMENT. THANK YOU.

>>FOR THE STELLAR ACHIEVEMENT. CONGRATULATIONS EVERYBODY.

[APPLAUSE] [CHEERING]

>>ALL RIGHT. BEFORE WE GET TO THE NEXT ONE Ã ÃI JUST WANT TO TELL ALL THE STUDENTS HERE TO TAKE AN EXAMPLE OUT OF MISS VIOLET AND REALIZE THAT YOU NEVER STOP LEARNING. YOU ARE NEVER TOO OLD. THERE SHOULD BE NO EXCUSES.

IT'S AN INCREDIBLE FEE AND I THINK ALL THIS CAN BE REALLY APPRECIATIVE OF LEARNING THAT IT'S NEVER TOO OLD TO KEEP LEARNING. SOME CAN KEEP MAKING SURE THAT I SAY THAT. CAN I GET THE MARJORIE STONE DOUGLAS EAGLES BATTALION JL RTC DOWNWARD PLEASE? ALL RIGHT. NOW.

I'VE GOT A LOT OF THEM HERE. [LAUGHTER] ALL RIGHT. MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS. EAGLES BATTALION JL RTC.

HAD A HISTORIC SEASON IN 2023. AND ONE NUMEROUS BIG TROPHIES. THEIR SUCCESSES CAME ONE AFTER ANOTHER THIS YEAR AND IT'S ALL DUE TO THE STUDENTS ARTWORK AND DETERMINATION.

AND TO THE GREAT LEADERSHIP PROVIDED BY THE ADVISORS. EAGLES BATTALION PLACED FIRST IN TWO CATEGORIES PER SECOND AND TWO OTHERS AND FIFTH AND ANOTHER.

THE FLORIDA STATE DRILL CHAMPIONSHIPS. THEIR COACH ÃÃLIEUTENANT COLONEL MARK ANDERSON SAID THIS IN THE BEST MSD HAS EVER DONE AT THE STATE LEVEL OF DRILL COMPETITION. THE TEAM COMPETED IN THE MAIL UNARMED AND FEMALE UNARMED SQUAD THAT THE STATE CHAMPIONSHIPS. WITH A PLACE AS RUNNERS-UP IN THE FIFTH AND OTHER CATEGORY. THE DRILL TEAM ALSO PLAYED FIRST OR SECOND AND 11/13 CATEGORIES IN THE BROWARD COUNTY DISTRICT DRILL COMPETITION IN MARCH PER THE

[00:35:10]

FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER ÃÃTHE DRILL TEAM WON FIRST PLACE OVERALL VISUAL TEAM COMPETITION.WITH 17 TEAMS COMPETING ÃÃYES, EXACTLY. THEY ALSO LIST FIRST OR SECOND AND 11/12 CATEGORIES. ON BEHALF OF THE CITY PARKLAND CITY COMMISSION ÃTHIS CONGRATULATIONS TO THE CADETS SERGEANT FIRST CLASS RAMON AREAS AND LEADERSHIP OF THE MARJORIE STONE DOUGLAS EAGLES BATTALION JL RTC FURTHER HISTORIC ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR THIS SCHOOL. CONGRATULATIONS.

[APPLAUSE] >>VERY COOL.

[APPLAUSE] [CHEERING] PERFECT TIME. GOOD TIMING.

[LAUGHTER] >>GETTING USED TO IT. >>THESE KIDS ARE GETTING TALL IN COLOR.

[CHEERING] >>CONGRATULATIONS.

[APPLAUSE] >>CONGRATULATIONS AGAIN. CONGRATULATIONS.

>>I WILL BE BACK. [APPLAUSE]

>>PR EARLIER. HANG ON ONE SECOND. >>OKAY, CAN I GET MOMS DEMAND ACTION? THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING DOWN.

ALL RIGHT ÃÃSO ÃÃWHEREAS EVERYDAY AN AVERAGE OF 124 AMERICANS ARE KILLED AND FIREARM RELATED INCIDENTS ÃÃ ACCORDING TO THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION ÃÃWHEREAS FIREARMS OF THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH AMONG AMERICAN CHILDREN AND TEENS AND NEARLY 2500 CHILDREN DIED BY HOMICIDE EACH YEAR. WHERE AS EVERY YEAR ÃÃROUGHLY 350 CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 18 UNINTENTIONALLY SHOOT THEMSELVES OR SOMEONE ELSE ACCORDING TO THE FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR.

THERE IS AN ESTIMATED 5.4 MILLION AMERICAN CHILDREN LIVE IN HOUSEHOLDS WITH AT LEAST ONE PLOADED UNLOCKED FIREARM. WHEREAS RESEARCH SHOWS THAT SECURE FIREARM STORAGE PRACTICES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH UP TO 85 PERCENT REDUCTION IN THE RISK OF UNINTENTIONAL FIREARM INJURIES AMONG CHILDREN AND TEENS. WERE AS MOMS DEMAND ACTION IS THE LARGEST GRASSROOTS COMPOUNDS PREVENTION ORGANIZATION IN THE UNITED STATES. WERE AS MOMS DEMAND ACTION WAS CREATED IN 2012 AFTER THE SANDY HOOK SCHOOL SHOOTING AND BECAME A SOURCE OF SUPPORT AND PARKLAND AFTER THE MARJORIE STONE DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL TRAGEDY. WHEREAS PARKLAND RESIDENTS USED RESIDENTS OF THE BROWARD GROUP FOR MOMS DEMANDING ACTION ARE WORKING DILIGENTLY TO EDUCATE THE PARKLAND COMMUNITY ABOUT GUN SAFETY AWARENESS. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE MAYOR RICH WALKER HERE AND THE CITY OF PARKLAND CITY COMMISSION HEREBY PROCLAIM THE MONTH OF JUNE 2023 AS NATIONAL GUN VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH IN THE CITY OF PARKLAND FLORIDA.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. [APPLAUSE] [CHEERING] [APPLAUSE]

>>I KNOW A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I WANT TO SAY. IN TERMS OF THANK YOU.

[00:40:07]

THAT'S 1 AND A HALF TIMES THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF PARKLAND. THIS IS 158 DAY OF 2023 AND THERE HAVE ALREADY BEEN 279 MASS SHOOTINGS THIS YEAR. BUT MASS SHOOTINGS REPRESENT ONLY A SMALL FRACTION OF DEATHS BY FIREARM. NEARLY 2/3 OF WHICH ARE WITH SUICIDES. AS IT PROCLAMATION STATES TESTIS FIREARMS AND OTHER LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH AMONG AMERICAN CHILDREN AND TEENS. BUT SUICIDE IS NOW THE THIRD LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH. AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE AND NEARLY HALF OF ALL YOUTH SUICIDES ARE BY FIREARMS. WE ARE ALL SAFER WHEN FIREARMS ARE LOADED, STORED, AND SEPARATED FROM AMMUNITION. OUR BE SMART CAMPAIGN EXPLAINS THAT GUN OWNERS DO NOT NEED TO CHOOSE BETWEEN STORING GUNS SECURELY AND MAINTAINING QUICK ACCESS TO THEM.

ULTIMATELY SECURE GUN STORAGE PREVENTS KIDS AND OTHER ERRORS PEOPLE FROM ACCESSING GUNS.

WHEN WE PROGRAM ATTACKED OUR MOST VULNERABLE PEOPLE FROM THE DANGERS OF UNINTENTIONAL SHOOTINGS OR SELF-HARM ÃÃTHE ENTIRE COMMUNITY BENEFITS. PLEASE GO TO BE SMART FOR KIDS.ORG TO LEARN MORE. WE WOULD ALSO WELCOME THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTNER WITH THE CITY. PARKLAND TO MAKE THIS INFORMATION MORE AVAILABLE TO OUR RESIDENTS HERE. SOME OF THE DOCUMENTATION ÃÃI WANT TO SAY TO COMMISSIONER CUTLER OUTSIDE ÃÃTHIS INFORMATION IS SO NONCONTROVERSIAL.

THE BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, WHICH IS NOT TO GRANT ANYTHING ÃÃUNANIMOUSLY PASSED A RESOLUTION TO DISTRIBUTE ALL OF THIS INFORMATION TO ALL 260,000 STUDENTS IN THE BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOLS. ONGOING.

WITH YOUR PERMISSION MR. MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO LEAVE SAMPLES OF THIS DOCUMENTATION WITH CITY MANAGER AND WE CAN FOLLOW UP WITH YOU GUYS. THANK YOU GUYS.

[APPLAUSE] >>WE MAY GO BACK ONE SECOND. SO LET'S GO IN AND DO THE

[8. Approval of the Agenda]

APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. >>MOTION TO APPROVE. SUBJECT TO GOING BACK TO MOTION

THE APPROVAL IN A SECOND. >>SECOND. WE'VE GOT VICE MAYOR WITH THE

[9. Consent Agenda]

>>FIVE. >>I. >>THE BILL PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

CONSENT AGENDA. >>MOTION TO APPROVE. >>SECOND.

>>WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER CUTLER. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ISRAEL.

IN ONE THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? SEEING IF THERE IS NONE ÃÃ

ROLL CALL. >>COMMISSIONER CUTLER? >>YES.

>>COMMISSIONER CUTLER SOON? >>VICE MAYOR BREYER? MAYOR WALKER?

>>YES. >>YES. >>PLEASE SHOW THAT IT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY BEFORE WE START THE REGULAR AGENDA. ANTHONY? WE'RE JUST WANT TO POSTPONE QUICK SECOND. SEE IF IVY TEXT MESSAGES.

[LAUGHTER] >>THIS IS FOR DRAMATIC PAUSE.

[00:45:42]

>>FORGIVE ME, ONE SECOND. I'M GOING TO STAND UP. COME BACK DOWN TO THE WELL.

[Additional Item]

SO WE'RE GOING TO BRING UP THE AMAZING PRINCIPLE OF MSD. WAIT, SHE'S NOT ÃÃYES SHE IS.

OKAY ÃJUST SHE'S NOT READY? WE ARE ALSO GOING TO BRING UP THE MSD THEATER? DRAMA? MSD DRAMA TEAM. AND I SEE THAT THE TEACHER,

MELANIE HERZFELD ÃDISABILITY Ã DISABILITY? >>AND THROWN IT OUT.

[LAUGHTER] OKAY. >>I LOVE THE DRAMATIC PAUSE.

[LAUGHTER] [CHEERING]

>>DO WE WANT ÃÃ [INDISCERNIBLE] >>HELLO, HOW ARE YOU?

>>I GET PUMPED STILL THINKING ABOUT IT. [LAUGHTER]

>>OF ALL THE STUDENTS THAT ARE HERE, IF YOU GUYS WANT TO GATHER AROUND AND SPREAD OUT.

YOUR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS THAT ARE HERE ÃÃSO PROUD OF YOU AND SO IS THE CITY OF PARKLAND WERE SO SUPPORTIVE OF THE ARTS FOR US OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS. THIS IS A VERY SPECIAL GROUP.

THIS IS THE GROUP THAT CAME IN AS NINTH GRADERS. AFTER EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENED AT THIS SCHOOL AND THEY HAVE BEEN MY LIFELINE. THEY ARE THE ONES THAT REALLY HAVE MADE IT WORTH EVERY MOMENT. SUMMER GRADUATES, WITH A FEW GRADUATES THAT ARE HERE, RAISE YOUR HAND FOR THE GRADUATES. YES.

THIS YEAR ÃÃTHEY WANT TO ME ACCOLADES AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL.

AND AT THE STATE LEVEL ÃÃ INCLUDING 21 CAPPING NOMINATIONS.

AND THEN BROUGHT HOME TWO THESE AS WELL AS SOUTH FLORIDA. SO I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE ONE BEST MUSICAL, BUT THAT'S OKAY. BUT IF THEY HAVE IN THE PAST Ã ÃALL OF THESE MOST OF THE STUDENTS HAVE BEEN PART OF THESE PRODUCTIONS AS WELL. AND THEY'VE JUST DONE A TREMENDOUS JOB IN CONTINUING TO LEAD AND BRING THE ARTS TO OUR COMMUNITY YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR. THEY KEEP ASKING ME WHAT WE ARE GOING UP IN PARKLAND AND I SAY IT'S ON COLONEL ENDERS GARDEN PUT WE ARE GROWING LOTS OF PEOPLE OVER THERE.

BUT WE ARE ALWAYS GOING SO MUCH DOWN HERE AND I'M SO INCREDIBLY PROUD OF THEM.

AT THE GREAT OFFICERS AND LEADERS THAT ARE AMONG US THAT MAYBE WE WILL SEE IN THE SHOWS UP SOON. SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR RECOGNIZING.

TRIP 4879 FOR ALL THESE ACCOLADES. WE ARE SO INCREDIBLY PROUD OF THEM. [APPLAUSE]

>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >>IS THERE A TRIP 47 NINE CHAPTER?

>>NO.

[CHEERING] [APPLAUSE]

>>BETTER GIRL ÃGUY AUDITS THAN FOOTBALL. >>THAT'S TRUE ACTUALLY.

[LAUGHTER] [CHEERING]

[10. Regular Agenda]

>>OKAY ÃÃWELL THEN. WE WILL GET BACK TO OUR REGULAR STATION PROGRAMMING.

[00:50:19]

>>REGULARLY SCHEDULED PROGRAMMING. >>BETHANY, TAKEN AWAY.

>>THANK YOU MAYOR. FIRST, THE REGULAR AGENDA TONIGHT IS ITEM 10 A.

RESOLUTION 2023Ä42. RANKING OFFERS FOR THE SALE OF APPROXIMATELY 21 PROPERTY AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION OF A SALE AGREEMENT FOR RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION IN PARKLAND'S FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 21 ACRES OWNED BY THE CITY AND ALLOCATING THE PORTION OF THE AARON BAY GOLF COURSE. PURCHASE OF THE SALE AGREEMENT WITH THE TOP-RANKED OFFER AND FOR NEGOTIATIONS UNSUCCESSFUL TO CONDUCT IN NEGOTIATION WITH THE SECOND HIGHEST RANK OFFER INVITING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I KNOW YOU HEARD AT THE WORKSHOP EARLIER. THE THREE PRESENTATIONS FROM THE SHORTLISTED FIRMS. FROM OUR BROKER. THE ENCLOSED RESOLUTION CALLS FOR YOU TO RANK THOSE THREE SHORTLISTED FIRMS AND AUTHORIE THE CITY MANAGER AND MYSELF AND THE BROKER TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM AND IT'S NOT SUCCESSFUL TO THEN PROCEED WITH THE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SECOND RANKED FIRM. I HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS.

>>THANK YOU ANTHONY. THAT WAS CLEAR ENOUGH. AS WE ÃÃFIRST I JUST WANT TO SAY A FEW THINGS ON THIS PROCESS. IT'S BEEN AN INTERESTING PROCESS. TO SAY THE LEAST. YOU KNOW? THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR QUITE SOME TIME. AND THERE WERE A LOT OF ISSUES.

THE RESIDENTS SPOKE LOUD AND CLEAR THAT THEY WANTED THE CITY TO COME AND HELP THEM TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET OUT OF A BAD SITUATION. AND THAT'S WHAT WE DID.

BUT IT WAS NOT EASY. WE DID NOT ALL AGREE. EVENTUALLY WE GOT INTO A PLACE WHERE WE WERE ABLE TO SECURE A FOR ONE VOTE. AND PURCHASE THE LAND.

THERE WERE A COUPLE OF PEOPLE WHO WERE AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR MOVE BY THE CITY.

BUT IT WAS IMPORTANT IN MANY WAYS. IT WAS IMPORTANT TO PROTECT ALL OF PARKLAND. YES ÃÃHERON BAY WILL BENEFIT. THERE WILL BE 2000 OR THOUSAND 15,000 WHATEVER YOU CALL IT. HERON BAY WILL BENEFIT. BUT THE REST OF THE CITY WILL BENEFIT. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THIS PROCESS IS GOING TO ALLOW US TO DO IS SPEND $25 MILLION TO BUY 69 ACRES OF LAND. TONIGHT ÃÃWE WILL SELL 21 OF THOSE ACRES FOR SUMMER BETWEEN 18 AND 19 MILLION. THAT TO ME SOUNDS LIKE IT'S A HOME RUN. THIS PEOPLE WHO DID NOT BELIEVE IN THE PROCESS ÃÃTONIGHT IS VINDICATION FOR THAT. THERE IS STILL A LOT OF WORK TO DO.

AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO WORK THAT PROCESS AND WE WILL GET TO A SUCCESSFUL 69 ACRE PROJECT.

WHAT THAT ULTIMATELY LOOKS LIKE ÃÃWE DO NOT KNOW YET. WE ARE NOW GOING TO SOLIDIFY WHAT 21 OF THOSE ACRES WILL BE. AND IT'S RESIDENTIAL. WHETHER IT'S 45 HOMES, 50 HOMES, 52 HOMES, WHATEVER THAT ULTIMATELY LOOKS LIKE. WE SHALL SEE.

BUT THAT'S GOING TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS. IT'S GOING TO GO THROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING. SKIN GO THROUGH ENGINEERING AND IT'S GONNA GO THROUGH ALL OF THOSE ITERATIONS. WE WILL HAVE PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES TO HAVE OUR INPUT. THE RESIDENTS WILL HAVE PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THEIR INPUT. BUT WE HAVE ALREADY OR WE WILL ALREADY SECURE 80 PERCENT OR 85 PERCENT, I'M NOT VERY GOOD AT MATH OF OUR INITIAL INVESTMENT. WITH THIS PARTICULAR SALE.

WHAT THAT WILL ALLOW US TO DO GOING FORWARD IS STILL HOPEFULLY DO COMMERCIAL.

THAT'S NOT CHANGING. THAT WAS ALWAYS PART OF THE PLAN.ECAUSE THAT'S WHAT A LOT OF RESIDENTS ARE ASKING FOR. SOME TYPE OF AREA WHERE WE CAN GET TOGETHER AND CONGREGATE AS RESIDENTS. AS A COMMUNITY.

MAYBE DO CRAFT FAIRS. MAYBE HAVE A PLACE TO EAT. SOME SHOPPING ÃÃWHAT EVER THAT ULTIMATELY WILL CLICK. WE WILL FIND THAT OUT IN THE COMING MONTHS.

BUT TONIGHT ÃÃIS A GREAT PROCESS. THE RESIDENTS ULTIMATELY TRUSTED US. WE HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFUL SO FAR. BUT AGAIN ÃÃTHERE IS A LOT MORE WORK TO DO. SO WE HAVE TO CONTINUE TO STAY PATIENT.

AND TRUST THE PROCESS. WE WILL GET THERE. AGAIN ÃÃWE WILL GET THERE.

NOBODY THOUGHT WE WOULD BE HERE ALREADY. AND HERE WE ARE.

