May 11, 2023 Planning and Zoning

[1. Call to Order]

[4. Approval of Minutes]

[7. Approval of the Agenda]

[Items 8.A. & 8.B.]

[00:16:34]

THEN AGAIN, CLARIFYING THE OFFSTREET PARKING, NO CHANGE,

[00:16:36]

[00:16:38]

[00:16:45]

QUESTIONS. >> THE DIRECTORY. I THINK WE

HAVE A COUPLE MORE SLIGHTS. >> WE ARE NOT ON THE SITE PLAN, THIS IS NOT FINAL. JUST SO YOU GUYS HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING SOME OF THE ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES THAT ARE IN THE CODE. THIS IS KIND OF WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. YOU CAN SEE THIS IS WHAT THE VIEW WOULD BE AND THIS IS JUST AROUN THE SITE JUST TO POINT OUT THAT ANY INTERIOR LOADING WOULD BE O THE INSIDE, WHICH IS A STANDARD REQUIRED BY THE CITY ZONING CODE. AGAIN, WE ARE NOT HERE TONIGHT ON THE PLANE. SURE. ANTHONY WANTED ME TO POINT OUT WE ALSO ADDED THE RATIOS FOR TH S1 ZONING DISTRICT ARE .35 FO A ONE-STORY BUILDING, .7 FOR A TWO-STORY PERMANENT 1.0 FOR A THREE-STORY BUILDING AT THE HEIGHT LIMITATION ON THIS ZONIN IS 45 FEET, OR THREE STORIES. THAT IS WHY THERE IS NO FAR.

[00:20:02]

>> RATHER THAN GO DOWN THE LINE I'M GOING TO PUT IT UP FOR IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS. ANYBOD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? JOEL KAPLA

HAS A QUESTION FOR GAIL. >> WHAT WAS THE REASONING BEHIN MAKING THE S1, MAKING EVERYONE HAVE TO COME BACK FOR THE

SPECIAL EXCEPTION ? >> THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCES ALLOWS US TO LOOK AT SPECIFIC IMPACTS THE VARIOUS USES THAT MIGHT NOT BE LIKE A NORMAL RETAIL STORE, FOR EXAMPLE, IN A COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. SO, THROUG THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCESS, THEY CAN PUT CONDITIONS ON THE APPROVAL AND ALSO REQUIRE THING LIKE TRAFFIC STUDIES OR REVIEWS OF PARKING FOR VARIANCES AND THINGS LIKE THAT. IT IS ANOTHER LAYER OF PROTECTION FOR CONDITIONAL USE. ON THE CRITERI IS TO SHOW THERE IS A NEED FOR THIS USE IN THE COMMUNITY. AND, IF THERE IS ANOTHER FACILITY CLOSE BY, THE IMPACTS OF WHAT A NEW USE WOULD DO TO THE EXISTIN USE. SO THAT WE ARE NOT COMPETING BUSINESSES AGAINST

SIMILAR BUSINESSES. >> I HEAR YOU BUT I DON'T THINK

IT IS GOING TO BE. >> WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE

CITY ITSELF. >> YES. YES. ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO DRAW TO YOUR ATTENTION, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IF YOU LOOK AT THE ZONING CODE , I THINK A FEW MONTHS AGO WE ALSO TALKED ABOUT LOT COVERAGE AND FLOOR AREA RATIOS. REMEMBER YOU LOT COVERAGE IS YOU WERE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AS A PERCENTAGE OF YOUR LOT AREA. THEN YOUR FLOOR AREA RATIO IS THE MASS OR THE BULK OF YOUR BUILDING. IT'S COUNTING THE MULTIPLE LEVELS IF YOU ARE TWO STORIES OR THREE STORIES, IT'S COUNTING ALL THREE STORIES. SO, IT IS KIND OF A MASS MEASUREMEN AGAINST THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY. ON LOT COVERAGE, SINC YOU ARE ONLY MEASURING THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING AGAINST A LOT, THERE IS NO REASON IN THE ZONING CODE PEOPL HERE TO HAVE TWO-STORY, THREE-STORY, FOUR-STORY STANDARDS BECAUSE LOT COVERAGE ONLY APPLIES TO THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, WHICH IS THE SAME REGARDLESS OF HOW MANY STORIES.

SO, WHAT WE ARE ADDING HIS MLB FLOOR AREA RATIO THAT KIND OF RED LIKE LOT COVERAGE. THE LOT COVERAGE STANDARDS LOOK LIKE FLOOR AREA NUMBERS ON THE FLOOR AREA NUMBERS LOOK LIKE LOT COVERAGE NUMBERS. WE ARE STREET OUT. YOU CAN SEE NOW ON A FLOOR AREA RATIO, FOR EACH STORY THAT WE ARE STACKING THAT PERCENTAGE OR THE BULK OR THE MASS OF THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE LOT AREA INCREASES FOR EACH FLOOR. SO, WHEN YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, FOR EXAMPLE, ONE STORY O TWO STORIES, TWO STORIES WOULD BE DOUBLE THE POTENTIAL FOOTPRINT OF THE GROUND FLOOR.

THE FLOOR AREA RATIO WOULD GO FROM .35 FOR ONE OF 2.70 FOR TW STORIES. JUST AN IDEA OF HOW THAT WOULD WORK. PLEASE, IT'S KIND OF UNUSUAL. SOME OF THE STANDARDS AND FLOOR AREA RATIO AND WHAT COVERAGES ARE CONTAINE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT IS A BIT UNUSUAL THAT YOU WOULD HAVE THOSE TYPE OF DETAILED ZONING RACKS AND THE COMPANY HA A PLAN. BUT, PARKLAND IS UNIQUE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT HIGH DENSITY HIGH-RISE CONSTRUCTION.

SO, IT IS OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO, THAT NUMBER ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS FAIRLY LOW. HERE WE GO. YOU CAN SEE IN THE COMMERCIAL, THE EXISTING F.A.R. IS .5. IF YOU HAD A ONE ACRE LOT, THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ANY BUILDING REGARDLESS OF HOW MANY STORIES ARE PERMITTED BY THE ZONING COD WOULD BE ABOUT 20,000 SQUARE FEET ON A ONE ACRE LOT. IT'S GOING TO BE .5 43 560. WHEN YOU GET TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND YOU KNOW THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR ONE-STORY, TWO-STORY, THREE-STORY, FOR EXAMPLE, THE HEIGHT LIMITATION IN THE S1 DISTRICT IS GOING TO BE THREE STORIES, A .5 F.A.R. IS VERY LIMITING. IF YOU ARE GOING TO DO THREE-STORY CONSTRUCTION. WE ARE OPPOSING T RAISE THE F.A.R. THE COMP PLAN TO 1.0 IN THE PENURY

[00:25:07]

>> I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR TH APPLICANT. OKAY.

>> WE ARE AMENDING TABLE 1.8. THIS IS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHERE ALL THE CATEGORIES ARE LISTED. THEY HAVE FLOOR ARE RATIOS AND PERMITTED USES. TABL 1.8 CURRENTLY LIMITS THESE FLOO AREA RATIOS TO FIVE FOR SEVERAL OF THE DISTRICTS, INCLUDING MARTIAL BUSINESS, INDUSTRIAL, OFFICE. WHEN YOU AMEND THE COMMERCIAL WITH THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL, IT ONLY MAKES SENSE T AMEND TOGETHER DISTRICTS TO BE CONSISTENT. SO, HERE YOU SEE TH APPLICANT'S PROPOSED CHANGE SHOWN IN BLUE. THE CHANGES SHOW IN RED ARE THE OTHER USED CATEGORIES THAT THE STAFF IS ALSO RECOMMENDING THAT WE REVIS FOR CONSISTENCY. YOU CAN SEE THAT IS OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL, AND COMMERCIAL, BUSINESS. THE SECON THING THAT THE STAFF IS TRYING TO KIND OF CLEANUP IS IN THE PERMITTED USE AND MASTER BUSINESS LIST, THERE ARE SOME CODIFICATION ERRORS, A COUPLE CATEGORIES THAT WERE LEFT BLANK THE LAST TIME THE CODE WAS UPDATED IN 2019. A COUPLE OF THEM THAT ARE PUT IN INCORRECTLY. SO , INSTEAD OF LISTING THE WHOLE MASTER LIST THAT CONTAINS ABOUT 100 USES, JUST PUT THE THREE OR FOUR CATEGORIES THAT WE ARE GOING TO CORRECT HERE SO YOU CAN SEE THOSE CORRECTIONS. THEN, ALSO , WHEN WE ARE CORRECTLY FLOOR ARE RATIOS AND WE LOT COVERAGES IN THE ZONING CODE, WE HAVE TO BE CONSISTENT TO AMEND THAT FOR TH OTHER COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS ALSO SAME KIND OF THING. FOR CONSISTENCY, WE NEED TO LOOK ACROSS THE BOARD AT ALL THE DISTRICT. SO, HERE IS THE ZONIN CODE CHANGES . WHEN IT COMES TO CAMPERS, MOBILE HOMES, STORAGE AND SALES, THERE WAS A FOOTNOTE NUMBER ONE. THOSE FOOTNOTES WER DELETED IN 2018 SO THE NUMBER ONE DOESN'T REFER TO ANYTHIN. WE ARE RECOMMENDING NUMBER ONE BE DELETED. SAME THING HAPPENS WITH DRY-CLEANING PLANT.

