[1. Call to Order]
[00:00:18]
>> CHAIR YOU MAY WANT TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO EXCUSE THAT ABSENCE THAT YOU JUST MENTIONED.
>> I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO EXCUSE THE ABSENCE.
[4. Approval of Minutes]
>> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> I'LL SECOND IT.
[6. Comments by the Chair]
>> WE WILL OPEN UP TO THE PUBLIC SEE NONE.
[8A. Ordinance 2022-005: Amending Sidewalk Cafe Regulations Consideration of an Ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Parkland, Florida, amending the City of Parkland Land Development code by amending Article 15 "Detailed Use Regulations", Division 5, "Sidewalk Cafes" to modify the City's sidewalk cafe regulations; providing for codification, conflicts, severability, and an effective date.]
THIS ONE HEARING ORDINANCE 2022--005.AMENDING SIDEWALK CAFE REGULATIONS.
CONSOLIDATION OF ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA AMENDING THE CITY OF PARKLAND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 15 DETAILED USE REGULATIONS DIVISION 5 SIDEWALK CAFES TO MODIFY THE CITY'S SIDEWALK CAFE REGULATIONS.
>> I WAS KIND OF IN A LITTLE BIT OF A QUANDRY AS FAR AS WHAT WOULD BE THE BEST WAY TO PRESENT THIS TO YOU.
ANY OPINION WHETHER YOU WOULD LIKE TO GO THROUGH THE MOTIONS BASED ON THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OR I CAN GO BASED ON THE I HAVE MY POWER POINT IN ORDER BY CODE SECTION THEN ADDRESS EACH SECTION THAT YOU HAD DISCUSSED REVISIONS IN. BUT AS I GO THROUGH THE POWER POINT I CAN TELL YOU WHICH COMMENT IT IS ADDRESSING ON THE MINUTES SO YOU CAN GO CHECK, THAT'S FINE. OR ANY OTHER REVISIONS THAT YOU MIGHT WANT TO MAKE. SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED. OF THE FOUR OR FIVE CODE SECTIONS THAT WE ORIGINALLY HAD REVISIONS TO, THESE THREE SECTIONS ENDED UP BEING WHERE ALL OF YOUR REVISIONS FELL. SO RATHER THAN GO BACK AND SHOW YOU ANOTHER TWO THAT YOU HAD ALREADY FOUND SEPTEMBERABLE -- ACCEPTABLE WE'LL FOCUS ON JUST THESE THREE. SO THE FIRST IN SECTION 15-520 ACTUALLY ADDRESSES ON THE FIRST PAGE OF YOUR MINUTES IT WOULD BE ITEM 3 WHERE IT SAYS CHANGE LANGUAGE FROM A SKETCH PLAN. OKAY.
SO, THE CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDED RATHER THAN CALLING IT A SITE PLAN WHICH IS DEFINED AS A CODE AS A VERY ELABORATE AND MULTIPLAN SUBMITAL WE DECIDED TO DETAIL DRAWING PLAN WOULD BE A BETTER LANGUAGE FOR THAT CORRECTION. IS EVERYBODY OKAY WITH THAT CORRECTION? SOME [INAUDIBLE]
>> OH, OKAY. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU KNEW WHICH CODE REVISION WAS ADDRESSING WHICH OF YOUR COMMENTS. OKAY WE CAN GO THROUGH ALL OF THEM THEN. OKAY MOVING ON TO SECTION 15-550, THERE WAS A SMALL AMOUNT OF LANGUAGE ADDED TO WHERE WE TALKED ABOUT WHERE THE SIDEWALK CAFE COULD BE IN FRONT OF AN ADJACENT BUSINESS.
SO, THE LANGUAGE MODIFIED SLIGHTLY WE MADE SURE THAT THE OWNER AND THE PROPERTY OWNER BECAUSE THE OWNER NEXT
[00:05:06]
DOOR MAY BE ANOTHER TENANT WOULD HAVE TO SIGN OFF ON EXPANDING THE OUTDOOR CAFE AREA INTO AN ADJACENT SPACE.IN D, THAT WAS WHERE WE HAD TALKED ABOUT WHEN YOU HAVE ALCOHOL SERVED OUTSIDE THERES HAD TO BE A DEFINED AREA THAT THE ALCOHOL HAS TO STAY WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THAT ZONE. SO YOU HAD TALKED ABOUT HIGH QUALITY DESIGN COMPATIBLE ARCHITECTURE SO THE LANGUAGE THAT'S SHOWN IN BLUE WAS MODIFIED SLIGHTLY TO BETTER ADDRESS YOUR COMMENTS. AND THAT BEING PAGE 2 OF OUR PRESENTATION IS ABOUT THE FOURTH OR FIFTH COMMENT DOWN UNDER D. OKAY ALSO UNDER THE SAME CODE SECTION 15-550 YOU TALKED ABOUT WHETHER FOOD COULD BE ACTUALLY COOKED OR PREPARED.