SELF ÃÃWE WILL GET THERE AND TRUST THE PROCESS. SO THAT BEING SAID ÃÃWE HAVE THREE PROPOSALS IN FRONT OF US TODAY. WE HAVE K HALF ÃÃWE HAVE

[00:55:03]

THAT BEING SAID ÃÃI THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT FOR US TO ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT OUR RESPONSIBILITY IS AS THE COMMISSION IS TO DO WHAT WE CAN TO ENSURE WE ARE RESPONSIBLE WITH THE FINANCES. SO ÃÃWE NEED TO DO WHAT WE CAN TO TRY AND SECURE AS MUCH AS WE CAN IN RETURN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. BECAUSE AGAIN, WHETHER IT'S 45 OR 42, WHATEVER ULTIMATELY ENDS UP BEING ÃÃTHAT'S GONNA SHAKE OUT IN PLANNING AND ZONING AND ALL THOSE DIFFERENT THINGS. BUT WE NEED TO LOOK OUT FOR OUR RESIDENTS AS A WHOLE TONIGHT TO SEE HOW MUCH WE ARE ABLE TO SECURE BACK TO THE CITY'S COFFERS.

WHAT WE WILL DO TONIGHT IS GIVE NANCY AND ANTHONY THE ABILITY TO NEGOTIATE THE CONTRACT AND THE REASON WE ARE PREPARING EVERYBODY IF THEY CANNOT MAKE AGREEMENTS WITH THE NUMBER ONE PICK ÃÃTHEY QUICKLY CAN GO ON TO NUMBER TWO.AND IF THEY CANNOT GO ON TO NUMBER TWO ÃÃ THEY WILL GO ON TO NUMBER THREE. HOPEFULLY DOES NOT GET ON TO THAT POINT. I DO NOT THINK IT WILL. BUT THAT'S WHAT WE ARE LOOKING TO DO TONIGHT. IS IT MERELY GET ANTHONY AND NANCY ÃÃWHICH I HAVE THE ULTIMATE FATE AND, BECAUSE AGAIN ÃÃOUR STAFF ÃÃWE CANNOT DO WHAT WE DO WITH OUR STAFF. AND ANTHONY ÃTEST PUT THE CONTRACTS AND THE LANGUAGE AND NANCY ÃÃTALKING TO WHOEVER SHE HAS TO TALK TO TO GET THE WHEELS GOING TO GET THINGS GOING. SO ÃÃI HAVE FULL FAITH IN OUR STAFF TO GET US TO THE NEXT STEP. WE JUST NEED TO GIVE THEM THAT GUIDANCE OF WHAT THAT IS.

WHAT THE NEXT STEP IS. SO DOES ANYBODY WANT TO SAY ANYTHING ON THAT?R PUT IN AN

EMOTION? >>I JUST WANT TO ASK ANTHONY A QUESTION BECAUSE I READ THAT WE ARE TO RENT ALL OF THE PROPOSALS THAT HAVE COME AND WITH THE FIRST AND BACKUP OR SECOND OR RANKING IS THAT JUST OF THE THREE THAT THE PRESENTATIONS TONIGHT WERE ALL

THE PROPOSERS WHO HAVE SUBMITTED. >>SO THE AGENDA BEFORE YOU IS WRITTEN TO FRANK THE THREE PROPOSERS? BUT IT'S REALLY UP TO THE COMMISSION. IF YOU FEEL THAT IT'S WANT TO DIRECT ALL OF THEM ÃÃYOU COULD. BUT WHAT WE ARE REALLY LOOKING FOR IS DIRECTION AT LEAST FOR NUMBER TWO. IF NOT THREE. SO ÃÃWE KNOW WHO WE ARE NEGOTIATING WITH IF THOSE NEGOTIATIONS FAIL. WHO WE ARE NEGOTIATING WITH

NEXT. AFTER THAT. >>I MEAN ÃÃIN MY OPINION ÃÃ WE HIRED COLLIERS TO HANDLE THIS PROCESS FOR US. ORIGINALLY ÃÃWE WERE GIVEN WHAT? 11 PROPOSALS IN THE BEGINNING? 11 PROPOSALS IN THE BEGINNING.

THEY NARROWED IT DOWN TO FOUR. THEN WE WENT BACK TO BEST AND FINAL.

NOT EVERY ONE OF THE INITIAL 11 SUBMITTED NEW BIDS. WE ONLY GOT BIDS FROM SEVEN.

AND FROM THOSE SEVEN ÃÃIT WAS NARROWED DOWN TO THE TOP THREE. THE SAME ÃÃTOLL BROTHERS OBVIOUSLY BEING IN BOTH PHASES. SO THAT THE MEAT WEIGHS A LOT. K HALF PUT A NICE PROPOSAL.

MADAM A AND K HAVE BOTH PUT ICE PROPOSALS TOGETHER. BUT AGAIN ÃÃI DO DEFER TO SOME OF THE WORK THAT TOLL BROTHERS DID EARLY ON TO HELP US GET TO THAT PROCESS.

THAT BEING SAID ÃÃTHERE IS OBVIOUSLY AN OPPORTUNITY YOU KNOW ÃÃTHERE IS SOME FLEXIBILITY IN THE NUMBER AT LEAST I HEARD SOME FLEXIBILITY WITH THAT.

SO ÃÃI WOULD LIKE TO SEE IF THAT IS ÃÃIF THAT IS A REALITY.

THAT'S WHERE I'M AT. >>YES ÃÃI THINK I MIGHT ÃÃ MY INTENTIONS COULD BE CLEARER FROM THIS MEETING AND OUR PRIOR MEETINGS, BUT MY GOAL IS OBVIOUSLY WE'VE GOT TO BE FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE AND GOOD STEWARDS OF THE TAXPAYERS DOLLARS AND SO, THAT IS A FACTOR. THE OTHER GOAL IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROJECT THAT IS GOING IN, WHICH I THINK IS PROBABLY THE CASE FOR ALL OF THE PROPOSERS, WHO HAD HIGH-LEVEL QUALITY PROJECTS. BUT THE PROJECT THAT IS COMING IN IS GOING TO BE BENEFICIAL AND NOT CAUSE FURTHER NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS TO THE RESIDENTS OF BOTH PARKLAND AND KAREN BASE

[01:00:03]

WE HAVE A BUNCH OF RIDGES THAT ARE MULTIPLE DEVELOPERS THAT WE HAVE HIGH QUALITY EXPERIENCE AND HIGH-CALIBER PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR THIS. SO ÃÃI ALSO ÃÃI ALSO VALUE SORT OF THE IMPACT THAT SOME OF THESE DEVELOPERS ALREADY HAD ON OUR COMMUNITY.

SO I THINK IT'S A BIG FACTOR FOR ME. AND SO ÃÃI THINK I'M APPRECIATIVE OF FOCUSING ON THOSE THINGS AND THEN GETTING TO THE NEXT PROCESS, WHICH IS, NOT ONLY AS I UNDERSTAND, WE ARE AUTHORIZING TONIGHT THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE FIRST RIGHT AND THEN IF NEED BE ÃÃ IF THEY CANNOT REACH A DEAL WITH THE SECOND REGION AND COMMIT TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONTRACT

ANTHONY?>YES. >>THAT IS CORRECT VICE MAYOR. FOR OUR CODE AND CHARTER ÃÃIT NEEDS TO BE ADOPTED. THE ACTUAL PURCHASE OF THE SALE AGREEMENT.

THERE WILL BE AN ORDINANCE COMING BACK TO YOU. SO THERE WILL BE TWO READINGS AND THE TERMS OF THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT WILL BE AS AN EXHIBIT TO THE ORDINANCE.

AND IT WILL BE BEFORE YOU, AFTER THE WE SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATED CONTRACT.

>>AND TONIGHT ÃÃIS IT A MAJORITY VOTE? AND THEN WE ULTIMATELY GET INTO THE PHASE OF APPROVING A CONTRACT. FOR THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY OF

4/5 VOTE. >>THAT'S CORRECT VICE CHAIR. MAJORITY VOTE FOR THE SELECTION AND AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE THE ORDINANCE WILL REQUIRE 4/5 AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF SECOND

READING THE PAST. >>I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION.

I DID NOT KNOW HOW WE WANT TO DEAL WITH THE SECOND AND THIRD RANKINGS, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A DECISION TO RANK TOLL BROTHERS AS NUMBER ONE. I'M JUST FOR MY PERSONAL BENEFIT AND AM HAPPY TO HAVE A DIALOGUE ON THE DAYS ROM A PERSONAL BENEFIT THERE, THEIR PROPOSAL THINK MIRRORED WHAT WE WERE LOOKING FOR IN NOT THAT THE OTHERS DIDN'T IN MANY RESPECTS, BUT THEY KNEW PROPOSED AND MIRRORED WHAT WE WERE LOOKING FOR IN THE

PROJECT. >>YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND DO A SECOND?

>>IF WE ARE ÃÃYES. IF WE ARE RESTRICTED TO THE THREE BASED ON THE RESOLUTION TONIGHT, BUT THEN I WOULD THINK MAYBE THEY WOULD BE A SECOND THAT I WOULD ÃÃI LIKE ALL THREE. I LIKED MATTAMY AS WELL AND THEIR LAYOUT HAD SOME VERY BENEFICIAL ON THE SITE PLAN IT'S VERY BENEFICIAL AGAIN ÃÃ I VALUE THE RELATIONSHIPS THAT WE HAVE HAD IN THIS COMMUNITY. AND SO ÃÃI THINK ÃÃTHE TOLL BROTHERS AS MY NUMBER ONE.

>>SO WE HAVE A MOTION AS TOLL BROTHERS NUMBER ONE. NUMBER TWO AND MATTAMY NUMBER

THREE. >>AND I WILL JUMP IN WITH THIS PROVISO THAT I AM UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS GIVING THE CITY ATTORNEY AND MANAGEMENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO NEGOTIATE WITH THESE PARTIES. AND WE HAVE HAD SEVERAL MEMBERS THROWN OUT AND YOU GUYS HAVE TALKED ABOUT PHYSICAL RESPONSIBILITY'S. SO ÃÃI AM HOPING THAT THE PARTIES THAT COME TO THE TABLE UNDERSTAND OUR JOB RELATIVE TO THOSE FINANCES AND MIGHT BE WILLING TO MEET OR BEAT CERTAIN NUMBERS THAT HAVE BEEN THROWN OUT HERE.

SO ÃÃIN THAT REGARD ÃÃI WOULD BE WILLING TO SECOND YOUR MOTION.

>>I'M ALSO GOING TO CHIME IN HERE. WE'VE SEEN A LOT OF GREAT PROPOSALS. BUT I THINK WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO THE LAST THREE ÃÃWHEN I LOOK NOW ÃTHIS IS THE TOLL BROTHERS SITE PLAN AND THEY HAVE LISTENED.

THEY HAVE LISTENED TO EVERYTHING THAT WE TALKED ABOUT.

THEY HAVE THE SEPARATION. FROM THE COMMERCIAL ÃÃBY WATER.

NOT JUST BY LANDSCAPING. TO THE EXTENT THAT THAT IS FEASIBLE.

WE STOPPED TO LOOK INTO THAT. THEY HAVE A GOOD AMOUNT OF GREEN OPEN SPACE.

I LIKE THE USE OF THE ROUNDABOUT AND THE WAY THAT THEY HAVE LAID THINGS OUT.

AND ALSO THIS IS A FACTOR OBVIOUSLY MONEY. BUT ALSO RELIABILITY AND CREDIBILITY. AND I DO HAVE TO GET SOME SORT OF VALUE TO THE HISTORY OF TOLL BROTHERS IN THE CITY AND I KNOW LINDSAY AND HER TEAM HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN A PART OF ACTUALLY DEVELOPING THIS CONVERSATION BEFORE WE EVEN EVER ACTUALLY AGREED ON THE PURCHASE OF THE LAND. AND I THINK THERE'S DEFINITELY A LOT TO BE SAID ABOUT SHOWING THEIR COMMITMENT TO NOT ONLY MAKING THIS HAPPEN, BUT DOING IT THE RIGHT WAY.

BUT I DO THINK ALSO THAT ÃÃI LOOK AT THE NUMBERS AND WHILE I KNOW THAT WE HAD OUR NUMBER OF 52 HOMES ÃÃIDEALLY ÃÃI WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO MAY BE ÃÃ EVEN IF IT WAS THE COUPLE OF HOMES TO REDUCE THE NUMBER ONLY BECAUSE A LOT OF US EXPRESS CONCERNS ABOUT DRAINAGE AND YOU KNOW ÃÃESSENTIALLY SETBACKS. AND WHILE YES ÃÃI UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE TRYING TO MAXIMIZE TO SOME DEGREE OUR RECOUPING OF THE INVESTMENT ÃÃI THINK THERE IS A PART OF US THAT ALSO HAS TO BE ABLE TO PUT SOME OF THAT MONEY TOWARDS THE BENEFIT OF THESE FUTURE APARTMENT

RESIDENTS. >>SO THE ONLY THING I WILL SAY TO THAT IS THAT I DO NOT DISAGREE WITH WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. I THINK DRAINAGE AND ALL THAT STUFF IS VALUABLE. BUT I THINK WE CAN ALSO ADDRESS THAT A LOT OF THAT STUFF IN THE

ENGINEERING. >>OF COURSE. >>MAKING SURE THE TRAINING IS DONE IN A CERTAIN WAY TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S BUILT IN A WAY THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT MAY

[01:05:13]

HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT. >>I DO WANT TO GET A WEDGE. >>I JUST WANT TO CHIME IN BECAUSE COMMISSIONERS HAVE RAISED A GOOD POINT. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT IN OUR WORKSHOPS INCLUDING THE ONE THAT WE HAD EARLIER THIS EVENING.

ONE OF MY BIGGEST CONCERNS IN ALL OF THIS IS NOT SO MUCH THE NUMBER OF HOMES.

AS WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER ÃÃ THE WIDTH OF THE LOTS AND THE SETBACKS.

AND SO ÃÃIF WE ARE GOING TO GIVE OUR CITY MANAGER GUIDANCE ON THAT.

THEN I THINK WE SHOULD WAIT AND ON THAT TOO. BECAUSE I THINK I AM LEANING TOWARDS A LARGER WATER LOT. WHETHER IT'S AN 80 FOOT LOT WITH LARGE SETBACKS.

I THINK THAT THAT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL OF THE COMMUNITY, NOT ONLY FROM AN APPEARANCE STANDPOINT ANESTHETIC, BUT ALSO AVOIDING ALL THESE DRAINAGE ISSUES AND ANYTHING ELSE.

SO ÃÃI WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT BE AS MUCH OF A FOCUS AS THE DOLLAR FIGURES FROM GOING

TO NEGOTIATIONS. >>I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WENT OUT ÃÃBECAUSE WE CAN TALK ABOUT DRAINAGE AND WE KEEP TALKING ABOUT ISSUES THAT WE HAVE HAD.

WE HAVE MADE SIGNIFICANT ADJUSTMENTS TO HOW WE MAKE HOMES GET BUILT.

AND THE LAST SET OF HOMES IN CASCARA AND PARKLAND BAY ADHERED TO THAT CRITERIA.

>>OF COURSE. >>NOT TALKING ABOUT SETBACKS. TALKING ABOUT YOU KNOW ÃÃ DOING FRENCH DRAINS AND DOING DOING DIFFERENT THINGS THAT WE CAN DO.

SO ÃÃTHE POINT THAT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND IS WE ARE MAKING CHANGES.

AND IT'S MORE THAN JUST SAYING THAT WE WANT TO SEPARATE THIS. WE WANT TO MAKE THAT DIFFERENT.

WE HAVE DONE MORE THAN THAT. SO JUST WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT STAFF IN MAKING SURE THAT IT'S NOT ÃÃJUST BECAUSE YOU DO AN 80 FOOT PLOT DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU DO AN 80 FOOT LOT AND A 50 FOOT HOME. IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU'RE NOT GONNA HAVE DRAINAGE ISSUES.

>>100 PERCENT AND I AGREE WITH THAT. DEFINITELY GIVE THIS THAT ALL THE CREDIT THE WORLD. I'M HONESTLY JUST SAYING THAT DRAINAGE FOR THE SAKE OF DRAINAGE. I ALSO RECOGNIZE IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF WATERCRESS, THERE'S MODELING AND HOUSES. NOT BY THE EFFECTIVE COARSENESS OF THE GROUND, BUT BECAUSE THERE'S NOT ENOUGH IGHT THAT CAN GET THROUGH JUST BY VIRTUE

OF HOW CLOSE THE HOUSES ARE TOGETHER. >>I DO NOT DISAGREE WITH THAT.

BUT THESE LOTS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT. THAN WHAT IS IN THE WEDGE.

>>WILL BE TRYING TO SAY? [LAUGHTER]

>>NO, AND LOOK, DOLLARS AND BRING THIS UP IS BECAUSE I WANT TO BE PART OF THE CONVERSATION.

I'M NOT SAYING THAT ANYTHING IS GOING WRONG FOR ANYTHING, BUT THE POINT IS THAT I THINK THEY HAVE PAID ATTENTION TO WHAT WE'VE BEEN ASKING FOR AND EVEN IF LET'S SAY YOU WERE ONLY TO REMOVE A COUPLE OF ÃÃI AM JUST SPEAKING OUT LOUD. THERE IS GREEN SPACE IN HERE THAT I THINK UTILIZES VERY WELL. BUT YOU COULD EVEN PLAY AROUND WITH EVEN THE SIZE OR THE SCALE OF THE SPACE SO THAT EVEN IT MAINTAINS A CERTAIN LEVEL OF OPEN SPACE FOR THE RESIDENTS THERE WHILE MAKING SURE THAT THE LOTS ARE NOT ONLY JUST FROM A PRACTICAL STANDPOINT FROM AN AESTHETIC STANDPOINT. I THINK IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT FOR THE FUTURE BUYER OF THESE HOMES. BREAK AND REMEMBER, WE'RE GONNA HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE ELEVATIONS AND WE'RE GONNA GET TO SEE WHAT IT'S REALLY GONNA LOOK LIKE. RIGHT NOW, WE'RE LOOKING AT CONCEPTUAL CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS.

AND A LOT OF PEOPLE GET SCARED WHEN THEY SEE CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS.

BUT >>I AGREE. THE PRICE RANGES ARE THERE IN TERMS OF WHAT WE CAN GARNER REALISTICALLY IN THIS CITY. THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE I THINK IS GOOD, ESPECIALLY FOR WE ARE LOOKING TO KIND OF PUT QUOTE THE LUXURY TWIST ON THIS.

WHICH I THINK IS WHAT WE'VE ALL AGREED UPON. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT NOT ONLY WE ARE PROUD OF, BUT HERON BAY IS PROUD OF AND IT BRINGS IN THE ABILITY TO ACTUALLY FILL THESE HOMES. YOU KNOW? WE DO NOT JUST WANT THEM SITTING EMPTY AND WILL POINT OUT.

WHY I LIKE TOLL BROTHERS IS THIS CONCEPT OF THE $10,000 MONTH FEE.

WHICH IS NONREFUNDABLE. I THINK IT'S REALLY GREAT BECAUSE THIS CAN BE A LOT OF DUE DILIGENCE AND CARRYING COSTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THE CITY WILL BEAR THAT BURDEN IF AND WHEN THE DEVELOPER ACTUALLY IS TAKING WHAT THEY ARE NEEDING TO DO.