THERE'S FOOTNOTE NUMBER THREE. FOOTNOTE NUMBER THREE DOESN'T EXIST. SO, WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT THREE BE DELETED. IF YOU LOOK BACK IN THE COLD, MINIATUR GOLF COURSES WERE NOT PERMITTED IN THE B2 DISTRICT. IN 2019, SOMEHOW , THE EXPERT LINE UNDE IT THAT SAYS PROHIBITED GOT LEF OFF THAT BOX WAS LEFT BLANK. SO WE ARE ADDING PROHIBITED BACK INTO THE BOX. SAME KIND OF GOES WITH RESIDENTIAL. IF YOU LOOK BACK IN THE CODE IN B1, RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS PERMITTE IN B1. THEY WERE REGULATED AND HAD A LOT OF LIMITATIONS ON THEM. THOSE LIMITATIONS ARE STILL IN THE CODE IN SECTION 15-110 BUT THE PAGE DROPPED OFF SO WE ARE PUTTING IT BACK IN B1 IT IS STILL SUBJECT TO SOME PRETTY HEFTY REGULATIONS THAT MAKE IT KIND OF DIFFICULT TO IMPLEMENT THAT USE. HERE IS WHERE WE ARE MAKING THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE LOT COVERAGE AND FLOOR AREA RATIO.

THE APPLICANT IS DEALING WITH BASICALLY THE THIRD COLUMN FROM THE RIGHT. THAT IS THE NEW S1 DISTRICT. IT IS FAIRLY CONSISTENT WITH THE OTHER DISTRICTS AND THE STAFF IS MODIFYING ALL OF THE OTHER DISTRICTS FOR CONSISTENCY THROUGHOUT THIS TABLE. THAT IS KIND OF STAFF AMENDMENTS, VERY

[00:30:01]

WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER. >> THANK YOU. I THINK ANTHONY HAD A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.

>> WE CAN GO DOWN THE LINE, DO YOU WANT TO GO DOWN THE LINE?

>> WHAT WE ARE LOOKING TO DO TONIGHT, FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, IS WE ARE LOOKING TO CHANGE OUR RULES. I HAVEN'T HEARD ANY COMPELLING ARGUMENTS. WE ARE NO HERE TO LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN O COLORS OR HOW THINGS LOOK AT THEIR IN THE PUBLIC. WE ARE HER TO CONTEMPLATE CHANGING OUR RULES. I HAVEN'T HEARD A COMPELLING ARGUMENT AS TO WHY W SHOULD CHANGE OUR RULES. I COUL SIT HERE AND MAKE A COMPELLING ARGUMENT THAT OUR RULES HAVE SERVED US WELL OVER THE YEARS. DON'T HEAR TOO MUCH OUT IN THE PUBLIC THAT WE NEED PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITIES IN THE CITY.

SO, I WILL LET LIZ, PLEASE, IF YOU COULD MAKE SOME SORT OF ARGUMENT AS TO WHY WE SHOULD CHANGE OUR RULES THAT, IN MY VIEW, HAVE SERVED US VERY WELL OVER THE YEARS.

>> I KNOW YOU POINTED IT OUT BU THERE ARE NO SELF STORAGE FACILITIES IN THE CITY AND THER ARE A LOT OF RESIDENTS IN THE CITY. SO, WE BELIEVE THAT IT WOULD BE A BENEFICIAL USE TO TH CITY TO ALLOW SELF STORAGE FOR RESIDENTS AND, YOU KNOW, BUSINESSES TO HAVE A PLACE IN THE CITY TO STORE THEIR BELONGINGS. THE AREA WE ARE LOOKING AT HAS A LOT OF RESIDENTIAL AROUND RESIDENTIAL THAT MAY BE DEVELOPED. WE BELIEVE THIS IS A VERY IMPORTAN AND BENEFICIAL USE FOR THE CITY I THINK THAT THE NEW RULES WE ARE PREGNANT PLEASE REALLY RESPECT THE DESIGN ASCETICS AND FEEL OF THE CITY AND TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT SO THAT THIS USE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF PARKLAND ASCETICS AND GENERAL VIEWS ON DEVELOPMENT.

>> THANK YOU. FOR GAYLE, HAVE WE, WHAT DOES THE PUBLIC AND THAT LIVES IN THE AREA THAT WE ARE CONTEMPLATING THIS CHANGE, THAT WE HAVE WE RECEIVED COMPLAINTS, EMAILS, LETTERS?

>> FOR THIS TYPE OF A CITYWIDE CODE AMENDMENT, BECAUSE REMEMBER, THIS IS NOT SITE-SPECIFIC, SITE-SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS, WE NOTIFY BY MAIL USUALLY ADJACENT PROPERTIES.

THIS IS A CITYWIDE AMENDMENT. SO, IT HAS BEEN ADVERTISED IN THE NEWSPAPER WITH TWO STANDARD ADS RUNNING 10 DAYS PRIOR TO TH HEARING. PRIOR TO CITY COMMISSION, THERE WILL BE A LARGE AND PLACED IN THE NEWSPAPER NOTIFYING THE PUBLIC OF THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING WHERE THESE AMENDMENTS COULD BECOME OFFICIAL. I WOULD LIKE T ADD A LITTLE BIT MORE TO LIZ'S RESPONSE TO LIGHT A SELF STORAG IS A POTENTIALLY GOOD THING. I WILL TELL YOU THAT SELF STORAGE AS FAR AS A NONRESIDENTIAL USE, IS, HAS A VERY LOW DEMAND FOR POLICE AND FIRE SERVICE, WATER AND SEWER AND ALSO IS A VERY LO TRAFFIC GENERATOR. AND, ALTHOUG SOMETIMES THE STRUCTURES CAN BE BIG AND HAVE OF MASS TO THEM, THE NOISE AND TRAFFIC THAT AFFECTS THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIA USES IS VERY LIMITED BECAUSE OF THE TIME, THEY ARE SHUTTING DOW ABOUT DARK TIME. PEOPLE DROP THEIR STUFF AND DON'T VISIT AGAIN FOR SIX MONTHS. BUT, ALSO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF A SELF STORAGE FACILITY IS TAXED AT TH SAME RATE AS A COMMERCIAL BUILDING THAT HAS AN INTERIOR BUILDOUT. SO, THIS BUILDING THA COULD POTENTIALLY BE A RESULT O APPROVING THESE APPLICATIONS FO THIS APPLICANT SITE WILL GENERATE A LOT OF TAX REVENUE.

[00:35:04]

SERVICES. >> I JUST WANT TO ADD ONE OTHER COMMENT WITH THE RESPONSE TO TH PUBLIC. JUST SO YOU UNDERSTAND, WE ARE NOT HERE TONIGHT ON THE SITE PLAN OR ANYTHING TO DO WIT OUR ACTUAL STORAGE FACILITY ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. JUST S YOU GUYS HAVE A HEADS UP, THIS APPLICATION HAS A LOT OF MOVING PARTS AND THE RISK WOULD BE A LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT, HE REZONING, A SITE PLAN, A SPECIA EXCEPTION, AND A PLAT APPLICATION. ALL OF THOSE APPLICATIONS WOULD BE, BEFORE YOU. THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE VARIOUS AMOUNTS OF CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS, WHICH ALL HAVE THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT NOTIFICATION TO THE PUBLIC. BEFORE THIS ACTUAL STORAGE FACILITY COULD EVEN BEGIN TO BE A REALITY, IT'S GOING TO HAVE AMPLE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLI TO BE AWARE OF IT.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO GO ON RECORD WE'VE HAD A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT MOVED AND WEDGED THAT CALLED TH CITY ASKING IF THEY CAN KEEP PONDS FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME AND WE'VE SAID NO. THERE IS A STORAGE ISSUE GOING ON. I'VE RECEIVED THE CONES.

>> NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> MORE SO FOR GAYLE, CAN WE GO BACK TO THE PICTURE THAT SHOWED THE SITE, THE LOCATION.

>> SURE. I DON'T THINK I HAVE I ON MINE. THERE WE GO.

>> GOING BACK TO OUR DISCUSSION WE'VE HAD BEFORE ABOUT PLANNING SO, BEYOND THIS PARTICULAR SITE ON THE NORTH, EXCUSE ME, SELF SIDE OF IT, WHAT IS THAT? HILLSBOROUGH IS EVENTUALLY GOIN TO GO SOMEWHERE THROUGH HERE, RIGHT?

>> THE CITY LIMITS RIGHT NOW BETWEEN UNINCORPORATED BROWARD COUNTY AND THE CITY OF PARKLAND RUNS ALONG THE SOUTH LIMITS OF THE SUBJECT SITE SHOWN HERE. FROM THE FALLS COMMUNITY, THAT IS TO THE EAST, IT RUNS ALL THE WAY WEST TO THE HENDRICKS PROPERTY AND THEN THE CITY LIMI HEADS SOUTH FROM THERE.

IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF THIS SITE THAT SITE IS OWNED BY MC LOCKS LLC. IF YOU TAKE THE SOUT LINE OF THE SUBJECT SITE, EXTENDED THAT ARE PRETTY IS WITHIN THE CITY OF PARKLAND, EVEN THOUGH, YOU KNOW, THE WEST SIDE IS OWNED BY MC LOCKS LLC, THE SOUTH PROPERTY SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS OWNED BY THE SAME APPLICANT INITIATING THIS CHANGE. SO.