CURRENTLY THE CODE SAID IT COULD NOT BE PREPARED IN THE OUTDOOR CAFE AREA. SO THIS ALLOWS FOOD TO BE PREPARED BUT NOT COOKED OR STORED.
SO YOU I THINK YOUR SPECIFIC EXAMPLE WAS YOU KNOW MIXING GUACAMOLE AT THE TABLE. THAT WOULD BE FINE BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE HIBATCH,ING AT THE TABLE.
P HAD TO DO WITH IF THERE WAS A NEED FOR POLICE DETAIL. SO, LANGUAGE IN P WAS ADDED.
YOU HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S NOISE AND NUISANCE ORDINANCE BUT IF NEEDED THE CITY MANAGER COULD SEND OUT OR REQUIRE A BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE DETAIL BE
PROVIDED. >> THAT'S A GREAT IDEA.
>> ON Q, IF YOU RECALL WE HAD INCREASED THE AREA FOR OUTDOOR SEATING FOR NO SMOKING AREAS ASK YOUR DIRECTION WAS TO LEAVE IT AS THE CODE REQUIRED AT 50%.
UNDER R, UNDER THE SAME CODE SECTION 15-550 WE HAD TALKED ABOUT BARRIERS. NOW THIS PARTICULAR BARRIER IS TALKING ABOUT PROTECTION OF A VEHICULAR USE AREA TO THE OUTDOOR SEATING CAFE AREA WHICH IS DIFFERENT FROM THE BARRIER THAT'S AROUND THE CAFE TO CONTAIN THE ALCOHOL. SO THIS IS ADDRESSING VEHICULAR USE AREAS SAME LANGUAGE HAS BEEN INCORPORATED FOR HIGH QUALITY MATERIALS ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY AND THE REVIEW OF THE ACTUAL YOU KNOW BARRIER TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE DESIGNED TO BE FWROFL.
FIVE WAS MOD FLIED SLIGHTLY IT ORIGINALLY CONTAINED LANGUAGE I BELIEVE THAT REFERRED TO THE A.D.A.
REQUIREMENTS. SO IT JUST SAYS THAT SAFE ACCESS HAS TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE SEATING AREA OF THE CAFE. AND T, WAS KIND OF ADDED JUST TO REMIND PEOPLE SINCE WE DID REMOVE THE A.D.A.
LANGUAGE IN F TO JUST REMIND PEOPLE THAT YOU HAVE TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS WHETHER IT BE RESTAURANT LICENSING OR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSING THEN SPECIFICALLY SAID DON'T FORGET AMERICAN DISABILITY ACT. OKAY MOVING ON TO 15-570 THAT DEALT WITH DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF YOUR SIDEWALK CAFE PERMIT IF YOU'RE NOT CONDUCTING YOURSELF PROPERLY. SO, IF YOU HAD THE LANGUAGE WAS MODIFIED SLIGHTLY SO IF YOU HAVE A SIGNIFICANT VIOLATION YOU HAVE TO CORRECT THAT VIOLATION WITHIN THREE DAYS OF RECEIPT OF WRITTEN NOTICE.
IF YOU HAVE UNDER SECTION 5, IF YOU HAVE THREE OR MORE VIOLATIONS, WITHIN THE SIDEWALK CAFE ORDINANCE WITHIN 12 MONTH PERIOD THAT CAN BE A REASON FOR REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION OF YOUR LICENSE.
IT COULD BE REVOKED ENSNIRL CAN YOU CLARIFY SECTION 5 WHERE THAT IS? SECTION 5 HAS THE PERMITTEE HAS THREE OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF THIS DIVISION FIVE.
>> WHAT'S DIVISION 5? >> ARTICLE A-5.
>> DIVISION 5 IS THE ENTIRETY OF THE SIDEWALK
CAFE PROVISIONS. >> WITH SECTION 15-570.