I AGREE WITH THE MOTION AT HAND. I WOULD ALSO PUT TOLL BROTHERS

ONE, K HALF TWO, MATTAMY THREE. >>COMMISSIONER? >>SO ÃÃI'M GONNA TAKE A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO THIS. OBVIOUSLY DEVELOPERS ARE QUALIFIED. THEY HAVE PRESENTED OPTIONS, DIFFERENT THINGS.

TWO OF THEM PRESENTED DIFFERENT PRICE POINTS. TO ME ÃÃTHAT'S IRRELEVANT AT THIS POINT. BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO NEGOTIATE WITH MORE.

NANCY AND ANTHONY ARE GOING TO NEGOTIATE AND GO FROM THERE. SO ÃÃWE'RE GOING TO GIVE A WHOLE LAUNDRY LIST OF THINGS THAT HERE'S WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR.

BUT RIGHT NOW ÃÃTHE ONLY THING THAT SEEMS TO ME THAT IS CERTAIN IS A PRICE POINT.

OF WHEN I SAY IN OTHER WORDS Ã ÃPER EITHER YOU GO FOR THE TOTAL PRICE OR UNITS PER LOST.

[01:10:03]

[INDISCERNIBLE] IS AT 355. SO AGAIN ÃÃTHE TOTAL OF $1 MILLION ÃÃA DIFFERENCE? I DO NOT KNOW. BUT IT ALSO GETS BACK TO WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPER. AGAIN ÃÃFUTURE PROJECTIONS OF WHO HAS HAD SOME CHALLENGES.

WHO HAS NOT HAD SOME CHALLENGES? I DO HAVE TO RUN OUT THAT PARKLAND BAY AND SOME OF THE HOMES IN PARENT BAY HAD SOME ISSUES WITH TOLL BROTHERS.

THEY CAME HERE ÃÃIT WAS AN AC UNIT ISSUE. THERE WAS MOLD ÃÃTHAT WAS GROWING IN THE AC UNITS AND WE HAD TO HAVE A TOWN HALL ÃÃI DO NOT KNOW IF YOU GUYS ARE ON IT. KEN WAS ON THE COMMISSION. WE HAD A TOWN HALL RESIDENTS COMPLAINING TO US ABOUT A SITUATION. SO ÃÃTO ME ÃÃAS MUCH TIME AND I APPRECIATE AND MAY BE A DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT GROUP. BECAUSE I SAW SOME DAY AND SOME OTHER THINGS THAT WERE DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT PEOPLE. SO TO ME ÃÃTO GET BACK TO YOU KNOW ÃÃTHE TRUST AND CONFIDENCE. BUT AGAIN ÃÃTHOSE ISSUES ÃÃ I AM ASSUMING ARE MORE TAKEN CARE OF. THEY WERE ADDRESSED.

I KNOW AGAIN ÃÃKHOFF HAD SOME INCIDENTS. DRAINAGE AND OTHER THINGS THAT TOOK PLACE. SO ÃÃI GO STRICTLY ÃÃNOT ONE IS BETTER THAN THE OTHER.

I AM LOOKING STRICTLY HERE AT A PRICE POINT. AND HAVE CONFIDENCE IN NANCY AND ANTHONY THAT WHAT THEY HAVE HEARD US AS WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR ÃÃTHEY CAN EITHER NEGOTIATE THAT WITH THE NUMBER ONE AND IF THEY DON'T GET IT Ã ÃTHEY GO TO THE NUMBER TWO.

OR THEY GO TO THE NUMBER THREE. LIKE I SAID ÃÃI MIGHT BE THE ODD ONE OUT.

BUT I WOULD PERSONALLY RANK K HAB NUMBER ONE AND MATTAMY AS NUMBER THREE.

AND PRICES OBVIOUSLY WE'VE GOT TO BE GOOD STEWARDS OF THE TAX DOLLARS.

BUT I WANT TO IMPRESS UPON OUR CITY MANAGER IN OUR CITY ATTORNEY EVERETT EXPRESSED THESE VIEWS OBVIOUSLY. THAT PRICES IS VERY IMPORTANT, BUT SO IS THE OVERALL QUALITY AND PACKAGE OF WHAT'S GONNA BE IN THAT COMMUNITY. SO ÃÃSO THEY ARE EQUALLY BALANCED IN MY VIEW. AND THAT'S WHY I GET THE LOT SIZES AND EVERYTHING ELSE.

I'M NOT A CITY PLANNER AND NOT A CITY ENGINEER. BUT I KNOW WHEN YOU GET TO THE LARGER LOTS, NOT ONLY IS THAT MORE COMMENSURATE WITH WHAT WAS HISTORICALLY PARKLAND ASK AND LESS DENSITY THAN WHAT WE HAVE BEEN SOME OTHER AREAS LONG BEFORE I CAME ON THIS DAY US Ã ÃBUT ALSO I THINK IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO HERON BAY RESIDENTS IN THOSE COMMUNITIES

THAT ARE BEING IMPACTED THE MOST. >>OKAY.

COMMISSIONER CUTLER ÃTESTY OF ANYTHING ELSE? >>ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING THAT THERE'S NOT JUST AS A BOAT THAT WE ÃÃGO AHEAD

MARK. SORRY, DID NOT SEE YOU THERE. >>

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>MR. MAYOR ÃÃI MIRROR YOUR COMMENTS. THINK EVERYBODY Ã ÃIT'S BEEN A LONG ROAD, BUT IT'S COMING OUT OKAY. SO ÃÃI UPLOAD ALL OF YOU.

GENTLEMEN FOR ÃÃIT'S BEEN A ROUGH ROAD, BUT I THINK IT'S ALL GONNA COME OUT.

THE ONE ISSUE I HAVE AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS HAVE READ THIS, BUT THIS IS A DEALBREAKER FOR HERON BAY. ON WHO DAMIEN ITEM 15. THE ASSIGNMENT.

IT SAYS THE BUYER SHALL BE PERMITTED WHEN SIGNING THE AGREEMENT.

THAT DOES NOT WORK. THAT MEANS ÃTHIS BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY HAD THIS PROBLEM IN

HERON BAY. >>WE HAVE NOT NEGOTIATED ANY CONTRACTS.

TO SAY IT'S DIFFICULT FOR HERON BAY IS ÃÃI'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU MEAN BY IT'S A DEALBREAKER.

AND SELL INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES. SO THERE'S ALWAYS INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE WHO DEAL WITH IT.T DOES NOT WORK. SO ÃÃSOMEBODY IS COMING IN HERE AND THEY ARE DECIDING THAT THEY ARE GOING TO TRANSFER THIS TO ANOTHER PARTY, WHICH IS WHAT THIS SAYS OR BREAK IT UP WHERE THEY ARE SELLING INDIVIDUAL HOMES THROUGH I DON'T KNOW Ãà MAYBE THEY DO LOOK WCI AND THEY SUB OUT THE BUILDERS. YOU KNOW? WCI AND PARENT BUILDER AND PARTS OF SPRINGS AND OTHER PARKS ÃÃTHEY ACTUALLY SENT OUT THE CONSTRUCTION AND RESIGNED OTHER PEOPLE. IT'S BEEN AN ISSUE. SO æ

>>SO IF YOU HAVE ÃÃAGAIN. THE CONTRACT ÃTESTY CONTRACT NEEDS TO BE ÃÃTHE CONTRACT

NEEDS TO BE NEGOTIATED. >>BUT THAT'S JUST AN ISSUE THAT I WOULD HAVE WITH RANKING THAT

WAS NUMBER TWO. >>I WOULD SAY PUBLICLY BECAUSE I'VE HAD THIS CONVERSATION WITH

[01:15:03]

>>I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT [INDISCERNIBLE] >>COMMUNITY RIGHT HERE.

THAT'S WHAT HE BROUGHT UP. SO æ >>BUT, THIS IS æ

CHATTER] >>THEY HAVE SOMETHING THAT THEY WROTE IN THE PROPOSAL THAT

>>I'M SURE THAT THE STANDARD CONTRACT. I'M SURE THAT IS A STANDARD

CONTRACT, WHICH WE ARE NOT APPROVING TONIGHT ANYWAY. >>RIGHT.

THOSE ISSUES WILL BE DEALT IN NEGOTIATIONS. INCLUDING THE PROGRESS OF THE

PROJECTS AND EVERYTHING ELSE I WOULD IMAGINE. >>AND THAT'S IT.

IF YOU COULD POINT TO BRING UP. AND OBVIOUSLY THERE ARE GOING TO BE A LAUNDRY LIST OF ITEMS AND CONDITIONS THAT BOTH SIDES ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH WHEN THEY FINALIZE EVERYTHING.

YOU KNOW? BUT I THINK FROM A MACRO PERSPECTIVE ÃÃWE ARE SELECTING DEVELOPERS THAT WE FEEL CONFIDENT WITH AND THAT WE THINK WILL BE GOOD PARTNERS AND STEWARDS FOR US. AND WE ARE LOOKING FOR MAKING SURE TO MAXIMIZE THAT THE FINANCIAL RETURNS TO THE CITY AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF. SO æ I THINK WE ARE GOOD PER

>>ANYBODY ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING THAT THERE IS NONE, WE HAVE A MOTION BY THE VICE MAYOR BRIAR.

SIDE WANTS TO DO THIS? WHAT DID YOU SAY ANTHONY? >>SHE MADE A MOTION.

GO AHEAD AND ACT ON THE MOTION FOR THE RANKING AND THEN WE WILL DO A MOTION ON THE OVERALL RESOLUTION THAT WILL HELP US PLUG IN THE NAMES AND THEN [INDISCERNIBLE]

>>WE HAVE A MOTION BY THE COMMISSIONER BRIAR TO RANK. THE TOLL BROTHERS.

K HAB AND MATTAMY. AND THEN A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CUTLER.

ROLL CALL? >>COMMISSIONER MEYERSON?>NO. >>COMMISSIONER ISRAEL.

>>COMMISSIONER YES. >>YES. >>VICE MAYOR BRIAR?

>>YES POINT >>PLEASE SHOW A BILL PASSES 4Ä.

>>MAYOR, IF WE CAN GET IN MOTION ON THE OVERALL NOW THAT WE HAVE THE RANKING.

SO IT WOULD BE THE RESOLUTION WOULD NOT HAVE TOLL BROTHERS AS THE TOP-RANKED OFFER.

TRENTON IS THE SECOND RANKED OFFER AND MATTAMY AS THE THIRD-RANKED OFFER.

19 I NEGOTIATE WITH THE TOP-RANKED OFFER, IF THOSE FAIL, GO TO THE SECOND OFFER

PICK >>I WOULD ASSUME VICE MAYOR'S GOING TO MOTION THAT.

>>I WILL MAKE THAT MOTION. MOTION SECTION ALL THE SUDDEN IN THE PROCESS CONCERNING CONCERNS RAISED BY THE HOA REPORTS WITHOUT SUBJECTING WORK CONDITIONS WITH AS WE ARE IN

NEGOTIATION PROCESS. I WILL SECOND. >>OKAY.

ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO COMMENT ON THAT? SEEING THAT THERE IS NONE ÃÃ

ROLL CALL. >>COMMISSIONER ISRAEL? >>YES.

>>COMMISSIONER CUTLER? >>YES. >>COMMISSIONER MEYERSON?>NO.

>>VICE MAYOR BRIAR? >>NO. >>MAYOR WALKER?

>>YES. >>PLEASE SHOW THAT IS 4Ä. >>NEXT ITEM IS 10 B. RESOLUTION 2023 0Ö7 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE PERCEPTUAL DESIGN OF THE COUNTER.

RESOLUTION CITY COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF PARKLAND FLORIDA APPROVED THE VALUATION TO THE RANKING AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASING DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT WITH THE TOP-RANKED PROPOSER.FIVE OF FIVE DESIGN CHARLOTTE INCORPORATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ON THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF THE TOWN CENTER IN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $100,000

PROVIDING EXECUTION FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. >>THANK YOU ANTHONY.

NOW WE'RE GOING TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL PARCEL THAT WE JUST COMPLETED WITH THE PRESIDENTIAL. SO ÃÃWE MADE THE DECISION TO BUY THIS LAND.

I AM VERY PLEASED TO SEE WITH THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT ALREADY IS.

BUT WE HAVE TO ASK OURSELVES WHY DID WE BUY THIS LAND? SO WE CAN BE IN CONTROL.

SO THE CITY CAN BE IN CONTROL OF THE PROPERTY. SO ÃÃWHEN WE ARE IN CONTROL OF THE PROPERTY ÃÃWEEK CONTROL A SENSE OF PLACE THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR COMMUNITY. WE ARE IN CONTROL TO CREATE A PROJECT VISION THAT TIES INTO A PUBLIC REALM. HIRING A CONSULTING FIRM TO ASSIST WITH THE VISION AND THE PLAN GIVES US THE ACCESS TO A TEAM. A TEAM OF HIGHLY QUALIFIED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, URBAN DESIGNERS ÃÃ AND PLANERS.

THESE INDIVIDUALS GIVE AND HAVE EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE AND HOW TO DEVELOP TOWN CENTERS.

THIS IS THEIR AREA OF EXPERTISE. SO AS INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT EXPERTS IN THIS FIELD ÃÃI FELT THAT IT WAS IMPERATIVE THAT WE GO OUT OUR OUR RFP TO SEEK THIS HIGH-LEVEL CONSULTING FIRM TO HELP GUIDE US AND EDUCATE US THROUGH THIS ENTIRE PROCESS. SO ÃÃI'M GONNA TURN OVER TO JACKIE, WHO'S GONNA REVIEW THE

[01:20:02]

PROCESS WITH YOU ALL. >>THANK YOU. I DO NOT THINK THAT THEY NEED TO PRESENT ANYMORE.HAT WAS WELL STATED. MOVING ON ÃTHIS WE'RE GOING TO GO THROGH THE PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

ON THE TOWN CENTER. >>A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND. THE BACKGROUND ÃÃTHE PURPOSE OF THE RFP WAS TO SEE A QUALIFIED FIRM.ITH THE EXPERTISE AND RESOURCES TO PROVIDE A VISION AND CONCEPT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE TOWN CENTER AND HERON BAY PROPERTY.

NOW TOWN CENTERS CAN MEAN A LOT TO MANY PEOPLE, BUT FOR PURPOSES OF THE RFP, IT'S A GATHERING PLACE THAT IS FAMILY ORIENTED, EXPERIENTIAL CENTER WITH A VIBRANT AND ENDURING PUBLIC REALM. THIS PUBLIC REALM WOULD BE ACTIVELY PROGRAMMED WITH CIVIC ENTERTAINMENT AND USED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PARKLAND COMMUNITY.

SO AS NANCY STATED EARLIER ÃÃ THE PURPOSE OF US PARTNERING WITH A CONSULTANT FIRM IS FIRST OF ALL TO CONTROL OUR DESTINY. WE SPOKE MANY TIMES ABOUT NOT HAVING A DEVELOPER CONTROL THIS PROCESS. WE WANT THE CITY OF PARKLAND IN PRINT TO BE OVER THE DRIVING OF THE CONCEPT OF THE CENTER. SO TO SEGMENT THAT ÃÃTHE CONCEPT WOULD THEN DRIVE THE DESIGN PRETEXTUAL STANDARDS. AND ULTIMATELY, WE ARE GOING TO USE PLACE MAKING TO REFLECT THE PARK AND IDENTITY AS THIS PROCESS. SO WE WOULD LIKE TO DEVELOP A SENSE OF PLACE. A PLACE WHERE RESIDENTS CAN UNIQUELY IDENTIFY WHAT IS PARKLAND BASED UPON THE VOICE OF WHAT WE HEAR BACK FROM THE COMMUNITY.

HOW OUR COMMUNITY INTERACTS IN THIS SPACE ÃÃWHAT WILL KEEP THEM HERE ÃÃAND WHAT WILL BRING THEM BACK ULTIMATELY A PLACE THAT MATTERS TO OUR RESIDENTS.

WITH REGARDS TO SUSTAINABILITY ÃÃWE WOULD LIKE TO BALANCE THIS SPACE.

IN TERMS OF COMMERCIAL. THIS WILL BE A PLACE AS THE MAIN GOAL, WHICH IS IMPORTANT.

SUCH AS PROVIDING A LITTLE BIT OF CLARITY ÃÃTHIS IS GOING TO PROVIDE THE FRAMEWORK OF WHAT THIS SPACE COULD BE. AND ULTIMATELY WHAT IT SHOULD IT WILL NOT BE AN ABSOLUTE BLUEPRINT. BUT IT'S GOING TO BE A CLEAR MESSAGE TO THE DEVELOPER OF EXACTLY WHO WE ARE. JUST A FEW OUTLINES IN THE RFP WITH REGARDS TO THE CITY'S VISION. WE WANTED TO BE IN DOWNTOWN. PICTURESQUE SUNSETS ÃÃWE ARE LOOKING FOR PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED STREETS. ELEGANT ARCHITECTURE ÃÃMAIN STREET STOREFRONTS, DINING AND WATERFRONT VIEWS AND WE WANT THIS TO BE REMINISCENT OF THE BEST HISTORICAL TOWNS IN FLORIDA. I'M GONNA TURN OVER TO JACKIE AND SHE'S GOING TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE ACTUAL RFP PROCESS AND HOW WE GOT TO OUR ULTIMATE SELECTION OF THE CONSULTANT.

>>THANK YOU. SO ÃÃIN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF OUR PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES Ã ÃTHE RFP WAS ISSUED IN EARLY APRIL, PROPOSALS OPEN IN LATE APRIL.

AND WE RECEIVED FIVE PROPOSALS FROM AE SEVEN, BRUNELLO@GMAIL. CPH TORTICOLLIS AND 505 DESIGN.

OUR EVALUATION COMMITTEE HELD ITS FIRST MEETING ON MAY 9 AND OUR EVALUATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS ARE HERE. BOB PAYTON, ME, CHRISTINE GARCIA, AND TODD DEANGELIS.

ON MAY 9, WE REVIEWED SCORED AND SHORTLISTED THREE FIRMS. TORTICOLLIS, 305 DESIGN AND BRUNELLO@GMAIL. AFTER THAT ÃÃPRIOR TO THE INTERVIEWS, BECAUSE WE DID REQUEST THAT WE RECEIVE INTERVIEWS FROM THESE FIRMS ÃÃ CARMELLA ADD JAMIL WITHDREW FROM THE AFFIRMATION PROCESS. AS PART OF OUR PROCUREMENT CODE, WE BROUGHT UP THE FOURTH-RANKED FIRM, WHICH IS AE SEVEN AND CONDUCTED A SHORTLISTED INTERVIEW WITH THESE FIRMS ON MAY 16 AND MAY 23.

AND ULTIMATELY, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED 505 DESIGN AS THE NUMBER ONE FIRM THAT WE WOULD LOOK TO MOVE FORWARD WITH. SO ÃÃOUR EVALUATION COMMITTEE IS HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS FOR YOU. WE ALSO HAVE THE AVAILABILITY OF GIVING A CALL TO 505 DESIGN IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM DIRECTLY.