>> HAS THE STAFF CONSIDERED , AGAIN, BEYOND JUST THIS SITE, D YOU HAVE A VISION OR THOUGHT OF WHAT THIS MAY BECOME MORE LOOK

LIKE? >> THE CURRENT USE ON THE PARKLAND SIDE IS RESIDENTIAL ONE DWELLING UNIT TO THE EAGER.

WE WOULD EXPECT PROBABLY A REQUEST FOR A HIGHER DENSITY OF AROUND THREE UNITS TO THE ACRE OR POSSIBLY HIGHER. THE NORTH SIDE THERE IS A LOT OF OPTIONS THERE BECAUSE IT IS CURRENTLY I BROWARD COUNTY. SO, A LOT HAS T DO WITH WHETHER THAT PROPERTY AND ACCESS INTO THE CITY OF PARKLAND AND THEN BECOMES UNDER THE PARKLAND REGULATIONS. IF STAYS IN UNINCORPORATED BROWARD COUNTY, YOU KNOW, WE REALLY DON'T HAVE A LOT OF CONTROL OVE WHAT HAPPENS TO THAT PART OF TH SITE. THAT COULD GO POTENTIALLY LOW-DENSITY MULTIFAMILY, SIMILAR TO THE VILLAS OR IT COULD GO TO SOME NONRESIDENTIAL USE . A LOT OF IT WOULD WAIT ON WITH IT CAME INTO THE CITY OF PARKLAND OR REMAINED IN UNINCORPORATED BROWARD COUNTY. HILLSBORO BOULEVARD, NO, YOU CA SEE IT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE FALLS COMMUNITY TO THE EAST. IT IS GOING TO CONTINUE WEST AND THEN IT WILL CONTINUE ACROSS TH HENDRICKS PROPERTY EVENTUALLY AND TIE INTO THE INTERSECTION O

TRAILS AND. >> I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT THE PROPERTY OWNER FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ALSO OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH, WHICH IS CURRENTLY IN INCORPORATED OAKLAND. IS THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT, WHEN THEY CAME IN, THEY AGREED THAT AGREEMENT TO DEDICATE ROADWAY AREA .

[00:40:32]

>> THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 4.8 ACRES AND THE SAME OWNER OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH, WHIC HAS A RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. I BELIEVE IT HAS AGRICULTURAL ZONING RIGHT NOW. THAT WILL EVENTUALLY COME IN. THAT PROPERTY IS ABOUT 500, 600 FEE IN WIDTH. HE WILL DEDICATE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THAT 500, 600 FEET UNDER HIS CONTROL FOR HILLSBORO BOULEVARD. THE NEXT SEGMENT WOULD BE UP TO THE MC LOCKS LLC PROPERTY, THE SOUTH HALF BEING IN THE CITY 24TH ON WAXAHACHIE ROAD IS CURRENTLY IN UNINCORPORATED BROWARD COUNTY. JUST SO YOU KNOW, THE COUNTY AND THE CITY IS AGGRESSIVELY CODED FORCING THE INDUSTRIAL USES FAIR. YOU SHOULD SEE A SUBSTANTIAL CLEANUP OCCURRING O THAT PROPERTY WITHIN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS.

>> THE LAST THING I HAD WAS, AN I HAVE SEEN, IT LOOKS LIKE THER IS A LOT OF CLEANUP GOING ON NOW. I HAVE NO ISSUE WITH THE STORAGE FACILITY IN GENERAL BECAUSE IT WOULD LOOK A LOT BETTER THAN WHAT IS THERE NOW. SO, THE ONLY OTHER POINT I AM MAKING, WHICH I WAS TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT COULD ACTUALLY HAPPEN ON THE SOUTH SIDE IS, I KNOW YOU ARE NOT SHOWING THE SITE PLAN AND ALL THAT STUFF NOW. YOU SHOWED US A NICE PICTURE OF THE FRONT. I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT IS THE FUL 360 BECAUSE OF WHAT COULD POTENTIALLY BE AROUND IT ON WHA THEY SEE AND ACCESS. I'M JUST TELLING YOU MY THOUGHTS.

>> RIGHT. RIGHT NOW , YOU KNOW, TALKING ABOUT THE ZONING CODE REQUIREMENTS, WHICH INCLUDES TH SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. THE SETBACK FOR THE BUILDING IS GOING TO BE 1.5 TIMES THE HEIGH OF THE STRUCTURE. SO, THIS PARTICULAR STRUCTURE IS APPAREN THE 40 FOOT MARK. IT WILL HAVE 60 FOOT OR GREATER SETBACKTO ANY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND THEN THERE WILL BE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS . THE SOUTH SIDE O THE BUILDING HAS SOME PARKING.

THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF THEIR PROPOSAL CURRENTLY JUST HAS DRY WELLS. WE DO HAVE A LITTLE PARALLEL PARKING AGAINST THE SOUTH LINE. IT WOULD BE 10 TO 1 FEET AWAY WITH LANDSCAPING IN

BETWEEN THAT PARKING AREA. >> I DIDN'T INTEND TO TAKE TIME FOR THAT TYPE, I'M JUST LETTING YOU KNOW FOR FUTURE THAT THAT WOULD BE ONE OF MY CONCERNS AND THOUGHTS AS WE ARE PLANNING FOR

WHATEVER IS GOING THERE. >> THAT HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR.

>> THIS IS THE VIEW OF THE BACK OF THE BUILDING. IN THE FRONT AND THE BACK SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE. AGAIN, IT IS NOT FINAL.

>> THANK YOU, TODD. DEREK. >>

>> AS SOMEONE WHO TRAVELS DOWN LOCKS ROAD MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY AND DEALS WITH THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND ALL THE OTHER TRAFFIC GOING INTO THOSE LOTS, PUTTING THIS AND OR REDEVELOPIN WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE THE CITY AND WHAT IS GOING ON ON AL THAT TRAFFIC DOWN LOCKS ROAD, BOTH BROKEN DOWN, EVERYTHING ELSE THAT PEOPLE STORE OUT THERE. FOR WHAT THAT IS WORTH.

JUST PEACE OF MIND. OTHER THAN THAT, I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS REGARDING THE PRESENTATION.

>> NATHANIEL. >> SOME OF THESE ARE FOR ANTHON SPECIFICALLY. THE FIRST OF WHIC IS DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS THAT ONLY HAVE ONE PERMITTED USE IN THEM AND THAT PERMITTED USES ONLY BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION?

>> ARE NOT AWARE OF ANY OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.

>> IS NOT CREATING ANY LEGAL CONCERNS, FROM YOUR STANDPOINT? IN ESSENCE, WE AREN'T READING ONE PERMITTED USE AND THE ONLY PERMITTED USE WILL BE BY SPECIA EXCEPTION RATHER THAN A MATTER

OF" >> I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY LEGAL

SET WOULD THAT. >> THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE COM LAND, AND THERE IS A BILL THAT PASSED THIS SESSION THAT IMPACT

[00:45:03]

>> LIKE YOU, I HAVE BEEN REVIEWING A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE BILLS. IT IS CERTAINLY SOMETHIN WE'LL TAKE A LOOK AT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ARE REFERRING TO TH LIVE LOCAL ACT.

>> THERE ARE SEVERAL. >> WE WILL CERTAINLY REVIEW THA

AND ANALYZE THAT. >> MY ONLY CONCERN IS I KNOW THAT THE COMP PLAN CHANGES WE ARE TALKING ABOUT ARE REALLY KIND OF JUST CLEANUP TYPE LANGUAGE. I JUST DON'T WANT US TO, I DON'T WANT THE CITY COMMISSION TO START DOWN A PATH OF APPROVAL OF THAT THAT IS GOING TO TRIGGER POTENTIALLY HAVING TO MAKE MORE SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENTS TO THE COMP PLAN TO COMPLY WITH THE NEW LAW, DEPENDING ON THE TIMING. WHILE DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH THE CLEANUP NOW, IF IT IS NOT GOING TO BE IN LIMITED PRIOR TO THE JULY 1ST EFFECTIVE DATE OF THAT TATUTE, I THINK THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME DISCUSSION IN TERMS OF WHETHER THE CLEANUP IS WORTH ANY OTHER CHANGES.

>> UNDERSTOOD. I APPRECIATE YOU RAISING IT. I THINK CURRENTLY W ARE ON TRACK FOR A FIRST READIN IN JUNE. THAT COULD BE SECOND READING JUNE 21ST. WE WILL CERTAINLY LOOK AT THAT. THINGS CAN GET DEFERRED. APPRECIATE EVERYTHING THAT. WE WILL EXPLOR

THAT. >> THE NEXT IS ALSO ANOTHER LEGAL ISSUE IN TERMS OF ADDING THE P BACK IN FOR THE APARTMENTS AND WHATNOT. I KNOW THERE ARE SOME OTHER BILLS THAT PASSED IN THE LEGISLATURE THIS YEAR IN TERMS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND THE ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN B2, B1 TYPE ZONING DISTRICT. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS ANY GRANDFATHERING IN THAT AS WELL IT IS JUST A QUESTION OF TIMING AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THIS CHANG MAY TRIGGER HEAVEN TO MAKE OTHE CHANGES BASED ON THAT LEGISLATION FOR THE AFFORDABLE

HOUSING. >> THE LIVE LOCAL ACT IS SIGNIFICANT IN TERMS OF ITS IMPACT ON LOCAL ZONING CODES, LAND-USE THE ELEMENT CODES. THERE IS THE REQUIREMENT IS ESSENTIALLY THAT YOU NEED TO HAVE 40%, MINIMUM 20% OF YOUR UNITS TO BE AFFORDABLE, WHICH AFFORDABLE TODAY IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT PROBABLY IN YOUR MIND AND AFFORDABLE WAS THREE YEARS AGO. EVEN ON A ONE BED YOU COUL GET IN BROWARD COUNTY LIKE AROUND $2000.00 AND IT WOULD STILL BE CONSIDERED AFFORDABLE.