>> I'M SORRY, I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION.
[00:10:02]
DIVISION 5 IS THE ENTIRE SIDEWALK ORDINANCE.SIDEWALK CAFE ORDINANCE. >> THE WHOLE THING.
>> RIGHT. >> SO IF YOU VIOLATE THREE OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF ANY OF THE REGULATIONS FOR SIDEWALK CAFES WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD THE PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR MAY DENY, REVOKE OR SUSPEND YOUR
SIDEWALK CAFE PERMIT. >> THANK YOU.
>> AND THEN, B TALKS ABOUT IF WE'RE AT THAT POINT WHERE YOU HAVE NOT BEEN CONDUCTING YOURSELF APPROPRIATELY, IT TALKS ABOUT HOW THAT NOISTS GIVEN.
WE DID CLARIFY THAT IF IT WAS A SIGNIFICANT EVENT THAT REQUIRED YOU TO CEASE-FIRES OPERATIONS WITHIN 24 HOURS IF YOU GOT -- CEASE OPERATIONS WITHIN 24 HOURS IF YOU GOT -- THAT EXCLUDES HOLIDAYS AND WEEKEND.
WE CLARIFIED THAT BY SAYING SATURDAY, SUNDAY AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS SHALL NOT BE EXCLUDED FROM THE 24-HOUR CALCULATIONS. I THINK THAT LANGUAGE WOULD ADEQUATELY IF YOU GOT A NOTICE ON FRIDAY THAT YOU WOULD CONTINUE OPERATING UNTIL MONDAY.
>> JUST ONE QUESTION. >> OKAY.
>> THE WAY I READ THAT IS IF YOU GET A NOTICE ON FRIDAY THAT YOU STOP YOU DON'T GET TO INCLUDE, YOU DON'T GET TO HAVE SATURDAY AND SUNDAY DID I HEAR YOU WRONG RIGHT.
CURRENTLY IN THE CODE WHEN IT TALKS ABOUT TIME FRAMES, IT CAN EXCLUDE SATURDAY, SUNDAY AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS.
WHEN WE FELT THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT VIOLATION AT 24 HOURS WE WANTED IT IF YOU GOT A NOTICE ON FRIDAY YOU
HAD TO STOP BY SATURDAY. >> OKAY.
SO WE'RE CLARIFYING THAT SATURDAY, SUNDAY AND HOLIDAYS ARE INCLUDED. SO YOU CAN'T GO MY 24 HOURS
IS FRIDAY TO MONDAY. >> THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT.
SO HOPEFULLY THAT WILL ADDRESS IT.
AND THAT'S REALLY ABOUT THE END OF ALL YOUR REVISIONS.
YOU HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSION WE TRIED OUR BEST TO INCORPORATE ALL OF YOUR IDEAS AND KIND OF RAN THROUGH WHERE YOU ALL WEREN'T ON THE SAME PAGE YOU WILL SEE THE VOTES BELOW WE HAVE DONE OUR BEST TO TRY TO GET THAT RIGHT.
CHAIR. GREAT JOB, GREAT WORK ON.
THIS THANK YOU FOR TAKING ALL OF OUR THOUGHTS NOT TOO MANY COMMENTS. THE ONE WAS GENDER, ONE 15-550 P WE WROTE IN TALKING ABOUT THE CITY MANAGER IT SAYS IN HIS OR HER WE CAN JUST BE GENDER NEUTRAL ON THAT ONE. THEY, WE TALKED ABOUT IN THAT LAST SENTENCE I SEE WE ADDED IN A GOOD AMOUNT ABOUT THE DESIGN BUT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT THAT LAST SENTENCE ADDING IN SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS DETERMINING THE REQUIREMENT AN ACCEPTABLE DESIGN AND PROTECTION MESSAGE JUST TO ADD THAT BEFORE THAT ADD IN THE WORD DESIGN THAT THEY'RE REVIEWING NOT JUST THE PROTECTION METHOD THAT THEY'RE ALSO REVIEWING THE DESIGN. I FEEL LIKE YOU GOT IT UP ABOVE. JUST TO REALLY EMPHASIZE
THAT -- >> YEAH, YOU KIND OF LOST ME
IN WHICH PARTICULAR SECTION. >> THE LAST SENTENCE OF R THERE IN 15-550, WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE ACCEPTABLE
PROTECTION METHOD. >> DESIGN MEASURES ACCEPTED BY THE CITY DESIGN REVIEW PROFESSIONAL AND CITY
ENGINEER. >> AND THE SENTENCE AFTER THAT IT ENDS WITH THEM TALKING ABOUT THE ACCEPTED
PROTECTION METHOD. >> YOU WANT IT TO SAY -- I WOULD JUST ADD THERE IF WE WANT TO ADDRESS THE COMMENT FIRST ON THE FIRST ONE WE SHOULD JUST SAY IN THE CITY OR IN THE CITY MANAGER'S SOLE DISCRETION THAT WILL TAKE CARE OF THE HIS OR HER. ON SECOND ONE WE CAN JUST ADD I THINK AT THE VERY END AND DESIGN MEASURES AND THAT WOULD COVER IT. PROTECTION METHODS AND DESIGN MEASURES. IS THAT YOUR.