>>THANK YOU FOR THAT. TO ME, THIS COULD NOT BE MORE Ã ÃTHIS CANNOT BE A MORE CRITICAL STEP IN GETTING US TO OUR ULTIMATE GOAL. AND THAT IS TO HAVE A SUCCESSFUL, TOWN CENTER WHERE THE COMMUNITY CAN GET TOGETHER. YOU OUTLINED IT PERFECTLY.

WHERE THE COMMUNITY CAN GET TOGETHER WITH A SENSE OF PLACE. AND HAVE ADDITIONAL THINGS TO DO. BECAUSE OF THE SUCCESS THAT WE ARE HAVING ON THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION ÃÃWE NOW HAVE SO MUCH MORE FLEXIBILITY OF WHAT WE CAN OFFER AND WHAT WE WANT. BUT NONE OF US KNOW. STAFF ÃÃAS GREAT AS OUR STAFF

[01:25:06]

AND I AM REALLY EXCITED BECAUSE OF AGAIN ÃÃI KEEP GOING BACK TO ÃÃAND VERY EXCITED ABOUT THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION. BECAUSE IT DOES GIVE US THIS FLEXIBILITY.

ONE OF THE THINGS AND ANOTHER REASON WE BOUGHT THIS IS TO DISTRIBUTE OUR BASE.

OUR TAX BASE.UR TAX BASE IS TWO RESIDENTIAL HEAVY. WHEN YOU ARE AT BUILDOUT, THAT'S IT. YOUR NEXT OPTION IS RAISING TAXES.

WE SEE THAT IN OUR BUDGETING PROCESS. THIS NOW GIVES US OTHER OPPORTUNITIES. WE CAN'T LEASE THIS NOW. AND COLLECT RENT.

FOR 100 YEARS IF WE WANT TO. TO ALLEVIATE SOME OF THOSE BUDGET ISSUES THAT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE IN THE FUTURE. BUT WE NEED SOMEBODY TO TELL US HOW TO DO THAT.

AND WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE. BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW.

AND WE CAN'T MICROMANAGE THIS PROCESS. WE NEED SOMEBODY TO COME AND FROM THE OUTSIDE AND TELL US THAT THESE ARE SOME OF YOUR OPTIONS.

RIGHT? HERE IS WHAT I HEARD FROM EVERYBODY.

HERE ARE SOME OF YOUR OPTIONS. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE JUST NEED TO BE MINDFUL OF AND BE CAREFUL OF IS THAT THEY ARE THE PROFESSIONALS. IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE CANNOT DISAGREE WITH THEM, BUT WE HAVE TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT THEY KNOW WHAT WE ARE DOING.

THEY CAN HELP US WITH THE RFP PROCESS. PYOU COULD SAY THAT WE DON'T WANT THAT.E ONLY .5 STORES. WELL, THEY COME BACK AND TELL US THAT WE CAN ONLY HAVE FIVE STORES, BECAUSE IT WILL FAIL. THIS PROJECT CANNOT FAIL. IT CANNOT FAIL.

IT NEEDS TO BE SUCCESSFUL. OUR NAMES ARE ALL OVER THIS PROJECT.

I STUCK MY NECK OUT. WE ALL STUCK OUR NECKS OUT. THIS PROJECT HAS TO BE SUCCESSFUL. UNDER EVERY ÃÃALL CIRCUMSTANCES.

AND THAT POTENTIAL IS SO MUCH EASIER NOW BECAUSE WE ARE NOT WORRIED ABOUT NEEDING TO SELL IT FOR $20 MILLION TO COLLECT SOME OF OUR MONEY BACK. WE DO NOT NEED TO DO THAT.

YOU KNOW? NOW WE HAVE ALL THE FLEXIBILITY IN THE WORLD.

WE JUST HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE THE EXPERTS. IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE CANNOT HAVE INPUT AND DISAGREE AND HAVE COMMENTS. BUT WE HAVE TO ÃÃLIKE YOU SAID EARLIER. HERE THE PROCESS AND WHAT THE RESIDENTS ARE SAYING AND BE OKAY WITH WHAT THEY ARE SAYING. SOMETIMES WHAT THEY SAY MAY NOT NECESSARILY AGREE WITH YOU.

BUT IT'S THE BEST OUTCOME. THEY ENFORCE WHAT WE WANT. IT'S OUR GOAL IS TO ADHERE TO RESIDENTS AND GIVE THEM WHAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR. THAT WILL ABSOLUTELY GUARANTEE A SUCCESSFUL COMMUNITY PLACE. THAT IS OUR OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A LEGACY ON THE CITY OF PARKLAND. BECAUSE WE THOUGHT OUTSIDE THE BOX.

WE WANT TO PROTECT OUR RESIDENTS. WE ARE DOING THAT AND WE'RE GOING TO BE SUCCESSFUL. WE JUST HAVE TO BE PATIENT, RELAX, TRUST THE PROCESS, AND LISTEN TO SOME PROFESSIONALS. I CANNOT BE MORE EXCITED TO GET THIS NEXT PHASE STARTED.

ANYBODY WANT TO JUMP IN? >>I DON'T THINK THERE'S MUCH TO SAY AFTER THAT.

R EXCITEMENT. THIS TO ME, IS WHEN HE FELT THIS WHOLE PROJECT WAS ABOUT. HE RESIDENTIAL WAS TO ME, A NECESSARY ÃÃONLY BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO BE ABLE TO MITIGATE AND SUBSIDIZE THE COMMERCIAL AND WE DID NOT WANT TO HAVE YOU KNOW Ã ÃEITHER TOO LARGE OF A COMMERCIAL SPACE OR TOO LARGE OR RESIDENTIAL.

I THINK WE ACTUALLY FOUND A VERY GOOD BALANCE. AND IN LOOKING AT SOME OF THE PROPOSED OR PROJECTS THAT 505 HAS DONE ÃÃNOT ONE OF THEM IS PERFECT TO ME IN THE SENSE THAT IT WOULD FIT PARKLAND. THERE ARE ASPECTS OF DIFFERENT PROJECTS THAT WE DID THAT I REALLY LOVE AND COULD SEE KIND OF COMBINING INTO SOMETHING LIKE THAT THAT CAN MAKE PARKLAND UNIQUE. SO ÃÃI WOULD BE WILLING TO MAKE A MOTION OF GOING WITH 505 AS RECOMMENDED BY OUR COMMITTEE, WHICH I THINK WE TRUST THEM THUS FAR AND THEY'VE DONE US PROUD. SO ÃÃI THINK THAT WOULD BE MY MOTION.>AND CAN I JUST ÃÃ ASK THE COMMITTEE. YOU HAD IN YOUR FIRST RANKING ANOTHER ONE OF THE VENDORS HIGHER THAN THE OTHERS ON PAPER. AND THEN THE INTERVIEWS CHANGED YOUR PERSPECTIVE. CAN YOU FILL US IN A LITTLE BIT ON WHAT IT WAS ABOUT THE INTERVIEW PROCESS THAT CHANGED THAT PERSPECTIVE? I TOO, HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO

[01:30:07]

NOT JUST THE COMMISSION, BUT THE COMMUNITY. BUT I DO WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU

ABOUT WHERE THE SELECTION PROCESS CHANGED? >>IF I COULD JUST START SPEAKING FOR MYSELF. BUT ONCE WE INTERVIEWED 505, WE GOT A REAL SENSE OF WHAT I WOULD CALL IN MY PREVIOUS HR WORLD AS FIT. THEY WERE THE PERFECT FIT FOR THIS COMMUNITY. ONE THING THAT THEY TOLD US AND WHAT COMMISSIONER AS ROSE SAID ABOUT SEEING ELEMENTS ÃÃYOU MIGHT SEE OME ELEMENTS OF SOME THE THINGS THAT THEY'VE DONE BEFORE, BUT YOU WILL NOT SEE THE SAME THING, BECAUSE WHAT THEY TOLD US IS THAT WE WILL NOT TELL YOU THAT YOU NEED TO HAVE THIS STYLE. YOU NEED TO HAVE THIS STYLE APPEARED THEY WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU AND HEAR FROM THE RESIDENTS AND WE GOT A TRUE SENSE FROM THEM THAT THEY ARE GOING TO COME HERE. THEY ARE GOING TO LISTEN, AND THEY WILL NOT GIVE US ANYTHING COOKIE-CUTTER. THEY WILL NOT GIVE US SOMETHING OFF OF THE SHELF. THEY WILL GIVE US PARKLAND. THAT'S HOW I FELT ABOUT 505.

I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE WANTS TO æ >>ONE THING THAT WE DID NOTICE PAID WE FOLLOW THE DESIGN CRITERIA. SO ÃÃIT'S NOT A BASIS FOR WHY WE MODIFY OUR DECISION. BUT THE FINAL INTERVIEWS Ãà ONE OF THE PRINCIPLES FOR 20 GALLUS WAS NOT THERE. THEY HAD A ACCIDENT, SO HE DID NOT GIVE A PRESENTATION.

AND IT JUST SEEMED LIKE THE ENERGY WAS GOING TO BE NECESSARY TO GET THIS PROJECT DONE. IT MIGHT NOT OF BEEN THERE. EVEN THOUGH YOU HAD THE TALENT.

THE SAME TEAM. WITHOUT HIM THERE ÃÃIT SEEMED LIKE THE ENERGY AND THE PRESENTATION ÃÃA VITAL PRESENTATION WAS JUST NOT THERE.

RANKING. I HAVE A DIFFERENT CONCEPT AND THOUGHT ABOUT HOW TO PROCEED.

SO ÃÃI'M JUST GOING TO SHARE WITH YOU. I WILL NOT NECESSARILY BRING THAT UP TODAY. BUT I DO HAVE CONCERNS IN PROCEEDING WITH THE CONCEPT.

IT'S ALMOST ÃÃIT'S ALMOST LIKE DC)JC VU WITH THE BRANDIN PAID THE BRANDING COMPANY WENT OUT AND HEARD WITH THE RESIDENTS HAD THE SACRED TURNAROUND BROUGHT SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT OF INNOVATION THAT MAY BE WORKED OR DIDN'T.

BECAUSE I BEAUTY IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER. THERE ARE THINGS THAT I THINK WE NEED TO DECIDE ON BEFORE WE GO OUT AND CREATE A VISION. THAT WHETHER IT'S NOT WE HAVE A BRD OR NOT. WHETHER OR NOT WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO LEASE OR TO SELL.

AND THERE MIGHT BE OTHER ELEMENTS IN THEIR IN THE PROCESS TO GET TO WHERE WE ARE AT. YOU SOLD THAT YOU HAD 11 DEVELOPERS THAT CAME IN.

EVERYBODY HAD A DIFFERENT RENDERING OF WHAT THEY THOUGHT THEY LIKED.

WHEN THEY CAME BACK AND HEARD WHAT WE HAD TO SAY ÃÃTHEY RETOLD AND THEY ARE GOING TO RETELL IT AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN. SO THIS PROCESS OF PUTTING OUT SOMETHING OF HERE IS OUR VISION IS GOING TO CHANGE. MY CONCERN IS THAT THE RESIDENTS ARE GOING TO SEE ONE THING AND GO WELL, HOW COME WE DON'T HAVE THIS ANYMORE?ND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SIT THERE AND EDUCATE THEM AND EXPLAIN TO THEM THAT IT DOES NOT FIT IN AS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TODAY ÃÃWE TALKED ABOUT 52 HOMES.

MAYBE 47 HOMES AND MAYBE WIDER LOTS. YOU KNOW? MAYBE A DIFFERENT ELEMENT OR A DOG PARK OR SOMETHING ELSE. THIS IS ALL PART OF THE PROCESS OF WHERE WE NEED TO GET. I AGREE THAT WE NEED TO GO OUT TO THE COMMUNITY.

I AGREE THAT WE NEED TO GO OUT AND YOU KNOW ÃÃFIND INFORMATION.

WE HAD INITIALLY CALVIN J DANO DID A STUDY OF WHAT MIGHT BE ON THERE.

BUT VERY SIMILAR TO THE NSAID PROCESS ÃÃTHEY WENT OUT TO DEVELOPERS AND SAID GIVE ME SOME IDEAS OF WHAT YOU WANT TO PUT THERE. I THINK THAT MAY HELP US.

GET TO WHERE WE NEED TO GO ÃÃ BECAUSE THOSE ARE THINGS THAT ARE FEASIBLE.

BECAUSE THEY HAVE DONE THE EXPERTISE.HEY HAVE DONE THE WORK AND IT DOES NOT COST US A DIME TO DO THAT. SO AS I SAID ÃÃTODAY'S ABOUT THE RANKINGS.

AND THAT IS WHAT WE ARE HERE TO DISCUSS. BUT I JUST WANTED TO SHARE WITH YOU MY OPINION.

>>I CANNOT AGREE. OR I COULD NOT DISAGREE MORE. WE DO NOT HAVE STAFF THAT HAVE THIS EXPERTISE. THIS IS WHAT WE ARE BRINGING IN.

HE TALKED ABOUT THE BRANDING. WE HAD EXPERTS GIVE COMMUNITY Ã ÃGO OUT AND REACH OUT TO THE COMMUNITY. NOT EVERYBODY IS GOING TO LIKE IT.

[01:35:03]

SO ÃÃIF I AM GETTING FEEDBACK FROM MY RESIDENTS THAT THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT ÃÃI WILL FIGHT FOR THEM. IT IS GOING TO BE ALL OF THEM Ã ÃNO ÃÃIT'S NOT GOING TO BE ALL OF THEM. I'M NOT CAN PLEASE EVERYBODY. THIS CAN BE PEOPLE INHERENT DAY NO MATTER WHAT. YOU TURN IT INTO A PARK AND THEY WILL HAVE AN OPEN PLAN.

BUT WE SAID FROM THE OUTSIDE Ã ÃAND WE GOT BY AND FROM HERON BAY.

BECAUSE HERON BAY PUT IT OUT TO ABOUT AND THEY VOTED OVERWHELMINGLY FOR US TO MOVE FORWARD WITH WHAT OUR PLAN WAS.

AND OUR PLAN WAS TO SELL A PORTION OF THE DOGLEG FOR RESIDENTIAL AND TO DO THE REST IN SOME COMMUNITY TOWNCENTER TYPE FIELD. THEY VOTED FOR THAT OVERWHELMINGLY. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY ARE GOING TO AGREE WITH THE THESE THINGS COME OUT AND LOOK LIKE. IT'S UP TO US TO STAY FIRM WITH WHAT WE PROMISED OUR RESIDENTS. WE PROMISED OUR RESIDENTS THAT WE WOULD NOT LOSE MONEY.

WE PROMISED RESIDENTS THAT WE WOULD DIVERSIFY OUR TAX BASE. AND WE PROMISED RESIDENTS THAT WE WOULD GIVE THEM AMENITIES THAT THEY WILL ENJOY. AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO DO. BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE SAID.

AND IN HERON BAY SUPPORTED US WHOLEHEARTEDLY IN THAT ENDEAVOR.

WHAT THAT ULTIMATELY LOOKS LIKE? WE SHALL SEE.

BUT I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT THERE WILL BE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT LIKE IT.

WE CAN'T PLEASE EVERYONE. AND WE HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT. >>WELL, ÃÃ

CHATTER] >>SOMETIMES WE LOSE SIGHT AND WELL, LOOK.

I SAY THIS ALL THE TIME. IF YOU DO NOTHING ÃÃYOU WILL GET REELECTED TIME AND TIME AGAIN. THE MORE YOU DO ÃÃTHE MORE OPPORTUNITIES THAT YOU HAVE TO FAIL, BECAUSE THE MORE PEOPLE WILL COME AFTER YOU. THE MORE PEOPLE WILL TELL YOU THAT I DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU ARE DOING. WHAT ARE YOU DOING? WHY ARE YOU CHANGING THIS? SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO DO ÃÃ YOU CANNOT SIT STILL FOREVER.

IF YOU SIT STILL FOREVER, YOU ARE GOING BACKWARDS. AND WE ARE SAYING THAT WHEN WE LOOK AT OUR BUDGET TIME AND TIME AGAIN. BECAUSE WE ARE AT BUILDOUT.

>>MAYOR ÃÃI JUST WANT TO STEP IN QUICKLY ONLY BECAUSE BOB, DURING OUR AGENDA BRIEFING, ACTUALLY EXPRESSED THE EXACT SAME CONCERN. AND AFTER TALKING IT OUT ÃÃ THE STAFF RIGHTFULLY SO CONVINCED ME THAT THIS REALLY IS NOT MORE AKIN TO THE LOGO PROJECT THAT WE DID, BECAUSE THE LOGO REALISTICALLY, WHILE THEY TOOK COMMUNITY INPUT OF HOW PEOPLE FELT ABOUT THE CITY AND A LOT OF GREAT DATA, THE ULTIMATE DECISION ON THE SUBJECT OF ARTISTIC DESIGN WAS RELEGATED JUST TO THEM. WHERE AS THIS, I THINK IT'S MORE AKIN TO HE WEST PRESERVE PARK, WHICH IS RELYING ON EXPERTS FOR REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY, MUCH MORE NUANCED AND COMPLEX.

AND IN ABLE TO TAKE OUR IDEAS, GIVE US AT LEAST A POSSIBLE CONCEPTUAL VISION ALLOWING US TO USE THAT AS A FOOTHOLD TO START BUILDING FROM AND BE ABLE TO TAILOR AND CRAFT FROM THERE.

SO ÃÃI UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM. BUT AFTER THINKING IT THROUGH AND DISCUSSING WITH THE TEAM. I SEE THAT THIS IS DIFFERENT AND I DO THINK THAT WE NEED THE SUPPORT, ESPECIALLY FOR PROJECT OF THIS SCALE AND COMPLEXITY. NOT JUST FROM A PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITY STANDPOINT, BUT ALSO FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY.

WHICH THESE ÃÃYOU KNOW ÃÃ THIS TEAM SEEMINGLY HAS EXPERIENCE IF YOU LOOK AT THE OTHER PROJECT OF MAKING SURE THAT NOT ONLY JUST LOOKS GREAT, BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT CAN

SUSTAIN PERPETUITY. >>NO.

>>I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SEE US BE ABLE TO GIVE A LAUNDRY LIST OF WHAT AFTER WE HAVE CONCEPTUALIZED WHAT WE WANT WITH THE COMMUNITY INPUT. AND THEN YOU COULD GO OUT TO THE DEVELOPERS AND SAY HERE'S THE LAUNDRY LIST OF WHAT WE WANT THIS PROJECT.

YOU COME BACK WITH SOME IDEAS JUST LIKE YOU ARE SUGGESTING AND SID DID.

AND THEN LET THEM PUT SOMETHING ON PAPER AND DRAW ALL OUT FOR US AND THEN WE GET TO DECIDE.