BUT, THERE IS A PROVISION IN TH LIVE LOCAL ACT THAT ADDRESSES I YOUR CITY AS A WHOLE HAS LESS THAN 20% OF THOSE CATEGORIES, WHICH WE DO THAT EXEMPTED FROM LOT OF THE MORE ONEROUS

PREEMPTION'S IN THAT BILL. >> THE PREEMPTION IN THE LEGISLATURE, YOU KNOW, THEY ARE GETTING AROUND TO JUST DEMOLISHING LOCAL GOVERNMENT. THE ONLY AREA THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HERE, DEALS, IS THIS THAT IS GOING TO BE GIVEN THIS DESIGNATION IS THE PARCEL THAT IS AT ISSUE, CORRECT?

>> GAIL, IF YOU DON'T MIND, I WILL ANSWER THAT. SO, WHAT YOU DOING TONIGHT, OF COURSE, IS NO REDESIGNATED ANY PARTICULAR PARCEL. SO, BUT, THEORETICALLY, THERE COULD BE OTHER PROPERTIES THAT COME IN IF THIS IS APPROVE THAT SEEK A REZONING. BUT, KEEP IN MIND, THERE ARE CERTAIN REGULATIONS. WE HAVE DIFFERENT SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS OF A MILE AND HAVE TO MEET ALL OF TH REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE LAID OUT FOR THAT SPECIAL EXCEPTION

APPROVAL. >> AS WE SIT HERE RIGHT NOW, THERE IS ONLY ONE APPLICANT. WE KNOW WHAT THE PARCEL IS. WHILE UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE THAT THIS IS THE WORK THAT IS HAPPENING TONIGHT AND WHEN THES COME TO THE COMMISSION IS OF CITYWIDE APPLICATION, THIS DOES HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON, AT LEAST RIGHT NOW, ONE RESIDENTIA COMMUNITY THAT ABUTS THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY FOR WHICH WE ALREADY KNOW THERE'S GOING T BE A REQUEST FOR REZONING. SO, DO HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A CONCERN ABOUT THE FACT THAT THERE WAS NOT, I KNOW THAT IT I NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED BUT IT IS NOT PROHIBITED EITHER IN TERMS OF PROVIDING NOTICE TO THE FOLK THAT ARE IN THE FALLS WHOSE BACKYARD IS GOING TO NOW ABOUT PROPERTY FOR WHICH THIS CHANGE IS BEING COMPLICATED. IS THERE ANY OTHER NOTICE GIVEN TO THOSE

RESIDENTS QUESTIONING >> COMMENTS, THE APPLICANT HAD SPOKEN WITH THE DEVELOPER OF THAT COMMUNITY AND THE RESIDENT THAT ABUT WHERE THE PROPERTY WOULD BE. ACTUALLY, AT THE FIRS HEARING THAT WE HAD ON ANNEXATION, THERE WERE SOME

[00:50:02]

CONCERNS. >> DID YOU GIVE ANY MORE INFORMATION IN TERMS OF WHAT WAS? I KNOW NO COMMITMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE OR THINGS OF THAT NATURE BUT JUST SORT OF GENERALLY SPEAKING? I DO HAVE A CONCERN FOR THOSE RESIDENTS WHO WORK AGAIN, I ALSO BELIEVE YOUR FIRM ALSO REPRESENTS THE

DEVELOPER OF THE FALLS. >> I'M NOT AWARE OF THAT.

POSSIBLY, VERY POSSIBLY. >> PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND

ADDRESS. >> MY NAME IS MITCH FELDMAN.

1930 NORTHEAST 119TH ROAD, NORT MIAMI, FLORIDA. I AM THE OWNER PRESIDENT OF FELDMAN COMPANIES. WE ARE THE APPLICANT. NICE TO MEET YOU ALL. THE STAFF HAS BEE GREAT, IT HAS BEEN WONDERFUL WORKING IN PARKLAND. I'VE KNOWN PARKLAND FROM ITS INFANCY. IT I NICE TO BE HERE TO PRESENT. HE SPOKE WITH THE NEIGHBORS NEXT DOOR, ACTIVELY AND INTENTIONALL BECAUSE THE DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY HAD REACHED OUT TO US WHEN WE BOUGHT THE PROPERTY.

WE'VE SPOKEN WITH THEM AND THEY WERE ASKING US WHAT ARE YOU DOING, WHAT ARE YOUR PLANS? WE GET ALONG FINE WITH THEM. TWO O THE NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE IN THE PROPERTY THAT ABUTS RIGHT ON OUR PROPERTY, THE NORTHERNMOST PIECE THAT OVERLOOK INTO OUR PROPERTY, THEY WERE HERE BECAUS THEY WERE OBVIOUSLY CONCERNED .

WE SHOWED THEM WHAT WE ARE DOING. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE THE FIRM UP THERE AND WE DISCUSSED THE LANDSCAPE AND THE REQUIREMENTS THEY IMPOSED ON US SO, THEY WERE ACTUALLY HAPPY. W GAVE THEM HER CARD. THINK EVENTUALLY REACHED OUT TO US BECAUSE WE INHERITED THIS PROPERTY WITH A JUNKYARD, BASICALLY AND ELITE DOWN YARD WHERE , I MEAN, YOU KNOW, REALLY, THINGS THAT WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE GOING ON THERE WERE GOING ON THERE AND THERE WERE CARS BEEPING AND TOPIC UP IN THAT AREA AND ANNOYING THEM. THEY REACHED OUT TO US AND ASKE IF WE COULD DO ANYTHING. WE VACATED THE WHOLE YARD. IT WAS INCOME AND WE TOOK THE HIT AND SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT, LET'S BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. WE WANT TO BE HERE. OUR INTENTION IS TO OWN THIS FOREVER. I'M NOT A BUILD AND FLIP GOING. I'M PICKING UP BUT I'M A RELATIVELY SMALL DEVELOPER. WE BUILT IN FLORIDA WE'VE BUILT ON THE WEST COAST O FLORIDA, PUERTO RICO, NEW JERSEY, PENNSYLVANIA. WE HAVE A GROWING SELF STORAGE COMPANY.

WE'VE BUILT OVER 2.5 MILLION SQUARE FEET. MY SON IS IN THE BUSINESS AND SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE, WE ARE PROUD OF WHAT WE DO . YOU CAN SEE BY THE RENTER, IF WE DIDN'T TELL YOU IT WAS TORCH AND WE AS YOU TO GUESS, YOU WOULD PROBABL THINK IT WAS A CLUBHOUSE OR SOMETHING. WE ARE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING HERE THAT IS UNIQUE AND WE RECOGNIZE WHAT PARKLAND IS AND WE WANT TO EVEN THE STAF RECOGNIZES WHAT IT IS. CLEARLY AND ALL THE POSITIONS ON US AND THE AGREEMENT WE HAVE WITH THEM FOR ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS IS BEYOND WHAT YOU SEE IN ANY MUNICIPALITY. JUST FROM DOING THIS IN MANY MUNICIPALITIES ÚAROUND THE COUNTRY IT IS A VER RESTRICTIVE ON US AND EXPENSIVE BUT IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE AR WILLING TO DO BECAUSE IT IS A LONG-TERM HOLD. YOU ARE NOT GOING TO FIND A LOT OF STORAGE GUYS THAT WILL DO THAT. EVERYON IS TALKING ABOUT IT IS CITYWIDE IN REALITY, I'D LIKE TO SEE SOMEONE PAY FOR A PIECE OF LAND ON MAIN AND MAINE IN PARKLAND AND BE ABLE TO AFFORD IT TO PUT UP A STORAGE FACILITY. IT IS JUST DIFFICULT TO DO , ESPECIALLY WITH THE RESTRICTION AND SETBACKS. YOU NEED SOMETHIN LIKE THIS THAT IS OUT OF THE WA ON WAXAHACHIE THAT WAS ONCE A JUNKYARD. THAT IS THE ONLY WAY TO GET IT DONE. I CAN ANSWER TH QUESTIONS. I CAN TALK ABOUT STORAGE ALL NIGHT.

>> PLEASE DON'T. I HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION. AGAIN, THIS IS GOING SLIGHTLY A FIELD OF EXACTLY WHAT IS IN FRONT OF US.

MY INTENTION IS BASED ON WHAT I'VE SEEN MY INTENTION IS TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THESE ITEMS. SINCE WE HAVE THE DEVELOPER HERE, I DON'T KNOW, HAVE THERE BEEN DISCUSSIONS THAT HAVE STARTED ALREADY IN CONNECTION WITH THE LOX ROAD ROAD, DO WE KNOW WHETHER THERE WAS ANY IMPACT? JUST IN TERMS OF HAVE THERE BEEN CONVERSATIONS WITH FDOT AND THE COUNTY?