NOT A PROBLEM. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH.
GREAT JOB. >> GREAT, THANK YOU.
>> I THINK WE HYPED THIS UP A LOT.
[00:15:01]
[INAUDIBLE] [INAUDIBLE] THE PRESENTATION TO ADD THATLANGUAGE. >> YES, BECAUSE THAT LANGUAGE IS EXISTING IN THE CODE.
SO WE HAVE TO STRIKE IT THROUGH ON THE ORDINANCE TO DELETE IT. I DID SHOW IT TO YOU ON THE POWER POINT SO THAT YOU COULD READ HOW THE COMPLETE LANGUAGE WITHOUT THE DELETIONS WOULD READ.
>> GREAT WORK AND BY THE BOARD.
>> THREW THIS AGAINST THE WALL SO I THINK THE BOARD AND THE STAFF DID EXTRAORDINARY.
THEIR IDEAS WERE EXTRAORDINARY IN PUTTING THEM ON PAPER. IT'S GOING TO WORK REALLY WELL GOING FORWARD. JUST ONE QUESTION, AND I ASK IT BEFORE BUT FOR SOME REASON MY MEMORY LEAVES ME AND I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT THE ANSWER TO MY QUESTION WAS BUT THE QUESTION IS THIS, IF WE HAD A B.R.D. GOING FORWARD, THE BUSINESS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND I KNOW GAIL IS AT A DISADVANTAGE BECAUSE YOU WEREN'T HERE DURING THOSE TIMES.
>> ACTUALLY I'VE DONE A LOT OF RESEARCH ON IT.
>> I MIGHT BE A LITTLE MORE AWARE THAN YOU MIGHT BE
SURPRISED. >> IF WE CREATED A B.R.D.
WITH THIS -- WOULD THIS ORDINANCE CARRY INTO THE B.R.D. OR THE B.R.D. WOULD HAVE A SEPARATE SIDEWALK
CAFE ORDINANCE TO IT? >> THIS SIDEWALK CAFE ORDINANCE IS CITY WIDE IN ALL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS THAT WE PRESENTLY HAVE. NOW IF WE WERE TO GO BACK AND ADOPT A B.R.D. ORDINANCE AND FOR SOME REASON YOU WANT THE SIDEWALK OR OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES DIFFERENT IN THAT PARTICULAR DISTRICT, WE CAN EITHER ADD LANGUAGE IN THIS PART OF THE ORDINANCE TO GIVE EXCEPTIONS TO THE B.R.D. OR WE CAN BUILD LANGUAGE IN THE B.R.D. THAT SAYS IT'S EXEMPT FROM THESE REGULATIONS AND THEN HAVE THEIR OWN SET OF REGULATIONS.
>> I THINK THIS IS A GOOD FOUNDATION FOR B.R.D. THAT MIGHT HAPPEN IN THE CITY GOING FORWARD.
SO I'M REALLY PLEASED WITH THIS.
I'M EXCITED TO SEE THAT THIS WOUND UP THE WAY IT DID.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR GREAT WORK.
>> OH, YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU.
>> GAIL, MY ONLY COMMENT IS THAT YOU HAVE DONE A FANTASTIC JOB AND IT DEMONSTRATED OUTSTANDING PROFICIENCY IN BEING ABLE TO HERD CATS.
THANK YOU. >> AND I HAVE CATS.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH.
>> I JUST HAVE A COUPLE COMMENTS.
FIRST I WOULD LIKE TO ECHO THE SENTMENTS OF ALL THE OTHER PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS.
I THINK WE'RE NOT AN EASY GROUP.