THAT WAY WE ARE STILL IN CONTROL OF ALL THAT. >>AS I SAID ÃÃI AM NOT HERE TO DEBATE OR ARGUE THE PROCESS OF THIS. THIS IS ÃÃTHIS IS COMING BEFORE US AS APPROVED RANKINGS. SO ÃÃDIFFERENT TO THOSE THAT POINT NORMALLY I WOULD NEVER GO

[01:40:07]

THERE WAS SOME RESIDENTS THAT HERON BAY WAS MORE VOCAL. THEN OTHER RESIDENTS.

BUT THERE WERE OTHER RESIDENTS I WOULD SAY IN MY AREA OF THE PCOMMUNITY THAT SAID THAT THIS REALLY DOES NOT GIVE US ÃÃ PERSONALLY, DOES NOT PROVIDE THEM ANY BENEFIT.

THAT'S WHAT I HEARD FROM THEM. WE ARE LOOKING AT IT AS ÃÃAND I JUST THROW IT OUT THERE AS AGAIN, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES WE NEED TO LOOK AT LONG-TERM PLANNING.

YOU'VE GOT POTENTIALLY 750 ACRES THAT IS SITTING OUT THERE.

WHAT ABOUT IF THAT 750 ACRES DECIDED TO CREATE A 35 ACRE TOWNCENTER BECAUSE IT'S IN THE CENTER OF THE CITY? GREAT IDEA. WHAT DOES IT DO TO THIS AREA? DO NOT KNOW. AND I'M NOT SAYING THAT WE NEED TO FIGURE THAT OUT TODAY.

BUT THAT IS PART OF ARE WE GONNA HAVE ANOTHER ÃÃ [LAUGHTER]

>>RIGHT. >>NOW ÃTHAT'S WHY IS BOB LAUGHING? [LAUGHTER] >BUT THESE ARE Ã ÃNO, NO, NO, I DO NOT THINK Ã Ã

>>COMMISSIONER MEYERSON ÃÃ >>WE CAN HAVE A ANOTHER TIME. THESE ARE THINGS THAT ARE PART OF THIS. I'M NOT SAYING SOME SORT OF PLANNING IS NOT IMPORTANT.

I AM JUST ÃÃWHEN I READ THIS AS CONCEPTUAL PLANNING ÃÃTO ME TO SPEND HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OF HAVING 20,000 OF THE AS A RENDERING ÃÃWHEN THE RENDERING IS GOING TO CHANGE.

WE ON THE RENDERING OR DO WE ON THE RENDERING? >>SURE, WE OWN IT.

IT WILL GIVE US ALL THE SCHEMATICS AND WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO TO CHANGE IT?

>>AND AGAIN, THERE ARE OPTIONS. >>CAN WE GET COMMISSIONER VICE MAYOR [INDISCERNIBLE] >SO ÃTHIS IS THINK I FALL SOMEWHERE IN THE MIDDLE.

BECAUSE I AGREE I HAVE SAID THIS WITH THE BRD AND SOME OF THE STRATEGIC STEPS THAT WE WANT TO TAKE TO START TO PUT TOGETHER THE VISION FOR WHAT THIS IS.

BECAUSE I HAVE MORE VISION OF WHAT I DON'T WANT THEM WHAT I DO.

RIGHT NOW. AS I SIT HERE TODAY. I HAVE THE EXCITEMENT THAT THE MAYOR DOES. ESPECIALLY AFTER COMING OFF THE BOAT THAT WE JUST HAD BECAUSE IN MY MIND BEING ABLE TO RECOUP THE MONEY THAT WE WILL RECOUP ON A RESIDENTIAL PORTION AND THAT LAND CAN ONLY BE USED FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION IN MY MIND.

GIVES US A GREATER AMOUNT OF FLEXIBILITY TO NOT PUT THAT 10 POUNDS AND FIVE POUND BAG THAT WE WERE SO CONCERNED ABOUT ÃÃ WHICH IS WHY WE WENT OUT AND BOUGHT THE PROPERTY AND TOOK CONTROL THIS ENTIRE PROCESS. BECAUSE TO ME ÃÃTHAT WAS THE UPSIDE.ND I HAVE ALSO EXCITEMENT ABOUT YOUR SELECTED RANKED NUMBER ONE PROPOSER. I'VE ACTUALLY BEEN TO ONE OF THE PROJECTS IN FORT MILL AND THOUGHT IT WAS VERY COOL. IS IT A PARKLAND PROJECT? NO. MY HOPE IS THAT THAT MALLEABLE TODAY.

SO ÃÃI DO NOT KNOW WHAT I DO NOT WANT UNTIL I SEE IT. SO ÃÃTHAT BECOMES PART OF THE CHALLENGE, RIGHT? WE CAN GET THE LAUNDRY LIST OF WHAT WE WANT THIS PROJECT TO BE ÃÃWHAT OUR VISION IS, WE DON'T WANT HERE. I THINK WE HAVE FLEXIBILITY NOT TO HAVE MORE GREEN SPACE. IN THE AREA BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE TO RECOUP ALL THE DOLLARS, BUT TO THE MAYOR'S POINT, WE'RE GONNA HAVE EXPERTS COME AND SAY YOU'RE GONNA NEED A CRITICAL MASS OF X IN ORDER FOR THIS TO BE SUCCESSFUL. BECAUSE THE LAST THING I WANT IS AN EMPTY VACANT BUILDING OR AN EMPTY VACANT RESTAURANT OR STORE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH CRITICAL MASS TO SUSTAIN THEMSELVES. SO ÃÃAND NOT THE EXPERT IN THE AREA. I VIEW THIS AS AN INVESTMENT. I DO NOT ÃÃI DON'T MAKE IT A CAN TO THE BRANDING PROCESS BECAUSE I THINK I WANT TO TAKE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRINTING PROCESS. AS MUCH AS I CAN BECAUSE WE SHOULD HAVE HAD A DIALOGUE BEFORE WE STARTED FOCUSING ON SENDING THAT OUT. BECAUSE WE NEVER TALKED ABOUT WHAT THOSE CONCEPTS LOOK LIKE AND I TAKE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT.

IT'S A LEARNING PROCESS. BECAUSE OF SUNSHINE, WE ARE NOT ABLE TO TALK AMONGST OURSELVES UNLESS WE ARE ON THIS DAY US. SO I AM IN THE MIX. AGREE WITH COMMISSIONER MEYERSON.

I AGREE WITH THE MAYOR. BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE US START THE PROCESS BECAUSE I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO GET TO A VISION UNLESS WE HAVE SOMETHING PUT ON PAPER TO SHOW

US WHAT WE DON'T WANT AND WHAT WE DO. >>AND WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT THE BR THEM ALL THAT STUFF ÃÃTHAT IS HANDLED. THE WHOLE PROCESS IS ULTIMATELY WHAT WE CAN DO. THIS COMPANY CAN GO WITH ÃÃ THEY CAN TAKE US ALL THE WAY TO

AN RFP. TO A DEVELOPER. >>AND THAT IS THE END RESULT.

WE GET THIS VISION AND THIS CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ÃÃOUR MEAN OUR NEXT STEP IS TO CREATE THAT DISTRICT FOR THE PARCEL. RFP TO GO OUT ON THE STREET. THERE'S A TON OF WORK TO REMAIN

[01:45:02]

ON THIS AND IT WILL TAKE SOME TIME. >>DO NOT BELABOR IT.

I WILL SECOND THE MOTION PURPORTS ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WAS TO SPEAK ON THIS

ITEM? >>THING THAT THERE IS NONE, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ISRAEL AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CUTLER. LOCAL PICK

>>COMMISSIONER CUTLER? >>YES PURPORTS COMMISSIONER MEYERSON?

>>YES. >>COMMISSIONER ISRAEL? >>YES.

>>MAYOR WALKER? >>WAIT, YOU'RE APPROVING THE RANKINGS, BUT WE ARE ALSO GOING

INTO CONTRACT. >>POLKA. >>PLEASE SHOW OF PASSES.

5Ä.Á. [LAUGHTER] BOX ITEM 10 C. ITEMIZING NEWS TO THE PARK. AN ORDINANCE TO THE CITY COMMISSION, AND PARKLAND FOR RECOMMENDING THE FUTURE LANDMASS USE TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF 39.5 GROSS ACRES FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL ONE DWELLING PER 10 ACRES AND PARKLAND RESIDENTIAL TWO DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE SUPPORT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HILLSBORO BOULEVARD AND NOB HILL ROAD AS PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A CASE NUMBER THE BOAT 23Ä01. PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE

DATE. SECOND READING. >>MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECOND. >>ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING THAT THERE'S NOT ÃTHIS WE'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MEYERSON AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ISRAEL. ROLL CALL. PARTS COMMISSIONER MEYERSON?

>>YES. >>COMMISSIONER ISRAEL? COMMISSIONER CUTLER?

VICE MAYOR BREYER? MAYOR WALKER? >>YES.

>>YES. >>YES. >>YES.

>>SHOULD PASSES 5Ä. >>1023 ÃÃZERO. FIRST AMENDMENT FIRST READING.

IN ORDER TO THE CITY COMMISSION CITY OF PARKLAND FOR AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFERENCE OF PLAN BY AMENDING THE LAND-USE ELEMENT TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN PERMITTED USES IN AREAS DESIGNATED COMMERCIAL AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT MAP TO REFLECT SAID CHANGES IN PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THIS IS FIRST READING.

MISTY STARLING, IS YOUR PRESENTATION JUST A FEW SUPPER PRESENTATIONS ARE ARE YOU DOING

A PRESENTATION THE HALF COVERS D AND E? >>I'M GONNA DO PRESENTATION AND JUST GET THE COMMISSION SOME BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE INFORMATION.

AND ALSO CHANGES THAT ARE INCORPORATED BY THE ORDINANCE AND THE STAFF VERSUS CHANGES THAT ARE PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT. BUT MY QUESTION IS REALLY 22 READ THE TITLE AND RECORD FOR THE NEXT SLIDE COURSE THAT CAN BE PRESENTED SEPARATELY?

>>I'M GOING TO PRESENT THEM TOGETHER INTO >>OKAY.

I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND READ THE ITEM.NEXT ITEM 10 EAT THE ITEM.

WE WILL NEED SEPARATE VOTES ON BOTH OF THESE ITEMS. ITEM 10 E 1023Ä06 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SUB STORAGE FIRST READING. IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION AND PARKLAND FLORIDA ÃÃAMENDING THE CITY PARKLAND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 5 AND ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL PROVISIONS SECTION 5Ö530 TERMS DEFINED DATA DEFINITION SELF STORAGE FACILITY AND AMENDMENT OF DEFINITION STORAGE WAREHOUSES.

AMENDING ARTICLE 10. DISTRICTS SECTION 10SS500 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS 10 4505 USE PERMITTED AND 10SS520 SET OF STANDARDS APARTMENTS. THE 1B THREE AND OP ZONING TRICKS TO CREATE THE S-1 ZONING DISTRICT. LIST THE USE PERMITTED AND ENUMERATE THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLICABLE WITHIN THE S-1 DISTRICT.MENDING ARTICLE 15. DETAIL USE REGULATIONS BY CREATING DIVISION SESSION AT SEVEN. SUB STORAGE FACILITIES BY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STORAGE RESTORE STORAGE FACILITIES. PARKING AND LOADING AND SECTION 98/530 OFFSTREET PARKING TO PROVIDE PARKING STANDARD FOR SELF STORAGE FACILITIES. PROVIDING IMPLEMENTATION COMPLEX SEPARABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THIS IS ALSO FIRST READING.

[LAUGHTER] >>GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COMMISSION.

FOR THE RECORD ÃÃAND GAIL EXTREMELY. THE MANAGER FOR THE CITY.

TONIGHT ÃÃWE ARE GOING TO BE SEEN TWO REQUESTS. THESE ARE BOTH RELATED TO SELF STORAGE FACILITY USE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. THE FIRST REQUEST IS GOING TO BE AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND JUST REMINDING YOU THAT ENOUGH ÃÃTHE ELEMENTS ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THE COMPETENCE OF PLAN VERSUS THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.

SO ÃÃTHE COMPREHENSIVE POINT IS YOUR LONG RANGE POLICY DOCUMENT THAT IS ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. IT HAS THE VISION FOR THE CITY ÃÃSHE HAS SOME GUIDANCE FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. IT'S KIND OF A BOOK OF GOALS, POLICIES, AND OBJECTIVES.

IT'S NOT SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WHERE WE THINK OF LIKE SETBACKS AND BLOCK COVERAGES GENERALLY IN THE ZONING CODE. BUT SETBACKS AND BUILDING HEIGHTS WOULD BE IN THE ZONING CODE. AND MORE LONG-RANGE POLICIES

[01:50:05]

THE DARKER THE YELLOW COLOR ÃÃ USUALLY THE HIGHER THE DENSITY. AND RED IS COMMERCIAL.

GREEN IS OUR PARKS. BLUE AND GRACE ARE NORMALLY COMMUNITY FACILITIES OR UTILITIES LOCATION. SO ÃÃTHE SECOND PART OF THE REQUEST THAT YOU CAN BE HOME TONIGHT IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

THIS IS WHERE WE GET INTO SPECIFIC REGULATIONS. WHICH ARE PROVIDING YOUR SETBACKS, HEIGHTS, REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING, BLOCK COVERAGES RATIOS, LANDSCAPING, ROADWAY STANDARDS, AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. VERY SPECIFIC DETAIL AND REGULATIONS. THE ZONING MAP ÃÃA LOT OF CITIES AND ZONING MAP IS NOT COLOR. BUT FOR THE CITY PARKLAND ÃÃ OUR MAP IS COLORED JUST KIND OF TO HELP CLARIFY THE DIFFERENT DISTRICTS. BUT YOU WILL SEE ÃÃWE HAVE A LOT OF PRD SPIRIT PLANT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. AND THEN WE HAVE SOME SINGLES FAMILY REGULAR RESIDENTIAL ZONING WITH COMMERCIAL AND SEVERAL OTHER CATEGORIES OF OPEN SPACE AND A PARKS AND RECREATION. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO TABLE 1.8 IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WHICH DEALS WITH FLOOR AREA RATIOS. THE STAFF ÃÃWHILE WE ARE REVIEWING THE TABLE WITH THE CHANGE PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT ÃÃIF WE'RE GOING TO MAKE THE CHANGE PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT ÃÃTHERE ARE A COUPLE OF OTHER CATEGORIES IN THAT SAME TABLE THAT THE STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND BE CHANGED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL ALSO.

SO ÃÃWE CAN GET INTO THOSE DETAILS WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE TABLES.

JUST TO LET YOU KNOW WHEN YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT FOR RATIO, WHAT IS IT THAT WE ARE SPEAKING OF? WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE BUILDING MASS TO THE SITE LAND AREA. SO ÃTHIS PLOT COVERAGE IS YOU ARE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF YOUR LAND AREA. FLOOR AREA RATIO CONSIDERS ALL FLOORS OF THE BUILDING.

SO ÃÃIF IT'S A THREE-STORY BUILDING AND SITE FIRST TWO FLOORS ARE STRAIGHT UP ÃÃBUT THE THIRD FLOORS MAY BE ONLY HALF OF THE FLOOR. THAT WOULD BE A 2 AND A HALF FLOOR RATIO. THIS CATEGORIES IN THE NONRESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RIGHT NOW AT.5. WHICH IS A VERY LOW RATIO WHEN TO ENCOURAGE SOME MULTI- MULTI STORY CONSTRUCTION. THE PROPOSAL FOR THE APPLICANT IS TO RAISE IT TO 1.0. AND THAT WHAT ALSO FOLLOWED SOME OF THE OTHER CATEGORIES.

SO ÃÃTHIS IS THE TABLE THAT IS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. LIKE I SAID ÃÃNORMALLY YOU WOULD NOT HAVE FLOOR AREA RATIO NUMBERS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

BUT THE CITY BEING KIND OF CONSERVATIVE ON GROWTH ÃÃ THEY'VE GOT IN THE CODE AND IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO ÃÃUNDER THE COMMERCIAL CATEGORY ÃÃYOU CAN SEE CURRENTLY THAT IT'S.5. WE ARE PROPOSING THE APPLICANT'S COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR HIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL WOULD REQUIRE 1.0 FOUR AREA RATIO.

STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THAT CHANGE. BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE THAT CATEGORY ÃÃTHE STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS THE CHANGES IN RED.

WHERE AS THE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS CATEGORIES SHOULD ALSO FOLLOW.

AND THE INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY TOGETHER WITH THE OFFICE CATEGORY.

SO TAKING OUT THOSE DISTRICTS LAND-USE CATEGORIES THAT WOULD LIKELY HAVE MADE A TWO STORY

CONSTRUCTION AT SOME POINT MAYBE IN THE FUTURE. >>GAIL?

WERE THESE PRESENTED TO PNC? >>YES. >>THE CHANGES?

>>YES. >>YES. >>YES.

>>WE HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ON A 5Ö VOTE.

[01:55:05]

>>SO THE APPLICANT INITIATED A REQUEST TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

THE ZONING CODE TEXT AMENDMENT IS TO CREATE A NEW AS ÃONE ZONING DISTRICT.

WHICH WOULD ALLOW SELF STORAGE FACILITIES SUBJECT TO SPECIAL EXCEPTION OR APPROVAL ONLY WITHIN THE DISTRICT AND THAT IT ALSO PROVIDES SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS SUCH AS SETBACK STANDARDS OR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS. THE TABLE THAT ALSO FOLLOWS IS THE TABLE WHERE ALL OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE CONTAINED.

THE LOT COVERAGE FOR RATIOS, SETBACKS, BUILDING HEIGHT. IF WE CREATE A NEW DISTRICT, WE NEED TO AND ACTIONS TO THE TABLE. SO THE S1 DISTRICT IS INITIATED BY THE APPLICANT. BUT ÃÃIF WE GO IN AND AMEND THE TABLE TO CREATE THIS STANDARDS FOR S1, WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S LOGICAL AND MAKES SENSE WITH WHEN COMPARED TO OUR OTHER COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS. SO ÃÃTHE STAFF IS ALSO RECOMMENDED SOME OF THESE ARE CODIFICATION ERRORS. TO ADD LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS IN FLOOR AREA RATIOS AND SOME OF THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.

AS THOSE ELEMENTS ÃTHIS ALSO SOME CODIFICATION ERRORS THAT ARE IN THE PERMITTED USE LIST.

SO WE'RE KIND OF ÃÃWHILE WE ARE HERE STRAIGHTENING THOSE OUT ÃÃCAMPERS AND CAR WASHING CARPET CLEANING HAD A SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE. BUT THERE IS NO NOTE TO REFERENCE. SO ÃÃWE NEED TO TAKE THE NUMBER OFF.

BEFORE IT'S SAMPLED.

THIS IS THE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS. SO NOW ÃJUST WHAT YOU CAN SEE HERE IS THAT WE ARE HERE ADJUSTING THESE NUMBERS. WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT LOT COVERAGE ÃÃIT'S ONLY A BUILDING FOOTPRINT MEASUREMENT. SO ÃÃTHERE IS NO NEED TO LOOK AT TWO STORY THREE-STORY OR FOUR-STORY CONSTRUCTION ON A LOT COVERAGE MEASUREMENT.