[00:55:03]

>> THE SHORT ANSWER IS YES. WE HAVE AN INTERVIEW HERE IF YOU WANT SPECIFICS. WE HAVE BEEN IN COORDINATION WITH FDOT TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN THIS PROJECT COMES BEFORE YOU, IT IS DONE IN TAKING CONSIDERATION THE LOX ROAD PROJECT.

>> SHORT ANSWER IS COMPLETELY FINE.

>> THAT IS GOOD, NOTHING APPEARED

>> THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> ANY ADDITIONAL? >> VERY ELEGANT.

>> THANK YOU. >>> WITH THAT, ALEX.

>> BACK TO WHAT ANTHONY SAID, OUR CODE HAS SERVED US A VERY WELL FOR A LONG TIME. BEING ON THE CIVIL SIDE AND DEVELOP SITE I'VE SEEN STORAGE, THE STORAGE STYLE BUILDINGS INFILTRATING BROWARD COUNTY SIGNIFICANTLY AN TAKING CITY SPINE STORM AND EVEN SEEING SOME CITIES PUT OUT MORATORIUMS TO TRY TO STOP THEM BECAUSE THEY HAVE GROWN SO QUICKLY. THERE IS A LOT OF PRO, THEY GENERATE TAX, THERE IS A LOW AMOUNT OF INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDED FOR THEM. THIS PRESENTATION TONIGHT IS VERY MISLEADING AND MAY WE HAVE NOT EVEN SEEN THE OVERALL LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY. WE HAVE SEEN VERY GREAT RENDERING. WE ARE LOOKING RIGHT NOW AT SUBJECT PROPERTY. I STATED IN THE BEGINNING, THIS IS NOTHING TO D WITH THIS PROPERTY. IT IS ABOUT THE LAND-USE PLAN. SO, A LOT OF TIME AND ENERGY HAS BEEN PUT INTO THIS . I WISH WE WOULD HAV STARTED OFF AND SAID HERE IS TH LAND-USE PLAN. HERE IS THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WHERE THIS IS GOING TO BE CHANGING. WE ARE SEEING THESE RENDERINGS BUT IT IS VERY MISLEADING WHAT WE HAVE SHOWN TONIGHT OR WHAT WE ARE EVEN TALKING ABOUT. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THIS BACK WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE HERON BA AND REZONING THAT. WE WEREN'T TALKING ABOUT HERON BAY, WE WER TALKING ABOUT HOW ARE WE GOING TO REZONE THIS? MY TAKE ON THE WAY THIS WHOLE MEETING STARTED, WE STARTED RIGHT AWAY ABOUT THI PROPERTY. IT WAS INTENDED NOT T GO THAT ROUTE. WHEN YOU LOOK ACROSS WHERE ALL THE COMMERCIAL COULD GO, AND I GET THE APPLICANT'S POINT, IT IS GOING TO BE VERY DIFFICULT TO GET THI PUT IN. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CITY IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE.

THAT IS WHY IT WASN'T IN THE CODE BEFORE. WE NEVER WANTED TH STORAGE UNITS IN OUR CITY. SO, AM NOT A FAN STORAGE UNITS. I'V SEEN WHAT THEY'VE DONE TO OTHER CITIES. THEY DON'T GENERATE JOBS. THEY LOOK BEAUTIFUL NOWADAYS INTO THE AUTONOMOUS, THE PEOPLE CAN GO IN AND OUT, THEY ARE AUTOMATED LOCKS AND AL SORTS OF GREAT STUFF. I JUST PERSONALLY NOT FOR THEM. THEY ALWAYS WANT ONE LITTLE VARIANCE OR ONE MORE THING. EVEN JUST LOOKING AT THE CODE, EVERYONE ELSE ON THE FLOOR PLAN RATIO, YOU WENT FROM .35 .6. THEY'VE GOT .7. WHY DID THEY GET .7? AT THE THREE STORIES, IT WAS .9, THEY GOT 1.0. THERE IS ALWAYS SOMETHING. IT IS A GREAT BUSINESS, THEY MAKE A TON OF MONEY, THEY GENERATE A TON OF TAX. BE CAREFUL WHAT WE ASK FOR ONCE IT IS IN THE CODE, THEY AR GOING TO BE COMING. THEN THERE WILL BE MORE ATTORNEYS COMING. THE ATTORNEYS TELL US WHY THIS SITE IS OKAY AND IT OPENS UP TH FLOODGATES. BE CAREFUL, LOOK AT THE LAND-USE MAP, THINK ABOUT WHERE THIS CAN GO IN THE FUTURE THINK ABOUT ALL THE DIFFERENT REZONING, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF LAND STIL OUT THERE TO BE POTENTIALLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY, WHAT DOE THAT ZONING LOOK LIKE? AND WHAT DOES THIS LOOK LIKE FOR OUR CIT IN THE FUTURE? I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, JUST MORE O A COMMENT THAT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE TO NOT FOCUS AS MUCH ON THIS SITE AND FOCUS MORE ON THE OVERALL, WHAT WE ARE TALKIN ABOUT TONIGHT. I LOVE WHAT YOU DID, CLEANING EVERYTHING UP. THAT IS PHENOMENAL. I WOULD BE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT ADDING STORAGE IN WITHOUT REALLY, REALLY TAKING OUR TIME THINKING ABOUT WHERE CAN THIS REALLY GO.

GET THIS RENDERING OUT OF YOUR HEAD AND THINK ABOUT WHAT DOES 10 YEARS FROM NOW LOOK LIKE? WHAT IF HENDRIX FORMS ZONES IN, WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE WHAT ARE WE GOING TO HAVE A FLOOD STORAGE UNITS COME IN? WE ARE GOING TO LINE THIS PLACE UP.

THAT IS MY TWO CENTS. >> I DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS ANY

[01:00:03]

RESTRICTION ON TIME? >> I BELIEVE IT IS OPERATING AT THE NORMAL OPERATING HOURS SET FORTH IN THE CODE FOR

BUSINESSES. >> I WANTED TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE REALIZES WE ARE DOING AT THE SITE PLAN, AT THE BUILDING, APPROVAL. THE QUESTIO IS FINE BUT WE SHOULDN'T TAKE

THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. >> I WANT TO ADDRESS YOUR COMMENT BECAUSE I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO THINK WE ARE BEING MISLEADING. THE ONLY REASON I STARTED OFF WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFIC IS SO THAT EVERYONE HA AN UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS, WE ARE NOT JUST COMING HERE OUT OF NOWHERE. WE HAVE BEEN WORKIN VERY CLOSELY WITH CITY STAFF AN THE CITY COMMISSION OVER THE LAST YEAR TO GET TO THIS POINT, TO GET TO THE CODE AND THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT BEFORE YOU. THE REASON WE DON'T HAVE ANY LAND-USE PLAN MAP UP IN OUR PRESENTATION IS WE WILL BE BACK BEFORE YOU GUYS WHEN WE DO TRY AND AMEND THE LAND-USE MAP FOR THIS PROJECT. RIGHT NOW, IT IS IN UNINCORPORATED BROWARD COUNT SO IT HAS A PRE-EXISTING PALM BEACH COUNTY LEGACY LAND-USE DESIGNATION. WE WILL BE COMING BACK BEFORE YOU TO TRY TO AMEN THE COMP PLAN TO CHANGE IT TO COMMERCIAL. WE WILL HAVE THE MAPS AND YOU CAN CONSIDER IT WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF EVERYTHIN IN THE CITY. I JUST WANTED TO ADDRESS THAT. WE WILL BE ABLE T DISCUSS ALL OF THOSE AND HOPEFULLY ADDRESS YOUR CONCERNS DIFFERENT MEANING. TONIGHT, WE ARE GOING TO BE CHANGING WHAT COMMERCIAL MEANS FOR THE CITY. IF YOU GUYS GO AWAY, WE ARE

STUCK WITH THIS DECISION. >> RIGHT BUT THEN IT IS STILL ONLY IN THE S1 ZONING DISTRICTS I UNDERSTAND.

>> MOUNT , DOES, TO ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS UNDERSTAND WHERE ALL THAT IS IN THE CITY? DOES EVERYONE KNOW WHERE THIS COULD

ACTUALLY BE QUESTIONED >> IT STILL HAS TO BE CONSISTEN WITH THE ZONING CODE. THAT, AGAIN, I MENTIONED AT THE START OF THE PRESENTATION, THE SPECIFIC REASON WHY INSTEAD OF JUST ADDING SELF STORAGE FACILITY WITH A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ONE OF THE COMMERCIAL PRE-EXISTING COMMERCIAL CATEGORIES WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT IT DOESN'T JUST ALL OF A SUDDEN EVERY COMMERCIA PROPERTY OWNER IN THE CITY NOW COULD DO A SELF STORAGE FACILIT AND JUST COME HERE WITH A SPECIAL EXCEPTION. IT IS STILL, AT A MINIMUM, GOING TO NEED A REZONING, POTENTIALLY COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. I DO UNDERSTAND YOUR

CONCERN. >> BILL, DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO ADD? IF NOT, I WILL OPEN IT UP TO SEE IF THERE IS SOMEONE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO WISHES TO COMMENT.

>> JUST TO POINT OUT THAT THIS IS AMENDING THE COMMERCIAL LAND-USE CATEGORY TO ADD SELF STORAGE AS A PERMITTED USE.