WE TALKED ABOUT A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS AND WENT DIFFERENT WAYS ON EACH THING.
I THINK THE PRODUCT THAT WE HAVE BEFORE US IS A GOOD REFLECTION OF WHAT WE DID AND I THINK YOU DID A GREAT JOB. BOTH AT THE LAST MEETING AND IF YOU DID ALL OF THIS FANTASTIC WHOEVER WORKED ON THIS I THINK YOU DID A GOOD JOB.
>> OH, THANK YOU, I HAD ASSISTANCE.
>> FANTASTIC. IN 1520 UNDER THE REQUIRED INFORMATION, I DETAIL DRAWING I THINK THAT'S GREAT. I THINK YOU SHOULD ALSO JUST HAVE A COPY OF THE APPROVED SITE PLAN OF WHATEVER SHOPPING CENTER IN THAT PACKAGE THAT CAN XEROX A COPY OF IT SO THAT WHEN ANYBODY IS LOOKING AT IT THEY CAN SEE WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING.
THEY CAN SEE THE APPROVED SITE PLAN IT WITH.
IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A SEALED COPY OR PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST IT'S VERY EASY TO PUT IN BUT IT SHOULD BE IN THE SIDEWALK PERMIT APPLICATION.
THAT WAY ANYBODY CAN SEE WHAT THEY WERE APPROVED FOR.
>> WE CAN GET THE EXISTING SITE PLAN THEN THE SIDEWALK CAFE AND MAKE SURE THAT THAT MAKES IT INTO THE PLAN.
>> THEY DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT MODIFYING THAT PLAN
JUST HAVE IT AS A REFERENCE. >> OKAY, GREAT.
>> THAT WAY IF IT COMES IN AND SOMETHING IS ON THE DETAILED DRAWING THAT IS NOT REFLECTIVE OF WHAT WAS OUT THERE YOU WOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABLE TO IDENTIFY THAT. IT WOULDN'T HAVE ANY ISSUES.
>> SO BASICALLY, TO HAVE THEM SUBMIT THAT AS PART OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS, CORRECT?
>> YES. >> AND GAIL WE'LL JUST PUT SOME LANGUAGE IN THEORETICALLY SOMEBODY COULD IN WITH A SITE PLAN AND ALSO BE REQUESTING A SIDEWALK CAFE. THE APPROVED OR PROPOSED.
>> YES. >> THE SECTION 15-530 A WHICH TALKS ABOUT WHY A PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR
[00:20:02]
MAY APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE IT SAYS BASED UPON THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION AND THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CRITERIA IS THE WORD SECTION ENOUGH? SECTION TO ME WOULD MEAN 515-530 A.MAYBE IT SHOULD BE CHAPTER 15 OR WHATEVER?
DO YOU FOLLOW ME? >> YES, ANTHONY DO YOU BELIEVE THAT SECTION SHOULD READ DIVISION?
>> WELL, -- WE'RE LOOKING AT 15-5030 A MY VERSION SAYS
FOR COMPLIANCE. >> THEN SAYS MAY APPROVE OR DENY THE REQUEST BASED UPON THEIR THE REQUIREMENTS OF
MAYBE DIVISION I THINK DIVISION WOULD BE PROPER APPROPRIATE THERE OTHERWISE YOU COULD ARGUE.
>> DIVISION IS MORE ENCOMPASSING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE. THANK YOU.
>> IN THE SAME SECTION 15550 P WHERE WE TALK ABOUT THE CITY MANAGER CAN DETERMINE THAT A SPECIAL POLICE DETAIL IS REQUIRED AND PROVIDED I THINK THEY SHOULD ALSO I THINK WE SHOULD ALSO ADD A DETAIL AND/OR OTHER MEASURES. FOR EXAMPLE, IF THERE'S CONSTANTLATEDDERING OR SOMETHING THAT THE MANAGER DECIDES ISENT BEING KEPT UP THEY GOT TO IMPLEMENT SOMETHING ELSE. IF THERE'S PEOPLE CONSTANTLY, IF WHATEVER PROTECTIVE BARRIERS THEY PUT UP IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR ITS PURPOSE THEY SHOULD HAVE TO IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENT WHAT THE OTHER WHAT THE MANAGER SAYS. SO I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT IT'S SHOULD THE CITY MANAGER, MANAGER WHATEVER, DISCRETION, DETERMINE THAT NOISE, NUISANCE OR CROWD CONTROL IS WARRANTED A SPECIAL POLICE DETAIL SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND PROVIDED MAYBE A POLICE DETAIL AND/OR OTHER MEASURES. WHATEVER THEY MAY BE.