THOSE NUMBERS ARE IMPORTANT THOUGH ON A FLOOR RATIO. BECAUSE YOU ARE HAVING TO CONSIDER THE MULTIPLE FLOORS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE LAND AREA. SO ÃÃTHE AREA WAS QUITE RIGHT AND WE ARE TRYING TO FIX IT WHILE YOU'RE IN HERE MAKING THESE OTHER ADJUSTMENTS.

SO ÃÃTHAT'S KIND OF THE JUST OF THE STAFF CORRECTIONS. SOME OF OUR CODIFICATION ERRORS.OME OF THEM ARE CONSISTENCY. WITH WHAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING. AND ALSO IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ÃTHIS ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS THAT WILL BE IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT IS A SEPARATION REQUIREMENT. THAT'S ONE OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS.

AND I KNOW THAT THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ABOUT THIS.

SO WE ARE PREPARED TO DO DISCUSS SEPARATION APARTMENTS WITH YOU.

>>WE WILL GO WITH VICE MAYOR FIRST AND THEN >>YES ÃÃI DO NOT RECALL THE PNC ADDRESSING THE FLOOR AREA RATIO ISSUE, BUT THE REPERCUSSIONS OF CHANGING OUR CODE FOR OTHER COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES AND OFFICES WITHIN THE CITY ÃÃIS THAT CAN HAVE PERCUSSIONS BEYOND THIS?S WE INCREASE OUR FLOOR AREA RATIO FROM .5Ä.0 ACROSS THE BOARD?

>>RIGHT ÃÃRIGHT NOW .5 FLOOR AREA RATIO IS VERY LIMITING. >>BUT IS NOT INTENTIONAL?

>>YES, BUT WHEN YOU ALLOW ÃÃ WHEN YOU HAVE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW THREE AND FOUR-STORY CONSTRUCTION ÃÃTHEY ARE NOT BALANCED BECAUSE WHEN YOU ARE ALLOWING FEAR FOR THREE OR FOUR-STORY CONSTRUCTION ÃÃPER YOUR ZONING CODE ÃÃYOUR FLOOR AREA RATIO IS LIMITED.5.

YOU REALLY CANNOT BUILD MORE THAN SINGLE-STORY. >>WHERE ELSE IN THE CITY DO WE

HAVE THREE AND FOUR FOR CONSTRUCTION? >>ZIMMERMAN BUILDING.

ON THE CORNER OF HILLSBORO AND STATE SEVEN. >>AND IS PROBABLY THE ONE AND

ONLY BUILDING, RIGHT? IN THE CITY? >>OF CHINA THINK THERE'S ANY

OTHERS >>DOES THAT ADHERE TO THE .5? >>I WOULD HAVE TO CHECK THAT SPECIFIC SITE PLAN. IT'S PART OF THE OVERALL BJ'S PROPERTY.

THAT HAD A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. >>MY CONCERNS ÃIS MY CONCERN PUTTING ASIDE CHANGING OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE SELF STORAGE FACILITY IN PARKLAND Ã ÃWHICH I HAVE RESERVATIONS ABOUT ÃTHE FOOT IS THE RIPPLE EFFECT OF NOW CHANGING CODE ÃÃ THIS WAS INTENDED TO BE A BEDROOM COMMUNITY LIMITED COMMERCIAL ÃÃCERTAINLY LIMITED LOW IMPACT COMMERCIAL AND NOW IF WE ARE GOING TO BE CHANGING OUR CODE TO ACCOMMODATE ONE APPLICATION ÃÃ BUT IT'S GONNA HAVE RIPPLE EFFECTS ON OTHER COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES IN OUR PROPERTY AND MAY LEAD TO BUSINESSES TO GO THREE OR FOUR STORIES UP.

I HAVE RESERVATIONS ABOUT THAT ISAAC IS CONCERNED >>THE ZONING CODE WILL STILL HAVE HIGH LIMITATIONS. SO ÃÃME GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE. FOR ÃÃFOR A FOUR ACRE SITE Ã

[02:00:03]

NOW ÃÃTHAT'S A LITTLE OVER FOUR ACRE SITE. NOW æ

>>NOW WHAT IS THE APPLICANT PROPOSING? >>APPROXIMATELY 160,000 SQUARE FEET. AND THAT'S ACCOMPLISHED IN A THREE-STORY STRUCTURE THAT MEETS THE LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS. AND CAN MEET ALL OF THE OTHER ASPECTS OF A CODE. SO ÃÃYOU KNOW ÃÃA .5 FLORIDA RATIO IS IMPORTANT FOR ANY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. IT PRETTY MUCH WILL LIMIT ALMOST EVERYTHING TO

SINGLE-STORY CONSTRUCTION. >>I THINK AGAIN THAT WAS INTENTIONAL, RIGHT?

>>RIGHT, BUT THE SAY WITH THE INTENTION IS ÃÃIF YOU OTHER THINGS TO GIVE AMENITIES TO YOUR RESIDENCE AND PROVIDE AND MEET YOUR BUDGET REQUIREMENTS ÃÃSOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS. SO YOU JUST HAVE TO WEIGH THOSE ADJUSTMENTS AND IF THEY ARE NOT ENOUGH FOR YOU ÃÃTHEN THEY ARE NOT. JUST BECAUSE SOMETHING WAS STARTED DOESN'T MEAN THAT YOU CHANGE. IT DOES NOT STATE ÃÃIT DOES

NOT HAVE TO STAY THAT WAY FOREVER. >>I UNDERSTAND IT.

I VIEW US AS THE GATEKEEPERS AND I LISTENED TO THE PNG CONCERNS AND CANDIDLY ÃÃIT MAY HAVE ÃÃTHINGS HAVE FALLEN OUT DIFFERENTLY. IT MAY HAVE EVEN BEEN A CLOSER VOTE ÃÃBUT THERE WERE SOME VERY STRONG CONCERNS ABOUT SOME OF THE IMPLICATIONS.

WITH REGARDS TO OUR PROCESS AND OUR CHANGING OF OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SO ÃÃ THIS ADDS TO THAT CONCERN. BECAUSE I DO HAVE A CONCERN. THAT WE ARE GETTING A LITTLE FAR AFIELD FROM WHERE OUR CORE VALUES WERE IN TERMS OF WHAT WE WANTED TO SEE IN THE CITY AND EVERYTHING ELSE. AND I APPRECIATE THAT IN ORDER TO MAKE THIS PROJECT WORK ÃÃ THE APPLICANT MADE THESE CONCESSIONS. BUT WHEN WE SEE GETTING CHANGED ÃÃIN OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND BUSINESSES AND OFFICES IN THE CITY ÃÃWANT THAT HAVE A LONG-STANDING EFFECT ON WHAT OTHER APPLICANTS WILL COME TO THE CITY FOR? WITH REGARDS TO DOUBLING THE SIZE ESSENTIALLY? OR DOUBLING

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>THE POTENTIAL FLOOR AREA, WHICH WOULD ENCOURAGE HEIGHT INCREASE PROBABLY TO TWO STORY. AND IN LIEU OF SINGLE-STORY CONSTRUCTION IN SOME AREAS.

YOU KNOW ÃTHE SHIFT REMEMBER THAT IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE LIMITED COMMERCIAL ÃÃYOU NEED TO MAKE THE MOST OF IT. SO ÃÃFOR EXAMPLE ÃÃFOR THE PROPERTY ENTRAILS AND UNIVERSITY ÃTHIS PART OF THAT IS OWNED BY I BELIEVE THE SCHOOL BOARD.

PART OF IT IS OWNED BY THE HOSPITAL DISTRICT. NOW ÃÃIT'S HIGHLY LIKELY THAT THE HOSPITAL DISTRICT WILL NOT WANT TO DEVELOP THAT PROPERTY WITH A SINGLE-STORY BUILDING.

>>BUT ÃÃ >>IN OUR CODE IS CAN BE VERY LIMITING IN THAT REGARD

CHANGES. >>RESPECTFULLY ÃÃIT'S NOT JUST THIS IS MY OPINION THAT WE ARE NOT CATERING TO DEVELOPERS WANT TO PUT A TOUR THREE-STORY HOSPITAL BUILDING CORPORATION OFFICE COMPLEX IN OUR CITY. IT'S JUST THE OPPOSITE. IF THE DRUG LINE AND SAY THIS IS TO THE POINT OF THE DIVISION FOR THIS IS WHAT WE DON'T WANT. AND I'M OKAY IF WE HAVE ALL SINGLE-STORY COMMERCIAL IN OUR CITY. I THINK THAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF

HAVING THESE PROVISIONS IN OUR CODE. >>AMINE ÃÃIT HAS BEEN POINTED OUT TO ME BY ANTHONY THAT DALE HAS SUGGESTED CONSISTENCY THROUGHOUT THE REMAINDER OF THE CODE. BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE CANNOT JUST LIMIT IT TO THIS ONE COMMERCIAL CATEGORY WHERE THIS OFF STORAGE FACILITY IS. SO WE DO NOT IN EFFECT RAISE ALL THOSE STANDARDS ACROSS THE CITY TO PROTECT AGAINST EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE POINTING OUT.

THAT WAS MY CONCERN AS WELL. I DID NOT WANT TO JUMP INTO A SCENARIO WHERE ALL OF A SUDDEN WE ARE OPENING IT UP TO DOING EXACTLY WHAT WAS NOT INTENDED WHEN WE ORIGINALLY PUT THIS CODE TOGETHER. I MEAN ÃÃTHE IDEA WAS TO RESTRICT EXACTLY THE FOUR AREA SPACE BECAUSE WE DID NOT WANT TO HAVE THESE MULTISTORY FACILITIES AND BUILDINGS AND STUFF LIKE THAT NOW. IF WE AND I GOT THIS IN. ONE OF THE BOATS HAD COME UP ON THIS DAIS THAT WE HAD AGREED TO ALLOW FOR THIS OFF STORAGE FACILITY AND HAD UNDERSTOOD THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A MULTISTORY TYPE OF BUILDING ÃÃ BECAUSE OF ITS LOCATION ÃÃ BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMITY TO ALL THOSE OTHER KINDS OF THINGS. BUT CERTAINLY I DO NOT WANT TO

[02:05:01]

IN REGARDS TO OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. SO ÃÃIF WE CAN LIMIT IT TO THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF JUST ALLOWING THIS ONE DESIGNATION Ã ÃTHEN THAT MIGHT BE A FIX FOR

THIS. >>THIS IS NOT MY FORTE OTHER THAN KNOWING WHAT I DON'T WANT AND I HAVE ÃÃIF WE CAN RESTRICT IT TO THIS APPLICANT FOR THIS PROJECT ÃÃTHAT'S ONE THING. IF WE CAN'T ÃÃMY CONCERN REMAINS THAT WE NOT OPEN UP

PANDORA'S BOX. >>WE CAN RESTRICT IT TO THIS APPLICANT.

SO I GUESS WE NEED TO ASK OURSELVES FOR NOW ÃTHIS WEEKEND.

>>RIGHT. >>BUT I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR IT IS THAT WE ARE AMENDING THE COMPANY INTO PLAN OR THE CODE Ã ÃTHESE ARE CITYWIDE CODE AMENDMENTS AND THEY ARE NOT SITE-SPECIFIC TO ANY SITE. THEY CAN BE INITIATED BY PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS.

BUT THESE ARE CODE WIDE AMENDMENTS. SO ÃÃYOU KNOW IF YOU ARE DISCUSSING JUST AMENDING SAY THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE CATEGORY ÃÃAND SUPPORT OF POTENTIALLY THE SELF STORAGE PROPOSAL ÃÃAND REVISING THAT FOUR AREA RATIO ÃÃTHAT CHANGE WILL AFFECT EVERY PROPERTY IN THE CITY THAT HAS A COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION NOW.

AND IN THE FUTURE. >>I DON'T THINK THAT THE PNC BOARD DRILLED DOWN ON THAT.

TO ADDRESS THE RAMIFICATIONS OF CHANGING THAT IN OUR CODE. AND AND I VEW THAT AS

CRITICAL. >>THE TWO CHANGES IN THE COMPANY INTO PLAN ARE BASICALLY TO THIS TABLE. BECAUSE THE .54 AREA RATIO FOR THE SELF STORAGE PROPOSAL IS VERY LIMITING. AND NO ÃÃACROSS THE BOARD FOR COMMERCIAL NONRESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ÃÃIF WE AMEND THE COMMERCIAL ÃÃIT'S ECOLOGICAL DIDN'T LOOK AT THE OTHER DISTRICTS FOR CONSISTENCY. ÃÃTHE SECOND CHANGE IS UNDER THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES ÃÃAND THIS CAN BE SOME GENERIC USE SUCH AS RETAIL SALES PERSONAL SERVICES RESTAURANTS AND OFFICE. WHAT IS NOT LISTED IN THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE CATEGORY IS

ANYTHING LIKE STORAGE FOR WAREHOUSE OR SELF STORAGE. >>OKAY ÃÃLET ME TRY TO DIAL

THIS BACK LITTLE BIT. >>OKAY. >>OUR GOAL IS ULTIMATELY TO FIND A WAY ÃÃIF WE SO CHOOSE TO HAVE THIS SELF STORAGE FACILITY.

OPERATE WHERE IT WANTS TO NOW IN THE WAY IT WANTS TO. THAT IS OUR OBJECTIVE.

>>MAYOR ÃÃCAN I CHIME IN HERE. I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU.

I THINK I HAVE A POTENTIAL PROPOSAL SOLUTION BASED ON SOME OF THE COMMENTS.

SO ÃÃIF YOU LOOK AT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ITEM ÃÃITEM D AND YOU LOOK AT THE CHART THAT'S THERE WITH THE FLOOR AREA RATIOS ÃÃTHE APPLICANT DRIVEN TAX AMENDMENT IS FROM THE CATEGORY OR SELF STORAGE FACILITY IS ADDED IS A PERMITTED USE.

I BELIEVE IT'S ON PAGE 6Å. AND THAT'S WHERE THE VARGAS FROM 5 TO 5.0.

STAFF LOOKED AT THAT AND THERE ARE SOME OTHER CONSISTENCY ISSUES WITH THE OTHER CATEGORIES THAT WE NEED TO CHANGE. BUT THAT IS NOT THE TEXT DRIVEN AMENDMENT BY THE APPLICANT. THESE ARE ALL POLICY DECISIONS. SO IF YOU SO CHOOSE ÃÃYOU COULD APPROVE THE CHANGE TO THE COMMERCIAL CATEGORY GOING INTO 1.04.

AND ADDING SOME STORAGE AS A PERMANENT USE AND REJECT THE OTHER CHANGES THAT ARE PROPOSED TO THE OTHER CATEGORIES THAT YOU SEE THERE SUCH AS IN COMMERCIAL BUSINESS TO 1.0 AND

INDUSTRIAL OFFICE. >>WELL, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IF WE CHANGE THE CATEGORY AND COMMERCIAL, THAT INCLUDES MOTELS, HOTELS, COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL USES, ETC. ÃÃ

ETC. >>THAT IS CORRECT. >>THERE IN LIES THE ROPE.

IN MY VIEW. BECAUSE YOU ARE OPENING UP THIS POTENTIAL ISSUE FOR OTHER COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY TO WANT TO GO HIGHER AND HIGHER TO EXPAND UPON THE FLOOR

AREA RATIO, RIGHT? >>BUT WE HAVE THE HEIGHT LIMITATION.

SO COULD YOU DISCUSS THAT PLEASE? >>YES.

SO CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW ÃÃYOU WILL SEE IN SOME OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS ALSO ON THIS TABLE Ã

ÃLET'S SEE. >>OKAY. >>SOME OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS

ALLOW UP TO FOUR STORY HEIGHT LIMITATIONS IN THE ZONING CODE. >>BUT YOU NEED A .54 AREA RATIO

SO ÃÃSORT OF. >>ME ABOUT .54 AREA RATIO ÃÃ YOU MIGHT GET A 4 1/2.

OKAY? SO ÃÃTHERE IS AN INCONSISTENCY HERE IF WE ARE GOING TO DO A POINT 54 AREA RATIO THE CONTACT PLAN ÃÃ WHICH NUMBER PRESENTED OUR CODE

ALLOWS ANYTHING OVER TWO STORIES. >>I'M OKAY WITH THAT.

>>ME TOO. >>WHICH IS THE NUMBER THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET THE

[02:10:08]

BEST VALUE OUT OF SOME OF YOUR NONRESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. >>WHICH WE DON'T HAVE MUCH OF.

IS THERE A WAY TO ÃÃLEGALLY Ã ÃANTHONY ÃÃI THINK IS THERE A WAY TO THREAD THE NEEDLE? IS THERE A WAY TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE THAT WE HAVE IN ONE AREA OF THE CITY WITHOUT OPENING UP

AN ISSUE IN OTHER AREAS? >>I DO NOT KNOW.>SO GENERALLY WHEN YOU'RE DOING YOUR NEW LOOKING AT LAND USE Ã ÃYOU ARE LOOKING CITYWIDE. BASED ON THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. IT MIGHT BE HELPFUL.

I DON'T WANT TO BE TO PUT THE MAP AGAIN WITH THE LAND USE OVERLAY.

SO THAT YOU CAN SEE AT LEAST WITH RESPECT TO COMMERCIAL THE PROPERTIES THAT WERE ACTUALLY TALKING ABOUT. SO THOSE PROPERTIES IN RED ON THIS MAP HAVE A COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION. SO KEEP IN MIND THAT ALL OF THE REST OF THEM ÃÃWHERE DID IT

GO? >>PUT IT BACK. >>POLITICAL PUT BACK HERE.

THERE YOU GO. [LAUGHTER]

>>'SALL THE REST OF THE DESIGNATIONS THAT YOU SEE THERE IN THE OTHER COLORS ÃÃIF THEY WANT TO LET'S SAY GO TO COMMERCIAL MENUS DESIGNATION TEST IS BECAUSE THEY ARE INTERESTED IN SELF STORAGE ÃÃ THEY WOULD NEED TO COME TO WITH LAND-USE AMENDMENT AND FOR A LAND-USE AMENDMENT ÃÃTHAT'S WHERE YOU HAVE THE MOST DISCRETION AND YOU COULD SAY NO. I DON'T THINK THIS IS THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY.

>>AMONG TALKING ABOUT SELF STORAGE FACILITIES.OPEFULLY THAT'S NOT MY ÃÃWHAT'S ÃÃ

SAID. >>YOUR CONCERN ABOUT SOMEBODY ELSE USING THE COMMERCIAL LAND

USE PER >>THUMBNAILS WITHIN A COMMERCIAL USE WHEN PROPERTY THAT'S ONE STORY COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPOT. AND THEY DECIDE WELL ÃÃNOW PARKLAND HAS OPENED UP MY ABILITY TO GO HIGHER. I CAN NOW BUILD A TWO-STORY BUILDING. OR A THREE-STORY BUILDING TO EITHER MYSELF OR SELL THE PROPERTY TO SOMEBODY. WOULD THAT BE ALLOWED UNDER THIS CHANGE?