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

PROPERTY. >> WHERE DID 31 MILE COME FROM? IS THAT A BENCHMARK THAT OTHER CITIES USE? CANNOT BE CHANGED?

[01:05:01]

>> YOU CAN MAKE ANY RECOMMENDATION YOU WOULD LIKE.

WE LOOKED AT OTHER CITIES. WE CAN YOU KNOW, I HAVE COME IN TH PAST FROM PLANTATION AND WE HAD TO PREP UP THE EIGHT OR 10 SELF STORAGE FACILITIES IN THE CITY. THEY ACTUALLY AMENDED THEIR COD TO ALLOW MORE BECAUSE THEY ARE VERY LUCRATIVE TAX BASE. YES, THERE COULD BE TOO MANY. THAT IS WHERE THE SEPARATION WAS PUT IN. AND, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE VER SPECIFIC CONTROL OVER WHETHER YOU APPROVE OF REZONING TO S1 O NOT.

>> MR. CHAIRMAN , THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION PART OF THIS, WE'VE HAD SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS COME THROUGH ALL THE TIME. IT DOESN' SEEM LIKE THE BOARD HAS A LOT O MIGHT IN TERMS OF STOPPING SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS. THE ARGUMENTS ARMY THAT MEET THE CRITERIA. THE CITY ATTORNEY TELLS US WE DON'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SAY NO BECAUSE W JUST DON'T LIKE IT. THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION THING FOR ME, IT DOESN'T INCENTIVIZE ME TO VOTE FOR THIS BECAUSE IT IS JUST, I THINK THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION, AT TIMES, IS FLIMSY. IN TERMS OF THE TAX, THE TAXES, THAT IS NOT FOR THIS BOARD TO BE DISCUSSING WE DON'T DEAL WITH THE FINANCES COMMENTS WITH ALEX. WE ARE CHANGING THE RULES AND WHAT IS THE COMPELLING ARGUMENT TO CHANGE THE RULES ? THAT RESIDENTS WANT MORE STORAGE? I AM A RESIDENT LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE. I DON'T HEAR THAT ARGUMEN GOING ON IN THE BARBERSHOPS, TH COFFEE SHOPS, OR THE RESTAURANT ABOUT WANTING MORE SELF STORAGE

FACILITY IS. >> YOU GO TO THE BARBERSHOP?

>> EVER SHOP, SHORT. >> THE DEPTH ADVOCATE.

>> TO THE FLOOR, MR. CHAIR? >> FOR ANOTHER 40 SECONDS.

>> I ALSO OUTLINE MY COMMENTS, TODD TOUCHED ON IT RELATING TO WHAT IS THE PLAN? WE HAVE THE LITTLE SQUARE BOX AMONGST THE JUNK YARD LOOKING OVERVIEW, WHA IS THE PLAN FOR THE FUTURE? LET'S SAY YOU GET A SELF STORAG THERE, WHAT IS THE PLAN AROUND ALL OF THAT KNOWING THAT WE HAV THE FALLS TO THE EAST? SO, I DON'T, I HATE THE HODGEPODGE WA OF DOING PLANNING. I THINK ALEX HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD WITH WHAT DOES THIS BRING? WE ARE CHANGING THE RULES AND WHAT IS THE COMPELLING ARGUMENT FOR THI BOARD TO CHANGE THE RULES? IF I IS SIMPLY WE NEED SELF STORAGE, OKAY, I GET THAT. I DON'T PLAN TO SUPPORT THE ITEM.

>> THE ONLY OTHER POINT I WAS GOING TO MAKE, I GUESS THE ALTERNATIVE. IF WE WERE TO SAY NO, NOT A PREFECT, WHAT HAPPENS TO THAT PEACE, AT LEAST THAT PARTICULAR LOCATION? IT IS JUST GOING TO BECOME ANOTHER CRAP HOLE AGAIN?

>> JUST SO EVERYBODY REMEMBERS AND IS AWARE, WE ARE THE ADVISORY BOARD TO THE CITY OF PARKLAND COMMISSION. WE ARE MAKING A RECOMMENDATION WITH AL OF THE INPUT, THE PROS, THE CONS. OUR OPINION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVATAGES AND WHAT WE DO MAKE A DETERMINATION AND REMOVE THE ITEM, WHETHER IT IS SUPPORTED OR NOT SUPPORTED, THE COMMISSION IS GOING TO BE THE ULTIMATE DECISION-MAKERS. WHETHER ONE SUPPORTS OR DOESN'T SUPPORT IT, ALL OF OUR INPUT IS VERY IMPORTANT AND PRACTICAL.

HOPEFULLY, AND THEY ALWAYS DO, TAKE OUR INPUT INTO CONSIDERATION HERE. I THINK ALL THE INPUT IS VALUABLE TO THE COMMISSION AND I THINK TO THE DEVELOPER THE PROPOSED DEVELOPERS SO THEY CAN LEARN AN HEAR AND UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE CONCERNS WE HAVE, WHETHER OR NO THE COMMISSION HAS THOSE CONCERNS OR NOT IS TO BE DETERMINED. JUST MY INPUT.

ANYBODY ELSE AT THIS TIME? I DON'T SEE ANY PUBLIC HERE BUT I WOULD LIKE TO OPEN IT UP TO THE PUBLIC AND SEE IF THERE IS ANY CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE CITY ON THE AGENDA ITEM.

>> TWO MORE QUESTIONS AND THEY ARE BOTH LEGAL. I AGREE WITH ANTHONY IN TERMS OF IT SEEMS LIKE WHENEVER WE GET A SPECIAL EXCEPTION OF THE ONE THAT IS MOST TRAUMATIC, MEMORY, INSLEE CHARTER SCHOOL SPECIAL EXCEPTIO AND FOR LACK OF ABILITY TO DO ANYTHING IN CONNECTION WITH THAT. IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCE AS GAIL MENTIONED, THERE IS GOING TO NEED TO BE, FOR ANY OF THESE PROPERTIES, IS GOING TO WIND UP NEEDING TO BE A LAND-USE PLAN

[01:10:03]

>> I NOTICED THAT THEY WHERE YO ARE GOING, IT IS A GOOD POINT.

KEEP IN MIND, THERE ARE LIMITED AMOUNT OF PROPERTIES IN THE CIT THAT HAVE A COMMERCIAL LAND-USE DEFINITION. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING, GAIL, YOU CAN CORRECT ME IF YOU THINK YOU NEE TO, MOST OF THEM ARE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A FEW EXCEPTIONS SO, THEY WOULD NEED TO BE REDEVELOPED. ANY OTHER PROPERTY IN THE CITY THAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT HAVE THAT LAND-USE DESIGNATION WOULD NEED TO BECOME, BEFORE THE BOARD AND TH COMMISSION TO GET A LAND-USE PLAN AMENDMENT. UNLIKE WHAT WAS DISCUSSED WHEN WE ARE LOOKING A A REZONING OR SITE PLAN OR FURTHER DOWN THE LINE, WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING AT A LAND-USE PLAN AMENDMENT, IT IS A PURELY LEGISLATIVE ITEM. AND IT IS WHERE THE COMMISSION AND THIS BOARD, TO THE EXTENT YOU ARE MAKING A RECOMMENDATION, HAS TH MOST DISCRETION, ESSENTIALLY, T SAY NO. IF YOU ARE GOING TO APPROVE IT, LOOK AT IF IT IS CONSISTENT WITH YOUR GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE COMPANY'S PLAN., WHEN YOU ARE A THAT LAND-USE PLAN AMENDMENT STATES, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU ASK THAT SOME OF THE QUESTION TO ME OR ANY OF THE BOARD MEMBERS, YO KNOW, YOU ARE NOT GOING TO HEAR FROM YOU HAVE TO APPROVE IT IF THEY TOOK THE BOXES. IT IS A PURELY LEGISLATIVE ITEM. IF YOU ARE NOT CURRENTLY A COMMERCIAL LAND-USE DESIGNATION, AND THEY'RE NOT, SO THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO COME IN AND THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DO THAT AS WELL, KEEP THAT IN MIND. THAT WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY LAND-USE AS

COMMERCIAL. >> ON A REZONING, WHAT IS THE LEGAL STANDARD FOR A REZONING APPLICATION?

>> ON A REZONING, IT IS A LITTL LESS DISCRETION AND IT GOES FURTHER DOWN THE LINE BUT THEY HAVE TO MEET ALL THE REZONING REQUIREMENTS THAT WE HAVE AND THE CODE, COMPATIBILITY, CONSISTENCY WITH SURROUNDING COMMUNITY, AND THERE IS, AT APPROXIMATELY NINE OR SO FACTOR THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT. IN ADDITION TO THE TRADITIONAL SITE PLAN FACTORS, WHEN THEY GET TO THE SITE PLAN STATES WITH SETBACKS WHERE THEY HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE TO THIS BOARD AND TO THE COMMISSION THAT THEY HAVE ADDRESSED ALL OF THOSE.