WITHOUT LIMITING THEIR DISCRETION TO SAY LOOK YOU NEED TO FIX SOMETHING BECAUSE SOMETHING YOU
PROPOSED ISN'T WORKING. >> THIS IS P IS SPECIFIC TO
NOISE AND NUISANCE. >> NOISE NUISANCE AND CROWD CONTROL. THAT COULD MEAN IF PEOPLE ARE WALKING OVER THE PLANTERS.
>> BARERS. >> OR WHAT HAVE YOU.
>> OKAY. >> IT'S JUST TO GIVE THE MANAGER OR HIS EXTRA DESCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO SAY HEY YOU HAVE TO TWEAK YOUR PLAN.
>> UNDERSTOOD. >> WE HAVE A LOT OF DISCUSSION LAST TIME ABOUT A LOT OF THINGS OTHER THAN TO SAY THAT THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS IS ZERO IN PRACTICE RIGHT NOW. AT MANY OF OUR CAFES THAT WILL PROBABLY BE AN ENFORCEMENT ISSUE AND I TOTALLY SUPPORT HAVING PUT THAT A.D.A. LANGUAGE IN THERE THROUGH ANY OF THE STORES THEY'RE GOING BACK OUT INTO THE PARKING LOT WHERE THEY CAN'T GO.
>> RIGHT. RIGHT NOW, YOU KNOW THE ONES THAT HAVE APPROVAL WILL HAVE A PLAN ON FILE AND WE CAN HOLD THEM TO THE PLAN. RIGHT NOW WITH COVID I BELIEVE THERE'S A LOT OF THEM OUT THERE THAT HAVE OUTDOOR SEATING THAT'S NOT BEEN APPROVED THROUGH THIS PROCESS. EVENTUALLY THAT WILL EITHER HAVE TO STOP OR COME IN AND BE REVIEWED.
>> WELL, I THINK THE ORDINANCE THAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN NOW GIVES STAFF ENOUGH CLARITY AND AUTHORITY TO GO OUT AND FORCE IT. I THINK THAT'S GOOD.
>> IF 15-570 A WHERE WE TALK ABOUT THE DENIAL REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE PERMIT. WE TALK ABOUT THAT THE DIRECTOR CAN DENY ARE REVOKE OR SUSPEND ANY OF THE SIDEWALK CAFES IF IT IS FOUND AND THEN IT LISTS SIX CRITERIA WHICH THE WAY I READ SAYS ALL OF THEM MUST BE SATISFIED. AND I WOULD, I WOULD RECOMMEND AT THE END OF THAT FIRST LANGUAGE IF IT IS FOUND THAT ANY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING HAS OCCURRED OR WHATEVER. THAT WAY, IF, IF NUMBER 1 HAPPENED YOU DON'T GET A WISEGUY SAYING WELL I HAVEN'T HAD THREE VIOLATIONS.
>> RIGHT. >> JUST ONE OR MORE OF THE
[00:25:06]
FOLLOWING. >> VERY GOOD POINT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> IN THE SAME SECTION BUT
>> WHERE IT SAYS UPON DENIAL OR REVOF INDICATION I THINK YOU SHOULD ADD SUSPENSION UPON SUSPENSION DENIAL OR REVOCATION THE DIRECTORS WILL GIVE NOTICE OF SUCH
ACTION TO THE APPLICANT. >> THANK YOU.
>> THAT'S IT. >> I THINK YOU DID A GREAT
JOB. >> OH, THANK YOU SO MUCH.
>> IS IT ON? SO IN 15 A 550 H-C I WAS READING OTHER CITY SIDEWALK ORDINANCES AND I THOUGHT THAT WHERE WE HAD IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY, WAS A LITTLE VAGUE LANGUAGE. SO FOR THE SAKE OF CONSISTENCY SOME CITIES HAVE A NOTE ARRESTIZED DOCUMENT INSTEAD OF JUST IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY.
BECAUSE MAYBE ONE APPLICANT MIGHT QUESTION IF ANOTHER APPLICANT WAS GIVEN PREFERENCE LIKE WHAT WAS THERE FOR THEM. WHAT DID YOU FIND ACCEPTABLE
FOR THEM AND NOT FOR ME. >> RIGHT.