>>YOU COULD REDEVELOP YOUR PROPERTY IN THE REGULATIONS IN PLACE OF THE TIME OF THE REDEVELOPMENT WOULD APPLY. SO ÃÃIF YOU INCREASE THE FLOOR AREA RATIO ÃÃTHEY COULD REDEVELOPMENT THE PROPERTY AND POTENTIALLY ADD ON OR BUILD UP A LARGER BUILDING.

BUT ÃÃYOU ALSO NEED TO OPEN THE SPACE IN THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS.

>>FROM A CITY PLANNING STANDPOINT ÃÃCOULD WE ADDRESS ONE ISSUE WITHOUT CAUSING OTHER

PROBLEMS? >>JUST BASED ON PARKING ÃÃYOU PROBABLY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DO THAT. BECAUSE THE ONLY PLACE THAT YOU COULD POTENTIALLY DO THAT IS 441.

>>YES. >>AND WE DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE PARKING FOR SOME OF THESE

FOUR-STORY BUILDINGS. OFFICE BUILDING OR WHATEVER. >>NOT UNLESS YOU BUILD A PARKING GARAGE AND THAT'S WHY THE HOSPITAL PROPERTY COMES TO MIND.

BECAUSE I COULD SEE THAT PROPERTY BEING POTENTIALLY REQUESTING MORE THAN ONE STORY.

>>WELL ÃÃAND THEN A PARKING GARAGE WITH THAT BUILDING >>YOUR DEFINITELY DON'T WANT

MORE THAN ONE STORY. THEN PAY $17 MILLION FOR THAT. >>BUT THAT BECOMES THEIR

PROBLEM. >> >>THAT BECOMES THEIR PROBLEM.

IF WE HAVE OUR CODE AND WE HAVE THIS RESTRICTION ÃÃBEFORE CHANGING THAT CODE, WE SHOULD

ASSESS WHAT THE IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING THAT CODE ARE. >>EXACTLY.

>>EXACTLY RIGHT. >>ANTHONY WOULD >I'M NOT SAYING NO, BUT LET'S NOT THE

IMPLICATIONS ARE. ASK SORRY. >>WOULD THERE BE ANY BENEFIT TO INSTEAD OF CONSIDERING SELF STORAGE IN THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE ÃÃCONSIDERING IT ONLY IN

THE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE WERE WE HAVE NO EXISTING SITES? >>THERE MAY BE.

WE NEED TO LOOK AT IT, RIGHT? IN ADDITION TO THE LAND-USE BY THE WAY ÃTHAT'S JUST BECAUSE IT'S IS 1.0 FAR YOU CAN ACTUALLY BUILD ON .0 FOLLOW THAT MOTEL.

BECAUSE THEN YOU STILL TO GO TO THE ZONING REGULATIONS PRODUCED WILL HAVE TO MEET SETBACK

REQUIREMENTS. >>HEIGHT LIMITATIONS. >>HEIGHT LIMITATIONS ETC.

>>PROGRESS. PARKING OPEN SPACE IMPERVIOUS Ã ÃIMPERVIOUS.

WAS A LOT EFFECTIVE. >>LET ME ASK YOU THIS QUESTION. LET'S SAY OBVIOUSLY AN APPLICANT COMES AND WHETHER IT'S THE ONE TODAY WERE THE ONE THAT'S COMING TO PNC THIS WEEK.

FOR WHATEVER IT IS. COMES IN AND THE APPLICANT SAYS YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M HEARING WHATEVER IT IS COMMISSION VOTE OR WHATEVER APPROACHES ÃÃI'M GONNA PULL MY APPLICATION BACK BECAUSE NOW I THINK I'M GONNA MAKE TWO STORIES.

AS OPPOSED TO ONE STORY. AND AGAIN ÃJUST LIKE ANYTHING ELSE ÃÃLIKE CAN GO WELL ÃÃ SOME KIND OF SHORT 15 SPACES. OR KIND OF SHORT WHATEVER ELSE IT NEEDS.

WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO GRANT A WAIVER. >>YES ÃÃI'D BE ABLE TO DENY

ALSO. >>RIGHT. >>AND TO DENY AS WELL.

WHICH WE HAVE USED THAT TOOL WITHOUT NECESSARILY CHANGING THE PLAN.

WE ARE CHANGING OTHER THINGS TO SAY COME IN ÃÃTELL US WHAT YOU WANT TO BUILD.

[02:15:02]

BUT AGAIN, JUST GIVING SOMEBODY OPPORTUNITIES TO SAY THAT YOU CAN ASK FOR A WAIVER OR IN SOME WAY ÃTHERE'S A SPECIAL EXCEPTION, WHICH YOU WOULD STILL HAVE TO APPROACH WITH

CERTAIN CRITERIA. >>THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOU CAN REQUEST A VARIANCE FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. BUT YOU CANNOT REQUEST VARIANCES OR WAIVERS FROM THE

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. >>MY PROBLEMS ARE LESS WITH THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSED PROJECT

AND MORE WITH THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THESE CHANGES. >>CORRECT, RIGHT.

>>BEFORE I WOULD FEEL COMFORTABLE BEING ABLE TO VOTE ON CHANGING THESE THINGS THAT COULD HAVE A RIPPLE EFFECT THAT WE DO NOT WANT. AND YOU RAISED ONE RIGHT THERE.

WHICH IS THE PROPERTY BY PARKLAND GOLF. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE WHAT THOSE IMPLICATIONS RESULT IN. AND IF THERE IS A WAY ÃÃIF THERE IS A WAY ÃÃWHETHER IT'S INDUSTRIAL OR SOMETHING ELSE TO AVOID THE RAMIFICATIONS, BECAUSE LET'S FACE IT.

IF WE OPEN THE GATE ÃÃPEOPLE ARE GOING TO WALK IN. AND PEOPLE WE MAY NOT WANT IN TERMS OF THE BUSINESSES AND THE HEIGHT AND EVERYTHING ELSE. MAY DISTURB WHAT PARKLAND WAS CREATED OR ENVISIONED TO BE. AND THAT IS MY CONCERN. I DON'T NEED PEOPLE IN TERMS OF ÃÃI MEAN ÃÃI AM USING THE ANALOGY MAY BE POORLY.

>>YOU MEAN PEOPLE. >>NO, I DON'T.

[LAUGHTER] I MEAN THE CHARACTER. I DO NOT WANT TO DRIVE IN THE CITY OF PARKLAND AND SEE TWO AND THREE-STORY BUILDINGS AND ALL OF OUR COMMERCIAL SPACES.

THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE. >>I CAN TELL YOU ÃÃLOOKING AT THE LAND-USE PLAN MAP ÃÃEVERY COMMERCIAL SITE IN THE CITY IS DEVELOPED. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRAIL SEND AN UNIVERSITY BECAUSE THE HOSPITAL SCHOOL BOARD PROPERTY.

AND ALSO THE SITE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARKSIDE AND HILLSBORO.

OTHER THAN THOSE ÃÃOUR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES STATE ROCEPHIN ARE ALL BUILT UP ASHTON GARDENS IS BUILT UP PUBLIX COMMENTS. YOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A TEAR DOWN AND REBUILD FOR POTENTIAL LARGER BUILDINGS. WITH THE AGENTS.

>>YOU WOULD NOT NECESSARILY STOP PARKING AND SPACE. >>IN THE CHANCE OF THAT

HAPPENING FOR ON A LARGE SCALE >>WE STILL HAVE THE WHITE ELEPHANT IN THE MIDDLE THE MAP THAT WE HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT TWO. RIGHT?

>>YES. >>WE SET OUR CODE NOW AND CHANGE THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THAT AND THEN THEY HAVE A LARGE COMMERCIAL SPACE IN THE MIDDLE OF THEIR ÃÃYOU ARE LOOKING AT

MULTIPLE STORY BUILDINGS RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CITY. >>RIGHT.

RIGHT NOW ÃTHAT THE HENDRICKS PROPOSAL AT THE COUNTY HAS 40 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL ON THE 100

ACRE PARCEL. >>THE GO. >>ON THE CORNER OF HILLSBORO

AND UNIVERSITY. >>THEY GO. >>YES, HILLSBORO UNIVERSITY PER

>>SO YOU ARE CHANGING THE COMPLETE DYNAMIC OF WHAT THE CITY LOOKS LIKE BY PUTTING

MULTISTORY BUILDINGS RIGHT UNIVERSITY. >>AND ME ÃÃIT'S IN HILLSBORO.

>>IT'S 40 ACRES OF IT HUNDRED. >>KEEP IN MIND WITH RESPECT TO THE HENDRICKS PROPERTY, IS CURRENTLY ON INCORPORATED IN BRIAR COUNTY. UNDER BROWARD COUNTY REGULATIONS, WE DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION IF THEY DID COME INTO THE CITY THROUGH ANNEXATION ÃJUST THEY WOULD NEED ÃÃTHEY WOULD LIKELY NEED A LAND-USE PERMIT.

>>JUST LET YOU KNOW THE FLORIDA RATIO IS THE OVERALL SQUARE FOOTAGE AS A RATIO TO THE PROPERTY SIZE. YOU COULD POTENTIALLY BUILD A REALLY SMALL FOOTPRINT AND STILL GO UP FOR STORIES. BECAUSE YOUR FLOOR AREA RATIO WOULD STILL BE BELOW.5.

>>BUT THAT WOULD NOT BE COMMERCIALLY VIABLE? WE NOT BE COMMERCIALLY PRACTICAL. RIGHT? NOBODY'S BUILDING A SPACE

NEEDLE. >>RIGHT. >>NOBODY ELSE IS KNOCKING DOWN THE STRIP MALL AT 441 TO BUILD SOMETHING ELSE WHEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE ENOUGH PARKING.

>>YES.

WOULD JUST LIKE TO THROW THOUGHT OUT THERE.HERE WE JUST DISCUSSED THE TOWN CENTER CONCEPT.ND WE ARE LOOKING AT DOING A LOOP BUT TO GET THAT DESIGNATED AS COMMERCIAL.

SO ÃTHAT'S WHAT I'M HEARING IN THE DISCUSSION IS THAN THAT THERE IS NO FEASIBILITY FOR THAT BUILDING TO BE TALLER THAN ONE STORY. AND I KNOW THAT WE HAVE EVEN TALKED ABOUT INCORPORATING PARKING GARAGES. AND WANTING TO OPTIMIZE THE LAND FOR SOMETHING MAYBE IN THE FUTURE. SO I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT

THOUGHT UP DURING THIS DISCUSSION. >>BUT THAT WAS PART OF THE BRD, RIGHT? IS THAT WE ARE GOING TO CREATE A BRD THAT HAD VERY SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS WITH REGARDS TO THAT. I MEAN ÃÃYES.

I GUESS. MY CONCERN IS THAT AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NOT NOTHING,

[02:20:04]

BECAUSE RIGHT NOW ÃÃFOR EXAMPLE ÃÃYOU BROUGHT UP ÃÃ YOU BROUGHT UP OTHER VACANT PROPERTIES. SOMEBODY COMES IN NOW AND WANTS TO BUILD SOMETHING ON THE PROPERTY ÃÃON A DIFFERENT PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT IS MORE THAN .5 FLOOR AREA RATIO OR THEY WANT TO GO UP TWO OR THREE STORIES, THAT IS NOT ALLOWED BY OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BEFORE FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, IS THAT RIGHT?

>>NO ÃTHIS BECAUSE THOSE REGULATIONS ARE CONTAINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ÃÃYOU HAVE NOT GOTTEN A VARIANCE OR A WAIVER. SO ÃÃTHERE IS NO OPTION OTHER THAN TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ZONING CODE.

EXPERT IF WE CHANGE IT ÃÃTHEN THERE IS DUST AS THEY ARE GRANTED IT BY RIGHT.

>>THEY ARE GRANTED BY RIGHT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. BUT YOU COULD BE MORE LIMITING IN THE ZONING CODE. AND THEN YOU YOUR CO-PLAN WOULD ALLOW IT UP TO 1.0.

YOU COULD SET YOUR ZONING CODE AT A LOWER FLOOR AREA RATIO, BUT THAT WHAT YOU GONNA DO IS FORCE SOMEBODY WHO WANTS TO DO YOU NOT ONE AND AND A HALF OR TWO STORIES OR HIGHER ÃÃTHEY COULD THEN APPLY FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. BECAUSE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

WOULD ALLOW FOR RATIO OF 1.0. >>CAN ASK A QUESTION? >>YOU CANNOT GET A VARIANCE

FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. >>I MEAN ÃÃWE ARE GOING TO SIT HERE AND BANTER THE IDEAS BACK AND FORTH. MY SUGGESTION WOULD EITHER BE Ã THIS BECAUSE THIS IS THE FIRST READING. TO PASS IT TONIGHT ÃÃYOU'VE HEARD CLEARLY WHAT OUR CONCERNS ARE. SEE IF YOU CAN COME BACK WITH SOMETHING THAT SATISFIES THEM.

AND IF NOT ÃÃNOT ÃÃWE GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD. BUT OTHERWISE ÃÃI DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO SOLVE THE ISSUE TONIGHT.>I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO SOLVE IT.

>>I DON'T KNOW HOW TO SOLVE IT EITHER. YOU MENTIONED EARLIER THAT

WITHOUT CHANGING THE ZONING CODES. >>YES.

BECAUSE RIGHT NOW ÃÃYOU KNOW ÃÃYOUR ZONING CODE ALLOWS A FOUR STORY HEIGHT.

YOUR COMP PLAN IS LIMITING FLOOR AREA RATIO IS 2.5. SO ÃÃYOU KNOW ÃÃYOU REALLY CANNOT BUILD MORE THAN ONE AND AND A HALF YOU KNOW ÃÃNUMBER TWO STORIES AT THE MOST.

WITH YOU KNOW ÃTHAT'S REALLY AN EFFICIENT PLAN. BUT THERE IS NO WAY TO EXCEED 8.5 AREA FLOOR RATIO BECAUSE THERE IS NO OPTION TO GET A VARIANCE OR A WAIVER.

>>THAT IS CORRECT. NEXT I THINK GOING BACK TO WHAT I SAID AND COMMISSIONERS MAY HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS. BUT AGAIN ÃÃYOU KNOW WHERE THE ZONING DISTRICTS ARE.

YOU KNOW ÃÃTHAT YOU HAVE HEARD WHAT OUR CONCERNS ARE. I THINK ANTHONY GETS WITH YOU AND NANCY AND 'S MONDAY AND WHOEVER ÃTHIS CONFLICT NOT HOW TO MAKE THIS WORK.

OR AT LEAST HOPEFULLY HOW TO MAKE THIS WORK. SO ÃÃYOU CAN SAY HERE IS WHERE WE CHANGE THIS. BUT IN ORDER FOR AN APPLICANT TO BUILD A YOU KNOW ÃÃTAKE LIKE I SAID ÃÃA TRAIL AND UNIVERSITY FOR THE HOSPITAL DISTRICT TO BUILD A THREE-STORY UNIT ÃÃTHAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN TO BUILD HIS TWO-STORY UNIT.

THAT'S LIKELY TO HAPPEN BECAUSE BASED UPON WOULD IT'S ON ÃÃ HERE'S WHAT THEY'RE GONNA HAVE TO DO. YOU KNOW ÃÃTHAT'S MY SUGGESTION.

BECAUSE LIKE I SAID ÃOUTSIDE OF ASKING QUESTIONS, I DON'T THINK WE'RE GONNA GET TO WHAT

WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS EVENING. >>I HEARD THE CONCERNS LOUD AND CLEAR. AND MAYBE DOES NOT COME BACK IN TWO WEEKS FOR SECOND READING.

MAYBE IT'S FOUR WEEKS TO GIVE US A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME TO FLUSH THROUGH AND ALSO IT SOUNDS LIKE IT MIGHT BE HELPFUL TO RUN THROUGH SOME EXAMPLES. NOT ON THE SELF STORAGE FACILITY, BUT ON SOME OF THESE OTHER PERMITTED USES IN COMMERCIAL TO WALK YOU THROUGH NOT ONLY THE LAND-USE STANDARDS, BUT THE STANDARDS UNDER THE UNDERLYING ZONING COULD TO GET A FEEL AND UNDERSTANDING. IT SOUNDS LIKE THOSE TYPES OF

EXAMPLES MIGHT BE HELPFUL THE NEXT GO AROUND. >>THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT IS GOING TO SAY. BASICALLY THE NANCY POINT, WE HAVE TO HAVE THIS WITH THE VISION OF GOING FORWARD.E WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT WITH THE HERON BAY PROJECT.

WHERE I KNOW PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO SEE A LOT OF HEIGHT, BUT IN MY MIND AND VISIONING ÃÃI WANT TO LIMIT OURSELVES TO JUST ONE STORY OF THAT TOWN CENTER BECAUSE YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO HAVE CERTAIN FEATURES OF LET'S SAY A DOWNSTAIRS OF A ROOFTOP AREA OR FOOD OR WHATEVER.

SO THE POINT IS I DON'T WANT TO LIMIT OURSELVES AND THE QUESTION IS CAN HAVE IS WITH

[02:25:01]

HAVING A HARD TIME. >>IS GENERALLY PURPLE AND WE DON'T ÃÃ

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>THE QUESTION IS CAN ASK IS, CONSIDER MAYBE DOING A LAND USE AMENDMENT AS OPPOSED TO WORKING ON THIS AND MAKE THAT SOLD PARTIAL INDUSTRIAL AND IT MIGHT BE A SELF STORAGE AND CHANGE THE COMP CLAIMS THAT SELF STORAGE COULD BE AN INDUSTRIAL

AREA? >>THAT'S WHAT I MENTIONED EARLIER TO ANTHONY.

MAYBE THAT'S AN OPTION THAT WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE. DOES NOT HAVE TO BE PERMITTED IN THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION. IT COULD BE LISTED AS A LAND USE CATEGORY. YOU THEN HAVE NO EXISTING PROPERTIES THAT HAVE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE. SO ÃÃYOU ARE NOT GIVING SOMEBODY EXTRA DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE IN THE PAST. YOU WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE ANY LAND-USE POINT AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL. YOU WOULD THEN HAVE TO CHANGE THE FLOOR RATIO ON JUST THE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE CATEGORY AND I THINK THAT YES.

>>THANK YOU. LET'S GO AHEAD AND PUT THIS TO BED.

AND THEN COME BACK WITH THE NEXT SECOND READING WITH A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR.>I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THE VOTING TO PASSES ÃÃI UNDERSTAND THAT.

BUT IS VOTING TO PASS IT THE PROPER VEHICLE AS OPPOSED TO TABLING?

AND ALLOWING THEM TO ÃÃ >>IT JUST ALLOWS THE PROCESS TO MOVE ON A LITTLE FASTER ÃÃ

THAT'S ALL. >>ANTHONY, FROM A LEGAL STANDPOINT ÃTHIS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OR I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION IS GOING TO BE, BUT WOULD THAT BE SUCH A MATERIAL CHANGE THAT IT COULD NOT BE DONE WITH A FIRST READING TONIGHT?