>> SO, AGAIN, UNLIKE IN MANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN YOU ARE DEALING WITH SPECIAL EXCEPTION, PERMITTED USE BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION, THERE IS, EVEN WITH THE REZONING, SOME SUBJECTIVE DETERMINATIONS ON ISSUES THAT THE COMMISSION IS GOING TO ULTIMATELY HAVE TO MAKE. IT IS NOT A PURELY LEGISLATIVE DECISION LIKE THE LAND-USE PLAN AMENDMENT BUT IT IS ALSO NOT JUST MERELY TEXT CHECK THE BOX ESTIMATE

>> THE BURDEN IS ON THE APPLICANT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY'VE MET ALL THE REZONING CRITERIA

>> AND, SORRY, I LIED, ONE MORE QUESTION. TONY, I THINK IT WAS YOU THAT MADE THE COMMENT, MAYB IT WAS TODD, I'M NOT SURE. IN TERMS OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN TH CITY, WHICH COULD COME IN TO TR TO GET A COMMERCIAL LAND-USE, TRY TO GET THIS LAND-USE DESIGNATION, THEY ARE MOSTLY BUILT OUT RIGHT NOW. IF A PROPERTY IS BUILT RIGHT NOW THA HAS A COMMERCIAL LAND-USE DESIGNATION, WANTS TO REZONE TO S1 IF IT WERE TO BE ADOPTED, UNLESS IT IS AN OUT PARCEL, WOULD, THEY COULDN'T REZONE THEIR ENTIRE PROPERTY SINCE THERE IS ONLY ONE PERMITTED USE ALLOWED IN THE S1 DISTRICT . IF I HAVE A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY THAT HAS RETAIL ON IT AND OTHER THINGS THAT ARE ON IT, HOW WOUL YOU EVEN GET A REZONING TO S1 O ANYTHING OTHER THAN A PEER OUT

PARCEL OF SUCH A PROPERTY? >> THEY WOULD HAVE TO COMMIT TO REDEVELOP THE WHOLE PROPERTY AN USE LEGAL PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH THE S1 ZONING DISTRICT. TH OTHER USES THAT ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE JOEL KAPLAN ZONING DISTRICT WOULD HAVE TO G AWAY AS PART OF THE APPLICATION.

>> I PUT THAT OUT AS A GOOD LEADER, I ONLY ASK A QUESTION FOR THE MOST PART THAT I THESE ATTRIBUTES, I KNOW YOU KNOW ALL

THESE ANSWERS. >> BUT, IN TERMS OF THAT PARTICULAR ISSUE, IT IS GOING T BE EXPERT IN ROLLING DIFFICULT FOR SOMEBODY WHO HAS A COMMERCIAL PARCEL IN THE CITY O PARKLAND RIGHT NOW TO REZONE BITS AND PIECES OF THAT PARCEL TO TRY TO ADD SELF STORAGE. WHILE I UNDERSTAND, ALEX, YOUR POINT THAT THERE IS OTHER PROPERTY THAT MAY BE COMING INT THE CITY, WHEN YOU LOOK AT A PROPERTY THAT MAY BE COMING INT THE CITY WITH A ONE MILE BUFFER I JUST DON'T SEE A SCENARIO WHERE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, THE ONE-MILE DOTS OF SELF STORAGE GOING UP AND DOWN LOX ROAD AND EVEN, FRANKLY, IF THERE WERE, IF HENDRIX WERE TO COME INTO THE CITY AT SOME POIN

[01:15:03]

APPRECIATE. >> ONE THING I CAN TELL YOU IS NOT CURRENTLY I PULLED UP THE LAND-USE PLAN MAP FOR YOU. THE ONLY VACANT COMMERCIAL SITE IS CURRENTLY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRAILS AND AND UNIVERSITY DRIVE. THERE ARE TWO PARCELS THERE, ONE OWNED BY THE SCHOOL BOARD, THE OTHER IS OWNE BY THE HOSPITAL DISTRICT. AS FA AS HENDRIX, CURRENTLY UNDER THE COUNTY LAND-USE PLAN, HE HAS 40 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL PLANNED.

THAT IS ON THE INTERSECTION OF HILLSBOROUGH AND UNIVERSITY. TH REST OF HIS PROPERTY, HE HAS DESIGNATED AS RESIDENTIAL TWO UNITS TO THE ANCHOR. IT COULD B YEARS BEFORE THAT PROPERTY DEVELOPS OR COMES INTO THE CITY

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AT THIS POINT IN TIME, I'M GOING TO OPE THE APPLICANT ITEM TO THE PUBLIC. I DON'T SEE ANY PUBLIC OR PERSONS HERE. I WOULD ASK IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY

CORRESPONDENCE . >> NO, NOBODY. NOBODY HAS

INQUIRED. >> CNN, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THIS APPLICATION AND SEE IF THERE AR ANY MORE QUESTIONS OR IF THERE IS A MOTION FROM ANY OF THE

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. >> I DIDN'T WANT TO CUT OFF IF THEY WERE ANY MORE COMMENTS. MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE IF YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE A MOTION, DO THE COMP PLAN ITEM 1ST AND FOLLOW BY THE LATE ELEMENT COD TEXT AMENDMENT.

>> ITEM B, WHICH IS WHAT WE ARE HEARING FIRST, ORDINANCE 2023-008, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, IS THERE A MOTION?

>> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> MOTION TO APPROVE, IS THERE

SECOND? >> SECOND, ME.

>> SECOND, CALL FOR THE VOTE, PLEASE.

>> ALEX LAZOWICK. >> NO.

>> DEREK BIXBY. >> YES.

>> TODD ROGERS. >> JOEL KAPLAN.

>> YES. >> NATHANIEL KLITSBERG.

>> YES. >> ANTHONY AVELLO.

>> NO. >> CHAIRMAN MURRAY ZWEIG.

>> YES. >> AT THIS TIME, OPEN FOR LOOKING FOR A MOTION FOR ITEM A ORDINANCE 2023-006, WHICH WE

LISTENED AND HEARD SECOND. >> ALEX LAZOWICK.

>> HOLD ON. LOOKING FOR A MOTION.

>> MOTION TO APPROVE BY DEREK, IS THERE A SECOND?

>> SECONDED BY NATHANIEL. PLEAS CALL FOR THE BOAT.

>> ALEX LAZOWICK. >> NO.

>> DEREK BIXBY. >> NO.

>> TODD ROGERS. >> YES.

>> JOEL KAPLAN. >> IS.

>> NATHANIEL KLITSBERG. >> IS.

>> LET THE RECORD STAND, 5-2. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> GAIL, CAN YOU TAKE THE MICROPHONE?

[9. Comments from the Planning & Zoning Manager]

>> GAIL. ITEM 9, COMMENTS FROM OUR PLANNING AND ZONING MANAGER FOR NEXT MONTH. WE WILL HAVE, MOST LIKELY WE WILL HAVE THE RIVER STONE ART PARCEL BUILDING NEW PROPOSAL FOR A 7000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON STATE ROAD SEVEN. I ALSO WANTED TO MENTION TO YOU FOR SOME THOUGHT, THE CITY COMMISSION GENERALLY GOES ON SUMMER BREAK . AND IN OUR NEXT MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 8TH, I BELIEVE. IS THAT CORRECT, JEAN?

>> SECOND THURSDAY IN JUNE. >> I BELIEVE IT IS JUNE 8TH. TH MEETING AFTER THAT WOULD BE JUL 13TH. THAT IS TYPICALLY THE MEETING THAT THIS BOARD WOULD CANCE FOR THEIR SUMMER BREAK. I WANTED TO KNOW IF YOU WANTED TO DECIDE THAT TONIGHT. THE OTHER OPTION IS THERE IS ALSO A MEETING ON AUGUST 10TH.

>> JULY 13TH DOWN. >> I WOULD PREFER NOT TO HAVE A

JULY MEETING. >> WOULD ONE OF YOU LIKE TO MAK A MOTION TO SUMMER BREAK FOR TH JULY 13TH MEETING?

>> I MOTION TO NOT DISTURB ANTHONY'S VACATION.

>> ALL IN FAVOR OF BEING OFF ON THE JULY MEETING FOR SUMMER

BREAK? >> I WILL BE AT THE LOCAL BARBERSHOPS ON JULY 13TH, JUST TO LET YOU KNOW.

>> THAT'S ONLY FIVE MINUTES MAX

[01:20:05]

>> IT'S JUST A CONVERSATION, NO

>> WE WILL SEE YOU ALL BACK IN JUNE. SOMETIME PROBABLY STARTIN IN AUGUST, YOU WILL SEE OTHER APPLICATIONS THAT MAY BE RELATE TO THE SITE WE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING TONIGHT.

[10. Comments from the Board]

>> MOTION TO ADJOURN? >> I JUST HAVE ONE COMMENT? IT WOULD BE QUICK. GAIL, YOU GUYS DID A GREAT JOB. YOU GUYS, REALLY, IT IS A DIRECTIVE CRITICISM, I GUESS, FOR THE FUTURE. IT TIES INTO SOME OF ALEX'S COMMENTS. OVERTIME, YOU KNOW, WE ARE VERY LASER FOCUSED ON THE ITEM ITSELF. AND IF ALE DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING, I WAS ACTUALLY THINKING I DON'T KNOW WHAT ELSE THAT IMPACTS US. THE THOUGHTFUL THOUGHT I HAVE THERE IS WHEN I'M LOOKING TO MAKE A DECISION ON SOMETHING, I KIND O WANT TO KNOW HOW IS IT AFFECTIN OTHER STUFF IN THE BIGGER PICTURE OTHER THAN JUST THAT ON ITEM? I'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU CAN DO TO TAKE THAT AWAY AND MAKE I MORE. HOW DOES IT IMPACT EVERYONE AROUND US AS OPPOSED TO JUST THAT ONE AREA? I STILL HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE WAY WE ARE NOTIFYING PEOPLE. HOPEFULLY THAT WILL IMPROVE DOWN THE ROAD ALEX MADE ME, IT REAFFIRMED IN MY MIND HOW WOULD I LIKE TO MAK A DECISION, IF I WANT TO SEE A BIGGER PICTURE, MAYBE START OFF WITH 100,000 FEET AND THEN GET DOWN TO 10,000. IF WE CAN REFER JUST A LITTLE BIT, THAT WOULD B

GREAT. >> I WILL TRY AND DO MY BEST.