>> YEAH. >> IF WE COULD CREATE A FORM IT WILL JUST BE AVAILABLE TO THE DEPARTMENT THAT WAY EVERYBODY WOULD BE UTILIZING THE SAME FORM THAT WE FIND
ACCEPTABLE. >> WE CAN HANDLE THAT ADMINISTRATOR SHE WE CAN SAY A FORM PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT.
[INAUDIBLE]. >> THAT WAS ASHLEY THE CITY ATTORNEY SUGGESTED THAT CHANGE BECAUSE I HAD SOME DIFFERENT LANGUAGE THERE. SO YOUR POINT IS WELL TAKEN.
>> I SUGGESTED IT BECAUSE I HAD IT IN MY NOTES THAT THAT WAS SUGGESTED BY THE BOARD FROM LAST MEETING BUT I WOULD ALSO NOTE THAT YOU KNOW IT'S HIGH QUALITY BASICALLY AS ACCEPTABLE TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND THE ENGINEERS WHO ARE MAKING THAT COMMENT.
SOME CODES THAT I HAVE REVIEWED IN LOOKING UP THAT THEY DID HAVE VERY HARD TO DEFINE TASTEFUL.
YOU KNOW. WHAT'S AESTHETICALLY PLEASING TO ME MAY NOT BE TO YOU.
THEE WERE SOME CODES THAT DID QUANTIFY LIKE CHAIRS HAD TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF 250 POUNDS.
THAT WAY YOU KNOW YOU'RE NOT GETTING PLASTIC OR FLIMSY CHAIR.
[INAUDIBLE]. >> DIDN'T I SEE LANGUAGE IN
[00:30:16]
THERE THAT TALKED ABOUT CLEANING THE STAINS OFF THE SIDEWALK. WELL, JUST AS ANOTHER COMMENT THAT'S NOT HAPPENING EITHER IN THE CITY.THEY'RE FILTHY. >> BUT I THOUGHT THAT THERE WAS A DEFINITION OF CLEANING REFUSE AND STAINS ASK THINGS LIKE THAT IN THERE.
>> WE ALL KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS.
I WOULD LIKE TO THE REVISIONS YOU SUGGESTED TONIGHT ARE FAIRLY MINOR. I'M HOPEFUL THAT YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SUPPORT THIS AND LET US MOVE IT FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION.
[INAUDIBLE]. >> YOUR SUGGESTION IN ADDITION TO LAST WEEK TONIGHT SUGGESTED VERY
HELPFUL. >> MR. CHAIRMAN REMEMBER I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 8 A ORDINANCE 2022-005 AMENDING SIDEWALK CAFE REGULATIONS INCLUDING THE SUGGESTIONS WHICH WERE MOST HOUSEKEEPING IN NATURE FOR THIS EVENING. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
MOTION TO APPROVE THEM. >> SECONDED.
>> I'LL SECOND. >> JUST A POINT OF CLARIFICATION DON'T WE NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SEE NO ONE -- [INAUDIBLE].
>> THERE WERE NONE. >> DO I NEED TO RESTATE MY
>> A MOTION IN THE SECOND. >> YOU WANT TO THIRD IT? [LAUGHTER]
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YEAH, WE GOT IT.
[9. Comments from the Planning & Zoning Director]
>> OKAY. >> WELL, PLAN ON A MEETING NEXT MONTH. NEXT MONTH WE'RE GOING TO BE BRINGING AT LEAST ONE ADDITIONAL CODE AMENDMENT TO YOU THAT HAS TO DO WITH SYNTHETIC TURF WHICH IS BECOMING VERY POPULAR WITH OUR NEW HOMEOWNERS, ESPECIALLY OUT IN THE WEDGE AREAS WHERE YOU KNOW DRAINAGE IS A BIG CONCERN. WE'LL BRING THAT FORWARD TO YOU NEXT MONTH. FOR PARKLAND GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB I'M NOT SURE IF THAT WILL MAKE THE MAY AGENDA BUT IT WILL BE COMING TO YOU SHORTLY IF NOT IN MAY PROBABLY IN JUNE.
>> MOTION TO ADJOURN. TODD YOU WANT TO SECOND IT.
[00:35:01]
>> I WOULD LIKE TO SECOND THAT.
THANK YOU, HAVE A GOOD NIGHT
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.