AND THEN A MATERIALLY ALTERED SECOND READING? >>YES ÃÃPOTENTIALLY FOR GO WITH THE INDUSTRIAL ROUTE, WHICH WE CAN EXPLORE ÃÃWE ARE LIKELY TO COME BACK TO AND NEED

TO READINGS ON THAT. >>WE WOULD HAVE TO BE ADVERTISED BECAUSE THEY WOULD

NEED A TITLE CHANGE. >>WE WANT A MOTION TO [INDISCERNIBLE]

>>JUST TO DO WITH INDUSTRIAL Ã ÃIT'S NOT GOING TO ADJUST AN ISSUE FURTHER DOWN WITH THE HERON BAY COMMERCIAL. BUT WE COULD CERTAINLY LOOK AT IT AND BRING IT BACK TO YOU.

I KNOW THE APPLICANT HERE AS WELL THEY WANT TO CHIME IN. >>

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>YOU'RE NOT GONNA GET VERY FAR.

>>AMERICAN TO GET VERY FAR. JUST BEFORE EVERYBODY ELSE, I JUST WANT TO MENTION THAT I WILL TALK TO GAIL AND ANTHONY, BUT WE DO HAVE A COUPLE OF PROPOSED SOLUTIONS FOR THIS.

SO I WOULD REQUIRE THAT WE TRY TO PASS THIS ON FIRST READING SO THAT WE CAN COME BACK TO YOU ON SECOND READING HOPEFULLY WITH A SOLUTION. THAT'S ALL I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST. I WILL NOT GOING TO THE THIS EVENING.

IF WE CAN TALK. THANK YOU. >>SO ÃÃI WOULD MAKE A MOTION

TO PASS. IF YOU DO NOT TWO ITEMS? >>ANTHONY ÃÃIF YOU COME BACK TO US AND TELL US THAT WE NEED TWO MORE READINGS ÃÃIT'S GOING TO HAPPEN ANYWAY COULD

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE, RIGHT? >>WE WOULD HAVE TO WITHDRAW AND THEN RE-ADVERTISE IT.

WE DID NOT DISCUSS THE ZONING CODE AMENDMENT AT ANY LENGTH. ID YOU WANT TO DISCUSS THAT

AT ANY DETAIL TONIGHT? >>I THINK WE CAN BEAT THIS UP. I THINK YOU UNDERSTAND ÃÃI

THINK YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND æ >>THERE IS ONE ISSUE ON THE ZONING.

>>RIGHT. BECAUSE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE HOLDS A WHOLE SEPARATE ISSUE THERE. ESTABLISHING THE SETBACKS. YOU KNOW ÃDISCLOSURE RATIOS AND A LOT COVERAGES AND THE ZONING CODE AND BUILDING HEIGHTS.

SO ÃÃFOR EXAMPLE ÃTHIS IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE FLOOR AREA RATIO, ARE YOU OKAY WITH A THREE-STORY BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE ZONING DISTRICT IS BEING PROPOSED BY THE

APPLICANT? >>IT SOUNDS LIKE WE WOULD NOT HAVE A CHOICE WITH THE

THREE-STORY BUILDING IN THAT ZONE. >>BUT IF YOU DON'T APPROVE OF

THREE FLOOR AREA RATIO ÃÃIT WILL NOT BE THREE STORIES PER >>ICE GUESS WE GO BACK TO THE CONVERSATION. YOU GET INCREASED LAND-USE, BUT LIMITED IN THE ZONE, RIGHT?

>>IF YOU INCREASE THE FLOOR AREA RATIO IN THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN ÃÃSAY TO 1.0 IS AN EXAMPLE ÃÃTHAT IS THE MAX AND IT'S NOT WAIVABLE TO A SUB VARIANCE.

IF YOU LIMIT THE ZONING CODE TO SAY .54 WHATEVER NUMBER YOU FEEL IS APPROPRIATE.

>>THAT IS SUBJECT TO VARIANCE. >>YOU COULD SUBJECT. THAT IS SUBJECT TO VARIANCE AND

THE RANGE WOULD BE BETWEEN SAY .5 AND 1.0. >>RIGHT.

>>AS LONG AS THE COMP PLAN IS MORE LENIENT ÃÃTHEN THE ZONING CODE ÃÃIT IS VERY AND

WAIVABLE. >>YES. >>THAT MAY ALSO BE AFFIXED THAT

WE MIGHT NEED TO LOOK AT. >>WE WILL DO ONE AND THEN WE WILL HAVE CONTROL OF FLOOR AREA

RATIOS TO VARIANCES. >>IT IS [INDISCERNIBLE]

>>THROUGH THE ZONING CODE. >>I THINK PERSONALLY THERE'S TOO MUCH TO THE I THINK I WOULD PROBABLY HAVE TO MOTION TO TABLE IT BECAUSE ONLY BECAUSE MY CONCERN IS BYPASSING IT ÃÃ WE ARE GOING TO NEED TO GO DOWN A PATH THAT WHERE WE REALLY HAVE A CLEAR VISION OF WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH OTHER THAN JUST FOR THE APPLICANT. AND I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD BE FOCUSING SOLELY ON THE APPLICANT AS OPPOSED TO THE BIGGER PICTURE.

[02:30:01]

>>MY ONLY POINT IS IF WE PASS IT ÃÃIF WE DO NOT PASS IT TONIGHT ÃÃIF WE TABLE IT ÃÃ AND WE TABLE IT ÃTHIS WE WOULD HAVE TO TABLE IT TO A TIME CERTAIN OTHERWISE WE HAVE TO

READVERTISE. >>YOU COULD DIFFERENT TO A TIME CERTAIN.

OTHERWISE YOU WILL HAVE TO READVERTISE. >>RIGHT.

SO ÃÃAGAIN ÃÃUNLESS WE GET THE WEBSITE. >>I VIEW THAT PROCESS AS A 6Ä/2 A DOZEN. I THINK WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO DO A LOT OF WORK.

TO GET TO THE POINT WHERE WE ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO MAKE A VOTE ON IT.

A OR MAY? AND IT DOES NOT SOUND LIKE THE SECOND READING WOULD BE THAT

TIME. >>RIGHT. BUT I'M JUST SAYING THAT IF WE PASS IT TONIGHT ÃÃWE COULD STILL ÃÃIT COULD TAKE THREE MONTHS BEFORE WE HEAR IT AGAIN.

SOME OF THE TIME IS NOT OF THE ESSENCE. IF WE VOTED DOWN ÃÃTIME IS OF

THE ESSENCE PER >>I'M FINE WITH THAT. >>IF WE VOTED DOWN ÃÃTHEN WE

HAVE TO TABLE THAT TWO TIMES PER >>IF YOU PASS IT TO ME ON FIRST READING IN THE SOLUTION IS ULTIMATELY WERE GONNA GO INDUSTRIAL OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT ÃÃI'M GONNA LET YOU KNOW. GAIL IS GONNA LET YOU KNOW AND YOU ARE EITHER GOING TO TABLE THE ITEM ON SECOND READING WERE DENIED.

AND WE'RE GOING TO BRING BACK THE OTHER ITEM. >>I'M FINE WITH THAT.

WE GET TO THE SAME RESULT. >>GAIL ÃÃI KNOW YOU GOT LOUD AND CLEAR, BUT I JUST ECHO THE POINT THAT WE'VE GOT TO ÃÃ WE'VE GOT TO BE AVAILABLE TO FLOODGATE ISSUE AND I

ABSOLUTELY UNDERSTAND THAT. >>GROWTH IS HARD.'M STRUGGLING HERE ÃÃWE HAVE A

LIMITED AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL TRYING TO æ >>THAT THE DELICATE BALANCE AND WE ARE TRYING TO THE I DO MY JOB IS NOT STRUGGLING AND SCREWING UP PORTLAND.

THE PROTECTION IS INSIDE. >>BUT TO THAT ÃÃAND I DON'T DISAGREE ÃÃI CAN APPRECIATE THAT MENTALITY. BUT I THINK BEING POVERPROTECTIVE IS ALSO A NEGATIVE. SO ÃÃTHERE HAS TO BE A BALANCE.

>>YES. >>I DON'T WANT FIVE STORY BUILDINGS BELIEVE IT OR NOT.

I KNOW MOST PEOPLE THINK THAT'S WHAT I WANT. BUT I AM MINDFUL OF THE BUDGET

AND I DO NOT WANT TO RAISE TAXES IF I CAN AVOID IT. >>I'M GONNA WITHDRAW MY MOTION

TO TABLE AND MOTION TO PASS. >>HE DID? JUST SECOND.

BUT IF YOU WERE MAKING A MOTION. GO AHEAD.

>>YOU CAN MAKE IT. >>NOTE ÃÃI WILL SECOND THE MOTION.

>>JORDAN MADE A MOTION TO PASS I SECONDED. SO ÃDESPERATE

>>ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC? >>THIS IS A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 10 D. THE CONFERENCE OF

PLAN AMENDMENTS ON FIRST READING. >>AMENDMENT FROM THE PUBLIC.

SEEING THAT THERE IS NONE. WILL CALL. >>COMMISSIONER COLOR?

>>NO. >>COMMISSIONER MEYERSON? COMMISSIONER ISRAEL?

VICE MAYOR BREYER? MAYOR WALKER? >>NO.

>>YES. >>NO.

[LAUGHTER] >>I WILL SAY YES SO IT CAN PASS.

WHICH COULD CHANGE ANYWAY. >>THAT'S WHAT I MEAN. WE COULD ALL VOTED 5Ä.

>>NOW YOU'RE ON ITEM 10 D. >>MOTION TO APPROVE. >>SO MOVED.

>>OR NOBODY WANTS TO VOTE YES ON THIS ONE EITHER? I SECONDED.

NO? >>A SECOND. I FEEL LIKE WE JUST NEED TO GET THROUGH THIS. LET'S MOVE ON.

[LAUGHTER] >>DO WE HAVE A MOTION ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC? MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MAYOR AND COMMISSIONER ISRAEL?

ROLLCALL? >>COMMISSIONER MEYERSON? >>COMMISSIONER MEYERSON?

>COMMISSIONER CUTLER? >>NO. >>BITES COMMISSIONER BREYER?

MAYOR WALKER? >>YES. I WILL LOOK FOR IT.

THAT IS JUST MIND-BOGGLING. BUT. >>THANK YOU.

>>OKAY. ITEM 10 F. ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023Ä09 STORMWATER ASSESSMENT SECOND READING. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION, THE CITY OF PARKLAND FLORIDA RELATING TO THE VISION OF SERVICES AND CAPITOL FACILITY FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IN THE POSITION OF STORMWATER ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES THROUGHOUT THE INCORPORATED AREAS OF PARKLAND FLORIDA. REBUTTING DEFINITIONS AND LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS ESTABLISHING STORMWATER UTILITY IN PROVIDING ITS RESPONSIBLE THESE. THAT WATCHING THE STORMWATER UTILITY FUND BUT AUTHORIZING THE IMPOSITION AND COLLECTION OF STORMWATER ASSESSMENTS TO FUND THE COST OF PROVIDING SERVICES AND CAPITOL FACILITIES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR NOTICE AND ADOPTION OF THE STORMWATER ASSESSMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS ROLE IN CORRECTING ERRORS OF OMISSIONS. PROVIDING STORMWATER ASSESSMENTS CONSTITUTE A LIEN ON THE ACCESS PROPERTY UPON ADOPTION, THE STORMWATER ASSESSMENT ROLE ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND METHODS OF THIS COLLECTION OF THE STORMWATER ASSESSMENTS.

ESTABLISHING PRIORITY OF THE STORMWATER LIEN OVER PRIOR RECORDED LIENS MORTGAGES PROVIDING SEPARABILITY AND REVISIONS AND APPLICABILITY. REBUTTING FOR EXEMPTIONS AND IN TERMS STORMWATER ASSESSMENTS AND CODIFICATION AND CONFLICTS AND PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE.

[02:35:03]

SECOND READ. >>YOU KNOW ÃÃI CANNOT BE MORE HAPPY THAT ANTHONY VOLUNTEERED TO READ ALL THE AGENDA ITEMS. BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY THAT I WANT TO DO THAT.

>>MOTION TO APPROVE. [LAUGHTER]

>>SECOND. >>ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS? PETER? YES. ANYBODY ELSE? OKAY. MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER CUTLER.

IS IT CUTLER? >>NO. ISRAEL.

AND THEN A SECOND BY CUTLER. ROLLCALL? >>COMMISSIONER ISRAEL? COMMISSIONER CUTLER? COMMISSIONER MEYERSON? VICE MAYOR BREYER?

MAYOR WALKER? >>YES. >>YES.

>>YES. >>YES. >>I SHOULD SAY NO, BUT YES.

[LAUGHTER] [LAUGHTER]

[11. Comments by the Broward Sheriff's Office]

>>YOU GUYS ARE MEAN TO EVERYBODY. BUT I WILL NOT DO THAT.

COMMENTS BY THE BROWARD SHERIFF'S ÃÃWAIT A SECOND! WHO IS THAT? [LAUGHTER]

IT'S GREAT TO SEE YOU SIR. >>GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY. THE TENANT GESKE WITH THE BSO.

APPLICABLE ITEMS FOR YOU GUYS TONIGHT. FIRST OFF ON MAY 17 ÃÃAROUND 9 PM WE HAD A HIT-AND-RUN ACCIDENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF UNIVERSITY AND LOCKS.

THERE IS NO INJURIES LOCALLY, BUT WE'RE STILL TRYING TO IDENTIFY THE VEHICLE AND THE DRIVER THAT WAS INVOLVED AND THE VEHICLE WAS A WHITE SEDAN. AND IT WENT WESTBOUND SO ÃÃIF ANYBODY HAS ANY INFORMATION THAT CAN HELP US OUT WITH THAT ÃÃPLEASE CALL A NONEMERGENCY NUMBER AT 554764 HELP. AND IT WOULD BE ANONYMOUS. YOU CAN USE CRIMESTOPPERS 954 493 TIPS. SO ÃÃHOPEFULLY COME FORWARD WITH THAT.

>>IN REGARD TO THAT PARTICULAR INCIDENT ÃÃHAVE YOU GUYS GONE TO THE VARIOUS HOA'S GUARD GATES AND STUFF AND TRY TO FIND OUT WHETHER OR NOT THEY HAVE ANY VIDEO OR ANY FOOTAGE OF

THAT? >>CURRENTLY AN ACTIVE INVESTIGATION SO I CANNOT GIVE THEM TOO MUCH DETAIL WITH THAT. BUT YES, WE ARE BEING VERY THOROUGH.

>>OKAY. >>WE ARE DOING EVERYTHING WHERE THAT HAS POTENTIAL VIDEO CAMERAS THAT HAS LEADS. IT HAS BEEN ON SOCIAL MEDIA SO, WE GOT SOME ADDITIONAL LEADS THAT WE ARE FOLLOWING UP ON PAIRED WE ARE STILL LOOKING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

>>ON THE SOCIAL MEDIA STUFF, CAN YOU MAKE SURE TO PUSH THAT TOWARDS US.

WE WILL MAKE SURE TO GET IT OUT OURSELVES AS WELL. THANKS.

>>SECONDLY, OPEN HOUSE VIEWINGS. WE RECENTLY HAD SOME ISSUES WITH THOSE. AS FAR AS THAT'S DURING THE OPEN HOUSES.

THOSE ARE CONCERN TO US. SO ÃÃWE WOULD JUST LIKE TO REMIND THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE PARTICIPATING IN THESE TYPES OF EVENTS TO MAKE SURE THAT THESE HAVE VALUE AHEAD OF TIME AND MAKE SURE NOBODY'S IN THE HOUSE UNSUPERVISED. MAKE SURE THEY LOG IN AND SIGN IN AND WHATEVER AND WHATEVER FORM YOU GUYS WANT TO USE PER THAT'S OUR CONCERN AS WELL.

THAT IS CURRENTLY AN ACTIVE INVESTIGATION. AS WELL.

LASTLY ÃÃWE WANT TO BRING UP THAT SUMMERTIME IS HERE. AS YOU ALL KNOW ÃÃ30 MENTIONED THAT SCHOOL BEING OUT AND ALL THAT AND THE GRADUATIONS ÃÃTHEY ARE TAKING PLACE. WE KNOW THAT WITH SCHOOL BEING OUT ÃÃTHOSE CAN BE A POTENTIAL FOR MORE TEEN DRIVERS ON THE ROADWAY. NO SCHOOL.

SO WE WOULD LIKE TO REMIND THE PARENTS TO PLEASE HAVE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE TEEN DRIVERS. MAKE SURE ALL THE TRAFFIC LAWS PUT IN THEIR PHONE WHILE DO NOT DESTROY UP WHILE THEY'RE DRIVING SO THEY CAN GET HOME SAFE.

WE CONSTANTLY PUT TIPS LIKE THE ON FACEBOOK SO THEY CAN FOLLOW US.

ON FACEBOOK AND PARKLAND AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR YOU. >>ALSO.HANK YOU.

[12. Comments by the Coral Springs-Parkland Fire Department]

DID ANYBODY LOOK AT THE SCORE? >>GOOD EVENING. I WILL BE VERY BRIEF.

WE HAD 149 INCIDENTS PER VNS AND PARKLAND PARK AND ONLY FOUR FIRE INCIDENTS TO ECHO THE COMMENTS ABOUT THE SUMMERTIME. SUMMERTIME ADVICE WENT A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT JUST A FEW WEEKS AGO IN THE CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS. A JUST UNDER TWO-YEAR-OLD WAS FOUND FACE DOWN IN A CANAL. AND THE SITUATION COULD'VE BEEN VERY TRAGIC.

BUT A NEIGHBOR, WHO KNEW CPR WENT AND GRABBED THE CHILD OUT AND THEY GET TO REUNITE WITH THE POLICE OFFICER, WHO ÃÃAND THEN NEIGHBORHOOD DID CPR ON THE CHILD AND HE IS COMPLETELY OKAY AND WILL BE PERFECTLY FINE. SO I WOULD LIKE TO ADVOCATE FOR SAFETY. WATER SAFETY, KIDS ARE OUT OF SCHOOL.

KIDS ARE TO BE SWIMMING AND ALSO, IF YOU RESIDENTS WANT TO VISIT 911 CPR.ORG, TO WEBSITE THAT NOT ONLY HAS CPR INSTRUCTIONS, BUT JUST FOR THE LATE PERSON TO HAVE SOME BASIC UNDERSTANDING, BUT YOU CAN ALSO SIGN UP FOR CPR CLASSES TO GET OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE. >>THAT'S IT? >>MIKE, I GOT YOUR EMAIL ON YOUR FOUNDATION THING. YOU WANT TO PUT ANYTHING ON THE RECORD REGARDING THAT?

>>THANK YOU. WE ÃÃARE GETTING CLOSE TO THE END OF THE DESIGN ÃÃPEOPLE

[02:40:04]

SO ÃÃI'M VERY EXCITED. >>GREAT! COMMENTS BY THE CITY MANAGER?

>>NO COMMENTS, THANK YOU MARY. >>COMMENTS BY THE CITY ATTORNEY?

>>GO

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.