>> YOU DO GREAT. I JUST LIKE TO START A PEER, UNDERSTAND THE WH AND HOW BEFORE WE GET TO THE WHAT.

>> WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER SEEN TH BUILDING. WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER SEEN THAT TONIGHT. IT WASN'T, W WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO CONTEMPLATE ANYTHING ON HOW THAT THING LOOKED.

>> WE WERE NOT DISCUSSING ANY THINGS SECTOR SPECIFIC TO KIND OF LIKE THE SAME SCENARIO WHEN HERON BAY CAME BEFORE US AND IT WAS STILL, HERON BAY GOLF COURS BUT WE WERE LOOKING AT AGAIN, I IS PART OF PLANNING. IT IS IMPORTANT. MAYBE THE PROCESS OR YOU KNOW, WE WERE LOOKING TO CREATE DISTRICTS AND DIFFERENT THINGS. BASED ON, YOU KNOW, THAT, NOTHING CONCRETE, SO TO SPEAK. AGAIN, IMPORTANT, MAYBE DIFFERENT VENUE, LIKE A WORKSHO

TYPE OF THING. >> IF THEY HAD DEVELOPED THIS UNDER THE COUNTY CODE IS NOT EVEN --

>> AS A SELF STORAGE QUESTION >> IT IS HIGHLY LIKELY THEY LAND USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE COUNTY. AND SO IT WOULD BE A REZONING OF THE NORTH PATH TO PERMIT SELF STORAGE USE, WHICH IS PROBABLY ALLOWED EITHER IN A COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL LAND USE, SORRY, ZONING DISTRICT. LAND-USE I BELIEVE IS ALREADY

INDUSTRIAL FROM THE COUNTY. >> THAT IS THE ARGUMENT THAT TITLE USED. HUMAN WITH THE FIV POUND BUILDING A 10 POUND BAG.

IF YOU DON'T GIVE ME WHAT YOU WANT, GO TO THE COUNTY. THAT WA

HIS PLAY. >> THAT IS ALSO ON A RESIDENTIA

PREDICATE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. >> I GRANT YOU THAT ALSO.

>> TYPICAL OF WHEN DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES WERE DEVELOPED OR WITH COME BEFORE US AND CHIP AWAY AT DIFFERENT ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND IF WE DIDN'T KOWTOW TO THEM, YOU KNOW, BY TH WAY, YOU TOOK MY STATEMENT AND YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO IT AGAIN. BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR. NOT ALLOWED TO DO THAT

ANYMORE. >> I'VE GOT ONE.

>> IT IS A QUESTION FOR ANTHONY SO, THE LEGISLATURE, IN THEIR IMMINENT WISDOM, DECIDED THAT INVISIBLE OFFICIALS HAVE TO ENGAGE IN THE FINANCIAL PROCTOR LOGICAL EXAMINATION CALLED FOR SIX. MY QUESTION, AND I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION, WHETHER OR NOT THE FORM SIX REQUIREMENT WILL IMPAC ANY OF THE MUNICIPAL ADVISORY BOARDS IN THE CITY OF PARKLAND.

WHILE I UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE, AS A GENERAL PRACTICE. THE ADVISORY, WE ALSO ARE GATEKEEPERS TO THE DECISION-MAKERS ON CERTAIN THINGS. AND, I FOR ONE WOULD

[01:25:02]

>> UNDERSTANDING IS, AND I WILL CONFIRM THIS FOR YOU IN JUNE, M UNDERSTANDING IS IT APPLIES TO ELECTED OFFICIALS AND NOT NECESSARILY APPOINTED OFFICIALS I WILL CONFIRM THAT FOR YOU AT THE NEXT MEETING. I KNOW ORIGINALLY IT ALSO INCLUDED CIT MANAGERS AND THAT WAS REMOVED A PART OF THE PROCESS. I WILL

VERIFY THAT FOR YOU. >> WAIT UNTIL CHARTER REVIEW

STARTS. >> IS THERE A MOTION TO ADJOURN

? >> I JUST HAVE A QUESTION.

>> I'M SORRY. >> IS THE PUBLIC NOTIFIED OF

THINGS LIKE THIS? >> DURING THE PRESENTATION, I BELIEVE, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, THERE WERE TWO NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS ABOUT THIS MEETING?

>> THERE IS NO PRESENTATION ONLINE CUSTOMER

>> NOT AT THIS TIME. I WILL LET GAIL OR ANTHONY

>> IS UPLOADED, OUR AGENDA IS UPLOADED ON THE WEBSITE WITH AL THE BACKUP AS WELL. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO THAT?

>> FOR CODE AMENDMENT LIKE THIS WHERE THERE IS NOT A SITE-SPECIFIC PROPERTY INVOLVED IT WILL, USUALLY THE GLASS IN MANY NEWSPAPER. AND I BELIEVE W ARE INVESTIGATING POSTING OUR INFORMATION ON THE COUNTY WEBSIT, I BELIEVE THAT IS IN PROGRESS. THERE WILL BE ANOTHER AVENUE FOR NOTIFICATION AT THE

COUNTY LEVEL. >> A LINK?

>> THIS WAS SITE-SPECIFIC. >> THIS IS A COAT AND

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. >> THE CODE AND COMP.

>> LATER, THE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING WILL BE SITE-SPECIFIC. WHEN WE HAVE A SITE-SPECIFIC APPLICATION, THER IS A MAILING NORMALLY GOES OUT TO A RADIUS OF 3 TO 500 PEOPLE.

3 TO 500 FEET FROM THE SUBJECT TO SITE. IF IT IS A SITE-SPECIFIC APPLICATION. THE CODE AMENDMENT THAT ARE MORE GLOBAL OR COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE ADVERTISED IN THE NEWSPAPER BE GOING FOR THE PARCEL THAT WE THE PARCEL OTHERWISE KNOWN AS WHAT WE WEREN'T TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT, WHEN THE APPLICANT --

>> IF THE APPLICANT COMES BACK IN AUGUST ON THESE, ALL OF THE RESIDENCE WITHIN 300 TO 500 FEET, WHICH IN THIS CASE IS JUS THE FOLKS IN THE FOSTER THE EAS , WILL HAVE GOTTEN AN INDIVIDUA MAILING ABOUT THOSE APPLICET. IT IS NOT

300, IT IS 500. >> THERE WILL BE SIGNS POSTED O THE SITE FOR SITE-SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS WHEN THEY ARE FILED. THEY WILL BE A SIGN POSTING THERE WILL BE A MAILING AND, IN SOME CASES, THERE ALSO MAY BE A NEWSPAPER AD.

>> OTHER MUNICIPALITIES AS A YOUTUBE LINK WHERE THEY CAN GO SO RESIDENCE THE CITY CAN GO AN ACTUALLY MUCH LIKE THE SITE PLA C. WHEN YOU JUST POST IN THE ADVERTISEMENT, NOBODY KNOWS WHA IS BEING PROPOSED. IF THERE IS AN ACTUAL PRESENTATION OR VIDEO THAT THEY COULD WATCH, I THINK THAT WOULD BE BETTER.

>> A VERY GOOD IDEA. >> ONE THING WE DID IMPLEMENT RECENTLY, AND IT IS EITHER ONLINE OR IT WILL BE ONLINE VER

SHORTLY -- >> I HAVE THIS PULLED UP RIGHT NOW SO I GET TO BRAG ABOUT IT. WE IMPLEMENTED A GIS DEVELOPMEN WEBSITE, WEBPAGE, MAP PAGE, THA I SHOW THE PARKLAND STORAGE LLC AS A PROPOSED PROJECT ON OUR GI WEBPAGE. RIGHT NOW, WE ARE BEIN LIVE STREAMED. IT IS LIVE STREAMED SO THE PUBLIC IS

WATCHING US RIGHT NOW IT >> IF THEY WANT TO.

>> IF THEY WANT TO END THIS AS WELL. TO GO TO THE FILAMENT PROJECTS, GAIL, TO THE LEFT. PROCEED TO SITE. THEN GO AHEAD AND THERE IS A PROPOSED PROJECT THERE IS PARKLAND STORAGE. WIT

ME, HOW'S THAT FOR SERVICE? >> I THINK THERE SHOULD BE A LINK ON LIKE THE ACTUAL PARKLAN WEBSITE WHERE SOMEONE CAN SEE

THE PROPOSED PROJECT. >> WE CAN PROMOTE THIS MORE ON

THE PARKLAND FACEBOOK. >> WHEN YOU ARE INVITING SOMEONE TO COME HERE, A LOT OF PEOPLE AREN'T GOING HERE BUT THEY WOULD WATCH A VIDEO OF THE APPLICANT MAKING A PRESENTATION

OF WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING. >> THAT MOTION TO ADJOURN?

[01:30:06]

>> DEREK FIRST. WHO IS THE SECOND?

>> SECOND LINE JOEL

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.